Skip to main content

Table 1 Critical appraisal of selected studies

From: Timing of (supplemental) parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review

Study

Critical appraisal items

Relevance

Validity

 

Domain

Determinant

Randomization

Blinding

Standardization

Missing data

Follow-up

   

Allocation

Similarity

  

%

Reason

%

Reason

ITT analysis

Bauer 2000 [11]

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

-

−

+

+

Cahill 2011 [12]

+

+

x

x

−

−

-

-

-

-

−

Casaer 2011 [13]

+

+

+

+

+/−

+

-

-

-

-

+

Doig 2013 [14]

+

+

+

+

+/−

+

+

+

+

−

+

Heidegger 2013 [15]

+

+

+

+

+/−

+

-

-

+/−

+/−

+

Kutsogiannis 2011 [16]

+

+

x

x

−

−

-

-

-

-

−

  1. Specification per item: Domain: critically ill adult patients on the ICU? + = yes, − = no. Determinant: parenteral nutrition? + = with PN, − = no PN. Randomization: concealed treatment allocation? + = yes, − = no; similarity subgroups in baseline characteristics? + = yes, − = no. Blinding: + = yes, +/− = partial, − = no. Standardization: + = yes, − = no. Missing data: percentage? + = <5%, +/− = 10%, − = >10%; reason? + = reason given, − = reason not given. Follow-up: percentage? + = < 5%, +/− = 10%, − = >10%; reason? + = reason given, +/− = not all reasons given, − = reason not given; ITT analysis? + = yes, − = no. ITT analysis, intention to treat analysis; x, not applicable.