Skip to main content
Fig. 5 | Annals of Intensive Care

Fig. 5

From: Automated characterization of patient–ventilator interaction using surface electromyography

Fig. 5

Detection examples that do not match the reference. In the left example, the parasternal sEMG signal is affected by crosstalk or another artifact. This leads to a false positive and multiple false negatives when compared to expert annotations in \(P_{\textrm{es}}\). In the diaphragm sEMG, no patient efforts were detected. In the second example, \(P_{\textrm{es}}\) and sEMG waveforms disagree, as there are more patient efforts visible in the electrical signal. These are all considered false positives

Back to article page