Skip to main content

Table 2 GRADE summary of findings

From: Use of dexmedetomidine in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

Certainty assessment

No of patients

Effect

Certainty

Importance

No of studies

Study design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

Dexmedetomidine

Other sedatives

Relative

(95% CI)

Absolute

(95% CI)

All-cause mortality at longest follow-up

11

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

None

154/616 (25.0%)

189/606 (31.2%)

RR 0.83 (0.69 to 0.99)

53 fewer per 1,000 (from 97 fewer to 3 fewer)

High

CRITICAL

Light sedation

7

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

None

130/489 (26.6%)

147/485 (30.3%)

RR 0.90 (0.74 to 1.09)

30 fewer per 1,000 (from 79 fewer to 27 more)

Moderate

CRITICAL

Deep sedation

2

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Seriousa

Sample size

17/75 (22.7%)

26/71 (36.6%)

RR 0.61 (0.30 to 1.23)

143 fewer per 1,000 (from 256 fewer to 84 more)

Moderate

IMPORTANT

APACHE II ≤20

4

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Seriousc

None

18/117 (15.4%)

28/117 (23.9%)

RR 0.67 (0.32 to 1.42)

79 fewer per 1,000 (from 163 fewer to 101 more)

Low

IMPORTANT

APACHE II >20

7

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

None

136/499 (27.3%)

161/489 (32.9%)

RR 0.85 (0.70 to 1.02)

49 fewer per 1,000 (from 99 fewer to 7 more)

High

CRITICAL

Dexmedetomidine vs Propofol

9

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

None

145/553 (26.2%)

164/544 (30.1%)

RR 0.89 (0.74 to 1.07)

33 fewer per 1,000 (from 78 fewer to 21 more)

High

CRITICAL

Dexmedetomidine vs other sedatives

2

Randomised trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Sample size

9/63 (14.3%)

25/62 (40.3%)

RR 0.36 (0.18 to 0.70)

258 fewer per 1,000 (from 331 fewer to 121 fewer)

Low -

IMPORTANT

  1. CI confidence interval, RR risk ratio
  2. a There are differences in the evaluation criteria for sedation
  3. b Wide confidence intervals do not exclude important benefit or harm which lowers our certainty in effect