Skip to main content
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Open access
  • Published:

SORT maneuver: ease and safety for the practitioner and the patient

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 02 December 2020

The Original Article was published on 12 June 2020

I read with interest the report of a randomized clinical trial by Sanaie et al. on the comparison of SORT maneuver versus a conventional technique of neck flexion lateral pressure (NFLP) for nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion in ICU-admitted patients [1]. This publication provides evidence for a greater ease of NGT insertion using SORT. Moreover, the success rate was much higher with SORT as compared to NFLP. The study looks flawless in methodology and straight forward in reporting the outcome results with a clever categorization for ease of insertion. Nevertheless, a general drawback is a lack of standard definitions for the favorable outcome like the time span attributable to “ease of insertion” and the determinants for “insertion failure”.

With regard to safety, they showed that the rate of complications was less in SORT compared to the other technique even though the difference was not significant. The power of study for this purpose, however, seems insufficient and a larger sample size is required to obtain a significant difference. Moreover, compared to the other complications studied, bleeding is more serious and more complex for which a kind of grading or scoring may be helpful for delineation of the severity.

A highlight from this study was that SORT is easy to be learnt by unskilled healthcare providers. I suggest the measurement of learning curve to support this claim. Then, it would be served as an advantage in demanding situations such as COVID-19 outbreak where trained personnel are overwhelmed by ICU overload [2]. The authors correctly mentioned the low number of providers and not including pediatric and high-risk groups as limitations. I’d like to add two other suggestions: studying hemodynamic response and comparing SORT with techniques that use equipment [3]. Hemodynamic compromise is a concern in cardiac and critically ill patients because of increasing myocardial oxygen demand. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension are even at greater risk [4]. The risk also theoretically increases when we insert NGT using laryngoscope with/without Magill forceps or using glidescope. SORT maneuver is devoid of both due to its smooth process and anatomical approach [5, 6]. These two proposals are among the issues to be addressed by future research projects on SORT maneuver.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Sanaie S, Mirzalou N, Shadvar K, et al. A comparison of nasogastric tube insertion by SORT maneuver (sniffing position, NGT orientation, contralateral rotation, and twisting movement) versus neck flexion lateral pressure in critically ill patients admitted to ICU: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10:79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00696-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Aziz S, Arabi YM, Alhazzani W, et al. Managing ICU surge during the COVID-19 crisis: rapid guidelines. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1303–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06092-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanaie S, Mahmoodpoor A, Najafi M. Nasogastric tube insertion in anaesthetized patients: a comprehensive review. Anaesth Intensive Ther. 2017;49:57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Dennison C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults. Hypertension. 2018;71:e13-115.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Najafi M, Golzari S. SORT maneuver for nasogastric tube insertion. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:351–351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Najafi M. Nasogastric tube insertion easily done: the SORT maneuver. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016;20:492–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Dr. Najafi is trained in anesthesiology, intensive care and cardiac anesthesia. He is associate professor of anesthesiology at Tehran Heart Center, affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences and adjunct professor at Schulich School of Medicine, Western University.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Najafi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Najafi, M. SORT maneuver: ease and safety for the practitioner and the patient. Ann. Intensive Care 10, 160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00778-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00778-1