Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics of all screened patients

From: Refractory ineffective triggering during pressure support ventilation: effect of proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors

 

All patients

Without ineffective triggering

With ineffective triggering

All

Non refractory

Refractory

All

Included

Number (% of all patients)

193 (100%)

157 (81%)

36 (19%)

15 (8%)

21 (11%)

12 (6%)

Age, years

64 [54–72]

65 [54–72]

64 [59–71]

65 [58–72]

64 [60–71]

63 [59–68]

Sex ratio, M/F

125/68

102/55

23/13

9/6

14/7

6/6

Weight, kg

75 [66–94]

75 [67–94]

78 [60–94]

79 [60–88]

77 [61–105]

83 [62–110]

Size, cm

170 [163–176]

170 [163–176]

171 [165–176]

169 [164–177]

172 [165–176]

171 [164–175]

BMI, kg/m2

26 [23–32]

26 [23–32]

25 [22–31]

25 [23–28]

25 [22–36]

31 [22–36]

COPD, n (%)

20 (10%)

14 (9%)

6 (17%)

2 (13%)

4 (19%)

3 (25%)

Initial PSL, cmH2O

10 [10–12]

10 [10–12]

14 [12–16]*

14 [11–14]

16 [13–18]

17 [14–18]

Optimized PSL, cmH2O

NA

NA

12 [10–15]

10 [8–13]

14 [12–18]**

17 [12–18]

PEEP, cmH2O

5 [5–7]

5 [5–7]

5 [5–8]

5 [5–6]

5 [5–8]

7 [5–8]

MV duration before screening, days

4 [2–7]

3 [2–7]

4 [3–12]

5 [2–12]

4 [3–9]

4 [3–7]

  1. BMI: body mass index; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PSL: pressure support level; PEEP: positive end-expiratory pressure; MV: mechanical ventilation; NA: not applicable
  2. *p < 0.05 vs. patients without ineffective triggering
  3. **p < 0.05 vs. patients with non-refractory ineffective triggering