From: Albumin infusion in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: another brick off the wall?
Trial | N | Age, ya | Experimental treatment | Control treatment | Mortality (albumin vs. control group; p) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis | |||||
Sort et al. [8] | 126 | 61.0 (7.9) | 20% albumin | No vascular filling | Favors albumin (22% vs. 41%; p = 0.03)b |
Xue et al. [10] | 112 | 22–70 | 20% albumin | No vascular filling | Favors albumin (10% vs. 34%; p = 0.002)c |
Fernandez et al. [14] | 20 | 61.0 (9.5) | 20% albumin | 6% HES 200/0.5 | NS (not significant) (0% vs. 20%; p = 0.47)c |
Chen et al. [11] | 30 | 56.5 (11.5) | 20% albumin | No vascular filling | NS (26.7% vs. 40%; p = 0.70)c |
Sepsis other than SBP in cirrhotic patients (no septic shock) | |||||
Guevara et al. [15] | 97 | 56 (11) | 20% albumin | No vascular filling | NS (17% vs. 20%; p = 0.78)b |
Thévenot et al. [16] | 193 | 55.3 (8.6) | 20% albumin | No vascular filling | NS (30% vs. 22%; p = 0,16)b |
Sepsis and septic shock in general ICU population d | |||||
SAFE study [2]e | 1218 | 60.5 (17.2) | 4% albumin | NaCl 0.9% | NS (30.7% vs. 35.3%; p = 0.09)f |
ALBIOS study [3] | 1810 | 69 [59–77] | 20% albumin | Crystalloids | NS (20.9% vs. 21.1%; p = 0.87)f |