Study/year/Country | Antimicrobial-coated central venous catheters | Number of patients | Age (year) Mean ± SD | CRBSIs, n/total | Catheter duration, days | CR, n/total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yücel et al. [17] /2004/Germany | AC versus CSC | 223 | 62 (29–80)/61 (21–80)ǂ | 0/118 0/105 | 6 (2–36)/6 (2–19)†| 6/118 38/105 |
Walz et al. [18] /2010/USA | AC versus Chlo/SS | 960 | 59.1 ± 15.6/60.1 ± 15.2 | 65/419 71/398 | 6.7 ± 4.8/6.8 ± 4.7 | 12/419 21/398 |
van Vliet et al. [19] /2011/The Netherlands | Chlo/SS versus CSC | 94 | 67 ± 8/68 ± 7 | Not reported | 9 ± 7/10 ± 7 | 6/48 10/46 |
Thornton et al. [20] /1996/UK | AC versus OVS | 176 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | 56/91 68/85 |
Theaker et al. [21] /2002/UK | Chlo/SS versus CSC | 232 | 62.5 | 12/101 12/131 | 7.4/7.2 | 40/101 55/131 |
Tennenberg et al. [22] /1997/USA | Chlo/SS versus CSC | 282 | 59.2 ± 1.1/57.9 ± 1.1 | 5/137 9/145 | 5.1 ± 0.2 5.3 ± 0.2 | Not reported |
Sheng et al. [23] /2000/China | Chlo/SS versus CSC | 235 | 64 ± 18/61 ± 18 | 1/113 2/122 | 9.1 ± 5.5 8.2 ± 4.6 | 9/113 25/122 |
Moss et al. [24] /2000/UK | AC versus CSC | 204 | 59/61 | Not reported | 3.79/4.25 | 21/106 38/98 |
Ostendorf et al. [25] /2005/Germany | Chlo/SS versus CSC | 184 | 51/53* | 3/90 7/94 | 12 (1–74)/10 (1–29)†| 11/90 31/94 |
Osma et al. [26] /2006/Turkey | Chlo/SS versus CSC | 133 | 49.4 ± 19.1/47.8 ± 17.5 | 4/64 1/69 | 11.7 ± 5.8 8.9 ± 4.6 | 14/64 14/69 |
Maki et al. [27] /1997/USA | CSC versus Chlo/SS | 158 | 47 ± 18/49 ± 18 | 9/86 2/72 | 6.04 ± 3.41 5.96 ± 2.79 | 21/86 10/72 |
Logghe et al. [28] /2006/UK | OVS versus CSC | 246 | 61/65 | 4/122 4/124 | 7 (3–21)/7 (2–18)†| 71/122 91/124 |
León [29] /1997/Belgium | Chlo/SS versus CSC | 680 | 51 ± 15.5/50 ± 15 | 17/338 15/342 | 20 + 12/20 + 13 | Not reported |
Khare et al. [30] /2004/Spain | AC versus CSC | 367 | Â | 6/187 11/180 | 10.3/10.4* | Not reported |
Kalfon et al. [31] /2007/France | OVS versus CSC | 617 | 61 ± 15/61 ± 17 | 8/320 8/297 | 10 (1–90)/10 (1–117)†| 47/320 36/297 |
Jaeger et al. [32] /2005/Germany | Chlo/SS versus CSC | 106 | 49/45* | 1/51 8/55 | 14.3 ± 8.2/16.6 ± 9.7 | 5/51 59/55 |
Hagaua et al. [33] /2009/Romania | CSC versus OVS | 272 | 55 ± 17/56 ± 20 | 4/131 8/141 | 9.7 ± 4.3/8.2 ± 4.1 | 30/131 38/14 |
Corral et al. [34] /2003/Spain | OVS versus CSC | 145 | 56 ± 18/58 ± 18 | 1/80 4/65 | 14 ± 7/12 ± 7 | 29/80 41/65 |
Carrasco et al. [35] /2004/USA | Chlo/SS versus CSC | 180 | 57 ± 16.9/55 ± 18.6 | 3/128 4/132 | 9.5/9* | 13/128 29/132 |
Camargo et al. [36] /2009/Brazil | Chlo/SS versus CSC | 109 | 73 (55–80)/74 (56–82)†| 8/51 6/58 | 14 (7.5–21)/12 (8–19)†| 15/51 20/58 |
Bun-Christian et al. [37] /2004/USA | Chlo/SS versus CSC | 363 | 59.2 ± 17.8/58 ± 18.0 | 3/188 5/175 | 10.5 ± 8.9/12 ± 11.7 | 7/188 23/175 |
Bach et al. [38] /1999/Germany | OVS versus CSC | 67 | Not reported | 2/34 2/33 | Not reported | 18/34 19/33 |
Bach et al. [39] /1996/Germany | AC versus CSC | 20 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | 3/10 4/10 |
Antonelli et al. [40] /2012/Italy | OVS versus CSC | 272 | 64.8 ± 16.6/62.9 ± 17.3 | 6/135 7/137 | 13 ± 24/15 ± 37 | 44/135 41/137 |
Moretti et al. [41] /2005/USA | OVS versus CSC | 514 | Â | 1/262 0/252 | 6.2/5.7* | 24.4%/ 24.5% |
Rupp et al. [42] /2005/USA | CSC versus Chlo/SS | 777 | 61 ± 15.5/60 ± 16.4 | 3/393 1/384 | 5.13 (0.1–31.8)/142 (2–32.9)†| 59/393 32/384 |
Rickard et al. [43] /2016/Australia | Chlo/SS versus CSC | 404 | 55.06 ± 18.66/49.78 ± 19.79 | 1/203 0/201 | 5.11 ± 1.1/5.26 ± 1.23 | 10/189 19/186 |
Richards et al. [44] /2003/Australia | Chlo/SS versus CSC | 460 | 58.3 ± 18.7/56.2 ± 20.3 | 2/237 6/223 | 8.4 ± 3.5/7.8 ± 3.2 | 14/237 30/223 |
Ranucci et al. [45] /2003/Italy | CSC versus OVS | 545 | 65 ± 15.3/63.5 ± 15.2 | 12/277 9/268 | 9 ± 6.9/9.1 ± 7 | 31 ± 7/21 ± 4 |
Raad et al. [46] /1997/USA | CSC versus AC | 298 | 56 (17–88)/58 (19–87)†| 7/136 5/130 | 6 (1–21)/6 (1–28)†| 36/136 11/130 |
Fraenkel et al. [47] /2006/Australia | AC versus OVS | 646 | 53.2 ± 20.1/53.4 ± 19.5 | 4/280 5/294 | 6.23 ± 3.83/6.25 ± 3.9 | 25/280 43/294 |
Collin [48] /1998/USA | Chlo/SS versus CSC | 220 | 46.4/47.2* | 1/58 4/61 | 9.0 ± 6.1/7.3 ± 5.0 | 2/58 25/61 |
Dünser et al. [49] /2005/Australia | OVS versus Chlo/SS versus CSC | 275 | 63 ± 16/62 ± 16/60 ± 16 | Not reported | 9.3 ± 4/9.7 ± 4/10.7 ± 4.2 | 27/160 12/165 19/160 |