Skip to main content

Comment on “Respiratory mechanics and gas exchanges in the early course of COVID-19 ARDS: a hypothesis-generating study”

The Original Article was published on 14 October 2020

The Original Article was published on 16 July 2020

Dear Editor,

We have read with great interest the article by Diehl et al. on the evaluation of respiratory mechanics and gas exchanges in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 that was recently published in the Annals of Intensive Care [1]. In 22 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, the authors observed high physiological dead space (VD/VT) and ventilatory ratio (VR). Several hypotheses are made to explain the pathogenesis of increased VD/VT, namely pulmonary embolism, alveolar overdistension, increased instrumental dead space, and diffuse microcirculatory dysfunction [1]. Even if alveolar overdistension due to high PEEP-protective ventilation, with regional compression of alveolar vessels, is likely to exert a major impact on lung mechanics in ARDS, the hypothesis of a contributing role of microvascular derangement is particularly captivating.

Lung injury in ARDS (and COVID-19 pneumonia) seems mainly driven by a dysregulation of the renin–angiotensin system, leading to increased vascular permeability, inflammation, pneumocyte apoptosis, and fibrosis [2]. Pulmonary microvascular injury, with leaky blood vessels, interstitial oedema, microthrombosis, and heterogeneous perfusion, may be the first responsible for ventilation/perfusion mismatch and increased dead space in ARDS. In 42 patients with early moderate or severe ARDS, Ospina-Tascon et al. showed an inverse correlation between VD/VT and sublingual microcirculatory blood flow distribution [3]. In their study, Diehl et al. reported an elevation of markers of endothelial damage and thrombosis (i.e., circulating endothelial cells and D-dimers); however, they did not show any statistical correlation with variables of respiratory mechanics and/or gas exchange [1].

In a recent report, we described the sublingual microcirculation of mechanically ventilated patients with severe SARS-COV-2 pneumonia and showed an inverse correlation between perfused vessel density (PVD) and D-dimers [4]. This relationship was confirmed in SARS-COV-2 patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [5]. Unfortunately, we could not evaluate the relationship with physiological dead space, because VD/VT data were not available for our cohort. We calculated the VR for 6 patients who were not receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (median VR = 1.9 [1.4–2.5]); however, we could not find any significant correlation with D-dimers (Spearman’s rho = − 0.1, p = 0.950) or microcirculatory variables (Spearman’s rho for PVD = 0.232, p = 0.650). The extremely low sample size significantly limits these analyses.

Taken together, all these data would suggest a connection between microvascular dysfunction, coagulopathy, and increased physiological dead space in the genesis of respiratory failure in COVID-19 pneumonia. Nonetheless, the cause–effect relationship remains to be proven. An altered sublingual microcirculation could just be an epiphenomenon of a hemodynamic compromise in patients with worse respiratory mechanics: in our cohort, sublingual microvascular perfusion tended to decrease with increasing driving pressures [4]. Further investigations are imperative to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the pathophysiology of COVID-19 and select the best treatment strategy. Appropriately designed clinical and laboratory-controlled studies are needed to prove any causal relationship between microvascular derangements and increased dead space ventilation.

Finally, a consideration must be made regarding the article by Diehl et al. [1]: the authors used side-stream capnography, which may be inaccurate for calculations of VD/VT as compared to main-stream capnography. The transport delay of the gas in the sampling tube with axial mixing of the gas residing in the tube, together with the variable sampling flow rate resulting from the alternating positive airway pressure during mechanical ventilation, leads to underestimation and distortion of the capnogram, with consequent inaccurate VD/VT calculations.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Acute respiratory distress syndrome


Severe coronavirus disease 2019


Physiological dead space


Ventilatory ratio


Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2


Perfused vessel density


  1. 1.

    Diehl JL, Peron N, Chocron R, Debuc B, Guerot E, Hauw-Berlemont C, et al. Respiratory mechanics and gas exchanges in the early course of COVID-19 ARDS: a hypothesis-generating study. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10:95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sarzani R, Giulietti F, Di Pentima C, Giordano P, Spannella F. Angiotensin system and its opposing arm in SARS-COV-2 related lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ospina-Tascón GA, Bautista DF, Madriñán HJ, Valencia JD, Bermúdez WF, Quiñones E, et al. Microcirculatory dysfunction and dead-space ventilation in early ARDS: a hypothesis-generating observational study. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10(1):35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Damiani E, Carsetti A, Casarotta E, Scorcella C, Domizi R, Adrario E, et al. Microvascular alterations in patients with SARS-COV-2 severe pneumonia. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10:60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Carsetti A, Damiani E, Casarotta E, Scorcella C, Domizi R, Montomoli J, et al. Sublingual microcirculation in patients with SARS-CoV-2 undergoing veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Microvasc Res. 2020;132:104064.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.



Author information




All authors equally contributed to the study’s conceptualization, methodology, and analysis. ED, AC, EC wrote the manuscript. RD, CS, EA, and AD revised the manuscript critically. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abele Donati.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Damiani, E., Carsetti, A., Casarotta, E. et al. Comment on “Respiratory mechanics and gas exchanges in the early course of COVID-19 ARDS: a hypothesis-generating study”. Ann. Intensive Care 10, 147 (2020).

Download citation