Skip to main content


Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Fig. 2 | Annals of Intensive Care

Fig. 2

From: Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava fail to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with isolated left ventricular dysfunction

Fig. 2

Distribution of dIVC and proportion of PLR responders in ILVD and NLVF patients. a There was no difference in dIVC value between ILVD and NLVF patients, p = 0.211. b ILVD patients had much lower proportion of PLR responders than that in NLVF patients, p < 0.001. ILVD isolated left ventricular systolic dysfunction, NLVF normal left ventricular function, dIVC inferior vena cava distensibility index, PLR passive leg raising

Back to article page