Skip to main content
Annals of Intensive Care

Table 2 Hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters of the patients

From: Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava fail to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with isolated left ventricular dysfunction

Categories

ILVD (n = 28)

NLVF (n = 101)

p

HR (bpm)

91 ± 18

88 ± 19

0.325

MAP (mmHg)

78 ± 13

79 ± 15

0.695

MAPSE (mm)

11.3 ± 2.8

14.9 ± 3.3

< 0.001

TAPSE (mm)

20.8 ± 3.4

22.1 ± 3.7

0.111

LVEF (%)

38 (29, 45)

65 (60, 71)

< 0.001

IVCEE (mm)

14.9 ± 3.4

15.8 ± 3.8

0.278

dIVC (%)

20 (13, 24)

16 (6, 25)

0.211

VTI (cm)

17.7 ± 5.1

20.1 ± 4.9

0.025

VTI post PLR (cm)

18.0 ± 5.0

21.6 ± 4.8

0.003

Number of PLR responders (n, %)

5 (17.9%)

57 (56.4%)

< 0.001

  1. ILVD isolated left ventricular systolic dysfunction, NLVF normal left ventricular function, HR heart rate, MAP mean arterial pressure, VTI velocity–time integral, PLR passive leg raising, IVC EE diameter of inferior vena cava at end expiration, MAPSE mitral annular plane systolic excursion, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, LVEF left ventricle ejection fraction, dIVC inferior vena cava distensibility index, MRLF mismatch of right and left heart function, PLR passive leg raising
Back to article page