Skip to main content

Table 3 (Adapted from [14, 15]) usual breakpoints and susceptibility of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae

From: Piperacillin–tazobactam as alternative to carbapenems for ICU patients

 

Susceptibility (%)

Breakpoints (mg/L)

Ecological impact

Comments

Third-generation cephalosporins

Escherichia coli: < 10%

Klebsiella species: 3%

EUCAST: S ≤ 1

CLSI: S ≤ 1

+++

Only for targeted therapy or de-escalation

MIC required

Cefepime

E. coli: 5–30%

K. pneumoniae: 5–60%

EUCAST: S < 1

CLSI: S ≤ 2

+++

Frequent failure if MICs > 1 mg/L

MIC required

Cefoxitin

E. coli: 80%

EUCAST: NA

++

PK optimization

Ceftolozane–tazobactam

E. coli: 85–95%

K. pneumoniae: 40–65%

EUCAST: S ≤ 1

CLSI: S ≤ 8

?

 

Ceftazidime–avibactam

E. coli: 98–100%

K. pneumoniae: 90–100%

EUCAST: S ≤ 8

CLSI: S ≤ 8

?

Probably as effective as carbapenems

Temocillin

E. coli 61% (CMI ≤ 8)

E. coli 99% (CMI ≤ 32)

EUCAST: S ≤ 8

EUCAST: S ≤ 32 (urinary)

CLSI: S ≤ 8

CLSI: S ≤ 32 (urinary)

±

PK optimization (high dosage and prolonged infusion)

  1. CLSI Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute, EUCAST European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, MIC minimum inhibitory concentration, NA not applicable, PK pharmacokinetic, VAP ventilator-associated pneumonia