Variable | Changes observed | LVOM outcome | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | ROC AUC (95% CI) | Fleiss kappa | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Responsive | Unresponsive | ||||||||
During lung volume optimization maneuvre | |||||||||
 Oxygenation–CDP | Increase, suggestive for lung volume recruitment | 36/41 | 6/13 | 87.8 | 53.8 | 85.7% | 58.3% | 0.71 (0.53–0.89) | 0.431 |
No change or decrease | 5/41 | 7/13 | |||||||
 ΔPproximal–CDP | Decrease, suggestive for increased compliance | 12/41 | 3/13 | 29.3 | 76.9 | 80.0% | 25.6% | 0.53 (0.35–0.71) | 0.782 |
No change or increase | 29/41 | 10/13 | |||||||
 Vt–CDP curve | Increase, suggestive for lung volume recruitment | 31/35 | 10/11 | 88.6 | 9.1 | 75.6% | 20.0% | 0.49 (0.29–0.68) | 0.866 |
 | No change or decrease | 4/35 | 1/11 | ||||||
After lung volume optimization maneuvre | |||||||||
 SpO2/FiO2 ratio at the end of the maneuvre | Increase ≥ 20% | 22/41 | 5/13 | 53.7 | 61.5 | 81.4% | 29.6% | 0.58 (0.40–0.75) | N/A |
Decrease or increase < 20% | 19/41 | 8/13 | |||||||
 SpO2/FiO2 ratio 1 h after the maneuvre | Increase ≥ 20% | 38/41 | 3/13 | 92.7 | 76.9 | 92.6% | 76.9% | 0.85 (0.70–0.99) | N/A |
Decrease or increase < 20% | 3/41 | 10/13 |