Skip to main content

Table 1 Studies characteristics

From: The end-expiratory occlusion test for detecting preload responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 YearNo. of patientsSettingPEEP (cmH2O)Tidal volume (mL/kg)Respiratory system compliance (mL/cmH2O)HD monitoring #1HD monitoring #2
Monnet et al. [8]200934ICU8 ± 36.8 ± 1.1NACalibrated PCPP
Monnet et al. [18]201239ICU7 ± 37.9 ± 2.536 ± 16Calibrated PCNA
Monnet et al. [11]201254ICU7 ± 37.9 ± 1.133 ± 6Calibrated PCNA
Silva et al. [19]201334ICU5 ± 0 vs. 14 ± 06.8 ± 0.227 ± 3 vs. 31 ± 1Calibrated PCNA
Guinot et al. [12]201442OR4 ± 28.2 ± 0.8NAODMEtCO2
Biais et al. [13]201741OR5 ± 06.9 ± 0.640 ± 10Uncalibrated PCNA
Myatra et al. [14]201730ICU9 ± 36.0 ± 0.1 vs. 8.0 ± 0.025 ± 4 vs. 32 ± 4Calibrated PCNA
Yonis et al. [15]201733ICU8 ± 16.0 ± 0.130 ± 5Calibrated PCNA
Jozwiak et al. [16]201730ICU10 ± 46.2 ± 0.235 ± 3TTECalibrated PC
Georges et al. [17]201850ICU6 ± 26.9 ± 0.750 ± 17TTENA
Dépret et al. [20]201928ICU12 ± 35.8 ± 0.639 ± 10ODMCalibrated PC
Messina et al. [21]201940OR5 ± 06.0 ± 0.0 vs. 8.0 ± 0.065 ± 4 vs. 83 ± 4Uncalibrated PCNA
Xu et al. [22]201975OR5 ± 08 ± 0.1NATOENA
  1. EtCO2 end-tidal carbon dioxide, HD haemodynamic, ICU intensive care unit, NA not available, ODM oesophageal Doppler monitoring, OR operating room, PC pulse contour, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, TOE trans-oesophageal echocardiography, TTE trans-thoracic echocardiography