Skip to main content
Annals of Intensive Care
Download PDF

Microcirculatory dysfunction and dead-space ventilation in early ARDS: a hypothesis-generating observational study

Annals of Intensive Care volume 10, Article number: 35 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Ventilation/perfusion inequalities impair gas exchange in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although increased dead-space ventilation (VD/VT) has been described in ARDS, its mechanism is not clearly understood. We sought to evaluate the relationships between dynamic variations in VD/VT and extra-pulmonary microcirculatory blood flow detected at sublingual mucosa hypothesizing that an altered microcirculation, which is a generalized phenomenon during severe inflammatory conditions, could influence ventilation/perfusion mismatching manifested by increases in VD/VT fraction during early stages of ARDS.

Methods

Forty-two consecutive patients with early moderate and severe ARDS were included. PEEP was set targeting the best respiratory-system compliance after a PEEP-decremental recruitment maneuver. After 60 min of stabilization, hemodynamics and respiratory mechanics were recorded and blood gases collected. VD/VT was calculated from the CO2 production (\(V_{{{\text{CO}}_{2} }}\)) and CO2 exhaled fraction (\(F_{{{\text{ECO}}_{2} }}\)) measurements by volumetric capnography. Sublingual microcirculatory images were simultaneously acquired using a sidestream dark-field device for an ulterior blinded semi-quantitative analysis. All measurements were repeated 24 h after.

Results

Percentage of small vessels perfused (PPV) and microcirculatory flow index (MFI) were inverse and significantly related to VD/VT at baseline (Spearman’s rho = − 0.76 and − 0.63, p < 0.001; R2 = 0.63, and 0.48, p < 0.001, respectively) and 24 h after (Spearman’s rho = − 0.71, and − 0.65; p < 0.001; R2 = 0.66 and 0.60, p < 0.001, respectively). Other respiratory, macro-hemodynamic and oxygenation parameters did not correlate with VD/VT. Variations in PPV between baseline and 24 h were inverse and significantly related to simultaneous changes in VD/VT (Spearman’s rho = − 0.66, p < 0.001; R2 = 0.67, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Increased heterogeneity of microcirculatory blood flow evaluated at sublingual mucosa seems to be related to increases in VD/VT, while respiratory mechanics and oxygenation parameters do not. Whether there is a cause–effect relationship between microcirculatory dysfunction and dead-space ventilation in ARDS should be addressed in future research.

Background

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a form of acute respiratory failure characterized by pulmonary inflammation leading to increased capillary and epithelial permeability, with subsequent loss of aerated lung tissue and increased lung stiffness [1]. These alterations lead to imbalances between ventilation and perfusion relationships, which finally result in hypoxemia and impaired carbon dioxide clearance.

An optimal ventilation-to-perfusion (VA/Q) ratio (0.1 < VA/Q < 10) is necessary to ensure a normal gas exchange [2,3,4]. Typically, it has been considered that pulmonary perfusion in ARDS occurs in non-ventilated (VA/Q < 0.005) or poorly ventilated (0.005 < VA/Q < 0.1) lung units, which, in turn, results in vasoconstriction of perfusing arterioles [5]. Such VA/Q mismatch in some lung regions in which perfusion largely exceeds ventilation, account for hypoxemia, which is the clinical hallmark of ARDS [1, 6, 7]. Nevertheless, distribution of ventilation to poorly perfused (10 < VA/Q < 100), severely hypoperfused (VA/Q > 100) or non-perfused (VA/Q ~ ∞) lung units might also occur in patients with ARDS [3] and indeed, increases in VD/VT have been strongly related with adverse clinical outcomes [8,9,10]. Importantly, high VA/Q and VA/Q ~ ∞ ratios corresponding to lung regions where ventilation largely exceeds perfusion, account for carbon dioxide retention [5]. Increases in high VA/Q and/or dead-space lung units have been classically attributed to alveolar overdistention with the subsequent compression of intra-alveolar vessels in the non-dependent lung areas [8, 11]. Nevertheless, increased dead-space ventilation has also been described in patients subjected to protective ventilation strategies with low plateau pressures [9, 10], which suggest that mechanisms different to alveolar overdistention should be implied.

In normal conditions, the heterogeneity of systemic microcirculatory blood flow distribution is negligible [12]. Nevertheless, severe inflammation can induce microcirculatory alterations [13, 14] determining alterations in oxygen extraction capabilities by the tissues and contributing to the development of multiple organ dysfunction [14]. Although there are many technical limitations to directly evaluate pulmonary microcirculation [15], heterogeneity of microvascular blood flow at pulmonary level could contribute to imbalances between ventilation and perfusion relationships. Thus, considering microcirculatory dysfunction during inflammatory conditions as a generalized phenomenon, which may involve systemic and pulmonary vascular beds, we hypothesized that alterations in microvascular blood flow distribution evaluated at the sublingual mucosa as representative of an extra-pulmonary territory could be related to variations in dead-space ventilation VD/VT during early phases of moderate and severe ARDS.

Methods

This prospective observational study was conducted in a 90-bed mixed ICU from a university hospital. The local Ethical and Biomedical Research Committee approved the study (Fundación Valle del Lili EBRC protocol number: 0628; approval number: 038-7, 2013). A written informed consent was waived as no invasive procedures or new interventions were used. We daily screened all patients under mechanical ventilation in the ICU during a 24-month period, searching for those with moderate and severe ARDS. To avoid the selection of cases with transitory hypoxemia simulating ARDS, patients were enrolled only after successfully completing a two-step selection process [16, 17]: (a) first, patients mechanically ventilated through an endotracheal tube with a PEEP ≥ 5 and FiO2 ≥ 0.5 for at least 12 h and meeting the moderate and severe ARDS criteria according to Berlin Consensus definitions [1] were declared potentially eligible; (b) then, potential candidates were subjected to a FiO2 trial at 1.0 while maintaining PEEP ≥ 10 (to sustain a SpO2 ≥ 88%, but ensuring peak inspiratory and plateau pressures < 35 and 28 cmH2O, respectively) for at least 30 min, after which, new arterial blood gases were collected. Those patients maintaining a PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 after such PEEP/FiO2 trial and with < 48 h of evolution of ARDS were finally included. The exclusion criteria were: < 18 years of age, pregnancy state, history of neuromuscular diseases, moderate and severe COPD (defined as FEV1 < 80% predicted); history of intubation due to COPD exacerbation, receiving domiciliary oxygen or long-term use of steroids because COPD; history of congestive heart failure or any acute ischemic cardiac condition. A patient was also excluded when limitation of therapeutic effort orders were given.

Study protocol

After fulfilling the two-step selection process, patients selected were connected to a mainstream CO2 sensor and this in turn to a volumetric capnography module (Infinity EtCO2 + respiratory mechanics module, Dräger Medical Systems, Telford, USA). Mechanical ventilation parameters were adjusted after a stepwise alveolar recruitment maneuver, as it will be detailed later. After a 60 min of stabilization period, we started capnography measurements while sublingual microcirculatory images were simultaneously acquired, such as detailed thereafter. A new set of measurements was obtained 24 h after. Arterial and mixed venous blood samples (when available) were drawn for gases analysis (ABL300, Radiometer; Copenhagen, Denmark) at T0 and 24 h after (T24). In all the cases, the attending physicians decided on the type of hemodynamic monitoring to use. Complete respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were also registered simultaneously.

Recruitment maneuvers, PEEP adjustment and mechanical ventilation settings

At the time in which this study was performed, the local protocol included an initial recruitment maneuver to adjust PEEP in patients with severe ARDS. Thus, patients were subjected to a stepwise recruitment maneuver with progressive PEEP increases until a peak pressure of 50 cmH2O while maintaining a driving pressure of 15 cmH2O, as described elsewhere [18, 19]. Once obtained the maximal peak pressure, it was sustained during 2 min whereupon a decremental PEEP titration trial was conducted in steps of 2 cmH2O at 2 min interval from 22 to 8 cmH2O registering the corresponding compliance of the respiratory system (CRS). After such a PEEP titration, a new alveolar recruitment was performed until a peak pressure of 50 cmH2O while maintaining a driving pressure of 15 cmH2O during 1 min, to finally adjust the definitive ventilatory settings. Definitive PEEP was set at the corresponding best CRS plus 2 cmH2O. If falls in CRS were observed in two consecutive downsteps, then the PEEP level was set at the highest compliance plus 2 cmH2O. According to the local protocol, the recruitment maneuver was stopped if one or more of following signs were observed: heart rate > 150 or < 60 bpm; decrease of mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg or systolic pressure < 90 mmHg; acute atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or ventricular tachycardia.

Thereafter, mechanical ventilation was set in volume-controlled mode or in pressure-controlled, according to the selection of the attending physician. In the first case, ventilation was set at Vt of 6 ml/kg of predicted body weight maintaining plateau pressures < 28 cmH2O, flow of 60 l/min, inspiratory pause of 0.5 s, I:E ratio of 1:1 to 1:2, respiratory rate to match the minute ventilation previous to the recruitment maneuver, FiO2 necessary for SpO2 ≥ 90 and ≤ 95% and PEEP adjusted as indicated above. If plateau pressures were > 28 cmH2O, then Vt was reduced to a minimum of 4 ml/kg of predicted body weight. For those ventilated in pressure-controlled mode, driving pressure was adjusted to maintain Vt 6 ml/kg of predicted body weight (or less if Vt/CRS > 18), I:E ratio 1:1 to 1:2, minute ventilation matching that previous to the recruitment maneuver, peak inspiratory pressure ≤ 35 cmH2O, and FiO2 and PEEP adjusted as indicated above.

Pulmonary dead-space fraction measurements

After an automatic purge and calibration procedure, a mainstream CO2 sensor was placed between the ventilator circuit and the patient connection. This sensor was in turn connected to a volumetric capnography module (Infinity EtCO2 + respiratory mechanics module, Dräger Medical Systems, Telford, USA). After selection of the ventilator settings, a 60 min of stabilization period was allowed before to start the measurements. Data trend for CO2 production (\(V_{{{\text{CO}}_{2} }}\)) and exhaled minute ventilation (VE) were averaged over 5 min. \(V_{{{\text{CO}}_{2} }}\) measurements were obtained at standard temperature and pressure, and dry (STPD), whereby a correction factor of 0.863 mmHg l/ml was used to convert to body temperature, and pressure, saturated (BTPS). The fraction of exhaled CO2 (\(F_{{{\text{ECO}}_{2} }}\)) was calculated dividing the \(V_{{{\text{CO}}_{2} }}\) by the VE (Eq. 1):

$$F_{{{\text{ECO}}_{2} }} = \frac{{V_{{{\text{CO}}_{2} }} }}{{V_{{{\text{E}} }} }} .$$
(1)

Exhaled CO2 pressure (\(P_{{{\text{ECO}}_{2} }}\)) was then calculated as the product between the \(F_{{{\text{ECO}}_{2} }}\) and the barometric pressure minus the water vapor pressure (Eq. 2):

$$P_{{{\text{ECO}}_{2} }} = F_{{{\text{ECO}}_{2} }} . \left( {P_{{{\text{B}} }} - 47} \right),$$
(2)

where PB corresponds to the local barometric pressure (i.e., 682 mmHg). Subsequently, VD/VT was calculated by the Enghoff modification of the Bohr equation (Eq. 3):

$$\frac{{V_{\text{D}} }}{{V_{\text{T}} }} = (P_{{{\text{aCO}}_{2} }} - P_{{{\text{ECO}}_{2} }} ) / P_{{{\text{aCO}}_{2} }} .$$
(3)

All measurements of \(V_{{{\text{CO}}_{2} }}\) performed by the module were automatically corrected for circuit compression, as described elsewhere [20].

Sublingual microcirculation assessment

A sidestream dark-field (SDF) imaging device (Micro Scan; MicroVision Medical, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) was used to explore the sublingual microcirculation simultaneously to dead-space fraction measurements, ventilatory mechanics and oxygenation parameters at both inclusion and 24 h after. A cutoff value of 20 μm was used to classify vessels as large or small. Continuous flows were considered as normal while intermittent and stopped flows were considered as abnormal. According to the consensus for the evaluation of microcirculation, we calculated the proportion of small vessels perfused (PPV), the total vascular density (TCD) and the functional capillary density (FCD) [21]. A heterogeneity index of microcirculatory blood flow was also calculated as the difference between maximal and minimal PPV values in five different mucosa areas divided by its own mean value (see Additional file 1). Additionally, we reported the microvascular flow index (MFI). A detailed description about microcirculatory blood flow assessment is provided in Additional file 1.

Statistical analysis

Sample size calculation is described in Additional file 1. Distribution of data was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Non-parametric test for related samples were used to evaluate the differences on hemodynamic, respiratory, capnometry and microcirculatory blood flow parameters between baseline and 24 h after. The relationships between the VD/VT, percentage of small vessels perfused (PPV), and microcirculatory blood flow index (MFI) were evaluated by the Spearman rho test. Other bivariate correlations between VD/VT, PaO2/FiO2, and respiratory mechanics were also performed using Spearman rho test. Additionally, simple linear regression models with linear and quadratic terms and their respective coefficients of determination (R2) were used to evaluate the relationship between each microcirculatory, respiratory mechanics or oxygenation parameter and the VD/VT at both baseline and 24 h after.

Finally, we calculated the delta of variation of VD/VT and PPV measurements between baseline and 24 h after. Then, a Spearman rho was used to evaluate the correlation between VD/VT and PPV dynamic variations from baseline to day-1. Furthermore, a simple linear regression model with quadratic term and its respective coefficient of determination (R2) was used to evaluate the relationship between variations in PPV and VD/VT from baseline to 24 h after. Data are presented as median [percentiles 25–75]. A p value ≤ 0.05 (2-tailed) was considered significant.

Results

A total of 42 patients with moderate and severe ARDS were included in the study. A complete flowchart detailing the selection process is shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1, while a STROBE statement checklist for observational studies is provided in Additional file 1: Table S1. Mortality at day-28 and day-90 were 31% and 45.2%, respectively. The ICU length of stay was 18.0 [11.8–26.3] days. General characteristics are presented in Table 1, while hemodynamics, respiratory mechanics, blood gases analysis, pulmonary dead-space fraction and microcirculatory blood flow parameters at baseline and 24 h after are presented in Table 2. We observed an inverse and significant relationship between PPV and VD/VT at both baseline (Spearman rho = − 0.76, p < 0.001; R2 = 0.63, p < 0.001) and 24 h after (Spearman rho = − 0.71, p < 0.001; R2 = 0.66, p < 0.001) (Fig. 1a, b). Similar findings were observed between VD/VT and the microcirculatory flow index at baseline (Spearman rho = − 0.63, p < 0.001; R2 = 0.48, p < 0.001) and 24 h after (Spearman rho = − 0.65, p < 0.001; R2 = 0.60, p < 0.001) (Fig. 1c, d). There were no significant correlations between VD/VT and other respiratory mechanics and oxygenation parameters (Fig. 2, Additional file 1: Table S2).

Table 1 General characteristics
Full size table
Table 2 Hemodynamics, respiratory mechanics, blood gases analysis, \(V_{{{\text{CO}}_{2} }}\), VD/VT and microcirculatory parameters at baseline and 24 h after
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Relationships between pulmonary dead-space fraction (VD/VT) and the microcirculatory blood flow at baseline and 24 h after. a Scatter plot depicting the correlation between pulmonary dead-space fraction (VD/VT) and the proportion of small vessels perfused at baseline. b Scatter plot depicting the correlation between pulmonary dead-space fraction (VD/VT) and the proportion of small vessels perfused 24 h after. c Scatter plot depicting the correlation between pulmonary dead-space fraction (VD/VT) and MFI at baseline. d Scatter plot depicting the correlation between pulmonary dead-space fraction (VD/VT) and MFI 24 h after. PPV: percentage of small vessels perfused; VD/VT: pulmonary dead-space fraction; HI: heterogeneity index of microcirculatory blood flow; MFI: microcirculatory blood flow index

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Relationships between pulmonary dead-space fraction (VD/VT) and some respiratory mechanics and oxygen parameters at baseline and 24 h after. a Scatter plot depicting the correlation between pulmonary dead-space fraction (VD/VT) and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio at baseline. b Scatter plot depicting the correlation between pulmonary dead-space fraction (VD/VT) and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio 24 h after. c Scatter plot depicting the correlation between pulmonary dead-space fraction (VD/VT) and PEEP levels at baseline. d Scatter plot depicting the correlation between pulmonary dead-space fraction (VD/VT) and PEEP levels 24 h after. e Scatter plot depicting the correlation between pulmonary dead-space fraction (VD/VT) and the VT/CRS at baseline. f Scatter plot depicting the correlation between pulmonary dead-space fraction (VD/VT) and the VT/CRS 24 h after. g Scatter plot depicting the correlation between pulmonary dead-space fraction (VD/VT) and Pmaw at baseline. h Scatter plot depicting the correlation between pulmonary dead-space fraction (VD/VT) and Pmaw 24 h after. PaO2/FiO2 ratio: arterial oxygen partial pressure to oxygen inspiratory fraction; PEEP: positive end-expiratory pressure; VT/CRS: tidal volume-to-respiratory system compliance ratio (i.e., driving pressure); Pmaw: mean pressure of the airway

Full size image

A significant relationship was observed between the variation in VD/VT and the percentage of variation of PPV from baseline measurements to 24 h after (Spearman rho = − 0.66, p < 0.001; R2 = 0.67, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3, Additional file 1: Figure S2). Additional information about survivors and non-survivors at day-90 is provided in Additional file 1: Table S3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Relationships between dynamic variations in pulmonary dead-space fraction (VD/VT) and microcirculatory blood flow. Scatter plot depicting the correlation between variations in pulmonary dead-space fraction (Δ-VD/VT) vs. percentage of change in small vessels perfused (Δ-PPV) between baseline and 24 h after

Full size image

Discussion

After simultaneous calculation of dead-space fraction by volumetric capnography and exploration of sublingual microcirculation by the SDF technique during the early stages of moderate and severe ARDS, we retrieved two hypothesis-generating observations: (a) VD/VT is inverse and significantly related with sublingual microcirculatory blood flow distribution, while PEEP levels, respiratory airway pressures, PaO2/FiO2 and lung strain surrogates (VT/CRS) do not; (b) VD/VT variations were closely related with dynamic changes in the microcirculatory blood flow distribution observed at sublingual mucosa.

Other mechanisms unrelated to shunt-induced hypoxemia could be implicated in gas exchange abnormalities and in the onset of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary multiorgan dysfunction in ARDS. Distribution of ventilation to poorly perfused (10 < VA/Q < 100), severely hypoperfused (VA/Q > 100) or non-perfused, i.e., true dead-space ventilation (VA/Q ~ ∞) lung units, can also contribute to gas exchange disturbances and it might be a key piece in the pathophysiology of ARDS. Some studies in the past demonstrated the occurrence of increased pulmonary dead-space fraction in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure [3, 22, 23], and highlighted the apparent relationship between high VD/VT and increased mortality [8]. Nevertheless, early studies included patients under non-lung-protective ventilation strategies, in which over-inflation leading to capillary collapse could explain VA/Q mismatching with the resultant increased VD/VT [24]. Remarkably, later studies in ARDS patients subjected to lung-protective ventilation, also demonstrated the occurrence of increases in VD/VT and confirmed its consistent relationship with worse clinical outcomes [9, 10, 25]. In agreement with this, we observed increases in VD/VT at baseline and 24 h after in patients with moderate and severe ARDS. Importantly, we did not find any relationship between VD/VT and variables suggesting vascular collapse related to alveolar overdistention or increased pulmonary strain (e.g., VT/CRS), although admittedly, controlling airway pressures and VT/CRS (driving pressure) could not prevent alveolar overdistention because the inhomogeneous lung compromise in ARDS [26].

Relationships between microvascular blood flow and VD/VT have not been widely studied because of technical limitations to directly evaluate pulmonary microcirculation [15]. Our data suggest an apparent relationship between microcirculatory dysfunction and dead-space ventilation. Admittedly, sublingual mucosa and pulmonary circulation are two dissimilar vascular beds with particular regulating mechanisms. Nevertheless, during inflammatory conditions, microcirculatory dysfunction is a generalized phenomenon involving simultaneously most vascular beds [14], although with different effects depending on the territory studied [27]. Microcirculatory alterations have been described in autopsies and biopsies from lungs of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure [28, 29] and angiograms performed through pulmonary artery catheters demonstrated filling defects attributable to macro- and micro-emboli [30, 31]. Increases in VD/VT in our patients were well correlated with alterations in microcirculatory blood flow distribution detected in a non-pulmonary vascular bed. Such observation could pose the hypothesis about heterogeneity of microvascular blood flow contributing to inequalities in VA/Q relationships. Indeed, variations of VD/VT from baseline to 24 h after were closely related with dynamic changes in microcirculatory blood flow distribution at sublingual mucosa, which reinforce the strength of such relation. Nevertheless, whether pulmonary microvascular alterations or other organ-specific microvascular blood flow can be evaluated or estimated through evaluation of an extra-pulmonary microvascular bed can result highly controversial [15].

In normal conditions, heterogeneity of microvascular blood flow is negligible [12] and matching of perfusion to metabolism usually improves during hypoxic or low-flow states [32]. However, during inflammatory conditions, heterogeneity of microcirculation increases as consequence of the interruption of blood flow of individual capillaries causing derangements in the oxygen extraction capabilities, thus contributing to organ failure. In agreement with this, we observed important microcirculatory alterations consisting in decreased PPV, reduced FCD and increased heterogeneity of blood flow, which were in turn linked to more severe extra-pulmonary organ dysfunction quantified by SOFA score (see Additional file 1: Table S3).

Pathophysiological mechanisms increasing VD/VT in ARDS are quite complex. An increased VD/VT reflects a global assessment of abnormal gas exchange, but not simply the contribution of discrete high VA/Q regions and true anatomic dead space (VA/Q ~ ∞). Although the patchy pattern of vascular damage is a phenomenon clearly recognized in ARDS [26], no studies demonstrated that damaged areas necessarily receive substantial ventilation, as would be necessary to explain regions of high VA/Q ratio. Using the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET) to evaluate the fractional contribution of each VA/Q abnormality (shunt, mid-range VA/Q heterogeneity, high VA/Q, and anatomic dead space) on total VD/VT at progressively high PEEP levels, Coffey et al. [33] demonstrated similar VD/VT values at different PEEP levels mediated by very different physiologic abnormalities, although certainly, higher PEEP values were consistently related to high VA/Q peaks. Our results might add more complexity to the pathophysiology on increased VD/VT in ARDS suggesting the contribution of altered microcirculatory blood flow distribution on the increase of high VA/Q units.

Routine assessment of pulmonary gas exchange in ARDS is based on analysis of oxygen and carbon dioxide partial pressures. These variables, although sensitive to intrapulmonary factors (e.g., shunt and VA/Q matching), could be also altered by extra-pulmonary elements such as cardiac output, oxygen consumption, minute ventilation and inspired oxygen fraction.

VD/VT values can widely vary according to the method used to estimate it [34]. Previous studies used the Enghoff modification of the Bohr equation (VDEnghoff) in patients with ARDS [8,9,10, 25]. Nevertheless, this method could overestimate the real VD/VT when anatomic or intrapulmonary shunts are present as it assumes a perfect VA/Q matching throughout all alveolar–capillary units [35, 36]. Although we used the VDEnghoff method, we computed VD/VT from the CO2 production (\(V_{{{\text{CO}}_{2} }}\)) and CO2 exhaled fraction (\(F_{{{\text{ECO}}_{2} }}\)) measurements by volumetric capnography, which can accurately reflect measurements by metabolic monitors [20].

Trying to exclude cases with transitory hypoxemia simulating ARDS, we completed a two-step selection previously described [16, 17]. Although breathing pure oxygen may influence the VA/Q distribution [5], our definitive VD/VT measurements were performed 60 min after return to the previous FiO2, thus causing the lowest impact on VA/Q balance. Also, we used a stepwise recruitment maneuver with progressive PEEP increases, which was part of the local protocol at the time in which patients were included. Probably at present, such maneuver would not be used as recent evidence suggests that it can be harmful [37]. Nevertheless, such maneuver allowed us to standardize the selection of PEEP and ventilatory parameters.

We recognize that our study has important limitations. First, many hemodynamic and respiratory coexisting factors can influence VD/VT measurements. Indeed, combination of hypovolemia, vasoactive agents and/or inotropics, cardiac output variations, pulmonary resistances and flows, distribution of ventilation along the lungs and even local microthrombi formation, might influence VD/VT variations in one or other direction. Thereby, identical VD/VT elevations might reflect simultaneous alterations in diverse physiological components. Second, our study is not able to demonstrate a causal association between VD/VT and sublingual microcirculation and it was not registered as observational study. Nevertheless, dynamic variations from baseline to 24 h after merit exploration in future studies. Third, whether pulmonary microvascular alterations occur in parallel to other extra-pulmonary microvascular beds is highly controversial. However, microcirculation studies reveal simultaneous alterations at different beds during shock or inflammatory conditions. Fourth, the number of cases included in our study was relatively small. However, the fact that our patients were strictly selected and calculation of VD/VT used \(V_{{{\text{CO}}_{2} }}\) and exhaled fraction of CO2 (\(F_{{{\text{ECO}}_{2} }}\)) measurements by volumetric capnography strengthens our results.

Conclusion

Increased heterogeneity of microcirculatory blood flow evaluated at sublingual mucosa seems to be related to increases in VD/VT independently of respiratory mechanics and oxygen parameters, thus suggesting that microcirculatory alterations could be implicated in ventilation/perfusion mismatching during early ARDS.

The inverse dynamic relationships observed between sublingual microcirculation and dead-space ventilation poses a hypothetical pathophysiological mechanism during moderate and severe ARDS that deserves future research efforts.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available as recommended by the local Ethical and research committee involving human beings (Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia) but these could be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and under prior approval by such committee.

Abbreviations

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

CO2 :

Carbon dioxide

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

C RS :

Compliance of the respiratory system

EtCO2 :

End-tidal CO2

FCD:

Functional capillary density

\(F_{{{\text{ECO}}_{2} }}\) :

Exhaled CO2 fraction

MFI:

Microcirculatory flow index

\(P_{{{\text{aCO}}_{2} }}\) :

Arterial CO2 partial pressure

\(P_{{{\text{ECO}}_{2} }}\) :

Exhaled CO2 pressure

PEEP:

Positive end-expiratory pressure

PPV:

Percentage of small-vessels perfused

TCD:

Total capillary density

VA/Q :

Ventilation-to-perfusion ratio

\(V_{{{\text{CO}}_{2} }}\) :

CO2 production

VD/VT :

Dead-space ventilation fraction

V E :

Exhaled minute ventilation

V T :

Tidal volume

VT/VRS :

Driving pressure

References

  1. Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dantzker DR, Brook CJ, Dehart P, Lynch JP, Weg JG. Ventilation-perfusion distributions in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979;120(5):1039–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ralph DD, Robertson HT, Weaver LJ, Hlastala MP, Carrico CJ, Hudson LD. Distribution of ventilation and perfusion during positive end-expiratory pressure in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985;131(1):54–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Matamis D, Lemaire F, Harf A, Teisseire B, Brun-Buisson C. Redistribution of pulmonary blood flow induced by positive end-expiratory pressure and dopamine infusion in acute respiratory failure. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984;129(1):39–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Radermacher P, Maggiore SM, Mercat A. Fifty years of research in ARDS. Gas exchange in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(8):964–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Murray JF, Matthay MA, Luce JM, Flick MR. An expanded definition of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;138(3):720–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, Carlet J, Falke K, Hudson L, et al. The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;149(3 Pt 1):818–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nuckton TJ, Alonso JA, Kallet RH, Daniel BM, Pittet JF, Eisner MD, et al. Pulmonary dead-space fraction as a risk factor for death in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(17):1281–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cepkova M, Kapur V, Ren X, Quinn T, Zhuo H, Foster E, et al. Pulmonary dead space fraction and pulmonary artery systolic pressure as early predictors of clinical outcome in acute lung injury. Chest. 2007;132(3):836–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kallet RH, Zhuo H, Ho K, Lipnick MS, Gomez A, Matthay MA. Lung injury etiology and other factors influencing the relationship between dead-space fraction and mortality in ARDS. Respir Care. 2017;62(10):1241–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dueck R, Wagner PD, West JB. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on gas exchange in dogs with normal and edematous lungs. Anesthesiology. 1977;47(4):359–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zuurbier CJ, van Iterson M, Ince C. Functional heterogeneity of oxygen supply-consumption ratio in the heart. Cardiovasc Res. 1999;44(3):488–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Backer D, Creteur J, Preiser JC, Dubois MJ, Vincent JL. Microvascular blood flow is altered in patients with sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):98–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Backer D, Ospina-Tascon G, Salgado D, Favory R, Creteur J, Vincent JL. Monitoring the microcirculation in the critically ill patient: current methods and future approaches. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(11):1813–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ware LB, Matthay MA. Measuring microvascular blood flow in sepsis—a continuing challenge. Lancet. 2002;360(9341):1187–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Villar J, Pérez-Méndez L, López J, Belda J, Blanco J, Saralegui I, et al. An early PEEP/FIO2 trial identifies different degrees of lung injury in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176(8):795–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferguson ND, Kacmarek RM, Chiche JD, Singh JM, Hallett DC, Mehta S, et al. Screening of ARDS patients using standardized ventilator settings: influence on enrollment in a clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(6):1111–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Matos GF, Stanzani F, Passos RH, Fontana MF, Albaladejo R, Caserta RE, et al. How large is the lung recruitability in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective case series of patients monitored by computed tomography. Crit Care. 2012;16(1):R4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Borges JB, Okamoto VN, Matos GF, Caramez MP, Arantes PR, Barros F, et al. Reversibility of lung collapse and hypoxemia in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(3):268–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Siobal MS, Ong H, Valdes J, Tang J. Calculation of physiologic dead space: comparison of ventilator volumetric capnography to measurements by metabolic analyzer and volumetric CO2 monitor. Respir Care. 2013;58(7):1143–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. De Backer D, Hollenberg S, Boerma C, Goedhart P, Büchele G, Ospina-Tascon G, et al. How to evaluate the microcirculation: report of a round table conference. Crit Care. 2007;11(5):R101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lamy M, Fallat RJ, Koeniger E, Dietrich HP, Ratliff JL, Eberhart RC, et al. Pathologic features and mechanisms of hypoxemia in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1976;114(2):267–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gattinoni L, Bombino M, Pelosi P, Lissoni A, Pesenti A, Fumagalli R, et al. Lung structure and function in different stages of severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA. 1994;271(22):1772–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hedenstierna G, White FC, Mazzone R, Wagner PD. Redistribution of pulmonary blood flow in the dog with PEEP ventilation. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1979;46(2):278–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kallet RH, Zhuo H, Liu KD, Calfee CS, Matthay MA, Investigators NHLaBIAN. The association between physiologic dead-space fraction and mortality in subjects with ARDS enrolled in a prospective multi-center clinical trial. Respir Care. 2014;59(11):1611–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Chiurazzi C, Amini M, Gallazzi E, Marino A, et al. Lung inhomogeneity in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(2):149–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. van Genderen ME, Klijn E, Lima A, de Jonge J, Sleeswijk Visser S, Voorbeijtel J, et al. Microvascular perfusion as a target for fluid resuscitation in experimental circulatory shock. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(2):e96–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Greene R, Zapol WM, Snider MT, Reid L, Snow R, O’Connell RS, et al. Early bedside detection of pulmonary vascular occlusion during acute respiratory failure. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981;124(5):593–601.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zapol WM, Kobayashi K, Snider MT, Greene R, Laver MB. Vascular obstruction causes pulmonary hypertension in severe acute respiratory failure. Chest. 1977;71(2 suppl):306–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bachofen M, Weibel ER. Alterations of the gas exchange apparatus in adult respiratory insufficiency associated with septicemia. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1977;116(4):589–615.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tomashefski JF, Davies P, Boggis C, Greene R, Zapol WM, Reid LM. The pulmonary vascular lesions of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Pathol. 1983;112(1):112–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Stein JC, Ellis CG, Ellsworth ML. Relationship between capillary and systemic venous PO2 during nonhypoxic and hypoxic ventilation. Am J Physiol. 1993;265(2 Pt 2):H537–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Coffey RL, Albert RK, Robertson HT. Mechanisms of physiological dead space response to PEEP after acute oleic acid lung injury. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983;55(5):1550–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Doorduin J, Nollet JL, Vugts MP, Roesthuis LH, Akankan F, van der Hoeven JG, et al. Assessment of dead-space ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):121.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuwabara S, Duncalf D. Effect of anatomic shunt on physiologic deadspace-to-tidal volume ratio—a new equation. Anesthesiology. 1969;31(6):575–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tusman G, Sipmann FS, Bohm SH. Rationale of dead space measurement by volumetric capnography. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(4):866–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura É, Laranjeira LN, Paisani DM, Damiani LP, Guimarães HP, et al. Effect of lung recruitment and titrated positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) vs low PEEP on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(14):1335–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Fernando Rosso (CIC, Fundación Valle del Lili-Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia) and Dr. Yuri Takeuchi (Universidad Icesi - Fundación Valle del Lili) for their unconditional support to this project.

Funding

The current study received logistic support from the Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas - Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali – Colombia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Intensive Care, Fundación Valle del Lili - Universidad ICESI, Av. Simón Bolívar Cra. 98, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia

    Gustavo A. Ospina-Tascón, Diego F. Bautista, Humberto J. Madriñán, Juan D. Valencia, William F. Bermúdez, Edgardo Quiñones & Luis Eduardo Calderón-Tapia

  2. Translational Medicine Laboratory for Critical Care and Advanced Trauma Surgery, Fundación Valle del Lili - Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia

    Gustavo A. Ospina-Tascón

  3. Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Glenn Hernandez & Alejandro Bruhn

  4. Department of Intensive Care, CHIREC Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

    Daniel De Backer

Authors
  1. Gustavo A. Ospina-Tascón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Diego F. Bautista
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Humberto J. Madriñán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juan D. Valencia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. William F. Bermúdez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Edgardo Quiñones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Luis Eduardo Calderón-Tapia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Glenn Hernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Alejandro Bruhn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Daniel De Backer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Literature search: GAOT, DFB and GH; data acquisition: GAOT, DFB, JDV, WFB, and HJM; data analysis and interpretation: GAOT, GH, HJM, JDV, WFB, EQ, LECT; critical review: GAOT, GH, AB and DDB; conception, hypothesis delineation, and design of the study: GAOT, and DDB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gustavo A. Ospina-Tascón.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical and research committee involving human beings approved the current study (Protocol number: 0628; Approval Number: 038-7, 2013, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Microcirculatory assessement.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ospina-Tascón, G.A., Bautista, D.F., Madriñán, H.J. et al. Microcirculatory dysfunction and dead-space ventilation in early ARDS: a hypothesis-generating observational study. Ann. Intensive Care 10, 35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00651-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00651-1

Keywords