Skip to main content

Table 4 Automated injection phase: Comparison between single-lumen 5Fr PICC vs. CICC

From: Are single-lumen 5Fr and triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs suitable for hemodynamic assessment by trans-pulmonary thermodilution? A pilot study

Variables

5 Fr single-lumen PICC

CICC

p value

Bias [LoA]

Bias, %

Error, %

Measurements, n

40

40

CI, L/min/m2

3.2 (0.9)

3.06 (0.9)

0.44

0.16 [− 0.29; 0.61]

5.4

14.4

GEDVI, mL/m2

721 (171)

704 (188)

0.676

16.9 [− 83.2; 116.9]

3.1

14

EVLWI, mL/kg

11.4 (3.1)

10.9 (3.1)

0.487

0.49 [− 1.14; 2.12]

5.3

14.6

SVI, mL/m2

35.7 (8.5)

33.7 (8.6)

0.299

2.0 [− 3.2; 7.2]

6.1

15

CVP, mmHg

9.8 (5.6)

9.7 (4.5)

0.965

ΔT,  °C

0.30 (0.06)

0.32 (0.06)

0.224

− 0.017 [− 0.045; 0.010]

8.7

Psi

112

109

0.07

  1. Data are reported as mean (standard deviation)
  2. CI: cardiac index; CICC: centrally inserted central catheter; CVP: central venous pressure; EVLWI: extra-vascular lung water index; GEDVI: global end-diastolic volume index; LoA: limits of agreement; PICC: peripherally inserted central catheter; Psi: pound per square inch; SVI: stroke volume index; ΔT: delta temperature