Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics of the included studies

From: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

Country

Mean age (years) total or case/control

Patient source

Sepsis/control (n)

Specimen tested

Inclusion criteria

Controls

Reference

Tests

Shozushima et al. [17]

Japan

62

CCU and ED

101/41

Whole blood

Presented to CCU and ED with ≥ 2 criteria for SIRS

SIRS (n = 41)

ACCP/SCCM 1991

PATHFAST

Endo et al. [29]

Japan

75/66

ICU and ED

115/70

Whole blood

Presented to ICU or ED with 1 criteria for SIRS

Non-infectious (n = 70)

Blood culture

PATHFAST

Liu et al. [33]

China

71/69

ED

680/279

Whole blood

Presented to ED with definition of sepsis by ACCP/SCCM

SIRS (n = 179)

HC (n = 100)

ACCP/SCCM 2001

PATHFAST

Ulla et al. [38]

Italy

71/56

ED

106/83

Plasma

Presented to ED with ≥ 2 criteria for SIRS

SIRS (n = 83)

ACCP/SCCM 1991

PATHFAST

Vodnik et al. [39]

Serbia

56/55.15

ED

30/100

Plasma

Presented to ED with ≥ 2 criteria for SIRS and intra-abdominal infection

SIRS (n = 30)

HC (n = 70)

ACCP/SCCM 1991

PATHFAST

Behnes et al. [25]

Germany

68/64

ICU

81/15

Serum

Presented to ICU with proven criteria of septic shock

SIRS (n = 15)

ACCP/SCCM 1991

PATHFAST

Brenner et al. [26]

Germany

70/44

ICU

60/60

Plasma

Presented to ICU with proven criteria of septic shock

HC (n = 30)

Postoperative (n = 30)

ACCP/SCCM 2001

PATHFAST

Romualdo et al. [35]

Spain

71/67

ED

37/189

Plasma

Presented to ED with SIRS and suspected infection

Negative blood cultures in SIRS (n = 189)

SSIDCM

PATHFAST

Ishikura et al. [31]

Japan

67.2

ED

43/39

Whole blood

Presented to ED and CCM with ≥ 1 criteria for SIRS

Non-sepsis (n = 39)

ACCP/SCCM 1991

PATHFAST

Kweon et al. [32]

Korea

64.3/56.1

ED

73/45

Whole blood

Presented to ED with ≥ 2 criteria for SIRS

SIRS (n = 20)

HC (n = 25)

ACCP/SCCM 1991

PATHFAST

Cakir Madenci et al. [27]

Turkey

38.5/44

ICU

26/11

Plasma

Presented to ICU with burn

Burn patients without sepsis (n = 11)

ABA

PATHFAST

Nakamura et al. [34]

Japan

70

ICU

37/75

Serum

ICU admission

Non-sepsis (n = 75)

ACCP/SCCM 1991

PATHFAST

Sargentini et al. [36]

Italy

55/53

CCU

60/44

Plasma

CCU admission

SIRS (n = 14)

HC (n = 30)

ACCP/SCCM 1991

PATHFAST

Godnic et al. [30]

Slovenia

Not provided

ICU

40/7

Plasma

Presented to ICU with ≥ 2 criteria for SIRS

SIRS (n = 7)

Blood culture

PATHFAST

Takahashi et al. [37]

Japan

80

ED and ICU

359/97

Whole blood

Presented to ED with ≥ 1 criteria for SIRS

SIRS (n = 97)

ACCP/SCCM 1991

PATHFAST

Carpio et al. [28]

Peru

34/69

ICU

114/9

Plasma

Presented to ICU with SIRS and suspected infection

SIRS (n = 9)

ACCP/SCCM 1991

PATHFAST

Kada Klouche et al. [41]

France

58

ICU

100/44

Plasma

Presented to ICU with suspected infection

SIRS (n = 44)

Sepsis 3.0

PATHFAST

Romualdo et al. [40]

Spain

73/69

ED

70/130

Plasma

Presented to ED with suspected infection

Non-complicated infection (n = 130)

Sepsis 3.0

PATHFAST

  1. ABA American Burn Association, ACCP American College of Chest Physicians, ED emergency department, HC healthy control, ICU intensive care unit, postoperative control major abdominal surgery without any evidence of infection, SCCM Society of Critical Care Medicine, SIRS systemic inflammatory response syndrome, SSIDCM Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology