- Open Access
An ultrasound limited test initiating medical airborne transportation (ULTIMAT-protocol): its impact in other settings in medicine
Annals of Intensive Care volume 10, Article number: 11 (2020)
Critical medicine is sometimes performed in airborne missions. How far can ultrasound help in these settings? This Editorial is devoted to approach the most difficult, but the same use can be done in less extreme conditions, up to routine assessments in numerous disciplines.
The principle of an airborne medical evacuation is to improve the outcome for the patient by providing faster care. Such a procedure is challenging . Restricted space, limited equipment, engine noise among other factors are hindrances for diagnosing an acute circulatory failure, a pneumothorax, etc. Even in a quiet hospital, doctors still request imaging to confirm their clinical diagnoses, sometimes initiating another kind of risky travel .
We have been using ultrasound in our airborne missions since 1995, as a natural complement to the physical examination in areas where it showed limited performances . We use light devices (the 3500-g TM-18, Dymax, Pittsburgh, USA, 1994) (the 1850-g Tringa S-50, Pie Medical, Maastricht, Netherland, 1998) (the 180-g Signos RT, Signostics, Thebarton, Australia, 2011) (the 750-g U-lite, Sonoscanner, Paris, France, 2016) all equipped with microconvex probes. Other machines are available (Lumify, Butterfly, iViz, etc.), but we had no opportunity to test them (note that using these tools with traditional probes would be possible, but would not be stricto sensu our protocol). Our ultrasound limited test initiating medical airborne transportation is a whole-body approach focused on ten critical, selected targets using a single probe and without Doppler. In no step of our protocol, by definition, is Doppler required (users having Doppler are free to use it of course—once again, it would be a distinct protocol). Our protocol involves searching for floating DVT in strategic areas (Fig. 1 ). Simple emergency cardiac sonography includes pericardial state, right ventricle volume, rough real-time approach to left ventricular function; lung ultrasound helps by estimating pulmonary artery occlusion pressure based on the A-profile or B-profile  (Fig. 2). This help may be of interest, because sophisticated methods, including Doppler-echocardiography, are difficult to access here . One checks for the absence of pneumothorax and few other items (Table. 1). In trained hands, a negative protocol is achieved in 1 min. Even multiplied by three or four for less trained users, the timing remains fully acceptable.
In scheduled missions without any apparent problem, the patient’s safety should be reconsidered if pathological conditions are present, particularly floating DVT. Clinical and biological items (kalemia, etc.) being considered apart, if all examinations are clear, the patient is decreed “sonographically fit-to-fly”. If unexpected dramas occur, the physician is armed for facing sudden respiratory failure using lung and venous ultrasound (BLUE-protocol), circulatory failure using a simple emergency cardiac sonography then lung ultrasound (FALLS-protocol) or cardiac arrest using a standardized approach beginning by lung ultrasound (SESAME-protocol) [4, 6, 7].
We use the principles of holistic ultrasound, favoring simple machines with minimal options, but including a “new” target, the lung. Lung and heart are the two mainstems of critical ultrasound [6, 8]. Both interact, lung ultrasound helps when cardiac windows are suboptimal. Our protocol fits perfectly into the spirit of holistic ultrasound: the adjunct of lung ultrasound, the development of an adapted venous ultrasound, the notion of ultrasound lung–heart synergy, all these concepts allow the use of simplicity. Our single and universal probe fits for the whole body. It is optimal for most critical targets (lungs, veins, abdomen) and is suitable for other critical areas, particularly the simple emergency cardiac sonography (Additional file 1: Video file 1, Additional file 2: Video file 2 and Additional file 3: Video file 3 ). This subtlety enables on-site use in extreme emergencies up to cardiac arrest . This ability to use a small and light machine is an absolute necessity in this setting, among other life-support equipments, and above all, proves sufficient. Our current 750-g machine (probe included) can be stored in a 1820-cc box (Fig. 3).
Yet most of us are not working up at 30.000 feet. Let us consider other areas. The same visual approach can be done in any critically ill patient of any ICU. Simple machines and a simple technique can be used in the first minutes in most critical situations. Any unstable patient before a necessary transportation (e.g., to CT) may benefit from (part of) this fast protocol. Obviously, the user just needs to recognize, when the problem remains unsolved, the time to use more sophisticated approaches. Lung ultrasound, a major part of our protocol, is useful in numerous settings. We have listed 17 disciplines for potential applications, from medicalized ambulances, emergency rooms, pediatrics, cardiology, pulmonology, obstetrics, etc., up to family medicine . Before the spectacular revolution of CT, lung ultrasound was operational for bedside use, with its familiar overwhelming advantages (cost, irradiation, point-of-care use). The possibility of using the same approach without any adaptation from the critically ill in airborne missions to the ambulatory patient, that is, locating these opposed settings on the same level of simplicity, is a perfect illustration of holistic ultrasound. This is maybe the most important message of this Editorial.
Mainly, this space was the opportunity for describing technical considerations (simple machine, universal probe) proving contributive in all concerned settings. Regarding airborne missions, we can hardly accept to be with a difficult patient 30.000 feet above the ocean and deprived of this visual assistance . More than a tool, this use of ultrasound should be the physician’s best friend in any critical or routine work.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional file.
Flabouris A, Runciman WB, Levings B. Incidents during out-of-hospital patient transportation. Anesth Intensive Care. 2006;34:228–36.
Szem JW, Hydo LJ, Fischer E, Kapur S, Klemperer J, Barie PS. High-risk intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: safety and outcome of the necessary “road trip”. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:1660–6.
Lichtenstein D, Courret JP. Feasibility of ultrasound in the helicopter. Intensive Care Med. 1998;24:1119.
Lichtenstein D, Mezière G, Lagoueyte JF, Biderman P, Goldstein I, Gepner A. A-lines and B-lines: lung ultrasound as a bedside tool for predicting pulmonary artery occlusion pressure in the critically ill. Chest. 2009;136:1014–20.
De Backer D, Bakker J, Cecconi M, Hajjar L, Liu DW, Lobo S, Monnet X, Morelli A, Myatra SN, Perel A, Pinsky MR, Saugel B, Teboul JL, Vieillard-Baron A, Vincent JL. Alternatives to the Swan-Ganz catheter. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(6):730–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5187-8 Epub 2018 May 3. Review.
Lichtenstein D. BLUE-protocol and FALLS-protocol, two applications of lung ultrasound in the critically ill (Recent advances in chest medicine). Chest. 2015;147:1659–70.
Lichtenstein D, Malbrain ML. Critical care ultrasound in cardiac arrest. Technological requirements for performing the SESAME-protocol—a holistic approach. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47(5):471–81. https://doi.org/10.5603/ait.a2015.0072 Epub 2015 Nov 18.
Vieillard Baron A, Slama M, Cholley B, Janvier G, Vignon P. Echocardiography in the intensive care unit: from evolution to revolution ? Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:243–9.
Lichtenstein D, Malbrain ML. Lung ultrasound in the critically Ill (LUCI): a translational discipline. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(5):430–6. https://doi.org/10.5603/ait.a2017.0063 ISSN 0209-1712.
van der Werf TS, Zijlstra JG. Ultrasound of the lung: just imagine. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:183–4.
Our deep thanks to François Jardin (from our ICU), Jean-Paul Courret and Christian Noël (from Fidelia), Arnaud de Courcy, Daniel Boulanger and their whole team (from Europ-Assistance), who all contributed by making this work possible. Victoria Turpin-Invernon made the English editing and deserves a special acknowledgement.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The author declares no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Lichtenstein, D.A. An ultrasound limited test initiating medical airborne transportation (ULTIMAT-protocol): its impact in other settings in medicine. Ann. Intensive Care 10, 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0620-x