Skip to main content

Table 4 Automated injection phase: Comparison between single-lumen 5Fr PICC vs. CICC

From: Are single-lumen 5Fr and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs suitable for hemodynamic assessment by trans-pulmonary thermodilution? A pilot study

Variables 5 Fr single-lumen PICC CICC p value Bias [LoA] Bias, % Error, %
Measurements, n 40 40
CI, L/min/m2 3.2 (0.9) 3.06 (0.9) 0.44 0.16 [− 0.29; 0.61] 5.4 14.4
GEDVI, mL/m2 721 (171) 704 (188) 0.676 16.9 [− 83.2; 116.9] 3.1 14
EVLWI, mL/kg 11.4 (3.1) 10.9 (3.1) 0.487 0.49 [− 1.14; 2.12] 5.3 14.6
SVI, mL/m2 35.7 (8.5) 33.7 (8.6) 0.299 2.0 [− 3.2; 7.2] 6.1 15
CVP, mmHg 9.8 (5.6) 9.7 (4.5) 0.965
ΔT,  °C 0.30 (0.06) 0.32 (0.06) 0.224 − 0.017 [− 0.045; 0.010] 8.7
Psi 112 109 0.07
  1. Data are reported as mean (standard deviation)
  2. CI: cardiac index; CICC: centrally inserted central catheter; CVP: central venous pressure; EVLWI: extra-vascular lung water index; GEDVI: global end-diastolic volume index; LoA: limits of agreement; PICC: peripherally inserted central catheter; Psi: pound per square inch; SVI: stroke volume index; ΔT: delta temperature
\