Skip to main content

Pulse oximetry, racial bias and statistical bias: further improvements of pulse oximetry are necessary

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 22 February 2022

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 22 February 2022

The Original Article was published on 04 January 2022

We read with great interest the review by Tobin and Jubran [1]. We strongly agree about the urgent need to correct racial bias due to the negative impact of dark skin pigmentation on the accuracy of pulse oximetry, and the necessity to introduce new international medical standards. In contrast to pulse oximetry, the influence of melanin absorption in the epidermal layer is already corrected in transcutaneous bilirubinometry, a widely used screening method, based on multi-wavelength optical spectroscopy, employed to diagnose of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia [2]. Unfortunately, pulse oximetry devices without melanin correction, and having additional technical limitations, are widely in use in many countries during the current COVID-19 pandemic [3, 4]. Therefore, there is an urgent need that manufacturers would replace conventional two-wavelengths finger pulse oximeters with multi-wavelength systems implemented for melanin absorption correction. High-cost multi-wavelength finger pulse oximeters, named pulse CO-oximeters, capable of estimating blood levels of carboxyhemoglobin and methemoglobin, are already commercially available. The significance of methemoglobinemia has been reported for COVID-19 patients [5]. The introduction of low-cost multi-wavelength finger pulse oximeters with melanin correction is urgently necessary. Furthermore, manufacturers of pulse oximeters should be forced to release the calibration algorithm and calibration data employed in their instruments so that the public and the medical community using these devices are aware of the possible bias introduced by calibration algorithm and data.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Tobin MJ, Jubran A. Pulse oximetry, racial bias and statistical bias. Ann Intensive Care. 2022;12(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00974-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Dam-Vervloet AJ, van Erk MD, Doorn N, Lip SGJ, Timmermans NA, Vanwinsen L, de Boer FA, van Straaten HLM, Bosschaart N. Inter-device reproducibility of transcutaneous bilirubin meters. Pediatr Res. 2020;89(4):770–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Luks AM, Swenson ER. Pulse oximetry for monitoring patients with COVID-19 at home. Potential pitfalls and practical guidance. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020;17(9):1040–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tobin MJ, Laghi F, Jubran A. Why COVID-19 silent hypoxemia is baffling to physicians. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(3):356–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Scholkmann F, Restin T, Ferrari M, Quaresima V. The role of methemoglobin and carboxyhemoglobin in COVID-19: a review. J Clin Med. 2021;10(1):50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the drafting of the manuscript and provided critical revision for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Ferrari.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferrari, M., Quaresima, V. & Scholkmann, F. Pulse oximetry, racial bias and statistical bias: further improvements of pulse oximetry are necessary. Ann. Intensive Care 12, 19 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-00992-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-00992-z