Skip to main content

Table 5 Automated injection phase: Comparison between triple-lumen 6Fr PICC vs. CICC

From: Are single-lumen 5Fr and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs suitable for hemodynamic assessment by trans-pulmonary thermodilution? A pilot study

Variables 6 Fr triple-lumen PICC CICC p value Bias [LoA] Bias,  % Error,  %
Measurements, n 40 40
CI, L/min/m2 3.4 (0.7) 3.0 (0.7) 0.012 0.39 [− 0.05; 0.83] 12.5 13.8
GEDVI, mL/m2 689 (117) 622 (89) 0.006 66.5 [− 40; 173] 9.7 16.2
EVLWI, mL/kg 14.3 (5.0) 12.7 (4.5) 0.134 1.6 [− 0.4; 3.7] 12 15.6
SVI, mL/m2 44.6 (8.4) 39.4 (7.5) 0.004 5.2 [− 1.3; 11.7] 12.5 15.5
CVP, mmHg 12 (5.3) 11.1 (4.9) 0.458
ΔT,  °C 0.30 (0.07) 0.34 (0.08) 0.008 − 0.05 [− 0.09; 0.00] 15.6
Psi 120 115 < 0.0001
  1. Data are reported as mean (standard deviation)
  2. CI: cardiac index; CICC: centrally inserted central catheter; CVP: central venous pressure; EVLWI: extra-vascular lung water index; GEDVI: global end-diastolic volume index; LoA: limits of agreement; PICC: peripherally inserted central catheter; Psi: pound per square inch; SVI: stroke volume index; ΔT: delta temperature
\