Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Annals of Intensive Care

Table 2 Diagnostic accuracy of the included studies

References	Thresholds (pg/mL)	AUC	Sensitivity	Specificity	TP	FP	FN	TN
Shozushima et al. [17]	415	0.85	0.80	0.81	81	8	20	33
Endo et al. [29]	600	0.91	0.88	0.81	101	13	14	57
Liu et al. [33]	317	0.82	0.71	0.86	481	40	199	239
Ulla et al. [38]	600	0.70	0.79	0.62	84	32	22	51
Vodnik et al. [39]	630	1.00	1	0.98	30	2	0	98
Behnes et al. [25]	700	0.84	0.90	0.60	73	6	8	9
Brenner et al. [26]	825	0.83	0.91	0.33	55	40	5	20
Romualdo et al. [35]	729	0.75	0.81	0.63	30	70	7	119
Ishikura et al. [31]	647	0.89	0.93	0.76	40	9	3	30
Kweon et al. [32]	430	0.94	0.88	0.82	64	8	9	37
Cakir Madenci et al. [27]	542	0.83	0.77	0.76	20	3	6	8
Nakamura et al. [34]	670	0.78	0.70	0.81	26	14	11	61
Sargentini et al. [36]	600	0.89	0.86	0.72	52	12	8	32
Godnic et al. [30]	413	0.71	0.85	0.63	34	3	6	4
Takahashi et al. [37]	685	0.89	0.80	0.83	285	16	74	81
Carpio et al. [28]	370	0.74	0.81	0.75	92	2	22	7
Kada Klouche et al. [41]	466	0.75	0.90	0.55	90	20	10	24
Romualdo et al. [40]	849	0.78	0.67	0.81	47	25	23	105

TP true positive, FP false positive, FN false negative, TN true negative, AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve