Table 1 Main tests results
From: Proceedings of Réanimation 2018, the French Intensive Care Society International Congress
Number | Percentage | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Positive samples using CM | 36 | ||
Positive samples using MxPCR | 43 | ||
Concordance between CM and MxPCR | |||
Identification | 65 | 76 | |
Resistance | |||
Total concordance | 17 | 55 | |
Partial discordance | 7 | 23 | |
Major discordance | 7 | 23 | |
Not concerned | 55 | ||
Impact of MxPCR | |||
Beneficial | 18 | 45 (39) | |
Probably beneficial | 21 | ||
Futile | 30 | 42 (36) | |
Probably futile | 6 | ||
Detrimental | 5 | 13 (11) | |
Probably detrimental | 6 | ||
Population deriving benefits from MxPCR | 39 | 45 | Saving days |
Accelerated de-escalation | 24 | 28 | 2* (2–3) |
Earlier weaning | 11 | 13 | 5* (2–7) |
Earlier appropriate escalation | 7 | 8 | 2* (1–4) |