Skip to main content

Table 3 Diagnostic accuracy of the end-expiratory occlusion test in the including studies

From: The end-expiratory occlusion test for detecting preload responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 

No. of patients

AUROC

95% CI

Threshold (%)a

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

PPV (%)

NPV (%)

Monnet et al. [8]

34

0.97

0.85–1.00

5

91

100

100

84

Monnet et al. [18]

39

0.97

0.91–1.00

5

100

91

90

100

Monnet et al. [11]

54

0.95

NA

5

93

92

94

91

Silva et al. [19]

34

0.96

0.82–0.99

6

100

90

86

100

Guinot et al. [12]

42

0.78

0.63–0.89

2.3

82

71

85

66

Biais et al. [13]

41

0.91

0.81–1.00

5

100

81

83

100

Myatra et al. [14]

30

0.95

0.88–1.00

4.1

88

93

93

87

Yonis et al. [15]

33

0.65

0.46–0.84

10

33

100

100

64

Jozwiak et al. [16]

30

0.98

0.85–1.00

4

93

100

100

93

Georges et al. [17]

50

0.96

NA

9

89

95

96

87

Dépret et al. [20]

28

0.95

0.79–0.99

3

86

93

92

87

Messina et al. [21]

40

0.93

0.84–1.00

3.6

89

86

87

88

Xu et al. [22]

75

0.9

0.83–0.97

5

81

93

91

84

  1. AUROC area under the receiver operating characteristic, CI confidence interval, NA not available, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value
  2. aThreshold of increase in cardiac output induced by the test reported as providing the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity