Skip to main content

Table 2 Clinical parameters on admission in the groups of patients treated with different dialysis modalities, IHD versus CRRT (n = 81; means with 95%CI)

From: Intermittent versus continuous renal replacement therapy in acute methanol poisoning: comparison of clinical effectiveness in mass poisoning outbreaks

Group of patients

MAP, mmHg (kPa)

GCS

Coma, n (%)

RR, min

MV, n (%)

HR, min

Vasopressors/inotropes

VD, n (%)

D, n (%)

GI, n (%)

CA and RA, n (%)

Alcoholism, n (%)

IHD (n = 41; 9F)

106.1 ± 6.0 (14.15 ± 0.80)

13 ± 2

8 (20%)

19 ± 1

9 (22%)

87 ± 5

6 (15%)

17 (41%)

11 (27%)

21 (51%)

2 (5%)

19 (46%)

CRRT (n = 40; 8F)

96.0 ± 7.1 (12.80 ± 0.95)

8 ± 2

25 (63%)

20 ± 2

28 (70%)

96 ± 7

23 (58%)

22 (55%)

22 (55%)

23 (58%)

5 (13%)

20 (50%)

Total (n = 81; 17F)

101.1 ± 4.9 (13.48 ± 0.65)

10 ± 1

33 (41%)

19 ± 1

37 (46%)

92 ± 4

29 (36%)

39 (48%)

33 (41%)

44 (54%)

7 (9%)

39 (48%)

P IHD/CRRT

0.026

<0.001

<0.001

0.257

<0.001

0.041

<0.001

0.223

0.010

0.570

0.222

0.742

  1. Italic text indicates statistically significant result at p < 0.05
  2. IHD intermittent hemodialysis, CRRT continuous renal replacement therapy, coma = GCS < 8, GCS Glasgow Coma Scale, VD visual disturbances, D dyspnea, GI gastrointestinal symptoms, HR heart rate, CA cardiac arrest, RA respiratory arrest, RR respiratory rate, MAP mean arterial pressure, MV mechanical ventilation