Skip to main content

Table 3 Technical validity and adverse events for endotracheal intubation with the DLM by operator sub-group

From: Usefulness of video-laryngoscopy with the Airway Scope for intubation performance and learning: an experimental manikin controlled study

 

Operator sub-group (device order)

p value*

Experts (DLM then AWS) n = 20

Novices 1 (DLM then AWS) n = 20

Novices 2 (AWS then DLM) n = 20

Events ** (out of 200 attempts)

Median [Q1–Q3]***

Events** (out of 200 attempts)

Median [Q1–Q3]***

Events ** (out of 200 attempts)

Median [Q1–Q3]***

Technically valid attempts, n

146

9 [7–9]

61

2 [1–4]

84

4 [2–6]

0.0005

Adverse technical events

 Esophageal intubation, n

6

0 [0–0]

34

1 [0–2]

21

0 [0–2]

0.02

 Delayed ETI time (>60 s), n

4

0 [0–0]

30

1 [0–2]

16

0 [0–1]

0.003

 Dental pressure, n

49

1 [0–3]

78

4 [2–5]

76

3 [2–5]

0.02

 Epiglottis loading, n

1

0 [0–0]

26

1 [0–2]

25

1 [0–2]

0.0001

 Lack of traction, n

3

0 [0–0]

35

1 [0–4]

15

0 [0–1]

0.002

 Cormack–Lehane grade (median)

1 [1, 2]

2 [1, 2]

2 [1, 2]

0.008

  1. ETI endotracheal intubation, DLM direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh, AWS video-laryngoscopy with Airway Scope®
  2. * Kruskal–Wallis test
  3. ** Total number of each event on 200 attempts in each sub-group with DLM
  4. *** Median [1st–3rd quartile] per operator of the number of events on 10 attempts with DLM in each sub-group