Skip to main content
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care Cover Image
Download PDF

Morpho-functional evaluation of lung aeration as a marker of sickle-cell acute chest syndrome severity in the ICU: a prospective cohort study

Annals of Intensive Care volume 9, Article number: 109 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Acute chest syndrome (ACS) is the main cause of morbi-mortality in patients with sickle-cell disease in the intensive care unit (ICU). ACS definition encompasses many types of lung damage, making early detection of the most severe forms challenging. We aimed to describe ACS-related lung ultrasound (LU) patterns and determine LU performance to assess ACS outcome.

Results

We performed a prospective cohort study including 56 ICU patients hospitalized for ACS in a tertiary university hospital (Paris, France). LU and bedside spirometry were performed at admission (D0) and after 48 h (D2). Complicated outcome was defined by the need for transfusion of ≥ 3 red blood cell units, mechanical ventilation, ICU length-of-stay > 5 days, or death. A severe loss of lung aeration was observed in all patients, predominantly in inferior lobes, and was associated with decreased vital capacity (22 [15–33]% of predicted). The LU Score was 24 [20–28] on D0 and 20 [15–24] on D2. Twenty-five percent of patients (14/56) had a complicated outcome. Neither oxygen supply, pain score, haemoglobin, LDH and bilirubin values at D0; nor their change at D2, differed regarding patient outcome. Conversely, LU re-aeration score and spirometry change at D2 improved significantly more in patients with a favourable outcome. A negative LU re-aeration score at D2 was an independent marker of severity of ACS in ICU.

Conclusions

ACS is associated with severe loss of lung aeration, whose resolution is associated with favourable outcome. Serial bedside LU may accurately and early identify ACS patients at risk of complicated outcome.

Background

Sickle-cell disease (SCD) is one of the most frequent haemoglobinopathies worldwide. Its overall prevalence is not well determined in developed countries, but its incidence is still increasing, reaching over 4500 newborns in France over the past 10 years [1]. Progress made in its management led to increased life expectancy in developed countries [2], however patients with SCD are still at risk of early mortality due to acute chest syndrome (ACS) [1]. Half of adult deaths arise in the intensive care unit (ICU), where ACS represents the main source of mortality [2,3,4]. ACS is also the most frequent vaso-occlusive event leading to ICU admission, and can lead to substantial morbidity [3]. Its typical presentation is a sudden onset of cough, dyspnoea, fever and rales, accompanied by new pulmonary infiltrate on chest radiography [5]. However, lung damage may vary from interstitial infiltrates to alveolar condensation, including atelectasis, pleural effusion, and in the worst case acute respiratory distress syndrome [6, 7]. Thus, a simple tool allowing estimating the initial extent of ACS-related lung injury and its early evolution is required to avoid delayed management and improve severe ACS patient care.

Bedside assessment of lung injury in severe ACS patients, and consequently of lung aeration, is challenging. Chest X-ray is now considered a very imperfect tool in ICU patients, showing low sensitivity and specificity particularly for the diagnosis of alveolar consolidation [8, 9]. CT-scan reported frequent large postero-lateral lung consolidations in severe ACS patients [9], but this exam cannot be used for daily bedside monitoring of ACS evolution. More recently, lung ultrasound (LU) has been reported as a reliable tool for diagnosis of lung condensation compared to CT-scan [8, 10]. Finally, a functional approach could be used to estimate the amount of aerated lung, notably by measuring the Inspiratory Vital Capacity (IVC) at bedside when patients performed incentive spirometry [11, 12].

Hence, we aimed to assess the reliability of a bedside morpho–functional evaluation of ACS-related lung aeration loss for early detection of SCD patients who experience a complicated course during their ICU stay.

Methods

See Additional methods in Additional file 1.

This article follows the STROBE statement [13]. STROBE Checklist is available as an Additional file 2.

Study population

All patients over 18 years suffering from severe ACS were prospectively included in this single-centre prospective observational study within the first 12 h of admission into the Tenon University Hospital ICU (Paris, France) between March 2013 and September 2014. ACS was defined as new pulmonary infiltrate on the chest X-ray and at least one of the following criteria: fever, cough, acute dyspnoea, thoracic pain, pulmonary crackles or tubal blowing sound [7, 11]. ACS severity was defined according to French recommendations (see Additional file 1: Methods) [11]. Patients re-admitted for a second severe ACS during the study period were not re-included. Patients with mixed thoracic disease, notably association of ACS with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, were not included.

Patient management

Inclusion did not modify patient care, conducted according to French recommendations [11]. Briefly, standard care included bed rest, oxygen therapy, respiratory physiotherapy, incentive spirometry, intravenous hydration, and folate supplementation. Pain was managed using an incremental protocol adapted from national recommendations [11] (Additional file 3: Figure S1). Indication of red blood cell transfusion followed recommendations [11] and was systematically validated jointly by a local SCD referent physician and the attending intensivist before transfusion. An empirical antimicrobial therapy combining cefotaxime and spiramycin was initiated when the patient had fever, and secondarily adapted according to the final microbiological results [11].

Data collection and outcome definition

Clinical data were prospectively collected. Blood sampling for biological examinations was left to the discretion of the attending physicians. When available, biological data regarding blood gases, blood count, haemoglobin S dosage, liver function tests, and LDH concentrations were collected.

Complicated outcome was defined a priori according to previously published criteria, by occurrence of at least one of the following events: ≥ 3 red blood cell (RBC) units transfused during ICU stay [3, 9, 14]; invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation requirement [3, 5, 9]; ICU length-of-stay > 5 days [3, 14, 15]; or in-hospital death.

Lung ultrasound

A first lung ultrasound (LU) examination was performed within the first 12 h of hospitalization in the ICU and recorded as video loops. Results were not provided to the attending physicians, ensuring that LU results did not affect patient management. A second LU examination was performed 48 h later for patients still hospitalized in the ICU by the same expert examiner (EM-H) who performed all the examinations of this study. LU was performed using a 4–6 MHz abdominal probe (Acuson® CV70, Siemens, Germany), investigating the 12 lung regions as previously described [16, 17]. Then, two experts (MG and CA) independently examined the recorded LU video loops in random order. Each lung region was characterized by the worst ultrasound pattern observed, according to the four patterns previously described [16, 17] (normal aeration [N]; moderate loss of aeration [B1]; severe loss of aeration [B2]; and lung consolidation [C], see characteristic LU patterns in Additional file 4: Video). Then, LU Score (LUS) at D0 and D2, and LU Re-aeration Score between D0 and D2 were calculated as previously described [16, 17].

Lung inspiratory vital capacity measurement

Lung inspiratory vital capacity (IVC) was measured during absence of pain (i.e., numeric pain scale ≤ 4) by the attending physiotherapist after 5 cycles of normal ventilation followed by a forced expiration, using a volumetric exerciser (Voldyne® 2500, Teleflex® Medical) within the first 12 h of hospitalization in the ICU and in a period of 4 h before or after LU examination. IVC was recorded as the mean value of 3 consecutive measurements, according to international guidelines [18].

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as median [25th–75th percentile]. Variables were analysed using non-parametric tests. Kaplan–Meier curves were plotted and a log rank test was performed to compare ICU and hospital length-of-stays. A multivariate analysis of the predictors of complicated outcome was performed using a logistic regression model. Multivariate analysis was performed using a model including parameters with p value ≤ 0.20 in univariate analysis. A final model adjusted for age, baseline Hb and LDH value at inclusion was used to test the independent value of dynamic parameters to assess patient outcome.

p < 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, USA) and Statview 5.0 (SAS Institute Inc, USA).

Results

Patient characteristics

During the study period, 63 patients with severe ACS were referred to our unit, totalling 71 admissions. Among the 63 first episodes of ACS screened for eligibility, 56 were finally included (Fig. 1). Fourteen of the 56 patients (25%) had a complicated outcome, among whom 14 (100%) had an ICU length-of-stay > 5 days, 7 (50%) received ≥ 3 RBC units during their ICU stay, and 2 (14%) were mechanically ventilated. Baseline characteristics of patients with favourable and complicated outcomes were similar, except for a more frequent history of cholecystectomy in complicated patients (Table 1). Baseline severity of SCD, assessed by the severity score of Hebbel [19], modified by Lee et al. [20], was similar between the two groups (Table 1). Clinical and biological characteristics at inclusion were also similar between the two groups (Table 2).

Fig. 1
figure1

Flow diagram of the study

Full size image
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients
Full size table
Table 2 Patient characteristics at inclusion
Full size table

Clinico-biological data

Daily mean O2 flow during the 24 h after inclusion was 3.3 [2.3–4.7] L/min. Oxygen delivery decreased from D0 to D2 (Table 3). There was no difference between patients with and without complicated outcome.

Table 3 Data course and outcomes
Full size table

Mean numeric pain scale during the 24 h following the inclusion was 4 [2.4˗6] (Table 3). Pain and corresponding morphine use significantly decreased from D0 to D2 (Additional file 3: Figure S2). There were no between-group differences. All patients were treated by at least 2 classes of analgesics, of whom 98% received acetaminophen, 93% morphine, 91% nefopam, 48% tramadol and 25% ketamine.

Haemoglobin values at D0 did not differ between patients with favourable and complicated outcomes. Haemoglobin values increased significantly more at D2 in patients with a complicated outcome but these patients were more transfused (Table 3). Neither platelets count, LDH and bilirubin values at D0, nor their change at D2, differed between patients with favourable and complicated outcomes (Table 3).

Lung ultrasound

See details on LU patterns in Additional file 5: LU results.

At inclusion, a loss of aeration was found in all lung regions for the majority of patients, except for antero-superior regions, without any difference according to patient outcome (Fig. 2). Forty-three patients (80%) had bilateral postero-inferior lung consolidations. The LUS was 24 [20–28], without any difference according to patient outcome (Additional file 3: Figure S3A and Table 3).

Fig. 2
figure2

Distribution of the Lung Ultrasound (LU) patterns among the 12 lung regions for the whole cohort (a), and patients with a favourable (b) or a complicated (c) outcome, at inclusion (left bar in each lung region) and D2 (right bar in each lung region). Lungs were divided in 12 regions: left and right antero-superior regions were numbered 1 and 7, respectively; antero-inferior regions 2 and 8; latero-superior regions 3 and 9; latero-inferior regions 4 and 10; postero-superior regions 5 and 11; and postero-inferior regions 6 and 12. The main LU pattern was large bilateral lung consolidations, predominantly distributed in dependent pulmonary areas (regions 4–6 for left lung and 10–12 for right lung). “N”: normal aeration; “B1”: moderate loss of aeration; “B2”: severe loss of aeration; “C”: lung consolidation

Full size image

At D2, LU patterns showed a moderate regression of aeration loss, with lung consolidation still reaching 79% and 69% of patients for left and right postero-inferior regions, respectively (Fig. 2). The LUS decreased from 24 [20–28] to 20 [15–24] between D0 and D2 (p < 0.001), with more improvement in patients with a favourable outcome (Additional file 3: Figure S3A). The overall LU re-aeration score between D0 and D2 was 5 [− 3 to 9.5]. Patients with a complicated outcome had a significantly lower re-aeration score than their counterparts (− 3 [− 6.5 to 1.8] vs. 7.5 [4.5–15], p < 0.001) (Additional file 3: Figure S3B and Table 3).

Lung inspiratory vital capacity

IVC was dramatically impaired at D0 (1000 [600–1250] mL, corresponding to 24 [16–35]% of the predicted forced vital capacity). Overall IVC significantly increased between D0 and D2 (1250 [1000–1690] mL, p = 0.05 vs. D0). Patients with a complicated outcome had a significantly lower IVC increase at D2 than their counterparts (+ 250 [0–250] vs. + 500 [150–600] mL, p = 0.003; Table 3). IVC change between D0 and D2 was correlated with the LU re-aeration score (r = 0.66—p < 0.0001—Additional file 3: Figure S4).

Outcomes

ICU and hospital length-of-stays

Overall, ICU and hospital length-of-stays were 5 [4–5.3] and 8 [6–11.3] days after inclusion, respectively. Compared to patients with a favourable outcome, length-of-stay of patients with a complicated outcome, by definition longer in ICU, was also significantly prolonged for the total hospital stay (Table 3). Patients with a positive LU re-aeration score had shorter ICU and hospital length-of-stays than patients with a negative re-aeration score (Fig. 3a, b). Patients with an increase of IVC at D2 had shorter ICU length-of-stay than patients without IVC increase, whereas there was no difference in hospital length-of-stay (Fig. 3c, d).

Fig. 3
figure3

Length-of-stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the hospital according to the lung aeration assessed by the lung ultrasound (LU) re-aeration score or the inspiratory vital capacity (IVC). Patients with a negative LU re-aeration score had longer stays in ICU (a) and in hospital (b) than patients with a positive LU re-aeration score. Patients with an increased IVC at D2 had a slightly shorter ICU stay than patients without IVC increase (c), while there were no differences between groups in hospital length-of-stay (d)

Full size image

Transfusion

Thirty-two patients (57%) were transfused with 2 [2] RBC units, among whom 13 had a combined phlebotomy. Among the 7 patients with complicated outcome who were transfused with ≥ 3 RBC units, the third RBC unit was transfused 2 [2–3] days after inclusion. Patients with a positive LU re-aeration score had significantly fewer transfusion episodes (Additional file 3: Figure S5A), and received fewer RBC units (1 [0–2] vs. 2 [1–3] units, p = 0.003) than patients with a negative LU re-aeration score. Conversely, there was no difference between patients with and without IVC increase in the number of transfusion episodes and RBC units transfused (1 [0–2] vs. 2 [0–3] units, p = 0.37) (Additional file 3: Figure S5B).

Mechanical ventilation and death

Finally, 2 patients were mechanically ventilated (1 non-invasively at day 5 post-inclusion and 1 invasively at day 9 post-inclusion), both with a negative LU re-aeration score but an increased IVC at D2. No deaths were observed.

Parameters associated with outcome

In univariate analysis, the only parameters significantly associated with the composite outcome criterion were LU re-aeration score and IVC change at D2 (Additional file 6: Table S1). After adjustment for age, baseline Hb and LDH value at inclusion, LU re-aeration score and IVC change at D2 remained independently associated with outcome (OR 0.62 [0.43–0.89] per point and 0.66 [0.46–0.95] per 100 mL, respectively) (Additional file 6: Table S1). The best area under the ROC curve associated with complicated outcome was obtained for the LU re-aeration score (0.87 [0.79–0.98] vs. 0.76 [0.62–0.90] for IVC change, p = 0.041) (Fig. 4). A negative LU re-aeration score between D0 and D2 (i.e., cut-off value of 0) had 71.4% sensitivity, 91.2% specificity and a positive likelihood ratio of 8 to predict complicated outcome.

Fig. 4
figure4

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the lung ultrasound (LU) re-aeration score (black symbols) and the inspiratory vital capacity (IVC) change (white symbols) for the diagnosis of acute chest syndrome (ACS) severity. If both the LU re-aeration score and IVC change had good accuracy for diagnosing ACS severity, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the LU re-aeration score was significantly better than that of IVC

Full size image

Discussion

Our main results may be summarized as follows: (1) severe ACS patients had a considerable morphological and functional loss of lung aeration and (2) early variation of lung aeration loss estimated by a bedside morpho–functional approach is independently associated with complicated outcome.

In our study, the main ACS morphological pattern was large bilateral lung consolidations, predominantly distributed in dependent pulmonary areas. Our results are concordant with previous CT-scan reports [9, 14, 21] and with the only other study that used LU in ACS patients admitted to the ICU [22]. Lungs of ACS patients showed a dramatic loss of aeration leading to severe impairment of vital capacity and high initial LUS. Distribution of ACS lung consolidation does not evocate classical bacterial pneumonia, in which no zonal predilection is usually reported [16, 23]. Thus, non-infectious mechanisms may also act in ACS, such as inflammatory oedema, diaphragmatic course limitation, and lower lobe collapse, notably due to the pressure exerted by a dilated right heart [9]. However, ACS patient tolerance of this severe acute lung injury is startlingly good, requiring mechanical ventilation in less than 5% of cases in our cohort, as in other recent reports [9, 24]. The discrepancy between the severity of morphologic and functional lung damages and the moderate hypoxemia observed in these patients may contribute to the low incidence of mechanical ventilation. Such a discrepancy, in our study as in others [9, 22], may be, at least in part, explained by enhanced microvascular response to hypoxia [25, 26] leading to increased acute hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. In addition, the functional shunt in the collapsed lung may be further reduced by sickle red blood cells entrapment in these most hypoxic regions, leading to a large redistribution of blood flow toward the upper lobes. This might contribute to explain the existence of an association between the morpho–functional evaluation of lung aeration loss and the outcome, and the absence of such an association for oxygenation parameters.

Early detection of ACS patients who will experience a complicated outcome is a major concern, since it would allow physicians to modify their management accordingly. To date, a simple and easily accepted diagnostic tool of ACS severity is lacking for severe patients admitted to the ICU. None of the specific tools associated with worsening evolution in ACS patients hospitalized in the wards (such as LDH concentration) [27] or in SCD patients referred to the ICU for mixed causes (such as changes in haemoglobin level or respiratory rate) [3], were associated with complicated outcome in our study. In addition, platelets count that has been reported to be predictive of rapidly progressive ACS [28], and its change between D0 and D2, were similar between patients with favourable and complicated outcomes. Eventually, general ICU prognostic tools such as SAPSII or SOFA scores at inclusion were not associated with complicated outcome, nor did SOFA change between D0 and D2. On the other hand, the early change of lung aeration loss appeared as a good severity parameter, morphologically estimated by LU and functionally estimated by bedside spirometry. If both evaluate lung aeration, they did not strictly evolve in a parallel manner, suggesting that a dual morphological and functional evaluation might be interesting. Indeed, several confounders other than lung aeration can influence vital capacity measurement, such as chest pain, patient tiredness, or even the method used to perform spirometry as reported in out-patients [29, 30]. Another limit of bedside spirometry to predict outcome is that the difference between the increase in vital capacity among patients with a favourable and a complicated outcome is weak, often inferior to the intra-individual variations that were observed within the repeated measures performed on each patient during the study. Thus, using only bedside spirometry as a predictive tool may be a source of error.

LU examination appears as an interesting complementary tool. In our study, LU showed the best area under the ROC curve associated with complicated outcome. LU allows for visual assessment of lung aeration, also providing the regional patterns of lung injury. LU is also useful in diagnosing pleural effusion [8, 31], and providing information on diaphragm function [32,33,34]. Some possible inconsistency of the lung ultrasound score (LUS) and a perfectible points allocation scale have been pointed out [35]. Indeed, “0 point” in an individual lung region does not necessarily reflect normal lung aeration and “3 points” complete loss of lung aeration. However, the LUS is a simple tool to provide a numerical quotation of the lung aeration that offers the advantages of being quickly calculated and easily understood by all LU practitioners. In addition, its validity is reinforced by the highly reproducible rating of lung aeration between examiners, in our study as in others [8], meaning that a LUS improvement most likely corresponds to a regression of the lung aeration loss. Finally, LU allows for bedside assessment of lung aeration without exposing patients to X-ray. This is an obvious advantage given the recurrence of ACS episodes during the lifespan of SCD patients, who receive an important dose of radiations among their life with current diagnostic strategies, among which an important part could be avoided implementing LU.

LU presents some limitations, among which availability of the technique and experience of physicians are probably the two most recurrent ones. The usefulness of LU in critically ill patients is now clearly demonstrated [31], leading to considerable improvement in availability of the technique. The development of an easy-to-use single-probe portable device mainly dedicated to LU could be a solution to democratize its use definitively. In addition, if training of ICU physicians has recently significantly increased, practicing in good quality training centres remains essential to improve learning and reinforce LU diagnostic performances. In these conditions, the learning curve of LU is short [36, 37], which could allow any physician involved in the management of SCD patients in the ICU, in the emergency room and even in the wards to quickly acquire the skills required to follow the ACS-induced lung aeration loss [38]. Then, it could be hypothesized that LU may be made in first line, and if possible replace chest X-ray for ACS diagnosis and follow-up in the near future, notably as chest X-ray performed in ICU lacks sensitivity and specificity in particular in ACS patients [9].

Our study presents some limitations. Conversely to previous results reported by Razazi et al. [22], initial LU seems not sufficient to determine severity and only dynamic parameters were informative in our study. This difference may be explained by the use of different scoring systems to transform LU images into numerical results between the two studies. This result may also be due to a lack of power related to the number of patients assessed with LU at D0 in our study. Eventually, this result may be explained by a difference in severity between the populations included in the two studies, in particular as the transfusion rate was 82% in the study of Razazi et al. [22] and 57% in the present one. However, all the other clinical and biological parameters reflecting the severity of an ACS are similar between the two cohorts. This rather suggests that our transfusion policy, based on a systematic joint assessment of the indication of the transfusion between the intensivist and the SCD referring physician and on the evaluation of the clinical course over the first 6 h in the ICU before transfusing, may be more restrictive than that of other centres. Thus, it could be hypothesized that the discrepancy between LU results at D0 and patient’s severity may be explained by the contribution of a chronic loss of aeration existing at steady state. Indeed, it was recently reported that 3 among 14 (21%) patients with SCD presenting to the emergency department for pain crisis and who did not developed ACS had however echographic lung consolidations [39]. These results suggest that lung aeration loss could exist chronically in SCD patients at steady state and/or occur in the event of an acute non-thoracic SCD-related event. Thus, a consolidation threshold associated with severity may be an interesting diagnostic tool but needs to be specified in larger studies. In this context, the early evolution of LUS, comparing data to those obtained in the same patient shortly before, seems a more reliable strategy to diagnose ACS severity. This questions the clinical relevance of such a two-point strategy and its real impact on patient care. In our study the evolution of lung aeration during the first 2 days was strongly associated with outcome events occurring beyond this time point. This requires further determination of the optimal timing for lung aeration re-assessment.

Conclusion

Patients with severe ACS have a dramatic loss of lung aeration. Serial bedside spirometry and LU examination accurately assess the ACS-related lung aeration loss and allow for early identification of patients who will experience a complicated outcome. A negative LU re-aeration score is the best independent parameter associated with a complicated course among all clinical and complementary examination parameters. Together, our results suggest that early evolution of lung aeration loss could be a reliable criterion to define ACS severity.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACS:

acute chest syndrome

CT-scan:

computed tomography scan

ICU:

intensive care unit

IVC:

inspiratory vital capacity

LU:

lung ultrasound

LUS:

lung ultrasound score

LUS-D0:

lung ultrasound score at inclusion (D0)

LUS-D2:

lung ultrasound score 48 h after inclusion (D2)

RBC:

red blood cell

SCD:

sickle-cell disease

References

  1. 1.

    Direction de la recherche, des études, de l’évaluation et des statistiques. Etat de la santé de la population en France—Rapport 2017. 2017. http://drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/esp2017.pdf. Accessed 10 Jul 2018.

  2. 2.

    Lucas S, Mason D, Mason M, Weyman D. Report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD); 2008. http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2008report1/Downloads/Sickle_report.pdf#search=’sickle.

  3. 3.

    Cecchini J, Lionnet F, Djibré M, Parrot A, Stojanovic KS, Girot R, et al. Outcomes of adult patients with sickle cell disease admitted to the ICU: a case series. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1629–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Perronne V, Roberts-Harewood M, Bachir D, Roudot-Thoraval F, Delord J-M, Thuret I, et al. Patterns of mortality in sickle cell disease in adults in France and England. Hematol J Off J Eur Haematol Assoc EHA. 2002;3:56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Vichinsky EP, Neumayr LD, Earles AN, Williams R, Lennette ET, Dean D, et al. Causes and outcomes of the acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease. National Acute Chest Syndrome Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1855–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gladwin MT, Vichinsky E. Pulmonary complications of sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2254–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Vichinsky EP, Styles LA, Colangelo LH, Wright EC, Castro O, Nickerson B. Acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease: clinical presentation and course. Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease. Blood. 1997;89:1787–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lichtenstein D, Goldstein I, Mourgeon E, Cluzel P, Grenier P, Rouby J-J. Comparative diagnostic performances of auscultation, chest radiography, and lung ultrasonography in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mekontso Dessap A, Deux J-F, Habibi A, Abidi N, Godeau B, Adnot S, et al. Lung imaging during acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease: computed tomography patterns and diagnostic accuracy of bedside chest radiograph. Thorax. 2014;69:144–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lichtenstein DA, Lascols N, Mezière G, Gepner A. Ultrasound diagnosis of alveolar consolidation in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:276–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Habibi A, Arlet J-B, Stankovic K, Gellen-Dautremer J, Ribeil J-A, Bartolucci P, et al. Centre de référence maladies rares «syndromes drépanocytaires majeurs». [French guidelines for the management of adult sickle cell disease: 2015 update]. Rev Med Internet. 2015;36:3–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bellet PS, Kalinyak KA, Shukla R, Gelfand MJ, Rucknagel DL. Incentive spirometry to prevent acute pulmonary complications in sickle cell diseases. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:699–703.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:344–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    De Prost N, Sasanelli M, Deux J-F, Habibi A, Razazi K, Galactéros F, et al. Positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with sickle cell acute chest syndrome. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tawfic QA, Kausalya R, Al-Sajee D, Burad J, Mohammed AK, Narayanan A. Adult sickle cell disease: a five-year experience of intensive care management in a university hospital in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2012;12:177–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bouhemad B, Liu Z-H, Arbelot C, Zhang M, Ferarri F, Le-Guen M, et al. Ultrasound assessment of antibiotic-induced pulmonary reaeration in ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bouhemad B, Brisson H, Le-Guen M, Arbelot C, Lu Q, Rouby J-J. Bedside ultrasound assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced lung recruitment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183:341–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. ATS/ERS Statement on respiratory muscle testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:518–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hebbel RP, Boogaerts MA, Eaton JW, Steinberg MH. Erythrocyte adherence to endothelium in sickle-cell anemia. A possible determinant of disease severity. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:992–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lee K, Gane P, Roudot-Thoraval F, Godeau B, Bachir D, Bernaudin F, et al. The nonexpression of CD36 on reticulocytes and mature red blood cells does not modify the clinical course of patients with sickle cell anemia. Blood. 2001;98:966–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bhalla M, Abboud MR, McLoud TC, Shepard JA, Munden MM, Jackson SM, et al. Acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease: CT evidence of microvascular occlusion. Radiology. 1993;187:45–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Razazi K, Deux J-F, de Prost N, Boissier F, Cuquemelle E, Galactéros F, et al. Bedside lung ultrasound during acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e2553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Nambu A, Ozawa K, Kobayashi N, Tago M. Imaging of community-acquired pneumonia: roles of imaging examinations, imaging diagnosis of specific pathogens and discrimination from noninfectious diseases. World J Radiol. 2014;6:779–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Allareddy V, Roy A, Lee MK, Nalliah RP, Rampa S, Allareddy V, et al. Outcomes of acute chest syndrome in adult patients with sickle cell disease: predictors of mortality. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e94387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Haynes J, Taylor AE, Dixon D, Voelkel N. Microvascular hemodynamics in the sickle red blood cell perfused isolated rat lung. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:H484–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sangkatumvong S, Khoo MCK, Kato R, Detterich JA, Bush A, Keens TG, et al. Peripheral vasoconstriction and abnormal parasympathetic response to sighs and transient hypoxia in sickle cell disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:474–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Stankovic Stojanovic K, Steichen O, Lefevre G, Bachmeyer C, Avellino V, Grateau G, et al. High lactate dehydrogenase levels at admission for painful vaso-occlusive crisis is associated with severe outcome in adult SCD patients. Clin Biochem. 2012;45:1578–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chaturvedi S, Ghafuri DL, Glassberg J, Kassim AA, Rodeghier M, DeBaun MR. Rapidly progressive acute chest syndrome in individuals with sickle cell anemia: a distinct acute chest syndrome phenotype. Am J Hematol. 2016;91:1185–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Giner J, Plaza V, Rigau J, Solà J, Bolíbar I, Sanchis J. Spirometric standards and patient characteristics: an exploratory study of factors affecting fulfillment in routine clinical practice. Respir Care. 2014;59:1832–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sipoli L, Martinez L, Donária L, Probst VS, Moreira GL, Pitta F. Spirometry in healthy subjects: do technical details of the test procedure affect the results? PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e107782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Lichtenstein DA, Mathis G, Kirkpatrick AW, et al. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:577–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    He L, Zhang W, Zhang J, Cao L, Gong L, Ma J, et al. Diaphragmatic motion studied by M-mode ultrasonography in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Lung. 2014;192:553–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ferrari G, De Filippi G, Elia F, Panero F, Volpicelli G, Aprà F. Diaphragm ultrasound as a new index of discontinuation from mechanical ventilation. Crit Ultrasound J. 2014;6:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Goligher EC, Laghi F, Detsky ME, Farias P, Murray A, Brace D, et al. Measuring diaphragm thickness with ultrasound in mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility, reproducibility and validity. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:642–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lichtenstein DA. Current misconceptions in lung ultrasound: a short guide for experts. Chest. 2019;156:21–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Charbonneau H, Arbelot C, Bouhemad B, Rouby J. Assessment of the learning curve of anesthesiology and intensive care residents for general ultrasound examination. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2009;28(S185):2009.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chalumeau-Lemoine L, Baudel J-L, Das V, Arrivé L, Noblinski B, Guidet B, et al. Results of short-term training of naïve physicians in focused general ultrasonography in an intensive-care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:1767–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lichtenstein DA. Lung ultrasound in the critically ill. Ann Intensive Care. 2014;4:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Colla JS, Kotini-Shah P, Soppet S, Chen Y-F, Molokie R, Prajapati P, et al. Bedside ultrasound as a predictive tool for acute chest syndrome in sickle cell patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36:1855–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Toulouse E, Masseguin C, Lafont B, McGurk G, Harbonn A, Roberts J, et al. French legal approach to clinical research. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018;37:607–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Joanna Shore for English proofreading.

Funding

This study was not funded by any external source.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Département d’Anesthésie et Réanimation, APHP Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France

    Marc Garnier, El Mahdi Hafiani, Clarisse Blayau, Francis Bonnet, Jean-Pierre Fulgencio & Christophe Quesnel

  2. Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, APHP Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France

    Marc Garnier, El Mahdi Hafiani, Clarisse Blayau, Vincent Labbe, Jean-Pierre Fulgencio & Muriel Fartoukh

  3. Université Pierre et Marie Curie Sorbonne Université, Paris, France

    Marc Garnier, Francis Bonnet, Muriel Fartoukh & Christophe Quesnel

  4. Département d’Anesthésie et Réanimation, APHP Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France

    Charlotte Arbelot

  5. Service de Médecine Interne et Centre de Référence de la Drépanocytose, APHP Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France

    Katia Stankovic-Stojanovic & François Lionnet

Authors
  1. Marc Garnier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. El Mahdi Hafiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charlotte Arbelot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Clarisse Blayau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vincent Labbe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Katia Stankovic-Stojanovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. François Lionnet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Francis Bonnet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jean-Pierre Fulgencio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Muriel Fartoukh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Christophe Quesnel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MG conceived the protocol, randomly read the LU video loops, analysed the collected data, and drafted the manuscript. EMH participated in the protocol conception, performed LU examinations and corrected the manuscript. CA randomly read the LU video loops, and corrected the manuscript. CQ and MF participated in the protocol conception, helped MG to analyse the collected data, and corrected the manuscript. CB, KSS, FL, FB, and JPF contributed to patient care and corrected the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Garnier.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

According to French law, this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (CPP “Ile-de-France VI”, Paris, France, #07-02-2013), and the French national commission on digital storage of personal data (CNIL, no. 1643704) [40]. Information was given directly to patients who accepted data and LU video collection.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garnier, M., Hafiani, E.M., Arbelot, C. et al. Morpho-functional evaluation of lung aeration as a marker of sickle-cell acute chest syndrome severity in the ICU: a prospective cohort study. Ann. Intensive Care 9, 109 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0583-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Acute chest syndrome
  • Sickle-cell disease
  • Acute lung injury
  • Lung ultrasound
  • Bedside spirometry