Skip to main content

Chronic critical illness and post-intensive care syndrome: from pathophysiology to clinical challenges

Abstract

Background

Post‐intensive care syndrome (PICS) encompasses physical, cognition, and mental impairments persisting after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. Ultimately it significantly impacts the long‐term prognosis, both in functional outcomes and survival. Thus, survivors often develop permanent disabilities, consume a lot of healthcare resources, and may experience prolonged suffering. This review aims to present the multiple facets of the PICS, decipher its underlying mechanisms, and highlight future research directions.

Main text

This review abridges the translational data underlying the multiple facets of chronic critical illness (CCI) and PICS. We focus first on ICU-acquired weakness, a syndrome characterized by impaired contractility, muscle wasting, and persisting muscle atrophy during the recovery phase, which involves anabolic resistance, impaired capacity of regeneration, mitochondrial dysfunction, and abnormalities in calcium homeostasis. Second, we discuss the clinical relevance of post-ICU cognitive impairment and neuropsychological disability, its association with delirium during the ICU stay, and the putative role of low-grade long-lasting inflammation. Third, we describe the profound and persistent qualitative and quantitative alteration of the innate and adaptive response. Fourth, we discuss the biological mechanisms of the progression from acute to chronic kidney injury, opening the field for renoprotective strategies. Fifth, we report long-lasting pulmonary consequences of ARDS and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Finally, we discuss several specificities in children, including the influence of the child’s pre-ICU condition, development, and maturation.

Conclusions

Recent understandings of the biological substratum of the PICS’ distinct features highlight the need to rethink our patient trajectories in the long term. A better knowledge of this syndrome and precipitating factors is necessary to develop protocols and strategies to alleviate the CCI and PICS and ultimately improve patient recovery.

Introduction

Critically ill patients’ survivors often acquire multi-organ long-lasting sequelae described as chronic critical illness (CCI) and post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). The CCI is usually defined as a subacute disease state requiring high intensity of care for a protracted period, characterized by lengthy hospital stays, intense suffering, high mortality rates, and substantial resource consumption. In contrast, the PICS represents the remaining health issues caused by the ICU stay after hospital discharge. These terms encompass several distinct pathological and physiological processes that vary among the initial organ injury and the underlying conditions but ultimately impact the functional outcome and long-term survival.

Inflammation, catabolism, and neuroendocrine disorder, also called “Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression, and Catabolism Syndrome,” precipitate chronic organ failure and frailty, delay adverse clinical outcomes, and govern clinical trajectories. Therefore, despite a substantial decrease in ICU mortality, the rate of patients discharged to rehabilitation or long-term facilities increases substantially [1]. As today around 50% of ICU patients in OECD countries are over 65 years of age, with increasing comorbidities and frailty criteria, an ICU stay can induce a significant downturn and compromise successful aging.

Today accumulative evidence reported that acute organ failure, even reversible, can cause chronic disorder at a distance or precipitate other systems’ degradation by organs interplays. This review describes the common or organ-specific pathophysiological mechanisms leading to neurocognitive, muscular, respiratory, renal, and cardiovascular long-lasting functional impairment or frailty (Fig. 1). The specific case of children's ICU survivors is also discussed. Each section describes the established or putative cellular mechanisms involved and their potential consequences for the clinician.

Fig. 1
figure 1

ICU survivors with post-intensive care syndrome. Clinical characteristics and consequences, and futures research directions for each long-lasting sub-syndrome after ICU stay

Catabolism syndrome and neuromuscular disorders

Critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) and critical illness myopathy (CIM), clinically defined by a Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score < 48, contribute unequivocally to ICU-acquired weakness (ICUAW). Patients with ICUAW experience poor short-term consequences (e.g., increased mechanical ventilation duration, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality) [2]. ICUAW also impacts long-term outcomes. A low MRC score at ICU discharge, even below 55, was associated with increased medium and long-term mortality [3,4,5]. Isolated diaphragmatic dysfunction was not associated with increased 2-year mortality, unlike isolated limb muscle weakness, but when both are combined, the prognosis worsened [5]. Post-ICU follow-up studies also revealed that ICU survivors, including COVID-19 patients [6, 7], frequently exhibited sustained weakness and long-term physical consequences. In the year following ICU discharge, survivors displayed a severe reduction in force development and endurance contraction [8], reported by patients as impacting physical performance and health-related QOL [9]. These consequences persist at 5 years with a persistent limitation in the 6-min walk test [10,11,12], an impairment in aerobic capacities (decrease in VO2 max) frequently involved in muscle limitations [13], and still have an impact on physical performance and health-related QOL [10,11,12]. This has been mainly studied after septic shock [9] and ARDS [10,11,12]. Such consequences on physical performance ultimately impact the autonomy of patients. In one study, almost half of patients who lived at home independently before hospitalization lost this ability 6 months after ICU stay [14]. However, the subsequent trajectory of ICU survivors is variable [15]. While some will improve their functional status, others will never recover. For example, two-thirds of patients surviving septic shock did not recover their previous physical status at 1 year [10]. Diagnostic tools to predict this evolution are currently limited.

Although CIP persists in nearly half of surviving ICU patients [16, 17], both animal and human studies suggest that the neural component is little involved in sustained ICUAW. Conversely, alteration of the muscle component would be the main mechanism [10, 18]. Sustained weakness following CIM is characterized by strength loss due to impaired contractility and muscle wasting. Following the acute insult, proteolysis pathways are intensely activated—due to energetic impairment and increased pro-inflammatory mediators—and are directly involved in muscle wasting [19, 20]. Although proteolysis appears to be deleterious to muscle mass, it is essential to muscle homeostasis [21]. In addition, to providing substrates to maintain an energetic level, the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) allows the clearance of non-functional cleaved proteins. In the rat, proteasomal overload was associated with a necrotizing muscle phenotype during long-term critical illness, suggesting an accumulation of proteins insufficiently degraded by UPS [22]. Furthermore, early or late pharmacological inhibition of the proteasome by bortezomib in an experimental model of extensive burn decreased the hypermetabolic muscle response but increased mortality [23].

During the recovery phase, while catabolic pathways are attenuated and protein synthesis is increased, some degree of muscle atrophy persists, suggesting anabolic resistance [24,25,26,27]. Animal and human studies have also revealed a decrease in muscle autophagy during the recovery phase of a murine sepsis model [28] and in skeletal muscle of prolonged critically ill patients [29], respectively, impacting muscle contractility. Autophagy is a massive degradation system of damaged cellular components (e.g., mitochondria, damaged organelles, toxic protein aggregates, unfolded or oxidized proteins) that accumulate during critical illnesses due to inflammation and oxidative stress and whose inhibition contributes to various myopathies and muscle wasting [30, 31]. Finally, in response to catabolic muscle damage, the muscle also has a great capacity for regeneration via its satellite cells [32]. This function is also impaired in ICU survivors, with both a decrease in satellite cell content 6 months after ICU stay [24] and aberrant up-regulation of genes involved in the structural and functional muscle development and extracellular matrix remodeling [33], suggesting a defect in the muscle repair process [27]. Moreover, the presence of mitochondrial dysfunction in satellite cells was demonstrated experimentally, and intramuscular injection of mesenchymal cells improved skeletal muscle function and prognosis in mice sepsis [34,35,36]. Mitochondria play a critical role in muscle physiology and ICUAW pathogenesis [37]. Its dysfunction may contribute to muscle weakness persistence over time. One month after murine sepsis, the mitochondrial population in the skeletal muscle of survivors remained profoundly altered with reduced respiration and severe morphological abnormalities. Mitochondrial dysfunction was also associated with an oxidized protein profile [38]. Abnormalities in calcium homeostasis may also occur due to channelopathies and alter mitochondrial function by calcium overload [39].

Moreover, both animal and human studies have shown persistent muscle weakness despite muscle mass restoration [24, 28, 38], and neuromuscular stimulation of quadriceps in ICU patients restored muscle mass but failed to improve muscle strength in a randomized controlled trial [40]. Overall, these data suggest that the biomechanical quality of muscle fibers seems to be at least as important as their quantity.

The persistence of these deleterious mechanisms which are responsible for sustained ICUAW would be related to persistent inflammation. Despite the insult resolution, a low-grade inflammatory state may persist in ICU survivors. Up-regulation of inflammation genes expressed in the muscle tissue was found at 7 days and 6 months after an ICU stay and was correlated with muscle strength decrease [29]. Persistent inflammation could be a possible explanation for the observed accelerated aging of limb muscles in ICU survivors, a concept described as inflamm-aging [41].

Despite the growing interest in the subject, significant efforts are needed to fill the knowledge gap and better understand the mechanisms underlying accelerated muscle aging in ICU survivors, summarized in Fig. 2. The search for relevant preclinical models to study long-term ICU consequences is crucial to finding innovative therapeutic targets [42]. Currently, there is no pharmacological treatment to prevent or improve weakness after critical illness [43]. Nutritional strategy is of first importance, but its effect could be lessened due to persistent inflammation and anabolism resistance [44]. On top of age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and function [45], accelerated ICUAW and sarcopenia are a critical issue, particularly in the elderly. At ICU discharge, referral to an appropriate physical rehabilitation route may be valuable but little evidence supports this strategy [46].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Putative mechanisms of intensive care unit‐acquired weakness

Long-term cognitive impairment and neuropsychic disability

Population-based datasets and prospective cohorts have reported that ICU survivors have a higher odds of a substantial and persistent cognitive downturn and functional disability. One prospective study showed that ICU patients hospitalized for severe sepsis were 3.33 more likely (multivariate analysis) to develop moderate/severe cognitive impairment at one year than to non-septic patients hospitalized in general hospitalization [47]. Similarly, another retrospective study showed that ICU patients hospitalized for sepsis were 2 more likely to develop dementia than age- and sex-matched controls and after adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities [48]. Using the same methodology but a reverse design, another study revealed that patients with dementia had a higher odds of previous sepsis than the control group. Besides sepsis and septic shock, a prospective study showed that 40% of ICU patients presented global cognition scores that were 1.5 SD below the population means at 3 months post-discharge and that 26% had scored 2 SD below the population mean (equivalent to mild Alzheimer’s disease) whatever the reason for ICU admission [49]. Deficits persisted at 12 months and were responsible for significant impairment in QOL (quality of life) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living associated with psychopathological symptoms as previously reported in ARDS patients or cardiac surgery [50,51,52]. Remarkably, in this study, a longer duration of delirium in the hospital was associated with worse global cognition and executive function scores at 3 and 12 months. Since then, this finding has been corroborated in multiple studies, establishing a solid association between delirium severity/duration and long-term cognitive decline acceleration and or severe psychological issues, such as PTSD [53, 54]. In studies focusing on predictive factors of accelerated post-ICU cognitive decline, the intensity of delirium (or need for neuroleptic), sepsis, hypoglycemia, and high NSE seem to be associated with poor cognitive outcomes [55, 56]. Overall, despite some heterogeneity in inclusion criteria, definition and measurement methods/tests for post-ICU cognitive impairment, and long-lasting neuropsychological disorders, there is mounting evidence for the clinical relevance of post-sepsis/post-ICU cognitive impairment and a significant association with delirium/sepsis-associated encephalopathy during the ICU stay [57]. However, the biological substratum of these alterations remains elusive yet.

In a rat model of polymicrobial sepsis (CLP) compared to sham surgery, sepsis directly causes learning and memory impairment even after complete recovery (10 days) [58]. In a non-septic acute inflammation animal model (LPS-induced non-lethal endotoxemia), survivors displayed memory deficits in the radial maze and changes in open field exploratory patterns 3 months after complete recovery [59]. Interestingly these changes were associated with neuroanatomical changes, such as loss of neurons in the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex and reduced cholinergic innervation in the parietal cortex. Interestingly, in rodent experimental studies, the severity of sepsis (estimated by sepsis behavioral score and plasma IL-6) at 24 h correlated to the increased permeability of the blood–brain barrier in the amygdala, prefrontal cortex, and hippocampus and correlates to persistent oxidative stress in the brain. Ultimately, the sepsis score negatively correlates with cognitive performance in rats at ten days post-CLP [60]. Multiple inflammatory mediators are potentially involved in acute and long-lasting neuroinflammation. Among them, IL-1β seems to play a pivotal role. In one study [61], while WT mice displayed impaired long-term memory consolidation after the LPS challenge, those receiving IL-1 receptor antagonists were protected. It also demonstrated that IL-1β caused hippocampal neuronal dysfunction and may drive neuronal death.

In humans, translational studies are scarce, and most of the literature comes from studies focusing on cognitive decline after major surgery, which is highly relevant in the elderly. In this context, several biomarkers of neuronal injury have been associated with postoperative delirium (POD) and subsequent postoperative cognitive decline (POCD) [62]. Non-specific markers of systemic inflammation, such as CRP, IL-6, IL-1B, or TNF-a, in the blood or CSF are frequently associated with delirium but poorly predict POCD [63,64,65,66]. Conversely, biomarkers of neuronal damage, such as S100ß, NSE [67], or phosphorylated neurofilament heavy subunit, are more consistently associated with POD and POCD [68]. In 2012, one study explored ICU survivors in a pilot study combining diffusion tensor imaging MRI, acute delirium monitoring, and cognitive outcomes in 47 patients evaluated after 3 and 12 months of follow-up. They observed that the duration of delirium was associated with significant white matter disruption [defined by a low fractional anisotropy (FA)] at hospital discharge, notably in the corpus callosum and anterior limb of the internal capsule. It also reported that a low FA in the anterior limb of the internal capsule at discharge and in the genu of the corpus callosum at three months was associated with poor cognitive outcomes at 3 and 12 months, suggesting that modern neuroimaging techniques could help screen patients at risk of post-ICU cognitive decline [69].

To date, the mainstream hypothesis is that sepsis/inflammatory critical illness-associated systemic inflammations can induce some acute CNS injury and potentially long-lasting activation of the CNS cells, such as blood–brain barrier endothelial cells [70] or neuroglial cells, and therefore promote a low-grade long-lasting inflammation responsible for neuronal death and neurological disorders. However, experimental data are feeble to support such a statement yet and whether systemic- or SNC-inflammation-induced acute brain dysfunction and long-term neurocognitive disorders occur by overlapping or discrete mechanisms remains to investigate. Nevertheless, because of the strong association with pre-existing mild cognitive impairment and intensity of delirium in the acute setting, measures to detect brain frailty and prevent delirium in ICU should be promoted and belong to a “standard of care bundle in ICU,” with the putative opportunity to limit the long-term cognitive impairment. In addition, older patients and patients at risk might be eligible for a long-term follow-up to favor early diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia.

Immunosuppression and persistent inflammation

Following acute critical illness—especially sepsis—a growing body of evidence reveals profound and persistent alteration of immune response in survivors. All cellular components of the immune response studied so far appear to be altered. At the acute phase of critical illness, chemokines, cytokine, and adrenergic storms trigger the rapid mobilization of innate myeloid cells from the spleen and the bone marrow during acute critical illness. This release of functional but mainly immature monocytes and neutrophils, called myeloid-derived suppressive cells (MDSCs), aims at the same time to fight the invading pathogen and initiate the resolution of inflammation. Thus, circulating neutrophils show reduced effector capacity (respiratory burst and chemotaxis), and recent reports reveal that these immature granulocytes (G-MDSCs) are circulating, displaying immunosuppressive properties, with their abundance in the blood being correlated with dire outcomes [71, 72]. Similarly, monocytes display diminished capacity to respond to further insult (experimentally explored by measuring amounts of cytokine production after microbial stimulation). Monocytic MDSC produces a tremendous amount of IL-10 that causes the deactivation of innate and immune cells and has impaired antigen presentation capacities characterized by a low HLA-DR surface expression [73, 74]. Low surface expression of HLA-DR on monocyte membrane is one commonly reported surrogate marker of this immunosuppressive state, strongly correlated with nosocomial infections and mortality. Overall, MDSCs are a heterogeneous population of immature and immunosuppressive myeloid cells, found in critical patients from the early phase to as late as 6 weeks after sepsis onset [75] and are consistently associated with nosocomial infections and bad outcome [76]. Massive MDSC release also creates a void in the bone marrow niche that stimulates the expansion of early myeloid progenitors at the expense of both lymphopoiesis and hematopoiesis [77], which partly explains the persistent lymphopenia and chronic anemia observed in ICU survivors.

Lymphocytes are also involved in immune dysfunction following critical illness. First, lymphopenia is a classical biological feature of sepsis, and persistent lymphopenia on days 3 and 4 after sepsis onset has been associated with nosocomial infection and subsequent death [78]. Data regarding B cells are relatively scarce, but B cell depletion has been documented in early and later phases of critically ill conditions, possibly through increased apoptosis and reduction in B cell maturation [79,80,81]. Besides B cell depletion, phenotype (B cells subpopulations) and function also seem altered, with data suggesting a switch toward regulatory profile and/or exhausted status, associated with mortality [80, 82]. Regarding T cells, numerous studies have first reported blood depletion during critical illness (especially sepsis) and concomitant apoptosis [83]. Conventional T cells are classically dichotomized as CD4 + or CD8 + , with the CD4 + subset exerting “helper” functions, notably by producing cytokines that shape immune response, and CD8 + being characterized by cytotoxic activities. Different CD4 + T cells subsets are not all similarly affected by apoptosis, and surviving cells undergo multiple phenotypic changes that alter their functions [84]. Thus, the increased proportion of regulatory T cells and decreased proportion of major “helper” subsets (namely, Th1, Th2, and Th17, able to produce IFN) have been documented. Besides numerical changes, functions are also documented, and the main Th subset seems to adopt an “anergic” hyporesponsive state after acute critical illness, characterized by decreased ability to produce cytokine and expression of co-inhibitory receptors. T CD8 + response has also been shown to be altered after experimental sepsis, with decreased response to antigen encounter, reduced proliferative capacity, and ability to clear pathogen [85]. Ultimately, these alterations converge to a defect in the adaptive response, characterized by a massive T and B lymphocytes apoptosis in lymphoid organs, a drastic reduction in their TCR or BCR repertoires, and a decreased effector function leading to insufficient response to further insults, such as nosocomial infections. In addition, persisting low-grade inflammation due to long-lasting tissue injury might perpetuate this phenomenon and paradoxically cause immunosuppression (Fig. 3). In older patients, on top of the immune senescence and inflamm-aging process, the post-septic immune profile notably contributes to the increased incidence and severity of infectious diseases and possibly cancers.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Putative mechanisms of ICU-acquired immune deficiency

Overall, readers should keep in mind that immune responses are highly dynamic, seldom dichotomic (“pro”/“anti”-inflammatory, for example), and can, at the same time, be compartmentalized. Also, as many human studies on immune function during and after critical illness are conducted in blood, conclusions should not be extrapolated to distant peripheral organs where immune cells exercise their function [86]. Thus, even if we can be affirmative on persistent alteration of immune response after critical illness, a more comprehensive, dynamic—and ideally regionalized—immune monitoring appears a prerequisite for future targeted therapeutic interventions.

Long-term acute kidney injury issues: risk for progression to chronic kidney disease and systemic consequences

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) has long been considered an utterly reversible syndrome. However, recent evidence shows that AKI is a major risk factor for progression to Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) (Hazard Ratio HR 8.8) and end-stage renal disease (HR 3.1) [87], especially in ICU patients [88]; the risk increases with AKI severity. AKI is also associated with cardiovascular risk: congestive heart failure (HR up to 2.2) [87] and acute coronary event (HR 1.7 after renal replacement therapy-requiring AKI) [89]; the risk of death or admission for a major adverse cardiac event is higher after AKI than after myocardial infarction [90]. From those epidemiologic findings emerged the concepts of “maladaptive repair” [91] and interconnection between AKI and CKD [92]. The predominant experimental model for progression from AKI to CKD is ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) in rodents. Two main mechanisms of kidney damage emerge from experimental findings, implying different cell death mechanisms: tubular and vascular damage, both leading to interstitial fibrosis. I/R in proximal tubules induces necroptosis, prolonged expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-18, IL-1ß and TGF-ß), macrophage infiltrate, and inflammasome activation, with an amplification loop, even after kidney function normalization [93, 94]. Those lesions are responsible for fibrosis and CKD. Mitochondria is a key effector of maladaptive repair. In proximal tubules, ATP dynamic-related protein 1depletion induced by I/R is responsible for mitochondrial fission via Dynamic-Related Protein 1, inducing Reactive Oxygen Species liberation. Therefore, the tubular cell proliferation is inhibited, whereas IL-6 secretion , neutrophils recruitment [95] and apoptosis are increased. Infusion of a mitoprotective agent 1 month after AKI decreases inflammation, restores structural kidney integrity (capillaries and podocytes), and decreases interstitial fibrosis [94]. Autophagy in tubular cells, despite a protective effect on initial AKI, is responsible for more inflammation and worse kidney outcome 30 days after I/R in mice [96], via cell cycle arrest in G2—M phase. It results in up-regulation of profibrotic cytokines (TGF ß, connective tissue growth factor), activation of COL4A1 and COL1A1 genes, and cellular dedifferentiation [97, 98]. The intensity of fibrosis does not depend on the level of apoptosis (preponderant role of cell cycle arrest over apoptosis on fibrosis process). Epigenetic phenomenon is also involved: histone deacetylase inhibition improves long-term kidney function by reducing fibrosis [99]. Peritubular capillary density decreases in the weeks following I/R, despite an initial repair of tubular damage [100]. Thus, sensitivity to angiotensin 2 and hypertension increases. The delayed expression of TGF-ß in ischemic kidney is implied in capillary rarefaction [100, 101], such as endothelin-1, which transcription is sustainably increased after I/R, resulting in a reduction in kidney mass [102]. Capillary rarefaction induces chronic hypoxia, persistent up to 5 weeks after I/R, with elevation in HIF 1 (hypoxia-inducible growth factor) [103]. Basile et al. demonstrated evidence of endothelial–mesenchymal transition, which is much more prevalent than epithelial–mesenchymal transition [104]. Apoptosis also plays a role in capillary rarefaction: indeed, caspase-3 (the main effector of apoptosis) remains activated several weeks after I/R, and caspase-3−/− mice show less microvascular rarefaction and renal fibrosis [103]. In human cell culture, hypoxia enhances apoptosis in endothelial but not epithelial cells, while necrosis is rather a tubular concern [103]. Finally, mitochondrial fission induced by DRP 1 is also implied in capillary rarefaction [95].

Beyond kidney lesions, AKI is a multisystemic concern, with repercussions, for example, in lymph nodes (fibrosis) [105], and lung and brain (increased transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines) [106, 107]. Among those distant consequences, cardiovascular repercussions are a major concern. I/R in mice induces an increase in TNF-α and IL1, endothelial dysfunction, and cardiomyocytes apoptosis [108] (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Mechanisms underlying progression toward chronic kidney disease after AKI

In conclusion, the physiopathology of progression from AKI to CKD has been well described in the last two decades, opening the field for renoprotective interventional studies: mitoprotection [94], inhibition of deleterious effectors, such as histone deacetylase [109], TGF-ß, or endothelin [101], or administration of renoprotective effectors, such as VEGF or arginine [100, 104].

Long-lasting pulmonary dysfunction after ARDS

The pathogenesis of ARDS involves an extensive insult of distal lung airspaces in response to direct or indirect aggression. Its resolution is an active and complex process that begins from the onset of injury and aims to restore both the structural and functional properties of the lungs. The inflammatory phase resolves through phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils by alveolar macrophages, while restoring the alveolar–capillary barrier integrity occurs during the proliferative phase. Epithelial repair involves migration, proliferation, and differentiation of type II alveolar cells associated with fibroblasts influx, aiming to remodel the denuded basement membrane. An inappropriate, extensive, and prolonged inflammation and excessive extracellular matrix deposition and remodeling may lead to residual pulmonary injuries, contributing to the patient’s long-term physical disability. After a sufficient delay, radiological, functional, and physical tests can assess sequelae. Radiological investigations performed after the first year in ARDS survivors may show a complete resolution of parenchymal infiltrates. However, persistent abnormalities, mainly reticular patterns, and ground-glass opacities, are observed in more than half survivors [110,111,112,113]. The overall extent is usually low, ranging from 8 to 15% of the lung parenchyma, with a preferential location to the non-dependent regions. Interestingly, patients with ARDS due to primary pulmonary causes, such as pneumonia display more severe fibrotic sequelae than patients with extrapulmonary ARDS [110]. In addition to residual anatomic abnormalities, many ARDS survivors have persistent pulmonary function impairments. The diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon dioxide (DLCO) improved during the first year post-ARDS, but without reaching the lower limit of the normal range [114]. Thus, one study reported a DLCO of 65% of the predicted value at 6 months, while another described an improvement from 63% at 3 months to 72% at 12 months, then stability over the 4 following years [115,116,117]. Regarding spirometry, very mild obstructive and restrictive patterns have been described within the first year post-ARDS [114,115,116, 118]. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ranged, respectively, from 85 to 87% and from 96 to 101% of the predicted value at 12 months, while total lung capacity (TLC) ranged from 88 to 95% of the predicted value at 12 months [114,115,116, 119]. Interestingly, a protective ventilation strategy (using a low tidal volume) did not provide benefit in terms of long-term pulmonary function in ARDS survivors [114, 118]. Moreover, no difference in lung volumes has been observed between ARDS due to primary pulmonary cause and extrapulmonary ARDS and between patients who had prone positioning or not [110, 119]. Assessment of physical function using the 6-min walking test (6-WT) has shown a significant and persistent exercise limitation in ARDS survivors. At 3 months, one study described a 6MWT distance of 49% of the predicted value, while values ranged from 66 to 72% at 12 months post-ARDS [116, 119]. Notably, this inability to exercise seems disproportionate to mild structural and functional abnormalities reported in ARDS survivors. This discrepancy may be explained by extrapulmonary long-lasting alterations, such as cardiac dysfunction, muscle deconditioning, and neuromyopathy. Accordingly, no correlation has been found between CT scan lesions’ extent or the importance of spirometry abnormalities and the 6MWT distance in ARDS survivors. In conclusion, these findings illustrate long-lasting pulmonary consequences of ARDS, which are relatively mild in terms of radiological abnormalities and spirometry alterations, but more critical in reducing diffusion capacity and exercise limitation.

Post-intensive care syndrome in children

Like adults, child PICU survivors may develop deterioration in physical, cognitive, social, and psychological functioning [120]. Recently, the conceptualization of PICS in children has led to the development of the PICS-Pediatrics framework. Factors specific to child health are critical to note. Critical illnesses occur at a time of tremendous growth and maturation, and an increasing proportion of children admitted to intensive care units have chronic diseases and developmental disorders at baseline. Consistently, upon discharge, the child's physical, cognitive, emotional, and social health are strongly influenced by the child’s pre-PICU condition, development, and maturation. Family, parents, and siblings’ emotional and social health may also be affected. Therefore, the trajectory and duration of recovery are highly variable [121].

Physical function impairment

PICU-acquired new dysfunctions (respiratory disabilities, pain, poor mobility, and impaired self-care and feeding) occur in 10% of all admissions [122, 123]. A Functional Status Scale (FSS), involving six domains (mental status, sensory, communication, motor function, feeding, and breathing), has been recently developed [124]. Identified risks for poor functional outcomes include baseline disability, admission for trauma, neurologic or oncologic disorders, cardiac arrest, age < 1 year, and disease severity [120, 125]. Children with normal baseline function experience a more significant functional decline, albeit with faster recovery than those with impaired baseline function [126]. The FSS does not assess sleep disturbance, fatigue, and severe weakness which may be underestimated [127].

Pediatric ICU-acquired weakness (PICUAW)

Unlike adults, data on PICUAW are limited, but it reportedly occurs in 1.7–4.7% of PICU survivors, which is much lower than that in adults [128, 129]. This discrepancy remains unclear, but differences between children and adults can be considered: children’s axons are shorter making them less susceptible to injury, and children have better mitochondrial function and higher/better restorative neurotrophic factor concentration/function. Consistently, they recover better from immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies [130]. Furthermore, children have fewer pre-existing nerve or muscle-damaging medical conditions, like diabetes, cancer, chronic organ failure, or chronic drug use. However, studies focusing on high-risk groups with multi-organ failure, severe sepsis, patients with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, ARDS, or polytrauma, may better estimate the real risk of PICUAW in susceptible critically ill children.

Lung consequences of prolonged mechanical ventilation in children

Experimental pediatric data show an age-related susceptibility to VILI [131]. The concentration of elastin in the infant’s lung increases tenfold during the first 20 days of life and then increases less rapidly. Collagen concentration increases linearly from infancy to childhood [132]. Differences in lung elastic properties may account for differences in lung strain. Age-dependent differences in NF-κB have been described in animal models, showing less inflammation in neonatal mice after exposure to hyperoxia [133]. Injurious mechanical ventilation does not activate innate immunity in infants or young children to the same extent as in adults, because the full capacity of the innate immune system is not reached until adolescence [134]. Adaptive immunity also differs between young children and adults, with a tendency toward a more anti-inflammatory response in children [135]. In summary, pediatric patients may be less susceptible than adults to VILI [136].

Pediatric neurocritical illness and cognitive function impairment

To assess the onset of new cognitive impairment, the 6-point Pediatric Brain Performance Category (PBPC) is commonly used to estimate baseline global cognitive function and changes during and after the PICU stay [137]. Cognitive decline reportedly occurs in 3.4% of PICU survivors. Risk factors include admission diagnosis of trauma, poisoning, neurologic disease or cancer, invasive mechanical ventilation, and extracorporeal life support [138]. Acute neurological condition was the most significant predictor of an adverse cognitive outcome at 6 months, after adjusting for illness severity and pre-PICU functioning [139]. Blood biomarkers of injury, inflammation, regeneration, and plasticity may be useful in assessing the risk of functional impairment after acute brain injury [140]. In children with traumatic brain injury or cardiac arrest, diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, such as NSE and S100b, have been evaluated [141, 142]. Recently, low blood levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and vascular endothelial growth factor, which are biomarkers of regeneration, have identified children at risk for new cognitive impairment among survivors of pediatric neurocritical care [143]. Ultimately, the cognitive impairments will evolve afterward and the PCPC score at PICU discharge may worsen or improve [120].

Psychological function impairment

From 17 to 62% of PICU survivors experienced post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [121, 144]. Depression, changes in self-esteem, delusional memories or fears, and sleep disturbances have also been reported in children after PICU discharge. Pieces of evidence suggest that children with psychiatric morbidity after discharge are more likely to be readmitted for physical problems in the following 6–12 months [145]. Several factors increase the risk of psychological issues. Delusional memories were independently associated with length of sedation and subsequent PTSD symptoms when adjusting for illness severity and emergency admission status. Conversely, factual memories of the ICU stay were not associated with PTSD symptoms, but emergency admission status was, as were illness severity, exposure to invasive procedures, and sepsis [146].

Social manifestations and PICS family

Qualitative studies of PICU survivors have revealed themes related to disrupted lives, social stigma, and the need to rebuild social identities, particularly in older children [147]. Parents of PICU survivors may experience post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms shortly after discharge and during the recovery process [148]. Risk factors for long-term problems include unexpected PICU admission and the number of medical procedures performed in the PICU, as well as a history of traumatic events, psychological problems before PICU admission, limited social support, and negative memories of the PICU stay [109, 120].

Conclusion

Despite significant improvement in global ICU survival, patients often develop a multi-faceted post-ICU syndrome, encompassing multi-organ frailty and causing substantial impairment in QOL. Given that ICU's population is rapidly aging in western countries, these issues are particularly meaningful. As a research agenda, a better understanding of the underlying biological mechanisms linking acute disorder and long-lasting impairment through translational studies is a matter of great priority, such as clinical trials to explore interventions to prevent or treat PICS. Nevertheless, this field of research is challenging due to the multiple facets of PICS, and the need for long-term follow-up collaborative studies.

Therefore, we believe that general practitioners, internists, or geriatricians must be sensitized alongside with intensivists to long-term follow-up of ICU survivors and its specific issues, so that patients could benefit durably and thoroughly from the in-ICU mortality reduction observed over the last 20 years.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

6MWT:

6 minutes’ walk test

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

BCR:

B cell receptors

CCI:

Chronic critical illness

CD:

Cluster of differentiation

CIM:

Critical illness myopathy

CIP:

Critical illness polyneuropathy

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

CLP:

Cecal ligation and puncture

CNS:

Central nervous system

CRP:

C-reactive procedure

DLCO:

Diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon dioxide

EMG:

Electromyography

FA:

Fractional anisotropy

FEV:

Forced expiratory volume

FSS:

Functional status scale

HR:

Hazard ratio

I/R:

Ischemia/reperfusion

ICU:

Intensive care unit

ICUAW:

ICU-acquired weakness

IFN:

Interferon

IL:

Interleukin

LTCI:

Long-term cognitive impairment

MDSC:

Myeloid-derived suppressive cells

MRC:

Medical Research Council

NSE:

Neuron-specific enolase

PCPC:

Pediatric cerebral performance category

PICS:

Post‐intensive care syndrome

POCD:

Postoperative cognitive decline

POD:

Postoperative delirium

PTSD:

Post-traumatic stress disorder

QOL:

Quality of life

SF36:

Short Form-36

TCR:

T cell receptors

TLC:

Total lung capacity

TNF:

Tumor necrosis factor

UPS:

Ubiquitin–proteasome system

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

VILI:

Ventilator-induced lung injury

References

  1. Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2012. JAMA. 2014;311(13):1308–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jolley SE, Bunnell AE, Hough CL. ICU-acquired weakness. Chest. 2016;150(5):1129–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hermans G, Van Mechelen H, Clerckx B, Vanhullebusch T, Mesotten D, Wilmer A, et al. Acute outcomes and 1-year mortality of intensive care unit-acquired weakness. A cohort study and propensity-matched analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(4):410–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Aerde N, Meersseman P, Debaveye Y, Wilmer A, Gunst J, Casaer MP, et al. Five-year impact of ICU-acquired neuromuscular complications: a prospective, observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(6):1184–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Saccheri C, Morawiec E, Delemazure J, Mayaux J, Dube BP, Similowski T, et al. ICU-acquired weakness, diaphragm dysfunction and long-term outcomes of critically ill patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Carenzo L, Protti A, Dalla Corte F, Aceto R, Iapichino G, Milani A, et al. Short-term health-related quality of life, physical function and psychological consequences of severe COVID-19. Ann Intensive Care. 2021;11(1):91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Heesakkers H, van der Hoeven JG, Corsten S, Janssen I, Ewalds E, Simons KS, et al. Clinical outcomes among patients with 1-year survival following intensive care unit treatment for COVID-19. JAMA. 2022;327(6):559–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Poulsen JB, Rose MH, Jensen BR, Moller K, Perner A. Biomechanical and nonfunctional assessment of physical capacity in male ICU survivors. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):93–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Solverson KJ, Grant C, Doig CJ. Assessment and predictors of physical functioning post-hospital discharge in survivors of critical illness. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6(1):92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Poulsen JB, Moller K, Kehlet H, Perner A. Long-term physical outcome in patients with septic shock. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53(6):724–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Herridge MS, Batt J, Santos CD. ICU-acquired weakness, morbidity, and death. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(4):360–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Aerde N, Meersseman P, Debaveye Y, Wilmer A, Casaer MP, Gunst J, et al. Aerobic exercise capacity in long-term survivors of critical illness: secondary analysis of the post-EPaNIC follow-up study. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(12):1462–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Urbina T, Canoui-Poitrine F, Hua C, Layese R, Alves A, Ouedraogo R, et al. Long-term quality of life in necrotizing soft-tissue infection survivors: a monocentric prospective cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2021;11(1):102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yende S, Austin S, Rhodes A, Finfer S, Opal S, Thompson T, et al. Long-term quality of life among survivors of severe sepsis: analyses of two international trials. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(8):1461–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Dinglas VD, Aronson Friedman L, Colantuoni E, Mendez-Tellez PA, Shanholtz CB, Ciesla ND, et al. Muscle weakness and 5-year survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3):446–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Semmler A, Okulla T, Kaiser M, Seifert B, Heneka MT. Long-term neuromuscular sequelae of critical illness. J Neurol. 2013;260(1):151–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guarneri B, Bertolini G, Latronico N. Long-term outcome in patients with critical illness myopathy or neuropathy: the Italian multicentre CRIMYNE study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(7):838–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goossens C, Weckx R, Derde S, Van Helleputte L, Schneidereit D, Haug M, et al. Impact of prolonged sepsis on neural and muscular components of muscle contractions in a mouse model. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021;12(2):443–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Klaude M, Fredriksson K, Tjader I, Hammarqvist F, Ahlman B, Rooyackers O, et al. Proteasome proteolytic activity in skeletal muscle is increased in patients with sepsis. Clin Sci. 2007;112(9):499–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morel J, Palao JC, Castells J, Desgeorges M, Busso T, Molliex S, et al. Regulation of Akt-mTOR, ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagy-lysosome pathways in locomotor and respiratory muscles during experimental sepsis in mice. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):10866.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kitajima Y, Yoshioka K, Suzuki N. The ubiquitin-proteasome system in regulation of the skeletal muscle homeostasis and atrophy: from basic science to disorders. J Physiol Sci. 2020;70(1):40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Preau S, Ambler M, Sigurta A, Kleyman A, Dyson A, Hill NE, et al. Protein recycling and limb muscle recovery after critical illness in slow- and fast-twitch limb muscle. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2019;316(5):R584–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vana PG, LaPorte HM, Wong YM, Kennedy RH, Gamelli RL, Majetschak M. Proteasome inhibition after burn injury. J Burn Care Res. 2016;37(4):207–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dos Santos C, Hussain SN, Mathur S, Picard M, Herridge M, Correa J, et al. Mechanisms of chronic muscle wasting and dysfunction after an intensive care unit stay. A pilot study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194(7):821–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Crowell KT, Soybel DI, Lang CH. Restorative mechanisms regulating protein balance in skeletal muscle during recovery from sepsis. Shock. 2017;47(4):463–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Gamrin-Gripenberg L, Sundstrom-Rehal M, Olsson D, Grip J, Wernerman J, Rooyackers O. An attenuated rate of leg muscle protein depletion and leg free amino acid efflux over time is seen in ICU long-stayers. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Walsh CJ, Batt J, Herridge MS, Mathur S, Bader GD, Hu P, et al. Transcriptomic analysis reveals abnormal muscle repair and remodeling in survivors of critical illness with sustained weakness. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Crowell KT, Lang CH. Contractility and myofibrillar content in skeletal muscle are decreased during post-sepsis recovery, but not during the acute phase of sepsis. Shock. 2021;55(5):649–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vanhorebeek I, Gunst J, Derde S, Derese I, Boussemaere M, Guiza F, et al. Insufficient activation of autophagy allows cellular damage to accumulate in critically ill patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(4):E633–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Masiero E, Agatea L, Mammucari C, Blaauw B, Loro E, Komatsu M, et al. Autophagy is required to maintain muscle mass. Cell Metab. 2009;10(6):507–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Masiero E, Sandri M. Autophagy inhibition induces atrophy and myopathy in adult skeletal muscles. Autophagy. 2010;6(2):307–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wagers AJ, Conboy IM. Cellular and molecular signatures of muscle regeneration: current concepts and controversies in adult myogenesis. Cell. 2005;122(5):659–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Walsh CJ, Escudero King C, Gupta M, Plant PJ, Herridge MJ, Mathur S, et al. MicroRNA regulatory networks associated with abnormal muscle repair in survivors of critical illness. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12903.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Rocheteau P, Chatre L, Briand D, Mebarki M, Jouvion G, Bardon J, et al. Sepsis induces long-term metabolic and mitochondrial muscle stem cell dysfunction amenable by mesenchymal stem cell therapy. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jiroutkova K, Krajcova A, Ziak J, Fric M, Waldauf P, Dzupa V, et al. Mitochondrial function in skeletal muscle of patients with protracted critical illness and ICU-acquired weakness. Crit Care. 2015;19:448.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Preau S, Vodovar D, Jung B, Lancel S, Zafrani L, Flatres A, et al. Energetic dysfunction in sepsis: a narrative review. Ann Intensive Care. 2021;11(1):104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Brealey D, Brand M, Hargreaves I, Heales S, Land J, Smolenski R, et al. Association between mitochondrial dysfunction and severity and outcome of septic shock. Lancet. 2002;360(9328):219–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Owen AM, Patel SP, Smith JD, Balasuriya BK, Mori SF, Hawk GS, et al. Chronic muscle weakness and mitochondrial dysfunction in the absence of sustained atrophy in a preclinical sepsis model. Elife. 2019. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49920.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Balboa E, Saavedra-Leiva F, Cea LA, Vargas AA, Ramirez V, Escamilla R, et al. Sepsis-induced channelopathy in skeletal muscles is associated with expression of non-selective channels. Shock. 2018;49(2):221–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Segers J, Vanhorebeek I, Langer D, Charususin N, Wei W, Frickx B, et al. Early neuromuscular electrical stimulation reduces the loss of muscle mass in critically ill patients—a within subject randomized controlled trial. J Crit Care. 2021;62:65–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Franceschi C, Bonafe M, Valensin S, Olivieri F, De Luca M, Ottaviani E, et al. Inflamm-aging. An evolutionary perspective on immunosenescence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;908:244–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Guillon A, Preau S, Aboab J, Azabou E, Jung B, Silva S, et al. Preclinical septic shock research: why we need an animal ICU. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9(1):66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Shepherd SJ, Newman R, Brett SJ, Griffith DM. Enhancing rehabilitation after critical illness programme study I. Pharmacological therapy for the prevention and treatment of weakness after critical illness: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(6):1198–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rosenthal MD, Vanzant EL, Moore FA. Chronic critical illness and PICS nutritional strategies. J Clin Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112294.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wilkinson DJ, Piasecki M, Atherton PJ. The age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and function: measurement and physiology of muscle fibre atrophy and muscle fibre loss in humans. Ageing Res Rev. 2018;47:123–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Connolly B, Salisbury L, O’Neill B, Geneen L, Douiri A, Grocott MP, et al. Exercise rehabilitation following intensive care unit discharge for recovery from critical illness: executive summary of a Cochrane Collaboration systematic review. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016;7(5):520–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Iwashyna TJ, Ely EW, Smith DM, Langa KM. Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis. JAMA. 2010;304(16):1787–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Chou CH, Lee JT, Lin CC, Sung YF, Lin CC, Muo CH, et al. Septicemia is associated with increased risk for dementia: a population-based longitudinal study. Oncotarget. 2017;8(48):84300–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Pandharipande PP, Girard TD, Jackson JC, Morandi A, Thompson JL, Pun BT, et al. Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1306–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, Gaver V, Grocott H, Jones RH, et al. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(6):395–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hopkins RO, Brett S. Chronic neurocognitive effects of critical illness. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005;11(4):369–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Moller JT, Cluitmans P, Rasmussen LS, Houx P, Rasmussen H, Canet J, et al. Long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly ISPOCD1 study. ISPOCD investigators. International study of post-operative cognitive dysfunction. Lancet. 1998;351(9106):857–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bulic D, Bennett M, Georgousopoulou EN, Shehabi Y, Pham T, Looi JCL, et al. Cognitive and psychosocial outcomes of mechanically ventilated intensive care patients with and without delirium. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10(1):104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Girard TD, Jackson JC, Pandharipande PP, Pun BT, Thompson JL, Shintani AK, et al. Delirium as a predictor of long-term cognitive impairment in survivors of critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(7):1513–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Calsavara AJC, Nobre V, Barichello T, Teixeira AL. Post-sepsis cognitive impairment and associated risk factors: a systematic review. Aust Crit Care. 2018;31(4):242–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Calsavara AJC, Costa PA, Nobre V, Teixeira AL. Factors associated with short and long term cognitive changes in patients with sepsis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Iacobone E, Bailly-Salin J, Polito A, Friedman D, Stevens RD, Sharshar T. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy and its differential diagnosis. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10 Suppl):S331–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Barichello T, Martins MR, Reinke A, Feier G, Ritter C, Quevedo J, et al. Cognitive impairment in sepsis survivors from cecal ligation and perforation. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(1):221–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Semmler A, Frisch C, Debeir T, Ramanathan M, Okulla T, Klockgether T, et al. Long-term cognitive impairment, neuronal loss and reduced cortical cholinergic innervation after recovery from sepsis in a rodent model. Exp Neurol. 2007;204(2):733–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. de Souza Goldim MP, Della Giustina A, Mathias K, de Oliveira Junior A, Fileti ME, De Carli R, et al. Sickness behavior score is associated with neuroinflammation and late behavioral changes in polymicrobial sepsis animal model. Inflammation. 2020;43(3):1019–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Skelly DT, Griffin EW, Murray CL, Harney S, O’Boyle C, Hennessy E, et al. Acute transient cognitive dysfunction and acute brain injury induced by systemic inflammation occur by dissociable IL-1-dependent mechanisms. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24(10):1533–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Schaefer ST, Koenigsperger S, Olotu C, Saller T. Biomarkers and postoperative cognitive function: could it be that easy? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019;32(1):92–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Franck M, Nerlich K, Neuner B, Schlattmann P, Brockhaus WR, Spies CD, et al. No convincing association between post-operative delirium and post-operative cognitive dysfunction: a secondary analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016;60(10):1404–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Amabili P, Wozolek A, Noirot I, Roediger L, Senard M, Donneau AF, et al. The edmonton frail scale improves the prediction of 30-day mortality in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33(4):945–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hall RJ, Watne LO, Cunningham E, Zetterberg H, Shenkin SD, Wyller TB, et al. CSF biomarkers in delirium: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;33(11):1479–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hirsch J, Vacas S, Terrando N, Yuan M, Sands LP, Kramer J, et al. Perioperative cerebrospinal fluid and plasma inflammatory markers after orthopedic surgery. J Neuroinflammation. 2016;13(1):211.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Taskforce DAS, Baron R, Binder A, Biniek R, Braune S, Buerkle H, et al. Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-Guideline 2015)—short version. Ger Med Sci. 2015;13:Doc19.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Mietani K, Sumitani M, Ogata T, Shimojo N, Inoue R, Abe H, et al. Dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier in postoperative delirium patients, referring to the axonal damage biomarker phosphorylated neurofilament heavy subunit. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10): e0222721.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Morandi A, Rogers BP, Gunther ML, Merkle K, Pandharipande P, Girard TD, et al. The relationship between delirium duration, white matter integrity, and cognitive impairment in intensive care unit survivors as determined by diffusion tensor imaging: the VISIONS prospective cohort magnetic resonance imaging study*. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(7):2182–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Hughes CG, Morandi A, Girard TD, Riedel B, Thompson JL, Shintani AK, et al. Association between endothelial dysfunction and acute brain dysfunction during critical illness. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(3):631–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Demaret J, Venet F, Friggeri A, Cazalis MA, Plassais J, Jallades L, et al. Marked alterations of neutrophil functions during sepsis-induced immunosuppression. J Leukoc Biol. 2015;98(6):1081–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Guerin E, Orabona M, Raquil MA, Giraudeau B, Bellier R, Gibot S, et al. Circulating immature granulocytes with T-cell killing functions predict sepsis deterioration*. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(9):2007–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Venet F, Lukaszewicz AC, Payen D, Hotchkiss R, Monneret G. Monitoring the immune response in sepsis: a rational approach to administration of immunoadjuvant therapies. Curr Opin Immunol. 2013;25(4):477–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Winkler MS, Rissiek A, Priefler M, Schwedhelm E, Robbe L, Bauer A, et al. Human leucocyte antigen (HLA-DR) gene expression is reduced in sepsis and correlates with impaired TNFalpha response: a diagnostic tool for immunosuppression? PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8): e0182427.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Hollen MK, Stortz JA, Darden D, Dirain ML, Nacionales DC, Hawkins RB, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cell function and epigenetic expression evolves over time after surgical sepsis. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):355.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Uhel F, Azzaoui I, Gregoire M, Pangault C, Dulong J, Tadie JM, et al. Early expansion of circulating granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells predicts development of nosocomial infections in patients with sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(3):315–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Loftus TJ, Mohr AM, Moldawer LL. Dysregulated myelopoiesis and hematopoietic function following acute physiologic insult. Curr Opin Hematol. 2018;25(1):37–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Drewry AM, Samra N, Skrupky LP, Fuller BM, Compton SM, Hotchkiss RS. Persistent lymphopenia after diagnosis of sepsis predicts mortality. Shock. 2014;42(5):383–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Hotchkiss RS, Tinsley KW, Swanson PE, Schmieg RE Jr, Hui JJ, Chang KC, et al. Sepsis-induced apoptosis causes progressive profound depletion of B and CD4+ T lymphocytes in humans. J Immunol. 2001;166(11):6952–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Monserrat J, de Pablo R, Diaz-Martin D, Rodriguez-Zapata M, de la Hera A, Prieto A, et al. Early alterations of B cells in patients with septic shock. Crit Care. 2013;17(3):R105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Shankar-Hari M, Fear D, Lavender P, Mare T, Beale R, Swanson C, et al. Activation-associated accelerated apoptosis of memory b cells in critically ill patients with sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(5):875–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Dong X, Liu Q, Zheng Q, Liu X, Wang Y, Xie Z, et al. Alterations of B cells in immunosuppressive phase of septic shock patients. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(6):815–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Venet F, Davin F, Guignant C, Larue A, Cazalis MA, Darbon R, et al. Early assessment of leukocyte alterations at diagnosis of septic shock. Shock. 2010;34(4):358–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Martin MD, Badovinac VP, Griffith TS. CD4 T cell responses and the sepsis-induced immunoparalysis state. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Danahy DB, Strother RK, Badovinac VP, Griffith TS. Clinical and experimental sepsis impairs CD8 T-cell-mediated immunity. Crit Rev Immunol. 2016;36(1):57–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Farber DL. Tissues, not blood, are where immune cells function. Nature. 2021;593(7860):506–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Coca SG, Singanamala S, Parikh CR. Chronic kidney disease after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Int. 2012;81(5):442–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Horkan CM, Purtle SW, Mendu ML, Moromizato T, Gibbons FK, Christopher KB. The association of acute kidney injury in the critically ill and postdischarge outcomes: a cohort study*. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(2):354–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Wu VC, Wu CH, Huang TM, Wang CY, Lai CF, Shiao CC, et al. Long-term risk of coronary events after AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(3):595–605.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Chawla LS, Amdur RL, Shaw AD, Faselis C, Palant CE, Kimmel PL. Association between AKI and long-term renal and cardiovascular outcomes in United States veterans. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(3):448–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Basile DP, Bonventre JV, Mehta R, Nangaku M, Unwin R, Rosner MH, et al. Progression after AKI: understanding maladaptive repair processes to predict and identify therapeutic treatments. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(3):687–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Chawla LS, Eggers PW, Star RA, Kimmel PL. Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease as interconnected syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(1):58–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Chen H, Fang Y, Wu J, Chen H, Zou Z, Zhang X, et al. RIPK3-MLKL-mediated necroinflammation contributes to AKI progression to CKD. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(9):878.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Szeto HH, Liu S, Soong Y, Seshan SV, Cohen-Gould L, Manichev V, et al. Mitochondria protection after acute ischemia prevents prolonged upregulation of IL-1beta and IL-18 and arrests CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(5):1437–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Perry HM, Huang L, Wilson RJ, Bajwa A, Sesaki H, Yan Z, et al. Dynamin-related protein 1 deficiency promotes recovery from AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29(1):194–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Baisantry A, Bhayana S, Rong S, Ermeling E, Wrede C, Hegermann J, et al. Autophagy induces prosenescent changes in proximal tubular S3 segments. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(6):1609–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Canaud G, Brooks CR, Kishi S, Taguchi K, Nishimura K, Magassa S, et al. Cyclin G1 and TASCC regulate kidney epithelial cell G2-M arrest and fibrotic maladaptive repair. Sci Transl Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aav4754.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Yang L, Besschetnova TY, Brooks CR, Shah JV, Bonventre JV. Epithelial cell cycle arrest in G2/M mediates kidney fibrosis after injury. Nat Med. 2010;16(5):535–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Wilcox RR, Keselman HJ. Modern regression methods that can substantially increase power and provide a more accurate understanding of associations. Eur J Pers. 2012;26(3):165–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Basile DP, Donohoe D, Roethe K, Osborn JL. Renal ischemic injury results in permanent damage to peritubular capillaries and influences long-term function. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2001;281(5):F887–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Spurgeon KR, Donohoe DL, Basile DP. Transforming growth factor-beta in acute renal failure: receptor expression, effects on proliferation, cellularity, and vascularization after recovery from injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005;288(3):F568–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Zager RA, Johnson AC, Andress D, Becker K. Progressive endothelin-1 gene activation initiates chronic/end-stage renal disease following experimental ischemic/reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 2013;84(4):703–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Yang B, Lan S, Dieude M, Sabo-Vatasescu JP, Karakeussian-Rimbaud A, Turgeon J, et al. Caspase-3 is a pivotal regulator of microvascular rarefaction and renal fibrosis after ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29(7):1900–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Basile DP, Friedrich JL, Spahic J, Knipe N, Mang H, Leonard EC, et al. Impaired endothelial proliferation and mesenchymal transition contribute to vascular rarefaction following acute kidney injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011;300(3):F721–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Maarouf OH, Uehara M, Kasinath V, Solhjou Z, Banouni N, Bahmani B, et al. Repetitive ischemic injuries to the kidneys result in lymph node fibrosis and impaired healing. JCI Insight. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.120546.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Hassoun HT, Grigoryev DN, Lie ML, Liu M, Cheadle C, Tuder RM, et al. Ischemic acute kidney injury induces a distant organ functional and genomic response distinguishable from bilateral nephrectomy. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007;293(1):F30-40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Liu M, Liang Y, Chigurupati S, Lathia JD, Pletnikov M, Sun Z, et al. Acute kidney injury leads to inflammation and functional changes in the brain. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(7):1360–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Kelly KJ. Distant effects of experimental renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(6):1549–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Cianciolo Cosentino C, Skrypnyk NI, Brilli LL, Chiba T, Novitskaya T, Woods C, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitor enhances recovery after AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(6):943–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Kim SJ, Oh BJ, Lee JS, Lim CM, Shim TS, Lee SD, et al. Recovery from lung injury in survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome: difference between pulmonary and extrapulmonary subtypes. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(10):1960–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Linden VB, Lidegran MK, Frisen G, Dahlgren P, Frenckner BP, Larsen F. ECMO in ARDS: a long-term follow-up study regarding pulmonary morphology and function and health-related quality of life. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53(4):489–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Wilcox ME, Patsios D, Murphy G, Kudlow P, Paul N, Tansey CM, et al. Radiologic outcomes at 5 years after severe ARDS. Chest. 2013;143(4):920–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Desai SR, Wells AU, Rubens MB, Evans TW, Hansell DM. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: CT abnormalities at long-term follow-up. Radiology. 1999;210(1):29–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Orme J Jr, Romney JS, Hopkins RO, Pope D, Chan KJ, Thomsen G, et al. Pulmonary function and health-related quality of life in survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167(5):690–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Masclans JR, Roca O, Munoz X, Pallisa E, Torres F, Rello J, et al. Quality of life, pulmonary function, and tomographic scan abnormalities after ARDS. Chest. 2011;139(6):1340–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al-Saidi F, et al. One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(8):683–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matte A, Tomlinson G, Diaz-Granados N, Cooper A, et al. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(14):1293–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Cooper AB, Ferguson ND, Hanly PJ, Meade MO, Kachura JR, Granton JT, et al. Long-term follow-up of survivors of acute lung injury: lack of effect of a ventilation strategy to prevent barotrauma. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(12):2616–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Chiumello D, Taccone P, Berto V, Marino A, Migliara G, Lazzerini M, et al. Long-term outcomes in survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated in supine or prone position. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(2):221–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Watson RS, Choong K, Colville G, Crow S, Dervan LA, Hopkins RO, et al. Life after critical illness in children-toward an understanding of pediatric post-intensive care syndrome. J Pediatr. 2018;198:16–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Woodruff AG, Choong K. Long-term outcomes and the post-intensive care syndrome in critically ill children: a North American perspective. Children. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8040254.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Rodriguez-Rubio M, Pinto NP, Manning JC, Kudchadkar SR. Post-intensive care syndrome in paediatrics: setting our sights on survivorship. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(7):486–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Ong C, Lee JH, Leow MK, Puthucheary ZA. Functional outcomes and physical impairments in pediatric critical care survivors: a scoping review. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016;17(5):e247–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Pollack MM, Holubkov R, Glass P, Dean JM, Meert KL, Zimmerman J, et al. Functional Status Scale: new pediatric outcome measure. Pediatrics. 2009;124(1):e18-28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Farris RW, Weiss NS, Zimmerman JJ. Functional outcomes in pediatric severe sepsis: further analysis of the researching severe sepsis and organ dysfunction in children: a global perspective trial. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14(9):835–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Choong K, Al-Harbi S, Siu K, Wong K, Cheng J, Baird B, et al. Functional recovery following critical illness in children: the “wee-cover” pilot study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16(4):310–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Als LC, Picouto MD, Hau SM, Nadel S, Cooper M, Pierce CM, et al. Mental and physical well-being following admission to pediatric intensive care. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16(5):e141–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Kasinathan A, Sharawat IK, Singhi P, Jayashree M, Sahu JK, Sankhyan N. Intensive Care Unit-acquired weakness in children: a prospective observational study using simplified serial electrophysiological testing (PEDCIMP Study). Neurocrit Care. 2021;34(3):927–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Field-Ridley A, Dharmar M, Steinhorn D, McDonald C, Marcin JP. ICU-acquired weakness is associated with differences in clinical outcomes in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016;17(1):53–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Purser MJ, Johnston DL, McMillan HJ. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy among paediatric oncology patients. Can J Neurol Sci. 2014;41(4):442–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Smith LS, Gharib SA, Frevert CW, Martin TR. Effects of age on the synergistic interactions between lipopolysaccharide and mechanical ventilation in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2010;43(4):475–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Nardell EA, Brody JS. Determinants of mechanical properties of rat lung during postnatal development. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982;53(1):140–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Yang G, Abate A, George AG, Weng YH, Dennery PA. Maturational differences in lung NF-kappaB activation and their role in tolerance to hyperoxia. J Clin Invest. 2004;114(5):669–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Ygberg S, Nilsson A. The developing immune system—from foetus to toddler. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(2):120–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Ghazal P, Dickinson P, Smith CL. Early life response to infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2013;26(3):213–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Kneyber MC, Zhang H, Slutsky AS. Ventilator-induced lung injury. Similarity and differences between children and adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(3):258–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Pollack MM, Holubkov R, Funai T, Clark A, Moler F, Shanley T, et al. Relationship between the functional status scale and the pediatric overall performance category and pediatric cerebral performance category scales. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(7):671–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Bone MF, Feinglass JM, Goodman DM. Risk factors for acquiring functional and cognitive disabilities during admission to a PICU*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15(7):640–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Fink EL, Kochanek PM, Tasker RC, Beca J, Bell MJ, Clark RS, et al. International survey of critically ill children with acute neurologic insults: the prevalence of acute critical neurological disease in children: a global epidemiological assessment study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(4):330–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Failla MD, Juengst SB, Arenth PM, Wagner AK. Preliminary associations between brain-derived neurotrophic factor, memory impairment, functional cognition, and depressive symptoms following severe TBI. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30(5):419–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Park SH, Hwang SK. Prognostic value of serum levels of S100 calcium-binding protein B, neuron-specific enolase, and interleukin-6 in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury. World Neurosurg. 2018;118:e534–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Fink EL, Berger RP, Clark RS, Watson RS, Angus DC, Richichi R, et al. Serum biomarkers of brain injury to classify outcome after pediatric cardiac arrest*. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(3):664–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Madurski C, Jarvis JM, Beers SR, Houtrow AJ, Wagner AK, Fabio A, et al. Serum biomarkers of regeneration and plasticity are associated with functional outcome in pediatric neurocritical illness: an exploratory study. Neurocrit Care. 2021;35(2):457–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Lopes-Junior LC, Rosa M, Lima RAG. Psychological and psychiatric outcomes following PICU admission: a systematic review of cohort studies. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018;19(1):e58–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Rees G, Gledhill J, Garralda ME, Nadel S. Psychiatric outcome following paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission: a cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(8):1607–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Colville G, Kerry S, Pierce C. Children’s factual and delusional memories of intensive care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(9):976–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Manning JC, Hemingway P, Redsell SA. Stories of survival: children’s narratives of psychosocial well-being following paediatric critical illness or injury. J Child Health Care. 2017;21(3):236–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Nelson LP, Gold JI. Posttraumatic stress disorder in children and their parents following admission to the pediatric intensive care unit: a review. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012;13(3):338–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the French Intensive Care Society (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

All the authors met authorship criteria and participated significantly to the study; in particular, JJ, GV, and MO were involved in conception and design; GV, MO, AP, CSG, YJ, and JJ wrote the article; PR, BS, HK, DV, LS, and SP provided critical revisions to the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jérémie Joffre.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Voiriot, G., Oualha, M., Pierre, A. et al. Chronic critical illness and post-intensive care syndrome: from pathophysiology to clinical challenges. Ann. Intensive Care 12, 58 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01038-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01038-0

Keywords

  • Post-ICU syndrome
  • Chronic critical illness
  • Long-term outcome
  • ICU sequelae
  • Neuromuscular disorders
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Acquired immunosuppression