Skip to main content

Table 3 Randomized controlled trials in adult ECMO

From: Concepts from paediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for adult intensivists

Author (ref no)

CMV (lived/total)

ECMO (lived/total)

Pro-ECMO

Anti-ECMO

Today’s perspective

Zapol et al. [1]

4/48 (8 %)

4/42 (10 %)

Change needed? Different patients with different diseases

Does not work

VV not used, ECMO duration arbitrarily limited to 5 days, ECMO started very late

Morris et al. [7]

8/19 (42 %)

7/21 (33 %)

2/3 death due to bleeding, learning curve

Does not work, protocols are better

Small study, outdated ECMO technology, training is important

Peek et al. [8]

41/87 (47 %)

57/90 (63 %)

ECMO works

Only 68 % received ECMO

Intention to treat analysis,

ECMO in care plan probably beneficial but still unproven

  1. CMV conventional mechanical ventilation, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, VV venovenous, CESAR conventional ventilator support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure