Skip to main content

Table 1 Study and baseline characteristics

From: Intravenous vitamin C monotherapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis

Author, year (Country)

Population

Number of centers

n (Analyzed)

Age

M/F

APACHE II

SOFA

Baseline Vit C level (umol/L)

Vit C level after intervention (umol/L)

Weight in kg

1. Ferron-Celma 2008 (Spain)

Abdominal surgery with postop mortality risk > 30%

1

20

67.8 ± 4.5 vs 65.1 ± 3.6

11/9

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

2. Razmkon 2011 (Iran)

Age ≥ 16, severe head injury (GCS ≤ 8). Exclude: G6PD, severe liver or renal disease

2

76 (Group A, B and D)

31.1 (16–67) vs 29.5 (19–75) vs 29.4 (16–68)

63/13

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

3. Fowler 2014 (USA)

Severe sepsis with organ dysfunction

1

24

30–70 vs 49–92 vs 54–68

13/11

20.4 (12–23) vs 24.0 (12–33) vs 20.4 (15–29)

10.1 ± 2.0 vs 10.8 ± 4.4 vs 13.3 ± 2.9

All: 17.9 ± 2.4 20.2 (11–45) vs 16.7 (14–28) vs 17.0 (11–50)

Day 4: 331 (110–806) vs 3082 (1592–5722) vs 15.6 (7–27)

NR

4. Zabet 2016 (Iran)

Surgical ICU patients with septic shock requiring vasopressors

1

28

64.14 ± 15.98 vs 63.71 ± 13.84

21/7

19.07 ± 5.18 vs 23 ± 5.61

11.78 ± 2.22 vs 12.35 ± 3.00

NR

NR

NR

5. Chen 2019 (China)

Age ≥ 18, sepsis, ICU stay ≥ 96 h Exclude: G6PD, severe arrhythmia

2

122

69 ± 13.5 vs 67.4 ± 17.3 vs 72 ± 16.6

88/31

18.5 ± 5.1 vs 19.6 ± 6.0 vs 18.1 ± 5.7

6.3 ± 2.5 vs 7.0 ± 2.7 vs 6.3 ± 2.8

3.5 ± 2.0 vs 4.0 ± 3.2 vs 3.4 ± 2.5

48 h: 26.65 ± 18.94 vs 48.88 ± 31.43 vs 2.80 ± 2.91

96 h: 52.40 ± 56.03 vs 111.62 ± 64 vs 4.26 ± 3.22

64.8 ± 7.0 vs 65.5 ± 7.6 vs 65.3 ± 6.2

6. Fowler 2019 (USA)

Age ≥ 18, sepsis, mechanically ventilated with PF ratio < 300. Exclude: active kidney stone, DKA, interstitial lung disease

7

166

53 (39–67) vs 57 (44–70)

90/77

NR

mSOFA: 9.8 ± 3.2 vs 10.3 ± 3.1

22 (8–39) vs 22 (11–37)

48 h: 166 (88–376) vs 23 (9–37)

96 h: 169 (87–412) vs 26 (9–41)

168 h: 46 (19–66) vs 29 (12–39)

NR

7. Niu 2019 (China)

Age 18–75, sepsis in ICU. Exclude: immunocompromised, metastatic cancer

1

234

58.2 ± 14.1 ± 60.1 ± 14.2

116/118

22.0 (18.0–29.0) vs 24.0 (19.0–29.0)

8.3 ± 2.7 vs 8.7 ± 2.9

NR

NR

NR

8. Lv 2020 (China)

Age 18–75, ICU patients with sepsis. Exclude: immunocompromised

1

117

58.7 ± 14.2 vs 60.2 ± 14.1

59/58

21.0 (19.0–28.0) vs 23.0 (20.0–29.0)

8.6 ± 2.9 vs 8.9 ± 3.1

NR

NR

NR

9. Jamali Moghadam Siahkali 2021 (Iran)

Age ≥ 18, COVID-19 with clinical manifestation of ARDS or myocarditis Exclude: G6PD, ESRF

1

60

57.53 ± 18.27 vs 61.00 ± 15.90

30/30

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

10. Kassem 2021 (Egypt)

Age 18–64, TRALI ≤ 6 h of transfusion. Exclude: ever had kidney stone, G6PD, AKI, immunocompromised

2

80

52.6 ± 11.6 vs 47.2 ± 13.7

45/35

18.7 ± 8.1 vs 21.1 ± 7.1

6.7 ± 2.9 vs 5.9 ± 2.8

NR

NR

NR

11. Mahmoodpoor 2021 (Iran)

Age: 18–80, severe pneumonia in ICU with CURB-65 score > 3. Exclude: vitamin C allergy, end-stage lung disease/malignancy, G6PD, DKA, active kidney stone

1

80

56.9 ± 12.3 vs 58.3 ± 13.1

46/34

24.5 ± 5.4 vs 22.7 ± 4.3

12.5 ± 2.7 vs 10.7 ± 2.7

117.1 ± 72.34 vs 129.3 ± 77.0

96 h: 449.7 ± 150.0 vs 93.0 ± 58.7

NR

12. Zhang 2021 (China)

Age ≥ 18 and < 80, COVID-19, PF ratio < 300. Exclude: G6PD, end-stage pulmonary disease

3

56

66.3 ± 11.2 vs 67.0 ± 14.3

36/20

13.5 (10.3–15.8) vs 14.0 (11.0–16.0)

NR

NR

NR

59.7 ± 11.2 vs 64.4 ± 9.3

13. Ap 2022 (India)

Sepsis defined by sepsis 3. Exclude: chronic kidney disease, chronic alcoholics, immunocompromised

1

40 (Group 1 and 4)

All: 52.4 ± 13.7

28/12

NR

NR

21.7 ± 10.0 vs 17.5 ± 7.9

Day 6: 22.8 ± 12.0 vs NR

NR

14. Rosengrave 2022 (New Zealand)

Septic shock with organ failure. Exclude: G6PD

1

40

69 (64–76) vs 66 (57–71)

27/13

SAPSII: 50 (41–49) vs 49 (42–58)

8.5 (6.8–11) vs 9.0 (7.8–10)

10 (4–13) vs 8.2 (4.7–11)

72 h: 408 (227–560) vs 4.4 (3.1–8.8)

Median weight: 80 kg

15. Wacker 2022 (USA)

Age ≥ 18, septic shock (≤ 24 h of diagnosis). Exclude: cardiac arrest, cardiac surgery 48 h, history of kidney stone, G6PD, ESRF

5

124

68.9 (60.1–79.9) vs 73.0 (60.9–80.0)

63/61

22 (16.5–28) vs 23 (17–28.5)

10 (7–11) vs 9 (7–12)

NR

NR

NR

16. Lamontagne 2022 (International)

Proven or suspected infection and receiving vasopressors ≤ 24 h of ICU admission. Exclude: known kidney stone within past 1 year

35

863

65.0 ± 14.0 vs 65.2 ± 13.8

538/324

24.2 ± 7.4 vs 24.1 ± 7.9

10.2 ± 3.4 vs 10.1 ± 3.7

20.6 ± 70.6 vs 19.1 ± 39.7

NR

84.9 ± 22.6 vs 85.6 ± 26.6

  1. The results are presented in this sequence: intervention (low-dose vs high dose) vs control. Fowler 2019 reported mSOFA: no bilirubin score because of many missing values. To convert vitamin C from umol/L to mg/dL, divide values by 56.78
  2. AKI acute kidney injury, DKA diabetic ketoacidosis, ESRF end-stage renal failure, F female, G6PD glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, M male, NR not reported, TRALI transfusion-related acute lung injury