Skip to main content

Table 3 Secondary outcomes

From: Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study

Variables

Continuous control

n = 18

Routine care

n = 18

p

Mean P cuff (cmH2O)

25.9 (25.5, 26.4)

22.7 (21.6, 24.8)

0.001

Coefficient of P cuff variation (%)

4.1 (1.5, 6.1)

7.7 (4.4, 11.5)

<0.001

P cuff 20–30 cmH2O

 Yes

18 (100)

18 (100)

>0.99

 % of recording time

 99.1 (97.9, 99.9)

 73.5 (54.4–96.8)

<0.001

P cuff <20 cmH2O

 Yes

0 (0)

13 (72)

<0.001

 % of recording time

0.0 (0, 0)

9.1 (0.0–36.1)

0.001

P cuff >30 cmH2O

 Yes

11 (61)

14 (78)

0.25

 % of recording time

 0.8 (0.1, 2.1)

 2.4 (0.7, 9.4)

<0.001

Pepsin (ng/mL)

230 (151, 300)

259 (134, 369)

0.95

% of tracheal aspirates positive for pepsin

67 (0, 100)

71 (0, 100)

0.83

Alpha amylase (ng/mL)

1475 (528, 10,333)

2400 (1342–15,391)

0.19

% of tracheal aspirates positive for alpha amylase

40 (0, 100)

33 (0, 100)

0.92

  1. Data are number of patients (%) or median (interquartile range)
  2. P cuff cuff pressure
  3. Yes indicates that a patient had the variable at least once