Skip to main content

Table 1 Studies characteristics

From: The end-expiratory occlusion test for detecting preload responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 

Year

No. of patients

Setting

PEEP (cmH2O)

Tidal volume (mL/kg)

Respiratory system compliance (mL/cmH2O)

HD monitoring #1

HD monitoring #2

Monnet et al. [8]

2009

34

ICU

8 ± 3

6.8 ± 1.1

NA

Calibrated PC

PP

Monnet et al. [18]

2012

39

ICU

7 ± 3

7.9 ± 2.5

36 ± 16

Calibrated PC

NA

Monnet et al. [11]

2012

54

ICU

7 ± 3

7.9 ± 1.1

33 ± 6

Calibrated PC

NA

Silva et al. [19]

2013

34

ICU

5 ± 0 vs. 14 ± 0

6.8 ± 0.2

27 ± 3 vs. 31 ± 1

Calibrated PC

NA

Guinot et al. [12]

2014

42

OR

4 ± 2

8.2 ± 0.8

NA

ODM

EtCO2

Biais et al. [13]

2017

41

OR

5 ± 0

6.9 ± 0.6

40 ± 10

Uncalibrated PC

NA

Myatra et al. [14]

2017

30

ICU

9 ± 3

6.0 ± 0.1 vs. 8.0 ± 0.0

25 ± 4 vs. 32 ± 4

Calibrated PC

NA

Yonis et al. [15]

2017

33

ICU

8 ± 1

6.0 ± 0.1

30 ± 5

Calibrated PC

NA

Jozwiak et al. [16]

2017

30

ICU

10 ± 4

6.2 ± 0.2

35 ± 3

TTE

Calibrated PC

Georges et al. [17]

2018

50

ICU

6 ± 2

6.9 ± 0.7

50 ± 17

TTE

NA

Dépret et al. [20]

2019

28

ICU

12 ± 3

5.8 ± 0.6

39 ± 10

ODM

Calibrated PC

Messina et al. [21]

2019

40

OR

5 ± 0

6.0 ± 0.0 vs. 8.0 ± 0.0

65 ± 4 vs. 83 ± 4

Uncalibrated PC

NA

Xu et al. [22]

2019

75

OR

5 ± 0

8 ± 0.1

NA

TOE

NA

  1. EtCO2 end-tidal carbon dioxide, HD haemodynamic, ICU intensive care unit, NA not available, ODM oesophageal Doppler monitoring, OR operating room, PC pulse contour, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, TOE trans-oesophageal echocardiography, TTE trans-thoracic echocardiography