Skip to main content

Table 3 Estimated differences and 95% confidence intervals for CI, GEDVI and EVLWI in each setting between time points and between catheter locations

From: Sustained low efficiency dialysis should not be interrupted for performing transpulmonary thermodilution measurements

Outcome measurement

Comparison

Estimated difference (95% CI)

P value

CI (L/min/m2)

HDP versus HDO

2.0 (1.9, 2.2)

< 0.001

 

HDP versus HDT

1.7 (1.5, 1.9)

< 0.001

 

HDT versus HDO

0.4 (0.2, 0.6)

< 0.001

 

IVC versus SVC

− 0.1 (− 1.2, 1.0)

0.879

GEDVI (mL/m2)

HDP versus HDO

470.0 (431.1, 508.9)

< 0.001

 

HDP versus HDT

452.1 (400.0, 504.2)

< 0.001

 

HDT versus HDO

17.8 (− 34.0, 69.7)

0.500

 

IVC versus SVC

− 207.9 (− 430.3, 14.4)

0.065

EVLWI (mL/kg)

HDP versus HDO

− 2.5 (− 2.9, − 2.2)

< 0.001

 

HDP versus HDT

− 3.1 (− 3.6, − 2.6)

< 0.001

 

HDT versus HDO

0.5 (0.0, 1.0)

0.038

 

IVC versus SVC

− 0.2 (− 3.9, 3.5)

0.904

 

HDO (SVC/IVC)

HDP (SVC/IVC)

HDT (SVC/IVC)

CI

Mean

3.08/3.19

5.26/4.46

3.27/3.79

SD

0.21/0.22

0.32/0.34

0.25/0.36

CV [%]

7/7

6/8

8/9

CE [%]

4/4

4/4

4/5

Precision [%]

8/8

7/9

9/11

LSC [%]

11/11

10/12

12/15

GEDVI

Mean

758/606

1286/866

743/641

SD

37/55

87/89

44/43

CV [%]

5/9

7/10

6/7

CE [%]

3/5

4/6

3/4

Precision [%]

6/10

8/12

7/8

LSC [%]

8/15

10/16

10/11

EVLWI

Mean

11/10

8/9

11/11

SD

0.9/0.62

0.63/0.41

1.45/1.2

CV [%]

8/6

8/5

13/11

CE [%]

5/4

5/3

8/6

Precision [%]

9/7

9/5

15/13

LSC [%]

13/10

13/7

21/17