Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics and laboratory data on admission in the groups of patients treated with different dialysis modalities, IHD versus CRRT (n = 81; means with 95%CI)

From: Intermittent versus continuous renal replacement therapy in acute methanol poisoning: comparison of clinical effectiveness in mass poisoning outbreaks

Group of patients Age, years S-MetOH, mmol/L (g/L) S-EtOH, mmol/L (g/L) S-Formate, mmol/L (g/L) S-Lactate, mmol/L (g/L) Arterial blood pH pCO2, kPa HCO3 , mmol/L (g/L) BD, mmol/L Creatinine, µmol/L (mg/L) Glucose, mmol/L (g/L) Time to presentation, hours
IHD (n = 41; 9F) 50.4 ± 4.2 40.9 ± 10.9
1.31 ± 0.35
9.8 ± 6.3
0.45 ± 0.29
13.3 ± 3.0
0.59 ± 0.14
4.4 ± 1.6
0.39 ± 0.14
7.17 ± 0.07 4.5 ± 1.8 11.3 ± 2.2
(0.67 ± 0.13)
−16.5 ± 3.2 93.3 ± 9.5
(10.5 ± 1.1)
8.5 ± 1.2
(1.53 ± 0.22)
41 ± 7
CRRT (n = 40; 8F) 51.5 ± 4.2 58.3 ± 16.5
1.87 ± 0.53
4.8 ± 5.2
0.22 ± 0.24
15.9 ± 3.0
0.68 ± 0.14
7.1 ± 1.7
0.63 ± 0.15
6.96 ± 0.08 4.1 ± 0.7 8.0 ± 2.0
(0.49 ± 0.12)
−21.7 ± 4.2 110.0 ± 13.0
(12.44 ± 0.34)
11.2 ± 1.8
(1.98 ± 0.32)
36 ± 6
Total (n = 81; 17F) 50.9 ± 2.9 49.6 ± 10.0
(1.59 ± 0.32)
7.2 ± 4.1
(0.33 ± 0.19)
14.5 ± 2.1
(0.63 ± 0.09)
5.9 ± 1.2
(0.53 ± 0.11)
7.06 ± 0.06 4.3 ± 0.9 9.6 ± 1.5
(0.59 ± 0.09)
−19.1 ± 2.6 101.7 ± 8.1
(11.43 ± 0.92)
9.8 ± 1.1
(1.77 ± 0.20)
39 ± 5
P IHD/CRRT 0.724 0.079 0.230 0.208 0.024 <0.001 0.609 0.024 0.048 0.042 0.012 0.274
  1. Italic text indicates statistically significant result at p < 0.05
  2. IHD intermittent hemodialysis, CRRT continuous renal replacement therapy, F females, S serum, BD base deficit, MetOH methanol, EtOH ethanol