Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Severe metabolic acidosis after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: risk factors and association with outcome

  • Matthieu Jamme1, 3,
  • Omar Ben Hadj Salem1, 3,
  • Lucie Guillemet1, 3,
  • Pierre Dupland1,
  • Wulfran Bougouin1, 3, 4,
  • Julien Charpentier1,
  • Jean-Paul Mira1, 3,
  • Frédéric Pène1, 3,
  • Florence Dumas2, 3, 4,
  • Alain Cariou1, 3, 4Email author and
  • Guillaume Geri1, 3, 4
Annals of Intensive Care20188:62

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0409-3

Received: 31 January 2018

Accepted: 2 May 2018

Published: 8 May 2018

Abstract

Background

Metabolic acidosis is frequently observed as a consequence of global ischemia–reperfusion after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We aimed to identify risk factors and assess the impact of metabolic acidosis on outcome after OHCA.

Methods

We included all consecutive OHCA patients admitted between 2007 and 2012. Using admission data, metabolic acidosis was defined by a positive base deficit and was categorized by quartiles. Main outcome was survival at ICU discharge. Factors associated with acidosis severity and with main outcome were evaluated by linear and logistic regressions, respectively.

Results

A total of 826 patients (68.3% male, median age 61 years) were included in the analysis. Median base deficit was 8.8 [5.3, 13.2] mEq/l. Male gender (p = 0.002), resuscitation duration (p < 0.001), initial shockable rhythm (p < 0.001) and post-resuscitation shock (p < 0.001) were associated with an increased level of acidosis. ICU mortality rate increased across base deficit quartiles (39.1, 59.2, 76.3 and 88.3%, p for trend < 0.001), and base deficit was independently associated with ICU mortality (p < 0.001). The proportion of CPC 1 patients among ICU survivors was similar across base deficit quartiles (72.8, 67.1, 70.5 and 62.5%, p = 0.21), and 7.3% of patients with a base deficit higher than 13.2 mEq/l survived to ICU discharge with complete neurological recovery.

Conclusion

Severe metabolic acidosis is frequent in OHCA patients and is associated with poorer outcome, in particular due to refractory shock. However, we observed that about 7% of patients with a very severe metabolic acidosis survived to ICU discharge with complete neurological recovery.

Keywords

Metabolic acidosisOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestPost-resuscitation syndromeOutcome

Background

Among successfully resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), the occurrence of a “post-cardiac arrest syndrome” is the leading cause of early mortality. This syndrome is related to multi-organ ischemic reperfusion injury and may lead to multi-organ failure in the early hours after resuscitation [1].

Acidosis is frequently observed in this context [2] and is often multifactorial, resulting from major metabolic disturbances (increased levels of blood lactate, phosphate, unmeasured anions, acute kidney injury) as well as respiratory disturbances. Metabolic acidosis has well-known deleterious effects including decrease of cardiac contractility [3], arterial vasodilatation [4], impairment of the inflammatory and immune response [5] leading to an increased risk of multi-organ failure. Accordingly, a strong association between the depth of acidosis and poor outcome has been previously demonstrated in critically ill patients [6, 7]. Even though intuitive in OHCA patients, data on the prevalence and the severity of metabolic acidosis at ICU admission are scarce. Moreover, data on the prognostic impact of metabolic acidosis in these patients and on the proportion of patients with severe metabolic acidosis discharged alive from ICU are lacking.

In the present study, we aimed to describe the outcome of successfully resuscitated OHCA patients with metabolic acidosis and to identify factors associated with severe acidosis and survival to ICU discharge.

Methods

Study population

In the present analysis, we screened all consecutive OHCA patients admitted to our cardiac arrest center between January 2007 and December 2012 (IRB number CE-SRLF 12-384). We then selected patients who evidenced a metabolic acidosis at ICU admission, defined by a positive base deficit, as described above. We only excluded patients who did not get ROSC in the prehospital setting and who received CPR at time of ICU admission.

Data collection and definitions

Cardiac arrest characteristics, in-hospital management and outcome data were prospectively collected according to the Utstein style [8]. The following information was recorded prospectively for each patient: demographic data, clinical parameters, cardiac arrest location, time from collapse to basic life support (BLS) and time from BLS to ROSC, initial rhythm, admission blood lactate level, temperature management and ICU mortality. Post-resuscitation shock was defined as the need for vasopressors (epinephrine or norepinephrine) lasting more than 6 h despite adequate fluid loading or the need for mechanical circulatory assistance (intra-aortic balloon pump) [9]. We reviewed patients’ charts in order to collect information that could impact ICU admission bicarbonate level, i.e., the use of intravenous bicarbonate during resuscitation, the existence of chronic respiratory condition and chronic kidney disease in the past medical history.

Laboratory values were computed from medical files and extracted from the patient data management system (Clinisoft, GE Healthcare). We specifically collected arterial blood gas (pH, PCO2 [mmHg], PO2 [mmHg], bicarbonate [mmol−1]), arterial blood lactate, hemoglobin, potassium, phosphorus, blood creatinine and urea levels. We determined the occurrence and the severity of acute kidney injury within the first 48 h using the KDIGO definition [10].

Metabolic acidosis was defined by a positive base deficit (i.e., negative base excess). Base deficit was calculated according to the Van Slyke equation [11, 12] and expressed in mEq/l. We then divided the study population in quartiles of base deficit.

Early management

As previously described [13], our local practices include a strategy of early imaging work-up performed within the first 24 h after an immediate assessment of the feasibility of further investigations by the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and ICU physicians. According to this strategy, we consider immediate coronary angiography in all patients without obvious extra-cardiac cause of cardiac arrest, regardless of the initial rhythm and ECG changes. In case of suspected extra-cardiac cause and in the absence of an obvious etiology, a CT scan can also be performed at admission (brain CT scan and chest CT pulmonary angiography). After this early imaging procedure, patients are then admitted to ICU. Arterial blood gas is taken as soon as possible, i.e., either at the cath laboratory arrival, or at ICU admission if the patient was directly admitted to the ICU. Renal replacement therapy is initiated at ICU admission in case of severe metabolic acidosis (defined by a pH lower than 7.20 and an admission bicarbonate level lower than 20 mmol/l) and/or in case of life-threatening hyperkalemia (defined by blood potassium level higher than 6 mmol/l with electrocardiographic findings suggestive of hyperkalemia) [2]. Therapeutic hypothermia was performed using surface cooling, using a 33 °C temperature target.

Outcomes

The main outcome was survival at ICU discharge. Neurological outcome and cause of death were our secondary outcomes. The cause of death was defined for each non-survivor as related to post-cardiac arrest shock, when death occurred as a direct consequence of shock (including subsequent multi-organ failure), or related to neurological injury if this led to withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy or brain death [9]. Neurological outcome at ICU discharge was assessed using the Cerebral Performance Categories score [14]. Briefly, CPC score ranges from 1 to 5: 1 is a normal neurological state while 4 means vegetative state and 5 death.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were presented as median [interquartile] and categorical variables as counts (percentages). Baseline characteristics were compared according to the presence of acidemia using Mann–Whitney test, and Pearson Chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate, for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Characteristics between quartiles of base excess were compared using Cuzick test and trend Pearson Chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

To evaluate prognostic performance of base deficit, admission pH, arterial lactate and bicarbonate level, we picked up thresholds corresponding to a specificity of 100% (i.e., no survivor above the threshold).

Factors associated with base excess were identified using a multivariable linear regression. Normal distribution of residuals was checked as well as heteroscedasticity. Factors associated with ICU mortality were assessed using a multivariable logistic regression. The multivariable model was built using all variables significantly associated with ICU mortality in univariate analysis (p < 0.05). The goodness-of-fit of the model was evaluated using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test.

This analysis was repeated in the following subgroups of patients, as sensitivity analyses: patients without prehospital bicarbonate infusion and patients without either chronic respiratory disease or chronic kidney disease. We also performed a sensitivity analysis including arterial blood lactate level in the multivariable model to assess a potential interaction between lactate level and base deficit. We thus included a cross-produced factor, and both lactate level and base deficit were included as continuous variables in the model.

All statistical tests were two-sided using a type I error of 0.05 unless otherwise mentioned. Analyses were performed using Stata 14.1 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX).

Results

A total of 899 resuscitated OHCA patients were admitted to the study hospital during the study period. We excluded 27 patients without ROSC at ICU admission, one patient with DNR order and 2 patients with no available arterial blood gases at ICU admission. Among the 869 remaining patients with acid–base status available, 43 patients did not have metabolic acidosis, and we included 826 patients in the analysis.

Baseline characteristics of the studied population

Most of the included patients were male (68.3%) of median age of 61 [iqr 50–73] years (Table 1). An initial shockable rhythm was observed in 414 (50.1%) cases, and the median time from collapse to ROSC was 20 [iqr 13–30] min. Post-resuscitation shock occurred in 480 (58.1%) cases. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was observed in 548/791 (69.3%) patients (baseline creatinine level was unknown in 35/45 patients with chronic kidney disease). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) was initiated within the first 24 h in 40.6% of cases. Even if indicated, 13 patients did not receive RRT because of major hemodynamic instability (n = 10) or early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (n = 3).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the 826 patients included in the study according to quartiles of base deficit

Variable

All patients

n = 826

Base deficit quartiles

p value

[0–5]

n = 207

[5–9]

n = 206

[9–13]

n = 207

> 13

n = 206

Demographics

Male gender

564 (68.3)

156 (75.4)

148 (71.8)

139 (67.1)

121 (58.7)

< 0.001

Age (year)

61 [50, 73]

60 [51, 71]

64 [51, 77]

60 [49, 72]

62 [51, 74]

0.678

OHCA characteristics

Public setting

262 (31.8)

79 (38.3)

71 (34.5)

70 (33.8)

42 (20.4)

< 0.001

Witnessed CA

698 (87.0)

181 (90.5)

183 (92.0)

177 (88.5)

157 (77.3)

< 0.001

Bystander CPR

444 (55.8)

122 (62.2)

122 (60.7)

99 (49.5)

101 (51.0)

0.004

Initial VF/VT

414 (50.1)

129 (62.3)

121 (58.7)

92 (44.4)

72 (35.0)

< 0.001

Collapse to ROSC, min

20 [13, 30]

16 [10, 25]

20 [14, 27]

22 [15, 33]

29 [20, 40]

< 0.001

Prehosp. infusion of bicar.

113 (13.7)

17 (8.2)

22 (10.7)

28 (13.5)

46 (22.3)

< 0.001

Chronic respiratory disease

42 (5.1)

11 (5.3)

14 (6.8)

8 (3.9)

9 (4.4)

0.399

Chronic kidney disease

45 (5.5)

5 (2.4)

12 (5.9)

14 (6.9)

14 (7.0)

0.039

Biological characteristics at ICU admission

pH

7.22 [7.11, 7.31]

7.33 [7.28, 7.39]

7.27 [7.21, 7.32]

7.18 [7.13, 7.25]

7.03 [6.92, 7.11]

< 0.001

PCO2 (mmHg)

42.8 [36.0, 51.2]

41.5 [36.8, 49.7]

42.3 [36.3, 50.5]

43.5 [35.7, 52.3]

43.5 [35.1, 52.5]

0.554

Bicarbonate level (mmol/l)

17.5 [14.0, 20.4]

21.8 [20.7, 22.9]

19.1 [17.8, 20.0]

16.0 [15.0, 16.9]

10.8 [8.7, 12.7]

< 0.001

Urea level (mmol/l)

7.3 [5.7, 10.2]

6.8 [5.3, 8.9]

7.3 [5.8, 9.8]

7.5 [5.8, 10.6]

8.1 [5.7, 13.2]

< 0.001

Creatinine level (µmol/l)

106 [78, 146]

87 [69, 111]

102 [77, 130]

114 [86, 148]

136 [101, 190]

< 0.001

Phosphorus level (mmol/l)

1.7 [1.1, 2.5]

1.2 [0.9, 1.7]

1.4 [1.0, 1.9]

1.9 [1.3, 2.5]

2.9 [2.1, 3.8]

< 0.001

Lactate level (mmol/l)

5.2 [2.5, 9.2]

2.5 [1.6, 4.3]

4.0 [2.3, 5.7]

6.5 [3.5, 8.8]

11.2 [7.6, 15.0]

< 0.001

Base deficit (mEq/l)

8.8 [5.3, 13.2]

3.6 [2.8, 4.5]

6.8 [6.0, 7.9]

10.8 [9.7, 11.9]

17.8 [15.2, 21.0]

< 0.001

In-hospital characteristics

Cardiac cause-related CA

436 (56.2)

136 (68.7)

122 (61.3)

103 (54.5)

75 (39.5)

< 0.001

Post-resus. shock

480 (58.1)

87 (42.0)

109 (52.9)

119 (57.5)

165 (80.1)

< 0.001

Acute kidney injurya

     

< 0.001

 No AKI

243 (30.7)

104 (51.5)

71 (35.9)

59 (30.3)

9 (4.6)

 

 KDIGO 1

65 (8.2)

12 (5.9)

27 (13.6)

19 (9.7)

7 (3.6)

 

 KDIGO 2

45 (5.7)

17 (8.4)

13 (6.6)

10 (5.1)

5 (2.6)

 

 KDIGO 3

438 (55.4)

69 (34.2)

87 (43.9)

107 (54.9)

175 (89.7)

 

Coronary angiography

556 (67.3)

145 (70.0)

150 (72.8)

135 (65.2)

126 (61.2)

0.019

Therapeutic hypothermia

717 (86.8)

186 (89.9)

182 (88.3)

185 (89.4)

164 (79.6)

0.005

RRT at day-1

335 (40.6)

42 (20.4)

56 (27.2)

89 (43.0)

148 (71.8)

< 0.001

OHCA out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, CPR cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ROSC restoration of spontaneous circulation, AKI acute kidney injury, KDIGO kidney disease improving global outcome, RRT renal replacement therapy

p value for trend has been calculated using a Chi-square trend test for binary variables and Cuzick test for ordinal and continuous variables

aMissing data are related to the missingness of basal level of creatinine in patients with chronic kidney disease

Factors associated with severity of metabolic acidosis

Arterial acidemia (pH < 7.38) was observed in the majority of patients at ICU admission (n = 743, 90.0%) with a median pH at ICU admission at 7.22 [7.11, 7.31] and a blood bicarbonate level of 17.5 [14.0, 20.4] mmol/l. Median base deficit was 8.8 [iqr 5.3, 13.2] mEq/l (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Median base deficit was 3.3 [iqr 2.5, 5.3] and 9.5 [iqr 5.9, 13.8] in patients without and with acidemia (p < 0.001). There were, respectively, 61, 19, 2 and 0 patients without acidemia in base deficit quartiles. The proportion of witnessed cases and of initial shockable rhythm decreased across base deficit quartiles while time interval from collapse to ROSC increased across the quartiles (16, 20, 22 and 29 min, p for trend < 0.001) (Table 1). Left ventricular ejection fraction did not differ in the 4 quartiles of base deficit (median = 40% in the four quartiles). In multivariable linear regression, male gender (beta estimate − 1.51 [95% confidence interval − 2.45, − 0.56]) and initial shockable rhythm (− 2.36 [− 3.41, − 1.31]) were negatively associated with base deficit. Conversely, time interval between collapse to ROSC (+ 0.09 per min [0.06, 0.12]) and the occurrence of post-resuscitation shock (+ 2.45 [1.60, 3.29]) was independently associated with base deficit (Table 2).
Table 2

Factors associated with base deficit in multivariable linear regression

Variable

Coefficient

95% confidence interval

p value

Age, per year

− 0.01

− 0.03, 0.02

0.670

Male gender

− 1.51

− 2.45, − 0.56

0.002

Public setting

− 0.85

− 1.76, 0.06

0.067

Witnessed CA

− 1.35

− 2.91, 0.22

0.091

Bystander CPR

0.69

− 0.17, 1.56

0.117

Collapse to ROSC, per min

0.09

0.06, 0.12

< 0.001

Initial VF/VT

− 2.36

− 3.41, − 1.31

< 0.001

Post-resus. shock

2.45

1.60, 3.29

< 0.001

Cardiac cause-related CA

− 0.16

− 1.21, 0.89

0.761

CA cardiac arrest, CPR cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ROSC restoration of spontaneous circulation

Association between base deficit, ICU mortality and cause of death

Overall, 543 (65.7%) patients died in ICU. ICU mortality rate increased across base deficit quartiles (39.1, 59.2, 76.3 and 88.3%, p for trend < 0.001). ICU mortality was 42.2 versus 68.4% in patients without and with acidemia (p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounders, we observed an association between base deficit and mortality at ICU discharge (odds ratio 1.76 [1.07, 2.91], 3.82 [2.20, 6.65], 5.13 [2.67, 9.88] for 5–9, 9–13 and > 13 categories with base deficit < 5 as reference category, respectively) (Table 3). Similar results were obtained in patients without prehospital bicarbonate infusion and without either chronic respiratory disease or chronic kidney disease. We observed a strong interaction between base deficit and lactate level (p for interaction = 0.004).
Table 3

Factors associated with ICU mortality in multivariable logistic regression

Variable

Odds ratio

95% confidence interval

p value

Age (year)

1.03

1.02, 1.05

< 0.001

Male gender

1.39

0.87, 2.22

0.164

Public setting

0.63

0.41, 0.97

0.034

Witnessed CA

0.96

0.39, 2.35

0.931

Bystander CPR

0.76

0.50, 1.16

0.200

Initial VF/VT

0.43

0.26, 0.71

0.001

Collapse to ROSC, per min

1.05

1.03, 1.07

< 0.001

Cardiac cause-related CA

0.48

0.29, 0.80

0.005

Post-resus. shock

1.31

0.89, 1.96

0.181

Base deficit quartiles (mEq/l)

   

 < 5

1.00

1.00, 1.00

 

 5–9

1.76

1.07, 2.91

0.026

 9–13

3.82

2.20, 6.65

< 0.001

 > 13

5.13

2.67, 9.88

< 0.001

CA cardiac arrest; CPR cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ROSC restoration of spontaneous circulation

Brain damage was the leading cause of death (n = 367, 67.6%), while refractory shock was responsible for 173 (31.9%) deaths. Three patients died in ICU from septic shock without brain anoxic injury. Death related to refractory shock was more frequent in the subgroup of patients with the most severe metabolic acidosis (13.6, 22.1, 28.5 and 49.5% across base deficit quartiles). Overall, the proportion of CPC1 patients decreased across the base deficit quartile while it was similar among patients discharged alive (72.8, 67.1, 70.5 and 62.5%, p = 0.21) (Fig. 1). Among patients with the most severe acidosis, clinical characteristics except initial rhythm and in-hospital management were similar between patients who died and those who were discharged alive from ICU (Additional file 2: Table S1).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Neurological outcome at ICU discharge in all patients (left panel) and in patients discharged alive from ICU (right panel). CPC, cerebral performance category scale

No patient survived with a base deficit higher than 25 mmol/l, a pH lower than 6.72, a blood bicarbonate level lower than 8.6 mmol/l or an admission arterial blood lactate level higher than 20 mmol/l (Additional file 3: Table S2).

Discussion

In the present study, we found that metabolic acidosis was almost constantly observed at ICU admission in OHCA patients. Metabolic acidosis was related to the initial rhythm and the time interval from collapse to ROSC. Furthermore, we observed that metabolic acidosis was associated with ICU mortality in a severity-dependent manner and was also associated with refractory shock. However, we also found that about 10% of patients with a very severe metabolic acidosis (median base deficit > 13.2 mEq/l) survived to ICU discharge with good neurological recovery.

In the present study, metabolic acidosis was severe and strongly determined by the initial cardiac rhythm and the time interval from collapse to ROSC. While several studies have already reported the occurrence of acidosis after cardiac arrest, the present study reports findings from a large cohort of OHCA patients using a reproducible and reliable definition of metabolic acidosis [1518]. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the largest study focusing on the prevalence and the prognostic impact of metabolic acidosis in successfully resuscitated OHCA patients. Moreover, several studies reported metabolic acidosis using either pH and/or blood lactate level [19, 20]. This probably includes some patients with exclusive respiratory acidosis, especially in countries where there is no use of advanced airway in the field, and simultaneously misses some patients with compensated metabolic acidosis. This is the reason why we used the base deficit calculation without using pH. Furthermore, the association we observed between severity of metabolic acidosis and both resuscitation duration and initial rhythm may reflect the goodness-of-fit of such a measure with the degree and the duration of inadequate perfusion [21]. Thus, we showed that lactate level was an important contributor of metabolic acidosis but not sufficient to exhaustively describe it [22, 23]. In the present study, acidosis strongly correlated with both lactate level and phosphorus level, highlighting the fact that metabolic acidosis after OHCA is not only related to increase of lactate level but also to accumulation of unmeasured anions partially because of frequent acute kidney injury. This additional finding may explain the association we observed between severity of metabolic acidosis and ICU mortality as acute kidney injury has been demonstrated as an independent marker of ICU mortality after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [2, 24].

Our findings support a strong association between severity of metabolic acidosis at ICU admission after OHCA and ICU mortality. Interestingly, we were able to provide cause of death and observed that ICU mortality in the most severe patients included in the present study was mostly related to refractory multi-organ failure. The association between metabolic acidosis and ICU mortality has been reported in different subgroups of critically ill patients: trauma [25], sepsis [26] as well as cardiac arrest [2729]. Nolan et al. [27] reported a significant increase of 45% of in-hospital mortality per 0.1 point of pH decrease below 7.25. In the same manner, Chien et al. [29] reported an odds ratio of survival to hospital discharge of 10 for patients with a pH higher than 7.07 [95% confidence interval 2.1, 47.7]. Although pH is a simple measure to obtain at ICU admission, it does not distinguish metabolic and respiratory acidosis. Indeed, PCO2 increase after ROSC may largely contribute to acidemia [30, 31]. Thus, we chose to consider base deficit, more likely to reflect metabolic acidosis and ischemia. We evidenced a severity-manner relationship between base deficit and survival to hospital discharge. Physicians may be aware that pH may add information to base deficit, as we observed that patients with acidemia had worse prognosis than those without. These findings are fully consistent with those previously published in some smaller cohorts [17, 28, 32, 33]. Besides the correlation between base deficit and duration of resuscitation efforts, metabolic acidosis may be associated with mortality by its hemodynamic effects, as depression of ventricular function, catecholamine release and reduction of ventricular responsiveness to catecholamines [4]. Interestingly, we did not evidence any relationship between metabolic acidosis and myocardial function, assessed by the left ventricle ejection function. This might suggest that in our cohort, metabolic acidosis may worsen vasoplegia in a more intensive manner and explain the increase of deaths related to refractory shock we observed across the base deficit quartiles.

We observed a survival rate of about 10% in the fourth quartile of base deficit, i.e., in patients with the most severe metabolic acidosis. In 1985, Weil et al. did not observe any survivor with a pH below 7.25 and an arterial lactate level higher than 7 mmol/l. However, this study was published 30 years ago and in-hospital management of successfully resuscitated OHCA patients has greatly improved since this publication [34]. In the study reported by Chien et al., the lowest pH associated with survival was 6.86 while Nolan et al. reported a survival rate of less than 1% below 6.70, about 3% between 6.70 and 6.80 and about 7% between 6.80 and 6.90 [27, 29]. Recently, Ilicki et al. [35] described 6 OHCA survivors with an initial pH lower than 6.90. However, among these cases, 3 had another underlying cause of acidemia (either ketoacidosis or metformin intoxication), and 2 had hemorrhagic shock. The comparison according to vital status at ICU discharge in this subgroup of patients did not evidence any in-hospital factors that could be associated with survival. We were particularly interested in the similar rate of renal replacement therapy in these patients regardless of the vital status at ICU discharge. Despite acidosis severity (almost three quarters of patients received renal replacement therapy within the first 24 h), several patients survived without aggressive treatment of metabolic acidosis and we did not find any additional factor that could differentiate these patients. Moreover, prehospital infusion of bicarbonate appeared to be strongly correlated with ICU mortality and seemed to be a surrogate marker of the severity assessed by the prehospital team.

We acknowledge several limitations in the present study. First, due to the retrospective design, we are not able to confirm the causality of the association we observed. Despite adjustment for prehospital and in-hospital confounders, we cannot be sure that metabolic acidosis might only be a mediator rather than an independent predictor of ICU mortality. Second, we specifically collected information about acidosis of OHCA patients included in analysis previously performed that focused on the prognostic impact of acute kidney injury in this setting [3]. Thus, we were not able to extend the study period beyond 2012. However, we do believe the results we observed would be similar in a more recent cohort. Third, we were not able to collect additional information on the pathogenesis of the metabolic acidosis. We did not collect chloremia, albumin or magnesium level, which could have allowed us to explore more deeply metabolic acidosis mechanisms. Fourth, we did not collect repeated measurements of base deficit, which prevented us to evaluate the prognostic impact of metabolic acidosis correction or acidosis duration. Last, we did not collect renal replacement therapy details, which could partly explain the differences between survivors and patients who died in the fourth quartile of base deficit.

Conclusion

Metabolic acidosis was observed in 95% of OHCA patients admitted to the ICU. Initial rhythm and time interval from collapse to ROSC were independently associated with base deficit. Base deficit was strongly associated with ICU mortality especially from refractory shock but seems to have no impact on neurological recovery in patients who were discharged alive. A substantial proportion of patients admitted with a very severe metabolic acidosis were discharged alive with a good neurological performance.

Abbreviations

OHCA: 

out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

ICU: 

intensive care unit

ROSC: 

return of spontaneous circulation

BLS: 

basic life support

PCO2

partial pressure in carbon dioxide

PO2

partial pressure in oxygen

KDIGO: 

kidney disease: improving renal outcome

EMS: 

emergency medical service

ECG: 

electrocardiogram

CPC: 

cerebral performance category score

RRT: 

renal replacement therapy

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MJ, AC and GG designed the study. MJ, OBHS, LG, PD, WB, JC, JPM, FP, AC and GG collected the data. MJ and GG performed the statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript. OBHS, LG, PD, WB, JC, JPM, FP, FD and AC reviewed the manuscript. MJ, AC and GG take responsibility for the integrity of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Nancy Kentish-Barnes for her help in preparing the manuscript.

Competing interests

GG was granted by the French Intensive Care Society, the Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris and by the Schueller-Bettencourt Foundation. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In accordance with the ethical standards of the French Intensive Care Society Ethics Committee (IRB Project Number CE-SRLF 12-384), informed consent was not necessary for analyses of demographic, physiological and hospital-outcome data, because this retrospective observational study did not modify existing diagnostic or therapeutic strategies.

Funding

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Medical Intensive Care Unit, Cochin University Hospital (APHP), Paris, France
(2)
Emergency Department, Cochin University Hospital (APHP), Paris, France
(3)
Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
(4)
INSERM U970, Sudden Death Expertise Centre, Paris Cardiovascular Research Centre, Paris, France

References

  1. Neumar RW, Nolan JP, Adrie C, Aibiki M, Berg RA, Böttiger BW, et al. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. A consensus statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, European Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Asia, and the Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa); the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; the Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; the Council on Clinical Cardiology; and the Stroke Council. Circulation. 2008;118(23):2452–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Geri G, Guillemet L, Dumas F, Charpentier J, Antona M, Lemiale V, et al. Acute kidney injury after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: risk factors and prognosis in a large cohort. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(7):1273–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wildenthal K, Mierzwiak DS, Myers RW, Mitchell JH. Effects of acute lactic acidosis on left ventricular performance. Am J Physiol. 1968;214(6):1352–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kellum JA, Song M, Venkataraman R. Effects of hyperchloremic acidosis on arterial pressure and circulating inflammatory molecules in experimental sepsis. Chest. 2004;125(1):243–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kellum JA, Song M, Li J. Science review: extracellular acidosis and the immune response: clinical and physiologic implications. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2004;8(5):331–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Gunnerson KJ, Saul M, He S, Kellum JA. Lactate versus non-lactate metabolic acidosis: a retrospective outcome evaluation of critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2006;10(1):R22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Jung B, Rimmele T, Le Goff C, Chanques G, Corne P, Jonquet O, et al. Severe metabolic or mixed acidemia on intensive care unit admission: incidence, prognosis and administration of buffer therapy. A prospective, multiple-center study. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2011;15(5):R238.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Perkins GD, Jacobs IG, Nadkarni VM, Berg RA, Bhanji F, Biarent D, et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update of the Utstein Resuscitation Registry Templates for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, Resuscitation Council of Asia); and the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation. Circulation. 2015;132(13):1286–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lemiale V, Dumas F, Mongardon N, Giovanetti O, Charpentier J, Chiche J-D, et al. Intensive care unit mortality after cardiac arrest: the relative contribution of shock and brain injury in a large cohort. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(11):1972–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kdigo AKI. Workgorup. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Siggaard-Andersen O. The van Slyke equation. Scand J Clin Lab Investig Suppl. 1977;146:15–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Morgan TJ, Clark C, Endre ZH. Accuracy of base excess—an in vitro evaluation of the Van Slyke equation. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(8):2932–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chelly J, Mongardon N, Dumas F, Varenne O, Spaulding C, Vignaux O, et al. Benefit of an early and systematic imaging procedure after cardiac arrest: insights from the PROCAT (Parisian Region Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest) registry. Resuscitation. 2012;83(12):1444–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet Lond Engl. 1975;1(7905):480–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Spindelboeck W, Gemes G, Strasser C, Toescher K, Kores B, Metnitz P, et al. Arterial blood gases during and their dynamic changes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective clinical study. Resuscitation. 2016;106:24–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Edmonds-Seal J. Acid-base studies after cardiac arrest. A report on 64 cases. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1966;23:235–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Langhelle A, Tyvold SS, Lexow K, Hapnes SA, Sunde K, Steen PA. In-hospital factors associated with improved outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A comparison between four regions in Norway. Resuscitation. 2003;56(3):247–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Prause G, Ratzenhofer-Comenda B, Smolle-Jüttner F, Heydar-Fadai J, Wildner G, Spernbauer P, et al. Comparison of lactate or BE during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to determine metabolic acidosis. Resuscitation. 2001;51(3):297–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Momiyama Y, Yamada W, Miyata K, Miura K, Fukuda T, Fuse J, et al. Prognostic values of blood pH and lactate levels in patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Acute Med Surg. 2017;4(1):25–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chien D-K, Lin M-R, Tsai S-H, Sun F-J, Liu T-C, Chang W-H. Survival prediction of initial blood pH for nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in the emergency department. Int J Gerontol. 2010;4(4):171–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Takasu A, Sakamoto T, Okada Y. Arterial base excess after CPR: The relationship to CPR duration and the characteristics related to outcome. Resuscitation. 2007;73(3):394–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Makino J, Uchino S, Morimatsu H, Bellomo R. A quantitative analysis of the acidosis of cardiac arrest: a prospective observational study. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2005;9(4):R357–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Funk G-C, Doberer D, Sterz F, Richling N, Kneidinger N, Lindner G, et al. The strong ion gap and outcome after cardiac arrest in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia: a retrospective study. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(2):232–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sandroni C, Dell’anna AM, Tujjar O, Geri G, Cariou A, Taccone FS. Acute kidney injury after cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016;82(9):989–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rutherford EJ, Morris JA, Reed GW, Hall KS. Base deficit stratifies mortality and determines therapy. J Trauma. 1992;33(3):417–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Noritomi DT, Soriano FG, Kellum JA, Cappi SB, Biselli PJC, Libório AB, et al. Metabolic acidosis in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a longitudinal quantitative study. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10):2733–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nolan JP, Laver SR, Welch CA, Harrison DA, Gupta V, Rowan K. Outcome following admission to UK intensive care units after cardiac arrest: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(12):1207–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Grubb NR, Elton RA, Fox KA. In-hospital mortality after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Lancet Lond Engl. 1995;346(8972):417–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Chien D-K, Chang W-H, Tsai S-H, Chang K-S, Chen C-C, Su Y-J. Outcome on non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the elderly. Int J Gerontol. 2008;2(2):60–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim Y-J, Lee YJ, Ryoo SM, Sohn CH, Ahn S, Seo D-W, et al. Role of blood gas analysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(25):e3960.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Yannopoulos D, Matsuura T, McKnite S, Goodman N, Idris A, Tang W, et al. No assisted ventilation cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 24-hour neurological outcomes in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(1):254–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Maupain C, Bougouin W, Lamhaut L, Deye N, Diehl J-L, Geri G, et al. The CAHP (Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis) score: a tool for risk stratification after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(42):3222–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Martinell L, Nielsen N, Herlitz J, Karlsson T, Horn J, Wise MP, et al. Early predictors of poor outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2017;21(1):96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Weil MH, Grundler W, Yamaguchi M, Michaels S, Rackow EC. Arterial blood gases fail to reflect acid–base status during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a preliminary report. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(11):884–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ilicki J, Djärv T. Reply to Letter: Survival in extremely acidotic cardiac arrest patients depends on etiology of acidosis. Resuscitation. 2017;113:e25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement