Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of the studies investigating the effects on the outcome of strategies using an assessment of preload responsiveness of critically ill patients

From: Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new?

First author

(year of publication)

Number of patients

Number of centres

Primary end-point

Effect of fluid administration*

Effect on mortality*

Other tested effects*

Chen [96]

82

1

Volume of fluids administered by days 3 and 5 and cumulative fluid balance by days 3 and 5

Fluid balance at Day-3

1 952 [48–5003] mL

vs

3 124 [767–10103] mL, p = 0.20

In-hospital

56% vs. 49%, p = 0.51

Ventilator-free days

5.5 [0–12.25] days

vs

5.5 [0–16.75] days, p =0 .05

      

Need for renal replacement therapy

41.5%

vs

39.0%, p = 0.82

      

Vasopressor-free days

5.5 [0–10] days

vs

5 [0–16] days, p = 0.84

Richard [97]

60

1

Duration of cardiovascular failure

Daily volume of fluids for volume expansion

383 (211 to 604) mL/day vs

917 (639 to 1,511) mL/day,

p = 0.01

28-day

23% vs. 47%, p = 0.10

Time to shock resolution

2.0 (1.2 to 3.1) days

vs

2.3 (1.4 to 5.6) days, p = 0.29

     

Red cell transfusions

103 (0 to 183) mL

vs

178 (82 to 304) mL, p = 0.04

     

Ventilator-free days

14 [0–24] days

vs

8 [0–21] days, p = 0.35

Douglas [95]

150

13

Positive fluid balance at 72 h or ICU discharge

Fluid balance at 72 h or ICU discharge

0.65 ± 2.85 L

vs

2.02 ± 3.44 L,

p = 0.02

30-day

20% vs. 21%, p = 0.42

Need for rate of renal replacement therapy

5.1%

vs

17.5%, p = 0.04

      

Need mechanical ventilation

17.7% ± 34.1%, p = 0.04

  1. Results in the intervention arm are presented first, and results in the control arm second. P values <0.05 are indicated in bold.
  2. ICU intensive care unit