Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Estimation of sodium and chloride storage in critically ill patients: a balance study

Annals of Intensive Care20188:97

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0442-2

  • Received: 2 April 2018
  • Accepted: 3 October 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Nonosmotic sodium storage has been reported in animals, healthy individuals and patients with hypertension, hyperaldosteronism and end-stage kidney disease. Sodium storage has not been studied in ICU patients, who frequently receive large amounts of sodium chloride-containing fluids. The objective of our study was to estimate sodium that cannot be accounted for by balance studies in critically ill patients. Chloride was also studied. We used multiple scenarios and assumptions for estimating sodium and chloride balances.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients admitted to the ICU after cardiothoracic surgery with complete fluid, sodium and chloride balance data for the first 4 days of ICU treatment. Balances were obtained from meticulously recorded data on intake and output. Missing extracellular osmotically active sodium (MES) was calculated by subtracting the expected change in plasma sodium from the observed change in plasma sodium derived from balance data. The same method was used to calculate missing chloride (MEC). To address considerable uncertainties on the estimated extracellular volume (ECV) and perspiration rate, various scenarios were used in which the size of the ECV and perspiration were varied.

Results

A total of 38 patients with 152 consecutive ICU days were analyzed. In our default scenario, we could not account for 296 ± 35 mmol of MES in the first four ICU days. The range of observed MES in the five scenarios varied from 111 ± 27 to 566 ± 41 mmol (P < 0.001). A cumulative value of 243 ± 46 mmol was calculated for MEC in the default scenario. The range of cumulative MEC was between 62 ± 27 and 471 ± 56 mmol (P = 0.001 and P = 0.003). MES minus MEC varied from 1 ± 51 to 123 ± 33 mmol in the five scenarios.

Conclusions

Our study suggests considerable disappearance of osmotically active sodium in critically ill patients and is the first to also suggest rather similar disappearance of chloride from the extracellular space. Various scenarios for insensible water loss and estimated size for the ECV resulted in considerable MES and MEC, although these estimates showed a large variation. The mechanisms and the tissue compartments responsible for this phenomenon require further investigation.

Keywords

  • Sodium
  • Chloride
  • Intensive care unit
  • Intracellular volume
  • Extracellular volume

Background

When long-term balance studies in humans demonstrated that sodium could accumulate without weight gain or hypernatremia, this challenged the generally accepted model on sodium homeostasis [1]. This model states that changes in sodium homeostasis can primarily be explained by a two-compartment model with an intracellular (ICV) and extracellular volume (ECV), where key ions are completely dissolved—i.e., osmotically active. An extra compartment that stores sodium nonosmotically without causing an expansion of the ECV has been proposed by Titze et al. [2]. In both animal and human studies, they found that sodium is stored nonosmotically in the skin [2, 3]. Nonosmotic sodium storage is presumably facilitated by large strongly negatively charged polymers such as glycosaminoglycans [4, 5]. The accumulation of chloride in the skin has been suggested in animal models [6, 7], but has not been as extensively studied as sodium storage.

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) typically receive large amounts of sodium and chloride during their ICU treatment [8]. Both hypernatremia and hyperchloremia are a frequent complication in critically ill patients and are associated with adverse outcome [912]. The infusion of high amounts of chloride is also recognized as cause of hyperchloremic acidosis [11, 12]. Improved understanding of sodium chloride homeostasis in this patient group is therefore of utmost importance. To our knowledge, no studies have tried to measure missing sodium as evidence of stored sodium in ICU patients. Likewise, a potentially similar phenomenon for chloride has not been studied yet.

The objective of our study was therefore to estimate sodium and chloride that might ‘disappear’ in balance studies in ICU patients. Since random and systematic errors as well as different assumptions on the size of the ECV and perspiration strongly affect the calculated sodium or chloride deficit, five scenarios were tested in which the assumed sizes of the ECV or perspiration were varied.

Methods

Study design

This observational retrospective balance study involved all patients of ≥ 18 years admitted to a tertiary cardiothoracic ICU from October 2010 until December 2014 with a minimal ICU length of stay of 4 days.

Data collection

Data that were collected and analyzed included basic demographics, reason of admission, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE-IV) score for disease severity, acute kidney injury according to the KDIGO AKI criteria in the first 7 days and in-hospital mortality [13]. Fluid, sodium and chloride balances were derived from meticulously recorded input records (including enteral and parenteral feeding and administered fluids, including creep fluids such as solvent solutions) and output records, including daily 24-h urine collections. Our ICU did not have a full electronic patient database management system during the study period. Therefore, all data were derived from nursing and medical charts. All electrolyte concentrations, determined in blood or 24-h urine, were collected.

Estimation of missing extracellular osmotically active sodium (MES) and chloride (MEC)

The most important components to determine electrolyte balances are detailed records of fluids, administered to or lost by the patient, including 24-h urine analyses. The detailed calculations used for determining water, sodium and chloride balances, including the estimation for (in)sensible perspiration, have been described earlier and are specified in detail in Additional file 1: Tables S1–S3 [8]. Insensible perspiration was calculated as:
  • Insensible perspiration = 10 mL/kg/day + 2.5 mL/kg/day per degree centigrade above 37 °C (max body weight in equation 100 kg) (× 0.6 if intubated)(× 0.5 on admission day) [14].

For insensible perspiration, core temperature measured via the bladder catheter was used.

To estimate MES for each ICU patient, we compared the observed changes in estimated extracellular ΔNaobs with the expected change (ΔNaexp).

Of every ICU calender day, last measured plasma sodium was compared with the last measured plasma sodium of the previous day. For electrolyte measurements, the direct ion-selective method was used. For the patients studied, we defined the ECV at 40% in our default model, since surgical patients receive a considerable fluid load perioperatively [15]. We corrected for different sizes of the ECV at the beginning of the day versus the end of day, due to infused fluids.

Only ECVfirst that was calculated for admission day used measured body weight:
$${\text{ECV}}_{\text{first}} \, = \,0.4\, \times \,{\text{body}}\,{\text{weight}}\,\,\left( {\text{kg}} \right).$$
The extracellular volume at the end of the day (i.e., 23:59) was defined as:
$${\text{ECV}}_{23:59} \, = \,{\text{ECV}}_{\text{previous}} \, + \,{\text{fluid}}\,{\text{balance}}\,\,\left( {\text{L}} \right),$$
where ECVprevious is the ECV from 24 h earlier, or in the case it concerns the end of the first ICU day it relates to ECVfirst.
The extracellular volume at the beginning of the next day (i.e., 00:00) was defined as:
$${\text{ECV}}_{00:00} = {\text{ECV}}_{{{\text{last}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{the}}\,{\text{previous}}\,{\text{day}}}} \,\,\left( {\text{L}} \right).$$
The expected change in total amount of sodium in the ECV over a calender day was defined as:
$$\Delta {\text{Na}}_{ \exp }^{ + } \, = \,\left[ {{\text{Na}}^{ + } } \right]_{\text{last}} \, \times \,{\text{ECV}}_{\text{last}} \, - \,\left[ {{\text{Na}}^{ + } } \right]_{\text{previous}} \, \times \,{\text{ECV}}_{\text{previous}} \,\,\left( {\text{mmol}} \right).$$
The observed change in total extracellular sodium on the basis of administrated and excreted sodium was thereafter defined as:
$$\Delta {\text{Na}}_{\text{obs}}^{ + } \, = \,{\text{sodium}}\,{\text{balance}}\, = \,{\text{Na}}_{\text{in}} \,{-}\,{\text{Na}}_{\text{out}} \,\,\left( {\text{mmol}} \right).$$
The missing extracellular osmotically active sodium that apparently ‘disappeared’ from the ECV was defined as:
$${\text{MES}}\, = \,\Delta {\text{Na}}_{\text{obs}} \,{-}\,\Delta {\text{Na}}_{ \exp } \,\,\left( {\text{mmol}} \right).$$
For chloride, the same method as described above was used to calculate MEC, where instead of sodium, chloride should be read.

As a sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of our results, we tested 2 × 2 additional more extreme scenarios with respect to our assumptions on the ECV and perspiration. Where the default model assumed an ECV of 40% of the body weight and an insensible perspiration of 10 mL/kg/day, we tested both an extracellular compartment of 20% of body weight [16] and 60% of body weight [17]. In order to encapsulate the wide uncertainty in estimating actual perspiration, we also tested both lower and upper published extremes in perspiration rate of 5 mL/kg/day plus 2.5 mL/kg/day per degree centigrade above 37 °C versus and a perspiration rate of 20 mL/kg/day plus 2.5 mL/kg/day per degree centigrade above 37 °C.

To assess the differences in ECV between males and females, we performed a sub-analysis. In this analysis, an ECV of 40% of the body weight was assumed for males and an ECV of 30% was assumed for females.

Statistical analyses

Means are given ± SE, medians with interquartile range, unless otherwise indicated. MES and MEC were compared with a Student’s t test. A two-sided P < 0.05 was considered significant. Cumulative calculations took account of increases in cumulative errors with the Pythagorean theory of error propagation. Balance calculations and statistical analysis were performed with SPSS 23.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL).

Results

A total of 38 patients with 152 consecutive ICU days were included. Their baseline characteristics are given in Table 1.
Table 1

Patients characteristics

 

n = 38

Age (years)

66 (13)

Sex, male

28 (74%)

Reason of admission

 

 Cardiothoracic surgery

31 (82%)

 Trauma

1 (3%)

 Vascular surgery

1 (3%)

Miscellaneous

5 (13%)

LOS ICU (days)

7.4 (4.8–13.7)

Patients on diuretics

25 (66%)

APACHE-IV

60 (44-71)

Hospital mortality

4 (11%)

AKI

11 (29%)

 Stage 1

6 (55%)

 Stage 2

3 (27%)

 Stage 3

2 (18%)

Data are depicted as mean (SD), n (%) or median (interquartile range) as appropriate

APACHE Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation

The included patients received large amounts of fluids (13.6 ± 0.6 L), sodium (1441 ± 75 mmol) and chloride (1377 ± 76 mmol) in the 4-day period, resulting in a cumulative fluid balance of 3.9 ± 0.6 L, a sodium balance of 822 ± 76 mmol and a chloride balance of 556 ± 82 mmol. Both the mean plasma sodium and chloride concentrations did not significantly change during the first four ICU days (Table 2).
Table 2

Cumulative data on fluid and electrolyte administration

 

Day 1

Day 2

Day 3

Day 4

P*

Intake

     

Fluid (L)

3.6 ± 0.4

7.9 ± 0.5

11.0 ± 0.5

13.6 ± 0.6

 

Sodium (mmol)

460 ± 52

935 ± 67

1235 ± 72

1441 ± 75

 

Chloridea (mmol)

420 ± 53

872 ± 68

1162 ± 79

1377 ± 76

 

Output

     

Fluid (L)

1.6 ± 0.1

3.9 ± 0.2

6.5 ± 0.3

8.9 ± 0.3

 

Sodium (mmol)

139 ± 14

293 ± 23

472 ± 30

626 ± 35

 

Chloridea (mmol)

117 ± 17

255 ± 28

418 ± 43

574 ± 47

 

Balance

     

Fluid (L)

1.9 ± 0.3

3.7 ± 0.5

4.0 ± 0.5

3.9 ± 0.6

 

Sodium (mmol)

321 ± 47

642 ± 62

769 ± 72

822 ± 76

 

Chloridea (mmol)

274 ± 51

498 ± 66

535 ± 82

556 ± 82

 

Plasma sodium (mmol/L)

137.1 ± 0.5

136.6 ± 0.5

136.2 ± 0.6

136.9 ± 0.5

0.741

Plasma chloridea (mmol/L)

109.8 ± 0.9

109.3 ± 0.8

108.2 ± 0.9

108.0 ± 0.9

0.107

Data are depicted as mean ± SE

* Difference between day 1 and day 4

aChloride data were available for 27, 27, 24 and 28 patients, respectively, on day 1 to day 4

Missing extracellular osmotically active sodium and chloride

Based on our calculations, for sodium a MES of 74 ± 15 mmol per day was observed. This resulted in a cumulative MES of 296 ± 35 mmol during four ICU days (Fig. 1). For chloride, a MEC of 61 ± 23 mmol per day was seen with a cumulative MEC of 243 ± 46 mmol over the first four ICU days (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Time course of estimated cumulative MES and MEC for the first four ICU days. Values are depicted as mean ± SE. The first values reflect levels at ICU admission, when storage was assumed defined as zero. The values at the subsequent time points reflect levels at the end (i.e., midnight) of each ICU day. As can be seen under normal and stable circulating electrolyte levels (Table 2), a significant amount of sodium (MES) and chloride (MEC) ‘disappears’ from the balances over the first four ICU days

We also calculated the difference between MES and MEC. The cumulative difference was 56 ± 40 mmol over the first four ICU days.

Scenarios

In the four scenarios in addition to the default scenario, we changed the assumed ECV and assumed perspiration and assessed their impact on MES and MEC (Figs. 2 and 3).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Scenarios for both estimated cumulative MES and MEC. Values are depicted as mean ± 95% CI. The 95% CI is represented by the dotted lines. The first values reflect levels at ICU admission, when storage was assumed to be zero. In all scenarios, there were considerable MES and MEC after 4 days of ICU admission. a With stable sodium levels, MES is mostly influenced by altering the insensible perspiration. b MEC showed a similar pattern as MES, but was slightly more affected by the changes in the extracellular compartment than MES

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Estimated cumulative MES and MEC according to different scenarios. Values are depicted as means. The calculated MES (blue), MEC (red) and their difference (light gray) on ICU day 4 according to the scenarios with different assumptions on perspiration and the size of the extracellular volume

When perspiration was increased to 20 mL/kg/day, MES doubled for both the 20% and 60% ECV scenario (551 ± 35 mmol and 566 ± 41 mmol, respectively, both P < 0.001, Fig. 2a). After decreasing perspiration to 5 mL/kg/day, in both the ECV of 20% and 60% scenario, the amount of sodium we could not account for decreased more than 2.5 times the initial calculated MES (111 ± 27 mmol and 126 ± 31 mmol, respectively, both P < 0.001).

When these four scenarios were repeated for the calculations of MEC, similar results were obtained. When perspiration was increased to 20 mL/kg/day, for both the 20% and 60% ECV scenario we observed a similar increase in MEC from 243 ± 46 mmol to 414 ± 39 mmol (P = 0.006) to and 471 ± 56 mmol (P = 0.003, Fig. 2b). After decreasing perspiration to 5 mL/kg/day, MEC decreased. A MEC of 62 ± 27 mmol was observed when ECV was set at 20% in the low perspiration scenario (P = 0.001). However, when ECV was defined as 60%, MEC did not significantly change (243 ± 46 mmol vs. 119 ± 55 mmol, respectively, P = 0.09).

For all five depicted scenarios, the difference between MES and MEC was also calculated (Fig. 3) to identify potential structural differences between sodium and chloride disappearance. These differences varied from 1 ± 51 to 123 ± 33 mmol, indicating that MES and MEC were of the same order of magnitude.

The sub-analysis to assess sexual differences in ECV is found in Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

Discussion

This is the first balance study that aimed to estimate missing extracellular sodium (MES) in ICU patients and missing extracellular chloride (MEC) in any patient group. Although we found considerable variations in estimated MES and MEC according to the various scenarios, the results suggest a considerable MES and a somewhat lower MEC (Fig. 3).

To calculate MES and MEC, we used one default and four more extreme scenarios, which we believe cover the scope of published sizes of the ECV and rates of perspiration. An ECV of 20% of body weight is a conservative choice in patients arriving at the ICU after major surgery [16], while 60% is an extreme estimate [17]. Regarding perspiration, defining the extremes was more difficult, but nearly all sources assume a perspiration ≥ 400 ml/day for both the skin and the respiratory tract without fever [14]. Our estimate of 5 mL/kg/day probably is thus the lower limit, while 20 mL/kg/day is a large estimate. We believe that the true value of both MES and MEC should be somewhere in between the four more extreme scenarios as depicted in Fig. 3. MES and MEC were mainly influenced by perspiration and MEC also somewhat by the ECV. This underscores that both the size of the ECV and insensible perspiration are important determinants in the estimated size of MES and MEC. In sex-specific models (Additional file 1: Fig. S1), males showed slightly higher MES and MEC compared with females.

More sodium and chloride disappeared from the balances during the first two days of ICU admission than in the subsequent days (Fig. 1). Resuscitation fluids, often high in sodium and chloride content, are frequently administered during surgery and in the early postoperative period. Whereas the recommended limits for dietary sodium intake are 2.3 g/day [18], our patients received an average of 8.3 g (i.e., 360 mmol) sodium per day, with positive sodium balances but stable sodium concentrations. This resulted in a MES of 296 mmol after four ICU days. When this MES is expressed in terms of NaCl 0.9% infusion, 1.9 L of this fluids sodium went missing in our patients.

Nonosmotic sodium storage has been studied in several non-critically ill patient groups. In healthy individuals, it has recently been observed that half of an acute intravenous hypertonic saline load of 201 mmol appears to be briefly stored nonosmotically [19], possibly in interaction with the endothelial glycocalyx. Sodium storage has been reported to increase with advancing age, to be greater in men and patients with hypertension, hyperaldosteronism, end-stage kidney disease and infection [2022]. Tissue sodium levels are variable and may be altered by dialysis and diuretic treatment [23, 24]. However, the precise clinical significance of nonosmotic sodium storage has not been defined yet. The existence of nonosmotic sodium storage has not been examined in critically ill patients. Nonosmotic sodium storage could also be relevant in ICU-acquired hypernatremia (IAH) [25] and could explain the relatively long duration of IAH once it develops, although sodium balances were not performed in this study. It is believed that the electrical binding capacity of various tissues for sodium is altered during inflammation [26], which may interact with the development of IAH in critically ill patients. Irrespective of a potential relation between IAH and sodium storage, a strategy in which infusion fluids with lower sodium chloride content are used to reduce IAH is probably desirable [27]. We reported earlier [10] that changes in bulk intravenous fluid constitution paralleled changes in the incidence of ICU-acquired hypernatremia. Recently, it was elegantly shown that maintenance fluid therapy constitutes a higher sodium, chloride and water burden than acute resuscitation fluid administration [28].

With regard to chloride, which also disappeared in our balance calculations, both sodium and chloride storage may affect changes in blood pressure [6, 29].

As we cannot explain MES and MEC by the conventional two-compartment model where sodium is extracellular and potassium intracellular, a specific storage compartment may be the buffer of these sodium and chloride loads. The key alternative to nonosmotic storage is loss of sodium and chloride to the ICV. This effect has been demonstrated by healthy persons who sustained muscular injury [30]. Critical illness is often accompanied with critical illness myopathy, and loss of sodium and chloride to the ICV might then also be conceivable [31]. As we reported in an earlier study [8], our patients displayed a negative potassium balance of 101 mmol, which is another argument for possible intracellular uptake of sodium in exchange for potassium release. Moreover, we also observed a negative electrolyte-free water (EFW) balance in these patients. Together, this suggests that no ICV expansion occurred [8]. Therefore, we assumed that all fluids administered (including EFW) remained in the ECV. However, if part of the EFW would enter the ICV, this would result in lower increases and thus even higher MES and MEC estimates.

The presence of nonosmotic storage could be verified through direct tissue analysis or via specialized MRI [2, 3, 20]. Sodium changes in the tissues of ICU patients resulting from MES could be imaged via 23Na MRI. To our knowledge, 35Cl MRI has not yet been used to study MEC, but it is a promising and intriguing technique to identify the anatomical spaces where salt is stored [32, 33]. Importantly, this technique should be able to differentiate between the two main explanations for missing sodium and chloride: nonosmotic storage or intracellular uptake.

Our study has a number of limitations. Due to its retrospective design, we could not control for many variations in standard care. We had to make several assumptions, as, for example, for the insensible perspiration or the size of the ECV. However, we believe that the extreme scenarios on perspiration and ECV in our sensitivity analyses covered all realistic scenarios. We did not account for fecal losses, as we could not retrieve this information. Since we observed early postoperative patients, fecal production was absent or very low and, moreover, loss of sodium and chloride through the gut is usually very limited [34]. We did not measure weight changes as this is not routine procedure at our unit. Daily weight measurements could be added in the future to further validate our results.

On the relatively short term, differences in body weight measured in kg as measured in ICU patients will be less accurate than fluid balances measured in mL. Therefore, we only used initial recorded weight to estimate the ECV. Fluid balances in critically ill patients often have a poor correlation with changes in body weight [35, 36]. Especially cumulative fluid balance is prone to errors, as measuring errors get cumulated [36], which we accounted for in our error estimates. It must be noted that body weight measurement also has multiple possible errors, which could be the explanation of the lack of association between fluid balance and differences in body weight [36]. However, we believe that due to the short time this study covers and the meticulous recalculation of the fluid balance, including gastric retention, drain fluids and insensible perspiration, we have minimized errors as far as realistically possible.

Insensible perspiration remains very challenging to measure. As MES and MEC were most influenced by insensible perspiration, the lack of direct measurement of perspiration is an important limitation of our study. We tried, however, to maximize the chance to include the true value as much as possible with our five different scenarios. Direct measurement of (in)sensible perspiration would make estimated of MES and MEC more accurate (Fig. 3). Unfortunately, we are not aware of reliable tools to measure (in)sensible perspiration.

In this first observational balance study, we selected our patients based on complete balance data, which could have induced selection bias. The Androque-Madias [37] and Nguyen-Kurtz [38] formulas are frequently used when estimating the plasma sodium level after a saline infusion in dysnatremic ICU patients [17, 19]. However, we choose not to use these formulas in our study, as they do not account for excretion of sodium or chloride or they use empirically derived constants which were not suitable for using in our model. However, predictions on the size of the ECV from both formulas fall within the four scenarios.

In conclusion, our detailed sodium and chloride balances in ICU patients after cardiothoracic surgery suggest a loss of osmotically active sodium and chloride from the ECV. The estimates depend considerably on the scenarios used. Whether these ions are nonosmotically stored or transferred to the intracellular space needs further study.

Abbreviations

AKI: 

acute kidney injury

APACHE-IV: 

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation—IV

ECV: 

extracellular volume

ICU: 

intensive care unit

ICV: 

intracellular volume

MEC: 

missing extracellular osmotically active chloride

MES: 

missing extracellular osmotically active sodium

MRI: 

magnetic resonance imaging

[Na+]first

plasma sodium concentration on day of measurement

[Na+]last

last plasma sodium concentration previous day

ΔNaobs

observed change in estimated extracellular sodium

ΔNaexp

expected change in estimated extracellular sodium

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

LH collected, analyzed and interpreted the data and was the main writer of the manuscript. AOL and MZH made important intellectual contributions to the manuscript. MWN conceived and oversaw the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data and made important intellectual contributions to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Flip Baardman, Rients de Boer and André Fitze for meticulously recording patient data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the medical ethics committee (IRB) of our institution (Medisch Ethische Toetsingscommissie, METc 2015.089). As a retrospective study of routinely collected and anonymized data, informed consent was not required by our IRB.

Funding

No funding was used in conducting this research.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Critical Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
(2)
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

References

  1. Titze J, Maillet A, Lang R, Gunga HC, Johannes B, Gauguelin-Koch G, et al. Long-term sodium balance in humans in a terrestrial space station simulation study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;40:508–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Titze J, Lang R, Ilies C, Schwind KH, Kirsch KA, Dietsch P, et al. Osmotically inactive skin Na+ storage in rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003;285:F1108–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Linz P, Santoro D, Renz W, Rieger J, Ruehle A, Ruff J, et al. Skin sodium measured with 23Na MRI at 7.0 T. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:54–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Titze J, Shakibaei M, Schafflhuber M, Schulze-Tanzil G, Porst M, Schwind KH, et al. Glycosaminoglycan polymerization may enable osmotically inactive Na+ storage in the skin. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;287:H203–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Machnik A, Neuhoger W, Jantsch J, Dahlmann A, Tammela T, Machura K, et al. Macrophages regulate salt-dependent volume and blood pressure by a vascular endothelial growth factor-C-dependent buffering mechanism. Nat Med. 2009;15:545–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wiig H, Schröder A, Neuhofer W, Jantsch J, Kopp C, Karlsen TV, et al. Immune cells control skin lymphatic electrolyte homeostasis and blood pressure. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:2803–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Benz K, Schlote J, Daniel C, Kopp C, Dahlmann A, Schröder A, Cordasic N, et al. Mild salt-sensitive hypertension genetically determined low nephron number is associated with chloride but not sodium retention. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2018;43:1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Hessels L, Oude Lansink A, Renes MH, van der Horst IC, Hoekstra M, Touw DJ, et al. Postoperative fluid retention after heart surgery is accompanied by a strongly positive sodium balance and a negative potassium balance. Physiol Rep. 2016;4:e12807.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Waite MD, Fuhrman SA, Badawi O, Zuckerman IH, Franey CS. Intensive care unit-acquired hypernatremia is an independent predictor of increased mortality and length of stay. J Crit Care. 2013;28:405–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Oude Lansink-Hartgring A, Hessels L, Weigel J, de Smet AMGA, Gommers D, Panday PVN, et al. Long-term changes in dysnatremia incidence in the ICU: a shift from hyponatremia to hypernatremia. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6:22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Shaw AD, Raghunathan K, Peyerl FW, Munson SH, Paluskiewicz SM, Schermer CR. Association between intravenous chloride load during resuscitation and in-hospital mortality among patients with SIRS. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1897–905.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Yunos NM, Bellomo R, Story D, Kellum J. Bench-to-bedside review: chloride in critical illness. Crit Care. 2010;14:226.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kellum JA, Lameire N. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (part 1). Crit Care. 2013;17:204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox P. Insensible water loss and its assessment in adult patients: a review. Acta Anaethesiol Scand. 1987;21:771–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Corcoran T, Rhodes JE, Clarke S, Myles PS, Ho KM. Perioperative fluid management strategies in major surgery: a stratified meta-analysis. Anaesth Analg. 2012;114:640–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Guyton AC. Textbook of medical physiology. 11th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2011. p. P285–P300.Google Scholar
  17. Lindner G, Schwarz C, Kneidinger N, et al. Can we really predict the change in plasma sodium levels? An analysis of currently proposed formulae in hypernatraemic patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23:3501–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Nutrition facts label sodium FDA. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/InteractiveNutritionFactsLabel/sodium.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.
  19. Olde Engberink RH, Rorije NM, van den Born BJ, Vogt L. Quantification of nonosmotic sodium storage capacity following acute hypertonic saline infusion in healthy individuals. Kidney Int. 2017;91:738–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kopp C, Linz P, Wachsmuth L, Dahlmann A, Horbach T, Schöfl C, et al. (23)Na magnetic resonance imaging of tissue sodium. Hypertension. 2012;59:167–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kopp C, Linz P, Dahlmann A, Hammon M, Jantsch J, Müller DN, et al. 23Na magnetic resonance imaging-determined tissue sodium in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2013;61:635–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Schneider MP, Ralf U, Kopp C, Scheppach JB, Toncar S, Wanner C, et al. Skin sodium concentration correlates with left ventricular hypertrophy in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:1867–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Dahlmann A, Dorfelt K, Eicher F, Linz P, Kopp C, Mössinger I, et al. Magnetic resonance-determined sodium removal from tissue stores in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2015;87:434–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Hammon M, Grossmann S, Linz P, Kopp C, Dahlmann A, Garlichs C, et al. 23Na magnetic resonance imaging of the lower leg of acute heart failure patients during diuretic treatment. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0141336.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Ijzendoorn MCO, Buter H, Kingma WP, Navis GJ, Boerma EC. The development of intensive care unit acquired hypernatremia is not explained by sodium overload or water deficit: a retrospective cohort study on water balance and sodium handling. Crit Care Res Pract. 2016;2016:9571583.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Zaferani A, Talsma DT, Yazdani S, Celie JW, Aikio M, Heljasvaara R. Basement membrane zone collagens XV and XVIII proteoglycans mediate leukocyte influx in renal ischemia/reperfusion. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e106732.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Severs D, Hoorn EJ, Rookmaker MB. A critical appraisal of intravenous fluids: from the physiological basis to clinical evidence. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:178–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Van Regenmortel N, Verbrugghe W, Roelant E, van den Wyngaert T, Jorens PG. Maintenance fluid therapy and fluid creep impose more significant fluid, sodium, and chloride burdens than resuscitation fluids in critically ill patients: a retrospective study in a tertiary mixed ICU population. Intensive Care Med. 2018;33:409–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Titze J, Krause H, Hecht H, Dietsch P, Rittweger J, Lang R, et al. Reduced osmotically inactive Na+ storage capacity and hypertension in the Dahl model. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2002;283:F134–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Dahlmann A, Kopp C, Linz P, Cavallaro A, Seuss H, Eckardt KU, Luft FC, et al. Quantitative assessment of muscle injury by (23)Na magnetic resonance imaging. Springerplus. 2016;5:661.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kress JP, Hall JB. ICU-acquired weakness and recovery from critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1626–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Nagel AM, Lehmann-Horn F, Weber MA, Jurkat-Rott K, Wolf MB, Radbruch A, et al. In vivo 35Cl MRI imaging in humans: a feasibility study. Radiol. 2014;274:585–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Baier S, Kramer P, Grudzenski S, Fatar M, Kirsch S, Schad LR. Chloride and sodium chemical shift imaging during acute stroke in a rat model at 9.4 Tesla. MAGMA. 2014;274:71–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Heer M, Baisch F, Kropp J, Gerzer R, Drummer C. High dietary sodium chloride consumption may not induce body fluid retention in humans. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2000;278:F585–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Schneider AG, Baldwin I, Freitag E, Glassford N, Bellomo R. Estimation of fluid status changes in critically ill patients: fluid balance chart or electronic bed weight? J Crit Care. 2012;27:745.e7–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Schneider AG, Thorpe C, Dellbridge K, Matalanis G, Bellomo R. Electronic bed weighing vs daily fluid balance changes after cardiac surgery. J Crit Care. 2013;28:1113e1–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Androgué HJ, Madias NE. Aiding fluid description for the dysnatremias. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23:309–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Nguyen MK, Kurtz I. Analysis of current formulas used for treatment of the dysnatremias. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2004;8:12–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement