Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics, details of interventions used and outcomes measured in randomized trials studying albumin treatment during spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, sepsis other than SBP in cirrhotic patients and general ICU population with sepsis

From: Albumin infusion in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: another brick off the wall?

Trial

N

Age, ya

Experimental treatment

Control treatment

Mortality (albumin vs. control group; p)

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Sort et al. [8]

126

61.0 (7.9)

20% albumin

No vascular filling

Favors albumin

(22% vs. 41%; p = 0.03)b

Xue et al. [10]

112

22–70

20% albumin

No vascular filling

Favors albumin

(10% vs. 34%; p = 0.002)c

Fernandez et al. [14]

20

61.0 (9.5)

20% albumin

6% HES 200/0.5

NS (not significant)

(0% vs. 20%; p = 0.47)c

Chen et al. [11]

30

56.5 (11.5)

20% albumin

No vascular filling

NS

(26.7% vs. 40%; p = 0.70)c

Sepsis other than SBP in cirrhotic patients (no septic shock)

Guevara et al. [15]

97

56 (11)

20% albumin

No vascular filling

NS

(17% vs. 20%; p = 0.78)b

Thévenot et al. [16]

193

55.3 (8.6)

20% albumin

No vascular filling

NS

(30% vs. 22%; p = 0,16)b

Sepsis and septic shock in general ICU population d

SAFE study [2]e

1218

60.5 (17.2)

4% albumin

NaCl 0.9%

NS

(30.7% vs. 35.3%; p = 0.09)f

ALBIOS study [3]

1810

69 [59–77]

20% albumin

Crystalloids

NS

(20.9% vs. 21.1%; p = 0.87)f

  1. aMean (SD) or median [IQ] or range
  2. b3-month mortality
  3. cHospital mortality
  4. dOnly studies including more than 100 patients are presented
  5. ePredefined subgroup of patients with severe sepsis from the SAFE study
  6. f28-day mortality