Skip to main content

Table 3 Diagnostic accuracy of the end-expiratory occlusion test in the including studies

From: The end-expiratory occlusion test for detecting preload responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 No. of patientsAUROC95% CIThreshold (%)aSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)PPV (%)NPV (%)
Monnet et al. [8]340.970.85–1.0059110010084
Monnet et al. [18]390.970.91–1.0051009190100
Monnet et al. [11]540.95NA593929491
Silva et al. [19]340.960.82–0.9961009086100
Guinot et al. [12]420.780.63–0.892.382718566
Biais et al. [13]410.910.81–1.0051008183100
Myatra et al. [14]300.950.88–1.004.188939387
Yonis et al. [15]330.650.46–0.84103310010064
Jozwiak et al. [16]300.980.85–1.0049310010093
Georges et al. [17]500.96NA989959687
Dépret et al. [20]280.950.79–0.99386939287
Messina et al. [21]400.930.84–1.003.689868788
Xu et al. [22]750.90.83–0.97581939184
  1. AUROC area under the receiver operating characteristic, CI confidence interval, NA not available, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value
  2. aThreshold of increase in cardiac output induced by the test reported as providing the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity