Skip to main content

Advertisement

Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care Cover Image
We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.
Download PDF

Use of ultrasound-measured internal jugular vein collapsibility index to determine static intracardiac pressures in patients with presumed pulmonary hypertension

Annals of Intensive Care volume 9, Article number: 124 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Bedside ultrasound helps to estimate volume status in critically ill patients and has traditionally relied on diameter, respiratory variation, and collapsibility of the inferior vena cava (IVC) to reflect fluid status. We evaluated collapsibility of the internal jugular vein (IJ) with ultrasound and correlated it with concomitant right heart catheterization (RHC) measurements in patients with presumed pulmonary hypertension.

Methods and results

We studied 71 patients undergoing RHC for evaluation of pulmonary hypertension. Using two-dimensional ultrasound (Sonosite, Washington, USA), we measured the diameter of the IJ at rest, during respiratory variation, and during manual compression. Collapsibility index during respiration (respiratory CI) and during manual compression (compression CI) was calculated. We correlated mean right atrial pressure (mRAP) and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) defined by RHC measurements with respiratory and compression CI. A secondary goal was examining correlations between CI calculations and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. Baseline characteristics demonstrated female predominance (n = 51; 71.8%), mean age 59.5 years, and BMI 27.3. There were significant correlations between decrease in compression CI and increase in both mRAP (Spearman: − 0.43; p value = 0.0002) and PAOP (Spearman: − 0.35; p value = 0.0027). In contrast, there was no significant correlation between respiratory CI and either mRAP (Spearman: − 0.14; p value = 0.35) or PAOP (Spearman:− 0.12; p value = 0.31). We also observed significant negative correlation between compression CI and BNP (Spearman: − 0.31; p value = 0.01) but not between respiratory CI and BNP (Spearman: − 0.12; p value = 0.35).

Conclusion

Increasing use of ultrasound has led to innovative techniques for estimating volume status. While prior ultrasound studies have used clinical parameters to estimate fluid status, our study used RHC measurements and demonstrated that compression CI potentially reflects directly measured mRAP and PAOP.

Background

Currently, precise determination of cardiac filling pressures and biventricular volume status requires invasive monitoring with a pulmonary artery catheter. Ultrasonography of the inferior vena cava (IVC) can non-invasively estimate the mean right atrial pressure (mRAP), but it can be misleading and limited, especially among critically ill patients or if visualization of the IVC is suboptimal [1, 2]. Despite these limitations, bedside ultrasound has become a versatile modality for assessing volume status in critically ill patients using measurements such as diameter, variation with respiration, and overall collapsibility of the IVC [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Recently, ultrasound characterization of the internal jugular vein (IJ), specifically diameter and cross-sectional area, has been shown to correlate with and predict central venous pressure (CVP) [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Furthermore, these IJ measurements are comparable and at times superior to IVC measurements [16]. However, no studies have correlated IJ ultrasonography with invasively measured hemodynamics. The aim of the current study was to correlate measurements of the IJ by bedside ultrasound with measurements obtained during concomitant right heart catheterization (RHC).

Methods

Study design and patient selection

We conducted a prospective study of 71 consecutive patients undergoing RHC as part of routine evaluation for pulmonary hypertension (PH) at Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Boston University Medical Center and the requirement for informed consent was waived.

Data extraction: ultrasound measurements

Clinical and laboratory data were collected for all patients before and during the procedure. Collected data from the electronic medical record included past medical history and laboratory tests. Procedural data included ultrasound measurements and RHC measurements (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Study Design

Full size image

RHC was performed in a fluoroscopy-equipped catheterization laboratory with patients positioned at the level of their respiratory comfort; 62 (87.3%) participants were supine for the entirety of the procedure. Using a bedside two-dimensional ultrasound (Sonosite, Washington, USA), the diameter of the IJ at rest, during respiratory variation (inspiration and expiration), and during manual compression (measured at 2 cm of depth from the skin) was measured. All ultrasound measurements were completed prior to the RHC. Trained Pulmonary/Critical Care physicians with certification to complete central venous and pulmonary artery catheterizations performed the ultrasound measurements and the subsequent RHC.

IJ measurements were recorded with the linear transducer probe. The IJ was visualized by placing the ultrasound transducer perpendicular to the skin in the transverse plane at a level just above the clavicle. The IJ was identified by compression as well as by color Doppler imaging and Pulse Wave Doppler. Sufficient ultrasound gel was used to prevent direct skin contact with the transducer, helping to limit the amount of pressure applied and avoid significant influence of external compression on the IJ diameter at rest [7]. Measurements were obtained by an M-mode scan on the ultrasound device. The maximum anterior–posterior diameter of the IJ was measured at rest followed by variations during the respiratory cycle, where the patient was asked to take a deep breath in, breathe out, and then hold their breath at the end of expiration for one second. Subsequently, minimal pressure (measured via ruler at 2 cm of depth from the superficial skin) via the transducer was applied on the IJ to induce extrinsic manual compression (Fig. 2). The antero-posterior diameter of the IJ was then re-measured. Accuracy of the measurements was based on agreement between the operator and the supervising physician (HWF for all patients). The collapsibility index of respiratory variation (respiratory CI) and the collapsibility index of manual extrinsic compression (compression CI) were computed using the following calculation: (maximum diameter − minimum diameter)/maximum diameter.

Fig. 2
figure2

Schematic representation of ultrasound findings in Short-axis and M-mode. 2-cm manual compression of the IJ is noted on the right panel of the figure. IJ internal jugular vein, CA carotid artery, Max maximum, D diameter, Min minimum

Full size image

Data extraction: RHC measurements

Following the ultrasound measurements, RHC was performed using best practice guidelines established by the European Respiratory Society (ERS) [17]. RHC measurements included right atrial systolic, diastolic, and mean pressures (mRAP); systolic, diastolic, and end diastolic right ventricular pressures (RVSP, RVDP, RVEDP, respectively); systolic, diastolic, and mean pulmonary artery pressures (PASP, PADP, mPAP, respectively); pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP). Cardiac output by both thermodilution (TD) and Fick methods. Cardiac index, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were calculated in standard fashion.

Study outcomes

The primary outcome of the study was the correlation between respiratory CI, compression CI, and volume status defined by the RHC measurements. Additionally, we evaluated the correlation between respiratory CI, compression CI, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, measured pre-procedurally.

Statistical analysis

Summary statistics are reported on all variables including n (%) for categorical and mean ± standard deviation for continuous measures. Spearman correlations were used to quantify the linear relationship between continuous measures. All analyses were performed using SAS v9.4 with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

The study included 71 consecutive patients. Baseline characteristics demonstrated female predominance (n = 51; 71.8%), mean age of 59.5 years, and a BMI of 27.3 (Table 1). Prominent co-morbidities included congestive heart failure (n = 32; 45.1%) and interstitial lung disease (n = 30; 42.3%). By RHC, 35 patients (49.3%) were diagnosed with Group 1 PH (pulmonary arterial hypertension; PAH) and 7 patients (9.9%) did not have PH; the remaining 29 patients were diagnosed with Groups 2–5 PH. The mean BNP level within 6 months prior to the RHC was 567.6 pg/mL.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients undergoing right heart catheterization and pre-procedural bedside ultrasound
Full size table

Prior to RHC, ultrasound measurements of IJ maximum diameter at rest, during inspiration, and during manual extrinsic compression were obtained (Table 2). IJ measurements of the right (n = 68; 95.8%) and left (n = 3; 4.2%) sides were obtained. Mean IJ diameter at rest was 1.17 cm, at inspiratory breath hold was 1.39 cm, and 0.73 cm with external compression. Calculated respiratory CI was 16.2% and compression CI was 40.0%.

Table 2 Bedside ultrasound measurements of internal jugular vein
Full size table

Mean measurements obtained by RHC in this cohort were: mRAP 6.4 mmHg, RVEDP 8.5 mmHg, mPAP 35.3 mmHg, and PAOP 10.0 mmHg (Table 3). The average cardiac output was 5.39 L/min by TD and 5.16 L/min by Fick. The average cardiac index was 3.03 L/min/m2 by TD and 2.86 L/min/m2 by Fick. PVR was 482.3 dynes/sec/cm−5 by TD and 512.1 dynes/sec/cm−5 by Fick; SVR was 1462.9 dynes/sec/cm−5 by TD and 1529.7 dynes/sec/cm−5 by Fick.

Table 3 Right heart catheterization measurements
Full size table

There were significant negative correlations between compression CI and both mRAP (Spearman: − 0.43; p value = 0.0002) and PAOP (Spearman: − 0.35; p value = 0.0027) measurements (Table 4). In contrast, there was no significant correlation between respiratory CI and either mRAP (Spearman: − 0.14; p value = 0.233) or PAOP (Spearman: − 0.12; p value = 0.307). In regards to our secondary goal, there was a significant negative correlation between a compression CI and serum BNP (Spearman: − 0.31; p value = 0.015), but not between respiratory CI and BNP (Spearman: − 0.12; p value = 0.351). Lastly, IJ diameter at rest correlated significantly with mRAP (Spearman: 0.26; p value = 0.029) but not with PAOP (Spearman: 0.14; p value = 0.238) or BNP (Spearman: 0.15; p value = 0.224).

Table 4 Spearman correlation coefficients between ultrasound measurements and markers of volume status
Full size table

Discussion

The increasing use of ultrasound to estimate CVP and fluid responsiveness in acutely and/or chronically ill patients has led to several innovative techniques. While prior ultrasound studies have used clinical parameters to estimate volume status, the current study used concomitant RHC measurements, the gold standard in volume assessment. This study demonstrated that compression CI, a simple ultrasound technique requiring minimal operator experience, accurately reflects directly measured mRAP and PAOP in patients with presumed pulmonary hypertension.

Compression CI

Assessing the ultrasound-measured compressibility of a vein and using it as a non-invasive marker for fluid status could provide yet another component to critical care ultrasound techniques. Volume status is a central component to manage both critically ill patients in an intensive care unit and chronically ill patients, such as those with underlying renal or cardiac disease [18, 19]. Moreover, the accuracy in estimating volume status is essential to improve patient care and therapeutic approaches. Based on the current observations, compression CI of the IJ, a simple, non-invasive technique that only requires basic ultrasound skills, could be used as a surrogate for CVP.

IJ vs IVC

Use of the compression CI of the IJ provides a novel approach to non-invasive fluid status assessment; however, is it better or easier than use of the IVC as the target venous structure? IVC collapsibility is a well-documented measurement in critical care ultrasound and volume assessment, although evidence for its accuracy is controversial; moreover, in many situations, the IVC is poorly visualized [1, 2, 16]. Additionally, formal echocardiography uses the IVC diameter and collapsibility with sniff to generate an estimated, yet imprecise, assessment of the mRAP [3]. Nevertheless, the IVC has historically been used as the target venous structure; in particular, size of the IVC and its dynamic change during respiration is used to estimate mRAP [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The current study suggests that use of the IJ may be an accurate and reliable estimation of mRAP during ultrasonography. Although we did not compare IJ and IVC measurements in the current study, the strong correlation observed between IJ diameter at rest and mRAP suggests the need for future studies comparing both ultrasound methods.

Limitations

The current study has several limitations. 1) The operators were not blinded to the ultrasound and RHC assessments, which could have influenced the results. 2) The cohort included patients with known or suspected pulmonary vascular disease; none were critically ill patients in an intensive care unit. Unfortunately, given the paucity of pulmonary artery catheters inserted in intensive care units currently, it would be very difficult to perform a similar study in such patients. Likewise, we did not assess fluid responsiveness in these patients. 3) We only evaluated patients undergoing RHC in a catheterization laboratory, leading to issues with extrinsic validity and generalizability. 4) Ultrasound probe compression is a non-formal technique commonly used to differentiate venous and arterial structures when obtaining vascular access [20]. In the current study, we used an extrinsic compression of 2 cm at the level of the patient’s skin. Despite the outlined technique, user error in estimating 2 cm and an inability to directly measure the degree of compression could result in variability. Additionally, variability with patient’s body habitus could also affect the ability to provide adequate compression. Although a standardized process of applying compression has yet to be described in the literature, in this study, one individual supervised all the procedures and measurements to assure a standard protocol among the operators. Further studies that apply the use of a pressure manometer could mitigate this variability; such a pressure manometer has been utilized in other ultrasound-based investigations [21]. In a similar manner, standardizing the maneuver used to obtain the respiratory CI was a challenge as well [22].

Ultrasound measurements of the IJ, specifically compression CI, correlate with invasively measured biventricular hemodynamics in this non-critically ill population of patients with presumed pulmonary hypertension. Thus, compression CI may be a useful tool in the non-invasive estimation of intravascular volume status. Further studies of the compression CI of the IJ, as well as direct comparison to IVC, are warranted.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to personalized/individualized data but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Fields JM, Lee PA, Jenq KY, Mark DG, Panebianco NL, Dean AJ. The interrater reliability of inferior vena cava ultrasound by bedside clinician sonographers in emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(1):98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Govender J, Postma I, Wood D, Sibanda W. Is there an association between central venous pressure measurement and ultrasound assessment of the inferior vena cava? Afr J Emerg Med. 2018;8(3):106–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dipti A, Soucy Z, Surana A, Chandra S. Role of inferior vena cava diameter in assessment of volume status: a meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(8):1414–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Muller L, Bobbia X, Toumi M, Louart G, Molinari N, Ragonnet B, Quintard H, Leone M, Zoric L, Lefrant JY, AzuRea group. Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with acute circulatory failure: need for a cautious use. Crit Care. 2012;16(5):R188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Corl KA, George NR, Romanoff J, Levinson AT, Chheng DB, Merchant RC, Levy MM, Napoli AM. Inferior vena cava collapsibility detects fluid responsiveness among spontaneously breathing critically-ill patients. J Crit Care. 2017;41:130–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Coen D, Cortellaro F, Pasini S, Tombini V, Vaccaro A, Montalbetti L, Cazzaniga M, Boghi D. Towards a less invasive approach to the early goal-directed treatment of septic shock in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(6):563–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Prekker ME, Scott NL, Hart D, Sprenkle MD, Leatherman JW. Point-of-care ultrasound to estimate central venous pressure: a comparison of three techniques. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(3):833–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nagdev AD, Merchant RC, Tirado-Gonzalez A, Sisson CA, Murphy MC. Emergency department bedside ultrasonographic measurement of the caval index for noninvasive determination of low central venous pressure. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55(3):290–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(9):1834–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kent A, Patil P, Davila V, Bailey JK, Jones C, Evans DC, Boulger CT, Adkins E, Balakrishnan JM, Valiyaveedan S, Galwankar SC, Bahner DP, Stawicki SP. Sonographic evaluation of intravascular volume status: can internal jugular or femoral vein collapsibility be used in the absence of IVC visualization? Ann Thorac Med. 2015;10(1):44–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Guarracino F, Ferro B, Forfori F, Bertini P, Magliacano L, Pinsky MR. Jugular vein distensibility predicts fluid responsiveness in septic patients. Crit Care. 2014;18(6):647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Haliloğlu M, Bilgili B, Kararmaz A, Cinel İ. The value of internal jugular vein collapsibility index in sepsis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2017;23(4):294–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Siva B, Hunt A, Boudville N. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound estimation of central venous pressure using the internal jugular vein. J Crit Care. 2012;27(3):315.e7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Donahue SP, Wood JP, Patel BM, Quinn JV. Correlation of sonographic measurements of the internal jugular vein with central venous pressure. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27(7):851–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Simon MA, Kliner DE, Girod JP, Moguillansky D, Villanueva FS, Pacella JJ. Detection of elevated right atrial pressure using a simple bedside ultrasound measure. Am Heart J. 2010;159(3):421–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Broilo F, Meregalli A, Friedman G. Right internal jugular vein distensibility appears to be a surrogate marker for inferior vena cava vein distensibility for evaluating fluid responsiveness. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2015;27(3):205–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A, Simonneau G, Peacock A, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Beghetti M, Ghofrani A, Gomez Sanchez MA, Hansmann G, Klepetko W, Lancellotti P, Matucci M, McDonagh T, Pierard LA, Trindade PT, Zompatori M, Hoeper M, ESC Scientific Document Group. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(1):67–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Keller AS, Melamed R, Malinchoc M, John R, Tierney DM, Gajic O. Diagnostic accuracy of a simple ultrasound measurement to estimate central venous pressure in spontaneously breathing, critically ill patients. J Hosp Med. 2009;4(6):350–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kircher BJ, Himelman RB, Schiller NB. Noninvasive estimation of right atrial pressure from the inspiratory collapse of the inferior vena cava. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66(4):493–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Komasawa N, Mihara R, Hattori K, Minami T. Evaluation of artery and vein differentiation methods using ultrasound imaging among medical students. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(6):832–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Koster M, Amann-Vesti BR, Husmann M, Jacomella V, Meier TO, Jeanneret C, Hafner J, Thalhammer C. Non-invasive pressure measurement of the great saphenous vein in healthy controls and patients with venous insufficiency. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2013;54(3):325–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Preau S, Bortolotti P, Colling D, Dewavrin F, Colas V, Voisin B, Onimus T, Drumez E, Durocher A, Redheuil A, Saulnier F. Diagnostic accuracy of the infereior vena cava collapsibility to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with sepsis and acute circulatory failure. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3):e290–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No additional acknowledgements.

Funding

There is no source or role of funding related to this research study.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
    • Raj Parikh
    •  & Christine C. Reardon
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
    • Matthew Spring
  3. Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
    • Janice Weinberg
  4. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
    • Harrison W. Farber
  5. Boston University Medical Center, 72 East Concord Street, R304, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
    • Raj Parikh
Authors
  1. Raj Parikh
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  2. Matthew Spring
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  3. Janice Weinberg
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  4. Christine C. Reardon
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  5. Harrison W. Farber
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in

Contributions

RP was the lead and corresponding author who constructed the study design, coordinated analysis of the data, and was the primary writer of the manuscript. MS assisted RP in his tasks as lead, corresponding author as stated above. JW analyzed and interpreted the patient data CCR was a major contributor in analyzing the results of the data and assisting in writing of the manuscript. HFW was a major contributor in regards to providing guidance and advice to the lead author while also helping interpret data and put together the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raj Parikh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study involved human participants and human data; informed consent was waived as part of the IRB approval for the study (IRB #: H-37464).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parikh, R., Spring, M., Weinberg, J. et al. Use of ultrasound-measured internal jugular vein collapsibility index to determine static intracardiac pressures in patients with presumed pulmonary hypertension. Ann. Intensive Care 9, 124 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0595-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hemodynamics
  • Heart failure
  • Pulmonary hypertension
  • Diagnostic testing
  • Echocardiography
  • Imaging
  • Ultrasound