Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Table 2 Hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters of the patients

From: Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava fail to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with isolated left ventricular dysfunction

Categories ILVD (n = 28) NLVF (n = 101) p
HR (bpm) 91 ± 18 88 ± 19 0.325
MAP (mmHg) 78 ± 13 79 ± 15 0.695
MAPSE (mm) 11.3 ± 2.8 14.9 ± 3.3 < 0.001
TAPSE (mm) 20.8 ± 3.4 22.1 ± 3.7 0.111
LVEF (%) 38 (29, 45) 65 (60, 71) < 0.001
IVCEE (mm) 14.9 ± 3.4 15.8 ± 3.8 0.278
dIVC (%) 20 (13, 24) 16 (6, 25) 0.211
VTI (cm) 17.7 ± 5.1 20.1 ± 4.9 0.025
VTI post PLR (cm) 18.0 ± 5.0 21.6 ± 4.8 0.003
Number of PLR responders (n, %) 5 (17.9%) 57 (56.4%) < 0.001
  1. ILVD isolated left ventricular systolic dysfunction, NLVF normal left ventricular function, HR heart rate, MAP mean arterial pressure, VTI velocity–time integral, PLR passive leg raising, IVC EE diameter of inferior vena cava at end expiration, MAPSE mitral annular plane systolic excursion, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, LVEF left ventricle ejection fraction, dIVC inferior vena cava distensibility index, MRLF mismatch of right and left heart function, PLR passive leg raising