Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of tests and indices assessing preload responsiveness based on heart–lung interactions

From: Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new?

Test/index

Advantages

Limitations

Confounding factors

Criterion of judgement

Diagnostic threshold

Level of evidence

PPV

→Automatically measured

→Widely available (invasive or non-invasive arterial pressure curve)

→Requires no manoeuvre

→Very well validated

→Impossible to use in many patients because of confounding factors

→False positives in case of cardiac arrhythmias, spontaneous breathing activity and possibly right ventricular failure

→False negatives in case of low Vt, low lung compliance and IAH

Absolute value itself

 ≥ 15%

++++

SVV

→Automatically measured

→Requires no manoeuvre

→Well validated

→Impossible to use in many patients because of confounding factors

→Requires a device for pulse contour analysis

→Those of PPV

→An arterial pressure of poor quality may provide wrong values

Absolute value itself

 ≥ 15%

+++

EEO test

→Easy to perform

→Works regardless of breathing activity, cardiac rhythm, Vt, lung compliance

→Well validated

→Requires a direct estimation of CO/SV

→Requires mechanical ventilation

→Cannot be used if the patient interrupts the 15-s EEO

→Interruption of the test before its end by breathing efforts of the patient

CO

 ≥ 5%

+++

   

VTI (better with additional EIO)

EEO alone: ≥ 5%

EEO + EIO: ≥ 13%

+

   

perfusion index

 ≥ 2.5%

+

Vt challenge

→Requires no measurement in CO/SV (just an invasive or non-invasive arterial pressure curve)

→Reliable in prone position and in spontaneously breathing patients

→Requires mechanical ventilation

→Different diagnostic thresholds reported

→Requires more validation

→Cardiac arrhythmias?

→Intra-abdominal hypertension?

PPV

 ≥ 1 to 3.5%

++

Vena cava distensibility

→Requires no measurement in CO/SV

→False positives in case of spontaneous breathing activity and possibly right ventricular failure

→False negatives in case of low Vt, low lung compliance

→Quite low reliability

→Not reliable in case of IAH

→For SVC: requires TOE

→Those of PPV (except cardiac arrhythmia)

Absolute value itself

IVC: ≥ 12%

SVC: ≥ 12 to 36%

+

  1. CO cardiac output, EEO end-expiratory occlusion, EIO end-inspiratory occlusion, IAH intra-abdominal hypertension, IVC inferior vena cava, PPV pulse pressure variation, SV stroke volume, SVC superior vena cava, SVV stroke volume variation, TOE trans-oesophageal echocardiography, Vt tidal volume under mechanical ventilation, VTI velocity-time integral in the left ventricular outflow tract
  2. *Takes into account the number of positive studies (confirming reliability) and of negative studies (denying reliability)