Table 5 Main results of the CATHEDIA trial
Refs. | Design | Outcome | Highlights |
|---|---|---|---|
[2] | RCT, parallel | Catheter infection | The risk of catheter infection inserted in FEM and JUG is similar |
RCT, parallel | Catheter infection | JUG site may be preferred in obese patients | |
RCT, parallel | Thrombosis | The risk of thrombosis is similar in FEM and JUG is similar | |
RCT, parallel | Severe mechanical injury | Without ultrasound guidance, FEM is safer than JUG | |
[3] | RCT, parallel | Catheter dysfunction | The risk to dysfunction is similar in FEM and JUG is similar |
Cohort | Catheter dysfunction | Right side of the body should be preferred for JUG | |
RCT, cluster | Dialysis quality | Urea Reduction Ratio is similar in FEM and JUG | |
Cohort | Dialysis quality | For blood flow >200 ml/min, jugular is better | |
Cohort | Dialysis quality | Length for FEM catheter should be >25 cm | |
[4] | Cohort | Catheter colonization | The risk of infection does not increase overtime with hemodialysis |
Cohort | Catheter colonization | The risk of infection increases overtime with hemodiafiltration | |
[5] | RCT, crossover | Catheter infection | The risk of catheter infection inserted in FEM and JUG is similar |
RCT, crossover | Dialysis quality | Urea Reduction Ratio is similar in FEM and JUG | |
RCT, crossover | Catheter dysfunction | The risk to dysfunction is similar in FEM and JUG is similar |