Skip to main content

Table 2 Primary and secondary outcomes

From: Non-invasive ventilation alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen versus high-flow nasal oxygen alone after extubation in COPD patients: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial

 

Non-invasive ventilation (n = 86)

High-flow nasal oxygen alone (n = 64)

Absolute difference % (95% CI)

p value

Primary outcome

 Reintubation at day 7, n (%)

11 (13%)

17 (27%)

− 14 (− 27 to − 1)

0.032

Secondary outcomes

 Post-extubation respiratory failure, n (%)

22 (26%)

23 (36%)

− 10 (− 25 to 4)

0.171

 Use of NIV to treat post-extubation respiratory failure, n (%)

19/22 (86%)

6/23 (26%)

60 (32 to 76)

< 0.001

 Reintubation at day 7 among patients with post-extubation respiratory failure, n (%)

10/22 (45%)

14/23 (61%)

− 15 (− 40 to 13)

0.300

 Reintubation at 48 h, n (%)

7 (8%)

11 (17%)

− 9 (− 21 to 2)

0.092

 Reintubation at 72 h, n (%)

8 (9%)

15 (23%)

− 14 (− 27 to − 2)

0.018

 Reintubation in ICU, n (%)

11 (13%)

18 (28%)

− 15 (− 28 to − 2)

0.019

 Length of stay in ICU, median (IQR), days

13 [8–21]

12 [8-19]

0.908

 Length of stay in hospital, median (IQR), days

26 [14–47]

23 [16–32]

0.406

 Mortality in ICU, n (%)

5 (6%)

6 (9%)

− 4 (− 14 to 5)

0.408

 Mortality in hospital, n (%)

15 (17%)

8 (12%)

5 (− 7 to 16)

0.406

  1. Italic means that there is a significant difference (p < 0.05)
  2. NIV non-invasive ventilation, CI confidence interval, ICU intensive care unit, IQR interquartile range (25–75th percentiles)