Skip to main content
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Open access
  • Published:

Animal ICU… Why not also use the existing veterinary ICUs?

To the editor,

We have read with interest the article published recently in the journal by Guillon et al. “Preclinical septic shock research: why we need an animal ICU” [1]. The authors review the limitations of current animal models in septic shock especially the lack of heterogeneity and comorbidities, and argue the need to develop animal intensive care unit (ICU) to better reflect the reality of human management.

We agree with the authors that rodents poorly reflect human conditions, and that financial and ethical issues are the main limitations to perform experiments in larger species. However, another way to explore therapies in sepsis, which was not mentioned by the authors, is the use of clinical models (in particular canine and feline) treated in existing veterinary ICUs. Our young research unit “Agressions Pulmonaires et Circulatoires dans le Sepsis” (APCSe) is composed of veterinary and medical physicians, and we have a platform for ovine and porcine experiments where we are able to reproduce ICU conditions for large-animal preclinical models [2, 3]. We also have access to a veterinary ICU at the veterinary school in Lyon (VetAgro Sup) where dogs and cats are treated for severe sepsis. For example, we previously explored hemodiafiltration [4] or hemostatic disorders in dogs suffering from multiple organ failure due to leptospirosis [5]. This approach provides solutions to the limitations highlighted by the authors: different weights, different ages and not only two conditions (alive or dead), but also animals having received organ support for several days (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Example of a dog treated for multiple organ failure secondary to leptospirosis infection in the veterinary intensive care unit

Another point is that this partnership allows not only to do translational research from animal to human, but also to implement methods used in human medicine to the veterinary ICU; for instance, recently, we introduced the use of high-flow nasal cannula in the veterinary ICU to treat respiratory failure due to viral or bacterial infections in dogs and cats (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Example of a dog treated with high-flow nasal cannula because of septic respiratory failure

In conclusion, animal ICU is probably the next step for research but we believe also that the future is the pooling of veterinary and medical expertise to perform research that will benefit both humans and animals in the ICU which is the “one health” concept.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



intensive care unit


  1. Guillon A, Preau S, Aboab J, Azabou E, Jung B, Silva S, et al. Preclinical septic shock research: why we need an animal ICU. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9:66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vassal O, Bonnet J-M, Barthelemy A, Allaouchiche B, Goy-thollot I, Louzier V, et al. Renal effects of amino acids. Acta Anaesth Scand. 2015;59:598–608.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pouzot-Nevoret C, Magnin M, Ayoub J-Y, Bourguignon L, Maire P, Wertz D, et al. Evaluation of haemodialysis as a protective technique for preventing high daily dose amikacin nephrotoxicity: an experimental study in an ovine model. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;50:148–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cambournac M, Goy-Thollot I, Guillaumin J, Ayoub J-Y, Pouzot-Nevoret C, Barthélemy A, et al. Acute kidney injury management using intermittent low efficiency haemodiafiltration in a critical care unit: 39 dogs (2012–2015). Acta Vet Scand. 2019;61:17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barthélemy A, Magnin M, Pouzot-Nevoret C, Bonnet-Garin J-M, Hugonnard M, Goy-Thollot I. Hemorrhagic, hemostatic, and thromboelastometric disorders in 35 dogs with a clinical diagnosis of leptospirosis: a prospective study. J Vet Intern Med. 2017;31:69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Philip Robinson (DRCI, Hospices Civils de Lyon) for revision of the manuscript.



Author information

Authors and Affiliations



FB drafted the manuscript. FB, CP-N, VL, IG-T, AB, SJ, J-MB-G, BA corrected the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florent Baudin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baudin, F., Pouzot-Nevoret, C., Louzier, V. et al. Animal ICU… Why not also use the existing veterinary ICUs?. Ann. Intensive Care 9, 93 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: