Skip to main content

Table 2 Diagnostic accuracy of the included studies

From: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References Thresholds (pg/mL) AUC Sensitivity Specificity TP FP FN TN
Shozushima et al. [17] 415 0.85 0.80 0.81 81 8 20 33
Endo et al. [29] 600 0.91 0.88 0.81 101 13 14 57
Liu et al. [33] 317 0.82 0.71 0.86 481 40 199 239
Ulla et al. [38] 600 0.70 0.79 0.62 84 32 22 51
Vodnik et al. [39] 630 1.00 1 0.98 30 2 0 98
Behnes et al. [25] 700 0.84 0.90 0.60 73 6 8 9
Brenner et al. [26] 825 0.83 0.91 0.33 55 40 5 20
Romualdo et al. [35] 729 0.75 0.81 0.63 30 70 7 119
Ishikura et al. [31] 647 0.89 0.93 0.76 40 9 3 30
Kweon et al. [32] 430 0.94 0.88 0.82 64 8 9 37
Cakir Madenci et al. [27] 542 0.83 0.77 0.76 20 3 6 8
Nakamura et al. [34] 670 0.78 0.70 0.81 26 14 11 61
Sargentini et al. [36] 600 0.89 0.86 0.72 52 12 8 32
Godnic et al. [30] 413 0.71 0.85 0.63 34 3 6 4
Takahashi et al. [37] 685 0.89 0.80 0.83 285 16 74 81
Carpio et al. [28] 370 0.74 0.81 0.75 92 2 22 7
Kada Klouche et al. [41] 466 0.75 0.90 0.55 90 20 10 24
Romualdo et al. [40] 849 0.78 0.67 0.81 47 25 23 105
  1. TP true positive, FP false positive, FN false negative, TN true negative, AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve