Skip to main content
Annals of Intensive Care
Download PDF

Percutaneous cannulation is associated with lower rate of severe neurological complication in femoro-femoral ECPR: results from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry

Annals of Intensive Care volume 13, Article number: 77 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous cannulation is now accepted as the first-line strategy for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in adults. However, previous studies comparing percutaneous cannulation to surgical cannulation have been limited by small sample size and single-center settings. This study aimed to compare in-hospital outcomes in cardiac arrest (CA) patients who received femoro-femoral ECPR with percutaneous vs surgical cannulation.

Methods

Adults with refractory CA treated with percutaneous (percutaneous group) or surgical (surgical group) femoro-femoral ECPR between January 2008 and December 2019 were extracted from the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. The primary outcome was severe neurological complication. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between percutaneous cannulation and in-hospital outcomes.

Results

Among 3575 patients meeting study inclusion, 2749 (77%) underwent percutaneous cannulation. The proportion of patients undergoing percutaneous cannulation increased from 18% to 89% over the study period (p < 0.001 for trend). Severe neurological complication (13% vs 19%; p < 0.001) occurred less frequently in the percutaneous group compared to the surgical group. In adjusted analyses, percutaneous cannulation was independently associated with lower rate of severe neurological complication (odds ratio [OR] 0.62; 95% CI 0.46–0.83; p = 0.002), similar rates of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.73–1.17; p = 0.522), limb ischemia (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.58–1.20; p = 0.341) and cannulation site bleeding (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.66–1.22; p = 0.471). The comparison of outcomes provided similar results across different levels of center percutaneous experience or center ECPR volume.

Conclusions

Among adults receiving ECPR, percutaneous cannulation was associated with probable lower rate of severe neurological complication, and similar rates of in-hospital mortality, limb ischemia and cannulation site bleeding.

Introduction

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), using veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for circulatory and respiratory support, has been increasingly used worldwide as a rescue strategy in patients with refractory cardiac arrest (CA) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Recent investigations have shown that ECPR is associated with improved survival and neurologic outcomes in patients with in-hospital CA (IHCA) or out-of-hospital CA (OHCA) as compared to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation [9,10,11,12,13,14].

In adults, peripheral femoro-femoral cannulation is the most commonly adopted method for the initiation of ECPR, predominantly performed with percutaneous approach or surgical approach [15,16,17]. The surgical approach has been widely used for a long time, but this more invasive procedure may be associated with severe complications, such as hemorrhage, delayed wound healing, and infections [18, 19]. With the development of ultrasound guidance for vascular access and the notable advances in devices and techniques, percutaneous cannulation is increasingly performed by intensivists, cardiologists, interventional radiologists, surgeons, and emergency physicians, and is often preferred over surgical cannulation in most cases [20, 21]. Importantly, percutaneous canulation was shown to be related to fewer complications and shorter cannulation time, potentially improving outcomes in patients undergoing ECPR [22]. However, previous studies comparing percutaneous cannulation to surgical cannulation have been limited by small sample size and single-center settings or were conducted in populations with cardiogenic shock [23,24,25]. In addition, there is little information regarding trends in the utilization of vascular access techniques (percutaneous vs surgical cannulation) for ECPR over the past decades.

The aims of this study were to leverage the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry to: (1) evaluate temporal trends in the use of percutaneous vs surgical cannulation in ECPR; (2) compare in-hospital outcomes among CA patients who received femoro-femoral ECPR with percutaneous vs surgical cannulation; (3) quantify the association of percutaneous cannulation with in-hospital outcomes in prespecified subgroups.

Methods

Study design and population

The ELSO Registry is a voluntary international database that collects information on ECMO use in adults and children from more than 400 member centers worldwide. Records stored in the registry include patient demographics, diagnosis and procedure information, pre-ECMO conditions, ECMO technique, physiological and microbiological data, complications, and outcomes. Diagnosis and medical history are reported according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9th Edition and 10th Edition codes. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the ELSO Registry. We included adult patients (≥ 18 years) who received femoro-femoral ECPR with percutaneous (percutaneous group) or surgical (surgical group) cannulation primarily for refractory CA from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2019. We excluded patients with multiple VA-ECMO runs, central cannulation, and other nonfemoral arterial cannulation approaches. Additional exclusion criteria included missing data with regard to key variables: cannulation method and neurologic complications. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Beijing Anzhen Hospital (2021020X).

Data collection

Two authors (F.Y and L.W) independently reviewed the deidentified data set from the ELSO Registry database and identified all patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Any discrepancies between the two reviewers were resolved by discussion. The following information was extracted for all included patients: demographic variables; comorbid conditions; CA characteristics; pre-ECMO support; pre-ECMO hemodynamic variables; pre-ECMO arterial blood gases (ABGs); post-ECMO ABGs; year of ECMO run; cannulation site; cannulation techniques; cannula type; VA-ECMO duration; and ECMO-associated mortality and morbidities, including neurologic complications, limb ischemia, cannulation site bleeding, infections, and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and obesity (defined as a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). CA characteristics included cardiac origin of CA, OHCA, and witnessed initial shockable rhythm. Cardiac origin of CA was reported according to ICD-9/10 codes. Pre-ECMO support included renal replacement therapy (RRT), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD), cardiopulmonary bypass use, norepinephrine and vasopressin use. The ELSO registry collects arterial blood gas values before initiation of ECMO and 24 h after the initiation of ECMO. The absolute change in PaCO2 upon ECMO initiation.

(ΔPaCO2) was calculated from the following formula: ΔPaCO2 = 24hPostECMOPaCO2- PreECMOPaCO2. The relative change in PaCO2 (Rel∆CO2) was calculated from the following formula: Rel∆CO2 = ΔPaCO2/PreECMOPaCO2. Severe hyperoxemia was defined as PaO2 > 300 mmHg. Cannulation techniques were reported as percutaneous or surgical. Neurologic complications were reported as brain death, central nervous system (CNS) diffuse ischemia, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, or seizure.

Outcomes and definitions

The primary outcome was severe neurologic complication, defined as brain death or CNS diffuse ischemia (ELSO definitions in Additional file 1: Table S1). Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, stroke, limb ischemia, cannulation site bleeding, systemic infection, respiratory tract infection, and need for RRT (ELSO definitions in Additional file 1: Table S1). In-hospital mortality was defined as death from any cause occurring in patients who were treated with ECPR for CA. Stroke included hemorrhagic stroke and ischemic stroke. Systemic infection was defined by a culture proven infection from blood during ECMO support and not believed to be pre-existing. Respiratory tract infection was defined by a culture proven infection from respiratory tract during ECMO support and not believed to be pre-existing.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as median with interquartile range (IQR) and were compared with the Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables were expressed as counts and percentages and were compared with chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between surgical and percutaneous groups. The percentage of patients undergoing percutaneous and surgical cannulation was plotted over time. Cochrane–Armitage test for trend was used to evaluate the use of percutaneous vs surgical cannulation over time.

To evaluate the association between percutaneous cannulation and outcomes, we performed multivariable logistic regressions by entering percutaneous cannulation (vs surgical cannulation) with available variables: age, weight, sex, race, comorbid conditions, cardiac origin, bilateral femoral cannula, distal limb cannula use, pre-ECMO PH, and VA-ECMO duration. Given a moderate level of missing data for pre-ECMO pH (32%) and pre-ECMO support (18%), we performed sensitivity analyses by repeating all logistic regression analyses by either omitting pH or including pre-ECMO support to assess their influence on outcomes. Sensitivity analyses with the year of ECPR entered in the models was also presented. Moreover, we explored if the association between percutaneous cannulation and neurological complications remained significant, once oxygenation variables (Rel∆CO2 and severe hyperoxemia) were entered in the multiple logistic regression model.

To assess for effect modification in the relationship between percutaneous cannulation and selected outcomes (severe neurologic complication, in-hospital mortality, limb ischemia, and cannulation site bleeding) in prespecified subgroups of interest defined according to age (< 50 years, 50–60 years, > 60 years), sex, obesity, white race, cardiac origin of CA, OHCA, witnessed CA, distal limb cannula use, pre-ECMO PH (< 7.2, > 7.2), and ECMO period (pre-2015, 2015–2019), multivariable logistic regression models as above including an interaction between percutaneous cannulation and the variable representing the subgroup were fitted in this study cohort.

We defined experience of percutaneous cannulation for each center as the total number of patients underdoing percutaneous ECPR at that center during study period. Centers with ≥ 5 cases of percutaneous ECPR was considered to be experienced in percutaneous cannulation (according to the median value of percutaneous ECPR volume across the included centers). We compared outcomes across different levels of center percutaneous experience with multivariable logistic regression models as above and tested for a statistical interaction between percutaneous cannulation and center experience of percutaneous cannulation. We also compared outcomes across different levels of center ECPR volume (two categories: < 30, and ≥ 30 cases; this categorization was adopted from a previous publication [26]) with multivariable logistic regression models as above and tested for a statistical interaction between percutaneous cannulation and center ECPR volume. P values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. All the analyses were performed with SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) and R 4.0.3 (the R Foundation, https://www.r-project.org/).

Results

Patient characteristics

Among 6432 adult patients receiving ECPR from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2019, 3575 patients met the study’s inclusion criteria (Fig. 1). Percutaneous cannulation was used in 2749 patients (77%), whereas surgical cannulation was used in 826 cases (23%). The proportion of patients undergoing percutaneous cannulation increased over time from 18% to 89% over the study period (p value for trend < 0.001) and has been higher than that of patients undergoing surgical cannulation since 2012 (Fig. 2). The baseline characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1. The median (IQR) age was 57 (45–66) years, the median (IQR) weight was 80 (70–98) kg, the median (IQR) BMI was 28 (24–33) kg/m2, and the majority of patients were white (61%) and were male (72%). The most common comorbid conditions were coronary artery disease (31%), obesity (23%), and hypertension (11%). CA of cardiac origin occurred in 2274 of 3575 (67%) patients, and OHCA occurred in 429 of 2017 (21%) patients. Three hundred and ninety-seven patients (14%) had an IABP placed before ECMO implantation, and 1228 (42%) patients required norepinephrine. The median (IQR) pH before cannulation was 7.14 (6.99–7.29). The median (IQR) ΔPaCO2 was −12(−31 to 0) mmHg, the median Rel∆CO2 was −26% (−48% to 0), and severe hyperoxemia was present in 658 of 2766 (24%) patients after the initiation of ECMO. Bilateral groin cannulation was performed in 1192 patients (33%), and distal limb cannula was used in 945 cases (26%). The median (IQR) time on VA-ECMO support was 3.0 (1.2–6.1) days. There was a significant difference between the percutaneous group and the surgical group in age, weight, BMI, race, hypertension, coronary artery disease, obesity, cardiac origin, baseline pH level, bilateral groin cannulation, and distal limb cannula placement (p < 0.05 for all).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram for selection of patients. ECPR extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, VA-ECMO venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, NC neurological complication

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Percentage of all adult patients undergoing percutaneous and surgical femoro-femoral extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) from 2008 to 2019

Full size image
Table 1 Baseline characteristics
Full size table

Primary outcome

The overall rate of severe neurological complication was 15%. Compared to patients undergoing surgical cannulation, patients undergoing percutaneous cannulation had lower unadjusted rate of severe neurological complication (13% vs 19%; p < 0.001; Table 2). After multivariable logistic regression modeling, percutaneous cannulation was independently associated with a lower risk of severe neurological complication (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.46–0.83; p = 0.002; Fig. 3). This association remained significant when the multivariable models were constructed with omitting pH (Additional file 1: Table S2), adding pre-ECMO support (Additional file 1: Table S3), adding the year of ECPR (Additional file 1: Table S4), or entering oxygenation variables (Additional file 1: Table S5). The association of percutaneous cannulation with lower rate of severe neurological complication remained consistent across most of evaluated subgroups (Fig. 4). There were no significant interactions between percutaneous cannulation and the variables that defined the subgroups.

Table 2 Outcomes
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Association of percutaneous cannulation and outcomes in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients. Data were adjusted for age, weight, sex, race, comorbid conditions, cardiac origin, bilateral femoral cannula, distal limb cannula use, pre-ECMO PH, VA-ECMO duration

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Association between percutaneous cannulation and severe neurological complication across prespecified subgroups. OHCA out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Full size image

Secondary outcomes

The overall in-hospital mortality was 74%. In-hospital mortality in the percutaneous group was similar with that in the surgical group (74% vs 72%; p = 0.257; Table 2). In multivariable logistic regression analyses, with adjustment for potential confounders, percutaneous cannulation was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.73–1.17; p = 0.522; Fig. 3). This association remained insignificant in sensitivity analyses (Additional file 1: Tables S2, S3 and S4). The association between percutaneous cannulation and in-hospital mortality remained fairly consistent across clinical subgroups (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Complications, including stroke, limb ischemia, cannulation site bleeding, systemic infection, respiratory tract infection, and renal failure requiring RRT, were common in both the percutaneous group and the surgical group. In multivariable logistic regression modeling, compared with surgical cannulation, percutaneous cannulation was associated with similar rates of stroke (OR 1.43; 95% CI 0.91–2.25; p = 0.125), limb ischemia (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.58–1.20; p = 0.341), cannulation site bleeding (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.66–1.22; p = 0.471), systemic infection (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.63–1.22; p = 0.435), respiratory tract infection (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.73–1.28; p = 0.793), and renal failure requiring RRT (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.76–1.17; p = 0.584; Fig. 3). These findings remained similar in sensitivity analyses (Additional file 1: Tables S2, S3 and S4). Associations between percutaneous cannulation and limb ischemia and cannulation site bleeding in prespecified subgroups are reported in Additional file 1: Figures S2 and S3, respectively.

Center percutaneous experience and ECPR volume

The median (IQR) volume of center percutaneous ECPR was 4(1–10) cases. Crude rate of severe neurological complication was similar across different levels of center percutaneous experience (< 5 cases, 18%; ≥ 5 cases, 14%; p = 0.052). In multivariable modeling, the association of percutaneous cannulation with lower rate of severe neurological complication was observed in both levels of center percutaneous experience (Additional file 1: Table S6), and there was no significant interaction between percutaneous cannulation and center percutaneous experience. Crude rate of severe neurological complication was similar across different levels of center ECPR volume (< 30 cases, 14%; ≥ 30 cases, 15%; p = 0.736). In multivariable modeling, the association of percutaneous cannulation with lower rate of severe neurological complication was only observed in centers with < 30 cases of ECPR (Additional file 1: Table S7), and there was no significant interaction between percutaneous cannulation and center ECPR volume. In centers with ≥ 5 cases of percutaneous ECPR or ≥ 30 cases of ECPR, percutaneous cannulation was also associated with a lower risk of limb ischemia (Additional file 1: Tables S6 and S7).

Discussion

To our knowledge, we report the largest, international, multicenter study comparing percutaneous cannulation to surgical cannulation in adults supported with femoro-femoral ECPR for CA. The main findings of our study are the following: (1) the proportion of patients undergoing percutaneous cannulation has increased exponentially over the past decade and has been higher than that of patients undergoing surgical cannulation since 2012. (2) Percutaneous cannulation was associated with a lower rate of severe neurological complication as compared to surgical cannulation. Older patients (age > 60 years) may benefit most from percutaneous cannulation. (3) Percutaneous cannulation was associated with similar rates of in-hospital mortality and other major complications. (4) The association of percutaneous cannulation and a lower risk of severe neurological complication was consistent across different levels of center percutaneous experience.

Percutaneous canulation use over time

Despite promising outcomes in patients with CA, the deployment of ECPR is time-sensitive, complex, and labor intensive, resulting in wide variability in cannulation timing, location, and technique [16]. Optimal cannulation technique is essential for ECPR initiation and outcome optimization. Percutaneous cannulation has been shown to be effectively performed by operators from many disciplines. In our study, approximately three-quarter of ECPR patients underwent percutaneous cannulation, and we found a substantial increase in the use of percutaneous cannulation over the past decade, consistent with reports from other observational studies [25, 27]. Advances in cannula designs and ultrasound machines has enabled the percutaneous technique to become more widespread in ECPR [28]. However, clinicians performing this technically challenging procedure must have the requisite training to develop the required skills, and sufficient volume of experience to maintain competency. The advantages of the percutaneous approach include the improved timeliness and the potentially decreased risks of bleeding and infection due to the snug fit of skin and subcutaneous tissue around the cannula. The major disadvantages are the inability to visually determine the appropriate size cannula and the potential for displacement of the needle or guidewire resulting in vessel injury or perforation. The advantages of the surgical approach include the direct visualization of the anatomy and the ability to properly size the cannula and ensure intraluminal placement. The disadvantages include the increased risk for surgical site bleeding and the need for surgical repair for decannulation. Despite the increasing use of the percutaneous approach, the availability of surgical support remains an important component in case of failed percutaneous access attempt.

Characteristics of patients undergoing percutaneous cannulation

Compared with surgical cannulation, percutaneous cannulation was more frequently used in patients with older age, with obesity, and with lower PH. This indicates that physicians prefer this approach in high-risk and sicker populations, potentially owing to the ready availability and minimal invasiveness of percutaneous cannulation at bedside [17]. In addition, percutaneous cannulation was less frequently used in Asian patients but more frequently used in White and Black patients, which could be explained by different levels of percutaneous experience across the included centers.

Percutaneous cannulation and severe neurological complication

Although recent data suggest a temporal trend toward improved survival rates in patients receiving ECPR, development of neurologic deficits is common and rate of survival with favorable neurologic outcome remains low [29, 30]. In the absence of studies evaluating the effect of percutaneous cannulation on neurologic outcome in ECPR, the most important finding of our study is the strong association of percutaneous cannulation with a lower rate of severe neurological complication in adult ECPR patients. This association might be explained by the potentially beneficial effect of percutaneous cannulation in CA patients treated with ECPR. With the appropriate use of ultrasound guidance, percutaneous canulation could be performed with a high rate of success and a reduced cannulation time, and a very short median VA-ECMO initiation time of 6 min was reported in a recent percutaneous ECPR study [31]; and low‑flow duration was subsequently shortened, which might be linked to better outcomes in patients undergoing ECPR [32, 33]. Unfortunately, we lack data on cannulation time or low‑flow time during ECPR to elucidate the mechanisms leading to improved neurologic outcome with percutaneous cannulation. Unexpectedly, stroke seemed to be more frequent in the percutaneous group as compared to the surgical group. After controlling for potential confounders, the association between percutaneous cannulation and stroke was insignificant. The association between percutaneous cannulation and a lower risk of stroke not observed in our study, likely due to unavailable imaging examinations or reporting bias.

The association of percutaneous cannulation with a lower risk of severe neurological complication consistent across most of evaluated subgroups. These included patients aged < 50 years vs patients aged 50–60 years vs patients aged > 60 years. We observed that patients aged > 60 years had substantially lower rates of severe neurological complication with percutaneous cannulation. Previous animal studies have indicated that old and young animals present different degrees of neuroinflammation and apoptosis reaction after brain ischemic damage [34]; old animals appear to have a reduced ability for brain cell survival [35]. Similarly, older patients might be at high risk of ischemic brain injury following ECPR and might be more likely to benefit from percutaneous cannulation owing to reduced low-flow times [33]. Although old age was associated with poor neurologic outcomes and hospital mortality, our finding suggested that percutaneous femoral ECPR might be a suitable treatment for older patients with refractory CA.

Percutaneous cannulation and mortality

In-hospital mortality in the overall study cohort was 74%, which was consistent with reports from other studies (66–76%). [1, 9] Since only 21% of the patients treated with ECPR for refractory OHCA, our results predominantly reflected discharge survival of IHCA cases. Compared with surgical cannulation, percutaneous cannulation was not associated with lower in-hospital mortality in the unadjusted as well as in the adjusted analyses, which differed from that in a recent propensity score-matched study by Danial et al. [24]. Although percutaneous cannulation significantly reduced the rate of neurological complication, it seemed not to translate into mortality reduction. Reasons for this observation will remain speculative. Our results could be explained by a variety of patient and center-specific factors, including reversibility of underlying aetiology, center ECPR experience, and quality of post-resuscitation care. However, these data were unavailable in the ELSO registry. Prospective studies are still needed to determine the effect of percutaneous cannulation on mortality in ECPR patients.

Percutaneous cannulation and ECMO complications

Despites advances in ECMO techniques, limb ischemia remained a common and serious complication of femoral arterial cannulation [36]. The rate of limb ischemia was low and comparable to those reported in earlier studies [24, 37]. The absence of increased risk of limb ischemia in percutaneous femoral ECPR wan another major finding in our study. This association between percutaneous cannulation and limb ischemia might be explained by systematic use of doppler ultrasound, optimal selection of cannula size, and prophylactic use of distal limb cannula [36, 38, 39]. Importantly, early recognition and prompt treatment usually results in favorable limb and patient outcomes. However, there is no standard of care regarding limb ischemia monitoring. Doppler ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy have been proposed to detect limb ischemia in this setting [36, 40]. Patients at high risk of limb ischemia (i.e., females, younger patients, patients with peripheral vascular disease, patients receiving high dose vasopressors) may particularly benefit from these tools.

We also did not observe any difference in the rate of cannulation site bleeding, which was consistent with the findings of the propensity score-matched study by Danial et al. [24]. Minimal invasiveness and appropriate use of ultrasound guidance might have decreased the rate of cannulation site bleeding [41]. In addition, percutaneous cannulation was associated with similar rates of systemic infection, respiratory tract infection, and renal failure requiring RRT, confirming the safety of percutaneous cannulation use in ECPR.

Center percutaneous experience

There was considerable variability in the center percutaneous experience across the included centers, ranging from 0 to 141 cases. After accounting for center percutaneous experience, percutaneous cannulation was also independently associated with lower rate of severe neurological complication as compared to surgical cannulation. However, the association of percutaneous cannulation with lower rate of severe neurological complication was not observed in high-volume centers. This finding was not surprising given that clinicians in high volume centers might be also experienced in surgical femoro-femoral ECPR. Unexpectedly, percutaneous cannulation was associated with a significantly decreased incidence of limb ischemia among centers with comparatively high level of percutaneous experience (≥ 5 cases) and had an interaction with center percutaneous experience, potentially suggesting centers that more frequently performed percutaneous cannulation might have better outcomes with this approach.

Study limitations

Our study’s strengths include the use of a large, international cohort of patients with CA and adjusted analyses to control for confounders in the evaluation of patients’ outcomes. However, this study has a number of important limitations. First, given its observational design, there is both residual and unmeasured confounding. For instance, data on low-flow time, cerebral performance category data, survivors’ neurological status, arterial cannula size, cannulation time, pre-ECMO lactate, and anticoagulation parameters were unavailable in the ELSO registry, which might have affected the results. Second, this population was mostly composed of IHCA cases. The usefulness of percutaneous cannulation for OHCA patients might have, therefore, been underestimated. Third, missing values for pre-ECMO pH and pre-ECMO support might limit the internal validity of our study. We attempted to mitigate this issue by repeating all logistic regression analyses by either omitting pH or including pre-ECMO support, and our results remined robust in these sensitivity analyses. Fourth, we were limited to analyzing complications collected in the ELSO registry, there were no data on vessel perforation or arterial dissection at canulation, failure of percutaneous cannulation, cannulation site infection, or vascular complications after decannulation, such as surgical revision for persistent bleeding and lower limb sensory-motor deficit. Finally, only in-hospital outcomes were available, precluding an analysis of longer term survival or functional outcomes. Future research should be directed toward determining the long-term benefits of percutaneous cannulation in adult ECPR patients.

Conclusions

In this large, multicenter, international registry of CA patients who received percutaneous or surgical cannulation for ECPR, percutaneous cannulation was associated with probable lower rate of severe neurological complication, and similar rates of in-hospital mortality, limb ischemia and cannulation site bleeding. Although the trend is in favor of the use of percutaneous cannulation for ECPR, clinicians should select the appropriate cannulation approach based on their experience.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ECPR:

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

VA-ECMO:

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

CA:

Cardiac arrest

IHCA:

In-hospital cardiac arrest

OHCA:

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

ELSO:

Extracorporeal Life Support Organization

ICD:

International Classification of Diseases

BMI:

Body mass index

ABG:

Arterial blood gas

RRT:

Renal replacement therapy

IABP:

Intra-aortic balloon pump

PVAD:

Percutaneous ventricular assist device

CNS:

Central nervous system

IQR:

Interquartile range

NC:

Neurological complication

References

  1. Abrams D, MacLaren G, Lorusso R, Price S, Yannopoulos D, Vercaemst L, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults: evidence and implications. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48(1):1–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tonna JE, Selzman CH, Girotra S, Presson AP, Thiagarajan RR, Becker LB, et al. Resuscitation using ECPR During In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (RESCUE-IHCA) mortality prediction score and external validation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15(3):237–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Abrams D, Combes A, Brodie D. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiopulmonary disease in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2769–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen YS, Yu HY, Huang SC, Lin JW, Chi NH, Wang CH, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support can extend the duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(9):2529–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thiagarajan RR, Brogan TV, Scheurer MA, Laussen PC, Rycus PT, Bratton SL. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to support cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(3):778–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Belohlavek J, Smalcova J, Rob D, Franek O, Smid O, Pokorna M, et al. Effect of intra-arrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and immediate invasive assessment and treatment on functional neurologic outcome in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;327(8):737–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lunz D, Calabrò L, Belliato M, Contri E, Broman LM, Scandroglio AM, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest: a retrospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(5):973–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bougouin W, Dumas F, Lamhaut L, Marijon E, Carli P, Combes A, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a registry study. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(21):1961–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen YS, Lin JW, Yu HY, Ko WJ, Jerng JS, Chang WT, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life-support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis. Lancet. 2008;372(9638):554–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakamoto T, Morimura N, Nagao K, Asai Y, Yokota H, Nara S, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective observational study. Resuscitation. 2014;85(6):762–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rob D, Smalcova J, Smid O, Kral A, Kovarnik T, Zemanek D, et al. Extracorporeal versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a secondary analysis of the Prague OHCA trial. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):330.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Patricio D, Peluso L, Brasseur A, Lheureux O, Belliato M, Vincent JL, et al. Comparison of extracorporeal and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a retrospective propensity score matched study. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lasa JJ, Rogers RS, Localio R, Shults J, Raymond T, Gaies M, et al. Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (E-CPR) during pediatric in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest is associated with improved survival to discharge: a report from the American Heart Association’s Get with the Guidelines-Resuscitation (GWTG-R) registry. Circulation. 2016;133(2):165–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sonneville R, Schmidt M. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adults with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: towards better neurological outcomes. Circulation. 2020;141(11):887–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mariscalco G, Salsano A, Fiore A, Dalén M, Ruggieri VG, Saeed D, et al. Peripheral versus central extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postcardiotomy shock: multicenter registry, systematic review, and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;160(5):1207-16.e44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Richardson ASC, Tonna JE, Nanjayya V, Nixon P, Abrams DC, Raman L, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults. Interim guideline consensus statement from the extracorporeal life support organization. ASAIO J. 2021;67(3):221–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eckman PM, Katz JN, El Banayosy A, Bohula EA, Sun B, van Diepen S. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock: an introduction for the busy clinician. Circulation. 2019;140(24):2019–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zimpfer D, Heinisch B, Czerny M, Hoelzenbein T, Taghavi S, Wolner E, et al. Late vascular complications after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(3):892–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang W, Guo W, Wang L. Research progress of survival predictive score in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue. 2022;34(2):211–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. DellaVolpe J, Barbaro RP, Cannon JW, Fan E, Greene WR, Gunnerson KJ, et al. Joint society of critical care medicine-extracorporeal life support organization task force position paper on the role of the intensivist in the initiation and management of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(6):838–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ganslmeier P, Philipp A, Rupprecht L, Diez C, Arlt M, Mueller T, et al. Percutaneous cannulation for extracorporeal life support. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;59(2):103–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Conrad SA, Grier LR, Scott LK, Green R, Jordan M. Percutaneous cannulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation by intensivists: a retrospective single-institution case series. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(5):1010–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Saiydoun G, Gall E, Boukantar M, Fiore A, Mongardon N, Masi P, et al. Percutaneous angio-guided versus surgical veno-arterial ECLS implantation in patients with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2022;170:92–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Danial P, Hajage D, Nguyen LS, Mastroianni C, Demondion P, Schmidt M, et al. Percutaneous versus surgical femoro-femoral veno-arterial ECMO: a propensity score matched study. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(12):2153–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang L, Yang F, Zhang S, Li C, Du Z, Rycus P, et al. Percutaneous versus surgical cannulation for femoro-femoral VA-ECMO in patients with cardiogenic shock: results from the extracorporeal life support organization registry. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022;41(4):470–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Barbaro RP, Odetola FO, Kidwell KM, Paden ML, Bartlett RH, Davis MM, et al. Association of hospital-level volume of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases and mortality. Analysis of the extracorporeal life support organization registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(8):894–901.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cairo SB, Arbuthnot M, Boomer L, Dingeldein MW, Feliz A, Gadepalli S, et al. Comparing percutaneous to open access for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in pediatric respiratory failure. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018;19(10):981–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Burrell AJC, Ihle JF, Pellegrino VA, Sheldrake J, Nixon PT. Cannulation technique: femoro-femoral. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(Suppl 5):S616–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Beyea MM, Tillmann BW, Iansavichene AE, Randhawa VK, Van Aarsen K, Nagpal AD. Neurologic outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation assisted CPR for resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a systematic review. Resuscitation. 2018;130:146–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Migdady I, Rice C, Deshpande A, Hernandez AV, Price C, Whitman GJ, et al. Brain injury and neurologic outcome in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(7):e611–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yannopoulos D, Bartos JA, Martin C, Raveendran G, Missov E, Conterato M, et al. Minnesota resuscitation consortium’s advanced perfusion and reperfusion cardiac life support strategy for out-of-hospital refractory ventricular fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(6):e003732.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ohbe H, Tagami T, Ogura T, Matsui H, Yasunaga H. Low-flow duration and outcomes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide inpatient database study. Crit Care Med. 2022;50(12):1768–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu HY, Wang CH, Chi NH, Huang SC, Chou HW, Chou NK, et al. Effect of interplay between age and low-flow duration on neurologic outcomes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(1):44–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Anuncibay-Soto B, Pérez-Rodríguez D, Llorente IL, Regueiro-Purriños M, Gonzalo-Orden JM, Fernández-López A. Age-dependent modifications in vascular adhesion molecules and apoptosis after 48-h reperfusion in a rat global cerebral ischemia model. Age (Dordr). 2014;36(5):9703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Llorente IL, Burgin TC, Pérez-Rodríguez D, Martínez-Villayandre B, Pérez-García CC, Fernández-López A. Unfolded protein response to global ischemia following 48 h of reperfusion in the rat brain: the effect of age and meloxicam. J Neurochem. 2013;127(5):701–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bonicolini E, Martucci G, Simons J, Raffa GM, Spina C, Lo Coco V, et al. Limb ischemia in peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a narrative review of incidence, prevention, monitoring, and treatment. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):266.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Grandin EW, Nunez JI, Willar B, Kennedy K, Rycus P, Tonna JE, et al. Mechanical left ventricular unloading in patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(13):1239–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Takayama H, Landes E, Truby L, Fujita K, Kirtane AJ, Mongero L, et al. Feasibility of smaller arterial cannulas in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(5):1428–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jia D, Yang IX, Ling RR, Syn N, Poon WH, Murughan K, et al. Vascular complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(12):e1269–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Steffen RJ, Sale S, Anandamurthy B, Cruz VB, Grady PM, Soltesz EG, et al. Using near-infrared spectroscopy to monitor lower extremities in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(5):1853–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sorrentino S, Nguyen P, Salerno N, Polimeni A, Sabatino J, Makris A, et al. Standard versus ultrasound-guided cannulation of the femoral artery in patients undergoing invasive procedures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):677.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank ChengCheng Shao, Shuo Wang, Junfeng Guo, Yao Hu, Jiawang Ma, and Shuai Zhang for their assistance in data collection.

Funding

This work was supported by the Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support (ZYLX202111, to X Hou), Beijing Hospitals Authority “Ascent Plan” (FDL20190601, to X Hou), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82100408, to X Hao), Beijing Nova Program (No. 2022064, to C Li), Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (2022QNRC001, to L Wang), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82200433, to L Wang), and Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Programme (QML20230602, to L Wang).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Liangshan Wang and Chenglong Li have contributed equally to this work and share co-first authorship.

  2. Feng Yang and Xiaotong Hou have contributed equally to this work and share co-corresponding authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Cardiac Intensive Care, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Liangshan Wang, Chenglong Li, Xin Hao, Hong Wang, Feng Yang & Xiaotong Hou

  2. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Peter Rycus

  3. Division of Emergency Medicine, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

    Joseph E. Tonna

  4. Department of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Peta Alexander

  5. Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Eddy Fan

Authors
  1. Liangshan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chenglong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xin Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Rycus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joseph E. Tonna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Peta Alexander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Eddy Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Feng Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xiaotong Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design: FY, LW, and XH. Analysis and interpretation: FY, LW, HW, CL, and EF. Drafting of the manuscript: FY, CL, and LW. Revision of the manuscript: FY, LW, CL, PT, JT PA, EF, and XH. All authors read and approved the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Feng Yang or Xiaotong Hou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee/review board of the Beijing Anzhen Hospital (2021020X). Informed consent for demographic, physiological and hospital-outcome data analyses was not obtained, because this observational study did not modify existing diagnostic or therapeutic strategies.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

There are no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

ELSO Registry Data Definitions of ECMO complications. Table S2. Sensitivity analyses for the association of percutaneous cannulation with outcomes removing pre-ECMO PH. Table S3. Sensitivity analyses for the association of percutaneous cannulation with outcomes adding pre-ECMO support. Table S4. Sensitivity analyses for the association of percutaneous cannulation with outcomes adding the year of ECPR. Table S5. Sensitivity Analyses for the association of percutaneous cannulation with severe neurological complications adding oxygenation variables. Table S6. Multivariable logistic regression model of percutaneous cannulation and outcomes stratified by center experience of percutaneous cannulation. Table S7. Multivariable logistic regression model of percutaneous cannulation and outcomes stratified by center ECPR volume. Figure S1. Association between percutaneous cannulation and in-hospital mortality across prespecified subgroups. Figure S2. Association between percutaneous cannulation and limb ischemia across prespecified subgroups. Figure S3. Association between percutaneous cannulation and cannulation site bleeding across prespecified subgroups.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Li, C., Hao, X. et al. Percutaneous cannulation is associated with lower rate of severe neurological complication in femoro-femoral ECPR: results from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. Ann. Intensive Care 13, 77 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01174-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-023-01174-1

Keywords