Skip to main content


  • Research
  • Open Access

Admission of tetanus patients to the ICU: a retrospective multicentre study

  • 1View ORCID ID profile,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 6,
  • 6,
  • 7,
  • 8,
  • 9,
  • 9,
  • 10,
  • 11,
  • 12,
  • 12,
  • 13,
  • 14,
  • 14,
  • 15,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Annals of Intensive Care20177:112

  • Received: 21 June 2017
  • Accepted: 25 October 2017
  • Published:



An extended course of tetanus (up to 6 weeks) requiring ICU admission and protracted mechanical ventilation (MV) may have a significant impact on short- and long-term survival. The subject is noteworthy and deserves to be discussed.


Twenty-two ICUs in France performed tetanus screenings on patients admitted between January 2000 and December 2014. Retrospective data were collected from hospital databases and through the registers of the town hall of the patients.


Seventy patients were included in 15 different ICUs. Sixty-three patients suffered from severe or very severe tetanus according to the Ablett classification. The median age was 80 years [interquartile range 73–84], and 86% of patients were women. Ninety per cent of patients (n = 63) required MV for a median of 36 days [26–46], and 66% required administration of a neuromuscular-blocking agent for 23 days [14–29]. A nosocomial infection occurred in 43 patients (61%). ICU and 1-year mortality rates were 14% (n = 10) and 16% (n = 11), respectively. Forty-five per cent of deaths occurred during the first week. Advanced age, a higher SAPS II, any infection, and the use of vasopressors were significantly associated with a lower number of days alive without ventilator support by day 90. Age was the only factor that significantly differed between deceased and survivors at 1 year (83 [81–85] vs. 79 [73–84] years, respectively; p = 0.03). Sixty-one per cent of survivors suffered no impairment to their functional status.


In a high-income country, tetanus mainly occurs in healthy elderly women. Despite prolonged MV and extended ICU length of stay, we observed a low 1-year mortality rate and good long-term functional status.


  • Tetanus
  • Intensive care unit
  • Outcome
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Elderly patient
  • Prognosis
  • Ventilators
  • Mechanical
  • Aged
  • Comorbidity


Tetanus is caused by the neurological effects of the toxin produced by Clostridium tetani. Although it is a completely preventable disease, tetanus remains responsible for around 60,000 deaths per year worldwide [1]. The blockage of neuromuscular transmission by the toxin causes painful muscle spasms and respiratory distress requiring ICU admission and mechanical ventilation (MV) in about 80% of patients [2]. Considering the long-lasting effect of the toxin, prolonged ventilation combined with sedation and neuromuscular blockade up to 6 weeks may be required [2, 3]. In developing countries, where access to high intensity care may be a challenge, the mortality rate of tetanus has risen to 50% for a mean age of 50 years with little improvement over time [4, 5, 6, 7].

Data about severe tetanus are scarce in high-income countries. In Australia, a net decrease in tetanus-related mortality was observed between 1957 and 1985 (from 44 to 5%), which likely reflects the implementation of intensive care medicine over these years [8]. In developed countries, the enduring incidence of tetanus is mainly due to a lack of vaccination coverage of the elderly [9, 10]. In the USA and France, people over 65 years old have a twice to ten times greater risk of becoming infected with tetanus compared to younger patients [11, 12]. Elderly patients admitted to the ICU may be faced with a particularly high risk of poor outcome. Indeed, in elderly patients admitted to the ICU for medical reasons and requiring prolonged length of stay and/or MV, ICU- and 1-year mortality rates up to 50 and 70% have been reported, respectively [13, 14].

Treating tetanus in developed countries undoubtedly carries the challenge of prolonged ICU care for a particularly at-risk population. This may have a major impact on short- and long-term survival, which has not been described in recent years. We therefore conducted a multicentre retrospective study on such patients in France, reporting both short-term and 1-year mortality and long-term functional status.

Patients and methods

Study design

A retrospective cohort of adult tetanus patients was created. The study was conducted in 22 French ICUs. Patients were identified using hospital-based medical and administrative as well as ICU databases in each centre. All adult patients admitted to the ICU for tetanus from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2014 were included.

Data collection

Data on patient hospitalisations were retrieved from local ICU databases and medical files. Demographic data were collected, including age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Knaus’ classification of functional limitation (ratings are A for no limitation, B for slight functional limitation, C for severe functional limitation, and D for bed-ridden patients) [15]. Severity of acute illness was recorded according the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) [16], the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II [17], and the Ablett classification of tetanus severity (mild for mild trismus, no dysphagia, and no respiratory involvement; moderate for moderate trismus, dysphagia, and moderate respiratory involvement; severe for generalised spasticity, severe respiratory involvement; and very severe when associated with autonomic disturbance involving the cardiovascular system) [18]. Data on the clinical presentation of tetanus included the presence of a wound, incubation time, time from symptom to admission to the ICU, status of vaccination protection, severity and extent of spasms (isolated trismus, localised spasm outside the jaw, dysphagia, generalised tetanus), and presence of an autonomic dysfunction. Autonomic dysfunction was defined by the report of labile blood pressure or heart rate, or ventricular arrhythmia in medical files [19]. Length of stay in ICU, mortality in ICU, duration of MV, use of vasopressors, renal replacement therapy (RRT), and nosocomial infections were recorded. Durations of the administration of neuromuscular-blocking agents and sedatives were registered. The use of magnesium and verapamil was recorded. Surgical treatment of the wound, antimicrobial therapy, and the use and dosage of human tetanus immunoglobulin (HTIg) were recorded.

Long-term outcome

Long-term survival outcome was obtained by consulting hospital databases and by consulting patient’s town hall registries. (The latter are used to record births and deaths, which is mandatory in France.) Last follow-up was determined depending on the date of inspecting town hall records and the day of admission into the ICU. Long-term functional status was defined using Knaus’ functional classification and the number of patients who required long-term care facilities. The functional status was retrieved from hospital medical records and general practitioners.

Statistical analysis

We performed analyses using the SPSS v15.0 statistical software package (IBM, New York, USA). Continuous variables were reported as medians with 25–75% percentiles (IQR). Categorical variables were reported as n and percentage. All parameters were tested for 1-year survival and for the number of days alive without ventilator support by day 90. Continuous data were compared using Student’s t test or the Mann–Whitney test, as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson’s Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used to evaluate mortality.


Fifteen ICUs identified 70 patients with tetanus over the study period. Baseline characteristics and clinical presentations of patients are provided in Table 1. Characteristics of tetanus are detailed in Table 2. Fifty-seven patients (81%) received antibiotic treatment (benzyl penicillin for 51 patients, metronidazole for 13, both antibiotics for 4, other regimen for 23) for a median duration of 7 days (IQR 7–10). Human tetanus immunoglobulin (HTIg) was used in the case of 57 patients (81%) after a median delay of 1 day after ICU admission, with a dose ranging from 250 to 5000 IU. None of the patients received verapamil to improve control of dysautonomia symptoms. Magnesium intravenous infusion was used in 23 patients for a median duration of 6 (IQR 2–14) days. Baclofen was used in 12 patients (17%), by intrathecal route in the case of 7 patients, for a median duration of 10 (IQR 4–12) days; all of them required MV. MV was performed in 63 patients (90%) for a median duration of 36 days (IQR 26–46; range 1–131). Continuous administration of a neuromuscular-blocking agent (NMBA) was used in 50 (71%) patients for a median duration of 23 days (IQR 14–29; range 1–39). Ninety-eight per cent (n = 61) of patients with severe or very severe tetanus were administered a continuous infusion of benzodiazepines for a median duration of 28 (IQR 19–34) days. Twenty-four patients (34%) required vasopressor support (only norepinephrine was used) for a median duration of 9 days (IQR 4–20; range 1–34). Two-thirds of patients underwent a tracheotomy (n = 46) after a median duration of 7 days (IQR 1–9; range 0–48) in the ICU. Median length of stay in the ICU and hospital was 41 days (IQR 24–53; range 1–117) and 51 days (IQR 32–69; range 1–178), respectively. Only one patient required RRT. Sixty-one per cent of patients (n = 43) developed a nosocomial infection with 12 bloodstream infections (4 central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections, 2 cases of ventilator acquired pneumonia (VAP) with bacteraemia, 1 sinusitis, 2 pyelonephritis, 3 primitive blood stream infection), 32 (51% of ventilated patients) VAPs (including the two with associated bloodstream infection), and 1 Clostridium difficile infection. The VAP rate was 15 episodes per 1000 ventilator days.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients


Median [IQ] (min–max) or number (%)


80 [73–84] (22–91)

Male sex

10 (14.3%)

Body mass index

24 [21–29]

Coexisting conditions

 Chronic heart failure

16 (23%)

 Chronic respiratory failure

4 (6%)

 Liver disease


 Chronic kidney disease

4 (6%)


10 (14%)


2 (3%)

 Active cancer

2 (3%)

Charlson Comorbidity Index

4 [3–5]

Knaus’ classification

 Knaus A

35 (50%)

 Knaus B

35 (50%)

 Knaus C or D


SAPS II upon ICU admission

33 [26–41]

SOFA upon ICU admission

1 [0–3]

Table 2

Characteristics of tetanus and specific management


Median [IQ] or number (%)

Status of protection

 No vaccination

26 (37%)

 Vaccination > 10 years

18 (26%)

 No information

26 (37%)


67 (96%)

 Gardening wound

31 (44%)

Incubation time

10 [8–14]

Time from symptoms to admission

2 [1–3]

Ablett classification


2 (3%)


5 (7%)


29 (41%)

 Very severe

34 (49%)


70 (100%)

Localised spasm

34 (49%)


46 (66%)

Generalised tetanus

39 (56%)

Autonomic dysfunction

40 (57%)

 Blood pressure instability

29 (41%)

 Heart rate instability

17 (24%)

 Ventricular arrhythmia

4 (6%)

ICU, 90-day, and 1-year mortality rates were 14% (n = 10), 13% (n = 9), and 16% (n = 11), respectively (see Fig. 1). The ICU mortality rate was higher than the 90-day survival rate due to one late death in the ICU of a patient at day 109. It is noteworthy that patients who did not receive MV had a mortality rate of 0% with a median length of stay in the ICU of 5 days (IQR 3–9; range 1–15), with all of them suffering from isolated cephalic tetanus. (Two patients had mild and five had moderate tetanus according to the Ablett classification.) Mortality status at 5 years was known for 57 patients (81%), among whom 36 (61% of the 57) were alive. Nearly half of the deaths that occurred during the first year occurred within the first week (n = 5). Four of these early deaths were caused by ventricular arrhythmia, possibly as a manifestation of autonomic dysfunction. Three patients died during the first 90 days in the ICU following the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, two patients died due to nosocomial infections, and one patient died after being discharged. None of the deaths could be attributed to delayed intubation resulting in hypoxic cardiac arrest. Among the survivors at last follow-up (n = 38), the health status according to Knaus’ classification was known for 95% of them, after a median duration of 1385 [302–3096] days. Sixty-one per cent of these survivors had no impairment of their functional status. Seventeen per cent (n = 6) of patients initially classified as Knaus A before ICU admission evolved to Knaus B (the same number was observed for Knaus B patients evolving to Knaus C) and 5% (n = 2) of Knaus A patients evolved to Knaus C. Only six patients (17% of survivors with a known functional status) required admission to a long-term care facility.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Kaplan–Meier curve for cumulative survival.
Survival data are censored at one year. No patient was lost to follow-up at one year

Age was the only factor that significantly differed between deceased and survivors at 1 year (83 [81–85] vs. 79 [73–84] years, respectively; p = 0.03). Advanced age, higher SAPS II (above the median of 33), any infection, bloodstream infection, VAP, and the use of vasopressors were significantly associated with a lower number of days alive without ventilator support by day 90 (see Table 3).
Table 3

Factors significantly associated with the number of days alive without ventilator support by day 90


Number of days alive without ventilator support by day 90. Median [interquartile range]

p value

Age (years)

 ≥ 80

43 [0–57]


 < 80

53 [45–59]



 ≥ 34

44 [22–54]


 < 34

57 [43–63]

Any infection


45 [27–57]



60 [48–71]

Bloodstream infection


42 [6–51]



54 [36–52]

Ventilator acquired pneumonia


42 [19–57]



55 [47–63]

Vasopressor use


43 [0–57]

< 0.05


53 [42–62]

aParameter dichotomised at median value


Epidemiology of tetanus in developed countries

In this study, tetanus mainly occurred in elderly patients (75% of patients were older than 73, median age 80 years), which is consistent with previous Italian and French studies reporting a median age of 76 years or 86% of patients being 70 years old or over, respectively [12, 20]. This is in contrast with US reports, which involved younger patients (median age of 49 years) [11]. The description of tetanus in injection drug users in the US [11] may explain part of these differences given that in our study a gardening wound was the main portal of entry in our patients. Women are a particular at-risk population (86% of tetanus patients in this study and 68% in Italy). It may be hypothesised that mandatory vaccination during compulsory military service for men provides them with long-lasting immunisation [20].

Controlling muscle spasms and autonomic dysfunction

Several treatments have been tested to control autonomic instability and muscle spasm and to hasten recovery. Despite little evidence, benzodiazepines remain the main treatment regimen for tetanus spasms [21]. Benzodiazepines in continuous infusion were used in all severe or very severe tetanus patients except one, while NMBAs were required in the majority of cases. Baclofen was used only marginally. Baclofen has the potential to relieve muscle spasms and may reduce the need for ventilation; however, evidence in favour of baclofen use is limited to case studies with conflicting results [22]. Severe autonomic dysfunction, and in particular early-onset ventricular arrhythmia, was responsible for 36% of deaths is this study; this percentage is commonly reported in tetanus studies [4, 23, 24]. The pathophysiological link between ventricular arrhythmia and tetanus toxin is still unclear. Verapamil and magnesium have been suggested as a prevention method. None of our patients received verapamil, while one-third of patients received magnesium treatment. We did not observe any association between magnesium use and outcome; however, this study was not designed to draw conclusions on this hypothesis. As shown by Thwaites et al. [2], magnesium may reduce autonomic dysfunction thanks to its calcium-antagonist properties [25]; however, no benefits for mortality were observed in our study, which is consistent with a recent meta-analysis [25].

Neutralisation of toxin, antibiotic, and wound management

HTIg was used in more than 80% of patients, with no difference in outcome between the patients who received HTIg treatment and those who did not (data not shown). HTIg is conventionally recommended in tetanus to bind the unbound toxin in serum, which has been demonstrated in 10% of serum samples [26]. Notably, none of the patients in this study received HTIg by intrathecal route, while previous uncontrolled studies showed an association between this route of administration and reduced mortality [27]. More recently, the benefits of intrathecal route combined with intramuscular HTIg were assessed in a randomised study and only a reduction in hospital stay was observed [28]. Antimicrobial therapy probably plays a minor role in tetanus but is conventionally recommended to halt the toxin’s production [21, 29]. No difference was observed in this study between patients treated with penicillin, metronidazole, or other regimens (data not shown). The first study that compared penicillin to metronidazole found a greater reduction in mortality in the metronidazole group [30]; however, more recent studies, including a randomised study, did not show any difference between these treatments [4, 31]. Penicillin and metronidazole are therefore equally recommended. Wound debridement, which can eradicate persistent spores of C. tetani, was only performed in 16% of cases. It is likely that in a context of a rare disease with severe symptoms, the portal of entry (sometimes a very small one) did not appear as a priority. However, persistence of C. tetani in the wound has been described despite antimicrobial therapy, and wound debridement therefore seems essential to haste the eradication of the bacteria [32].

Prolonged mechanical ventilation and elderly patients

Most patients in our study required prolonged mechanical ventilation. Most of them were elderly (median age 80 years), but all had no or only slight functional limitation and a low burden of comorbidities as measured by Knaus’ classification and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Indeed, a gardening wound was identified in about half of the cases, thereby selecting a population of “healthy elderly”. Despite a strikingly high duration of MV with frequent requirement for tracheotomy and a long ICU length of stay, ICU and 1-year survival were excellent, at 86 and 84%, respectively. The increasing number of elderly patients in the ICU, combined with concerns regarding their high mortality rate and uncertainty regarding the functional outcome, fuelled a continuous debate about the benefits of their admission [13, 3338]. A recent study by Moitra showed that higher duration of MV and length of stay in the ICU were almost linearly correlated with outcome [13]. In sharp contrast with this late study, the very low rate of comorbidities in our population combined with a completely reversible disease may explain the very low ICU and 1-year mortality rate in our study [13, 14]. Finally, our study confirms and builds on a study performed in Italy that showed a 16.5% hospital mortality rate for tetanus patients in a population with a median age of 76 years [20]. Further comparison with this study is limited by the lack of any ICU data and a known outcome for only 43.9% of patients.

Outcome of tetanus in high-income countries

The low mortality rate observed in our patients (16% 1-year mortality) in comparison with low-income countries likely reflects the availability of high-cost ICU facilities [8]. These are essential for managing prolonged MV, paralysing agents, autonomic dysfunction, and the high rate of infectious complications. Indeed, the mortality rate of severe tetanus patients remains between 30 and 50% in low-income countries [4, 5, 6], which is consistent with the mortality rate of tetanus before the implementation of ICUs [39] in Europe. A study in the 1970s reported a mortality rate of only 11% in England [40].


Our study presents certain limitations. The main concern is the lack of detailed information regarding the long-term functional status of survivors. Indeed, we could not assess it precisely due to the study’s design. However, the functionality score according to Knaus’ classification was known for 95% of survivors, with 61% of them suffering no loss of autonomy. Moreover, only six patients required admission to a long-term care facility. Another limitation is that we could not include tetanus patients subject to a Do-Not-Resuscitate order that would have prevented ICU admission, or patients who suffered hypoxic cardiac arrest before ICU admission. Finally, due to the incompleteness of most medical reports, we could not establish accurately the processes or indications that lead the physicians to intubate, start NMBA treatment or perform a tracheotomy.


Tetanus in France occurs mainly in healthy elderly patients, especially women. In this population, despite prolonged MV with frequent NMBA use as well as extended ICU length of stay, we observed a low mortality rate and a good long-term functional status.



human tetanus immunoglobulin


intensive care unit


mechanical ventilation


neuromuscular-blocking agent


renal replacement therapy


Simplified Acute Physiology Score II


Sequential Organ Failure Assessment


ventilator-associated pneumonia


Authors’ contributions

RM, TR, and NL drafted the manuscript. All authors participated in collecting data for the study and then read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data analysed as part of the study are included.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Angers University Hospital (No. 2015/23)



Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Département de réanimation médicale et médecine hyperbare, CHU Angers et faculté de santé Angers, 49933 Angers, France
Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, CHU Rennes, 35033 Rennes, France
Service de Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Poitiers, 2, rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France
Département d’anesthésie-réanimation, LUNAM université, université d’Angers, CHU d’Angers, 49933 Angers, France
Service de réanimation, Centre hospitalier Bretagne Atlantique, 56017 Vannes Cedex, France
Medical Intensive Care Unit, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
Medical-surgical ICU, Hospital of Saint-Brieuc, 10 rue Marcel Proust, 22000 Saint-Brieuc, France
Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Tours, 37044 Tours, France
Service de Réanimation Médicale, CHRU Nancy, Hôpital Central, Nancy, France
Medical-Surgical ICU, Saint-Etienne University Hospital, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
Medical intensive care unit, Nantes academic hospital, Nantes university, Nantes, France
Intensive Care Medicine, CHU de Grenoble, BP 218, 38043 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
Service de Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier-Universitaire, Nice, France
Service de Réanimation Médicale, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, Strasbourg, France
Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France


  1. GBD 2015 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1459–544.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Thwaites CL, Yen LM, Loan HT, Thuy TTD, Thwaites GE, Stepniewska K, et al. Magnesium sulphate for treatment of severe tetanus: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;368:1436–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. da Nóbrega MVD, Reis RC, Aguiar ICV, Queiroz TV, Lima ACF, Pereira EDB, et al. Patients with severe accidental tetanus admitted to an intensive care unit in Northeastern Brazil: clinical–epidemiological profile and risk factors for mortality. Braz J Infect Dis. 2016;20:457–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Saltoglu N, Tasova Y, Midikli D, Burgut R, Dündar IH. Prognostic factors affecting deaths from adult tetanus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:229–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chalya PL, Mabula JB, Dass RM, Mbelenge N, Mshana SE, Gilyoma JM. Ten-year experiences with Tetanus at a Tertiary hospital in Northwestern Tanzania: a retrospective review of 102 cases. World J Emerg Surg WJES. 2011;6:20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Tosun S, Batirel A, Oluk AI, Aksoy F, Puca E, Bénézit F, et al. Tetanus in adults: results of the multicenter ID-IRI study. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2017;36:1455–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Brauner JS, Vieira SRR, Bleck TP. Changes in severe accidental tetanus mortality in the ICU during two decades in Brazil. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:930–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilligan JEF, Lawrence JR, Clayton D, Rowland R. Tetanus and the evolution of intensive care in Australia. Crit Care Resusc J Australas Acad Crit Care Med. 2012;14:316–23.Google Scholar
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Tetanus and pertussis vaccination coverage rates among adults aged > 18 years—United States, 1999 and 2008. MMWR. 2010;59:1302–6.Google Scholar
  10. La Gergely A. couverture vaccinale contre le tétanos, la poliomyélite et la diphtérie en 2006 dans une population âgée francilienne. Bull Epidémiol Hebd. 2008;9:61–4.Google Scholar
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Tetanus surveillance—United States, 2001–2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:365–9.Google Scholar
  12. Antona D. Le tétanos en France en 2008–2011. Saint-Maurice: Institut de veille sanitaire. Bull Epidemiol Hebd. 2012;26:303–6.Google Scholar
  13. Moitra VK, Guerra C, Linde-Zwirble WT, Wunsch H. Relationship between ICU length of stay and long-term mortality for elderly ICU survivors. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:655–62.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Roch A, Wiramus S, Pauly V, Forel J-M, Guervilly C, Gainnier M, et al. Long-term outcome in medical patients aged 80 or over following admission to an intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2011;15:R36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Lawrence DE. APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med. 1981;9:591–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993;270:2957–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ablett J. Analysis and main experiences in 82 patients treated in the Leeds Tetanus Unit. In: Ellis M, editors, Symposium on Tetanus in Great Britain. Leeds General Infirmary; 1967. p. 1–10.Google Scholar
  19. Kerr JH, Corbett JL, Spalding JM. Sympathetic overactivity in severe tetanus. Proc R Soc Med. 1969;62:659–62.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Filia A, Bella A, von Hunolstein C, Pinto A, Alfarone G, Declich S, et al. Tetanus in Italy 2001–2010: a continuing threat in older adults. Vaccine. 2014;32:639–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rodrigo C, Fernando D, Rajapakse S. Pharmacological management of tetanus: an evidence-based review. Crit Care. 2014;18:217.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Müller H, Börner U, Zierski J, Hempelmann G. Intrathecal baclofen for treatment of tetanus-induced spasticity. Anesthesiology. 1987;66:76–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Thwaites CL, Yen LM, Glover C, Tuan PQ, Nga NTN, Parry J, et al. Predicting the clinical outcome of tetanus: the tetanus severity score. Trop Med Int Health TM IH. 2006;11:279–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Phillips LA. A classification of tetanus. Lancet. 1967;1:1216–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rodrigo C, Samarakoon L, Fernando SD, Rajapakse S. A meta-analysis of magnesium for tetanus. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:1370–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Veronose R. Tetanus: important new concepts. Excerpta Medica. 1981; p. 183.Google Scholar
  27. Sun KO, Chan YW, Cheung RT, So PC, Yu YL, Li PC. Management of tetanus: a review of 18 cases. J R Soc Med. 1994;87:135–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. de Miranda-Filho D, De Alencar Ximenes RA, Barone AA, Vaz VL, Vieira AG, Albuquerque VMG. Randomised controlled trial of tetanus treatment with antitetanus immunoglobulin by the intrathecal or intramuscular route. BMJ. 2004;328:615.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Afshar M, Raju M, Ansell D, Bleck TP. Narrative review: tetanus-a health threat after natural disasters in developing countries. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:329–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ahmadsyah I, Salim A. Treatment of tetanus: an open study to compare the efficacy of procaine penicillin and metronidazole. Br Med J Clin Res Ed. 1985;291:648–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Ganesh Kumar AV, Kothari VM, Krishnan A, Karnad DR. Benzathine penicillin, metronidazole and benzyl penicillin in the treatment of tetanus: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2004;98:59–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Campbell JI, Lam TMY, Huynh TL, To SD, Tran TTN, Nguyen VMH, et al. Microbiologic characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium tetani isolated from wounds of patients with clinically diagnosed tetanus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:827–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Heyland D, Cook D, Bagshaw SM, Garland A, Stelfox HT, Mehta S, et al. The very elderly admitted to ICU: a quality finish? Crit Care Med. 2015;43:1352–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ely EW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, Ancukiewicz M, Steinberg KP, Bernard GR. Recovery rate and prognosis in older persons who develop acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:25–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Moss M. The effect of age on the development and outcome of adult sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:15–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Orwelius L, Nordlund A, Nordlund P, Simonsson E, Bäckman C, Samuelsson A, et al. Pre-existing disease: the most important factor for health related quality of life long-term after critical illness: a prospective, longitudinal, multicentre trial. Crit Care. 2010;14:R67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Zivot JB. Elderly patients in the ICU: worth it or not? Crit Care Med. 2016;44:842–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sjoding MW, Prescott HC, Wunsch H, Iwashyna TJ, Cooke CR. Longitudinal changes in ICU admissions among elderly patients in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:1353–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Trujillo MH, Castillo A, España J, Manzo A, Zerpa R. Impact of intensive care management on the prognosis of tetanus. Analysis of 641 cases. Chest. 1987;92:63–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Edmondson RS, Flowers MW. Intensive care in tetanus: management, complications, and mortality in 100 cases. Br Med J. 1979;1:1401–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2017