Skip to main content

Physiological effects of adding ECCO2R to invasive mechanical ventilation for COPD exacerbations

Abstract

Background

Extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) could be a valuable additional modality for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in COPD patients suffering from severe acute exacerbation (AE). We aimed to evaluate in such patients the effects of a low-to-middle extracorporeal blood flow device on both gas exchanges and dynamic hyperinflation, as well as on work of breathing (WOB) during the IMV weaning process.

Study design and methods

Open prospective interventional study in 12 deeply sedated IMV AE-COPD patients studied before and after ECCO2R initiation. Gas exchange and dynamic hyperinflation were compared after stabilization without and with ECCO2R (Hemolung, Alung, Pittsburgh, USA) combined with a specific adjustment algorithm of the respiratory rate (RR) designed to improve arterial pH. When possible, WOB with and without ECCO2R was measured at the end of the weaning process. Due to study size, results are expressed as median (IQR) and a non-parametric approach was adopted.

Results

An improvement in PaCO2, from 68 (63; 76) to 49 (46; 55) mmHg, p = 0.0005, and in pH, from 7.25 (7.23; 7.29) to 7.35 (7.32; 7.40), p = 0.0005, was observed after ECCO2R initiation and adjustment of respiratory rate, while intrinsic PEEP and Functional Residual Capacity remained unchanged, from 9.0 (7.0; 10.0) to 8.0 (5.0; 9.0) cmH2O and from 3604 (2631; 4850) to 3338 (2633; 4848) mL, p = 0.1191 and p = 0.3013, respectively. WOB measurements were possible in 5 patients, indicating near-significant higher values after stopping ECCO2R: 11.7 (7.5; 15.0) versus 22.6 (13.9; 34.7) Joules/min., p = 0.0625 and 1.1 (0.8; 1.4) versus 1.5 (0.9; 2.8) Joules/L, p = 0.0625. Three patients died in-ICU. Other patients were successfully hospital-discharged.

Conclusions

Using a formalized protocol of RR adjustment, ECCO2R permitted to effectively improve pH and diminish PaCO2 at the early phase of IMV in 12 AE-COPD patients, but not to diminish dynamic hyperinflation in the whole group. A trend toward a decrease in WOB was also observed during the weaning process.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: Identifier: NCT02586948.

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is currently the fourth leading cause of death in the U.S. and is expected to become the third leading cause of death [1]. Value of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for severe AE- COPD was formally demonstrated by randomized clinical trials [2, 3]. While the hospital mortality of patients successfully treated with NIV has decreased over years, and is currently less than 10%, mortality in patients requiring IMV after NIV failure is close to 30% [4]. Among the techniques which could help to improve the prognosis of such patients, extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) seems to be a very promising approach [5, 6]. However, most of the studies focused on ECCO2R in NIV AE-COPD patients, with the aim to prevent intubation [7,8,9] or to provide an additional respiratory support after extubation [10]. Only a small number of IMV COPD patients were studied under ECCO2R, with the aim to facilitate extubation [10,11,12,13]. ECCO2R was initiated early after intubation in 2 studies [12, 13], while the delay between intubation and ECCO2R initiation was higher than 15 days in another study [11]. We preliminarily reported an ECCO2R-induced reduction in work of breathing and CO2 production in such a setting [14], confirming and extending previous observations [15].

In the present study, we hypothesized that the addition of ECCO2R at the early phase of IMV could both improve gas exchanges and could also permit to diminish respiratory rate (RR), therefore, minimizing dynamic hyperinflation in AE-COPD patients. Beyond efficacy assessments, we also planned to describe the complications or adverse events associated with the technique, since bleeding and clotting complications were frequently reported in AE-COPD patients [7].

Materials and methods

Study design

This interventional open prospective study was planned to recruit 12 deeply sedated IMV AE-COPD patients in tertiary-level ICUs in France. An institutional ethic board (Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile-de-France VI, Paris, France) approved the protocol (protocole EPHEBE P141 203-ID CRB: 2015-A100446-43). Informed consent was obtained from patients' legal representatives. The study was prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: Identifier: NCT02586948.

Patients

Consecutive COPD patients older than 18 yrs. hospitalized for hypercapnic respiratory failure requiring IMV were prospectively screened for inclusion in the study. Inclusion criteria were:

  • AE of a known or suspected COPD

  • Intubation (whatever the reason for intubation which had to be specified)

  • MV since less than 72 h.

  • Persistent respiratory acidosis and hyperinflation, while the patients were deeply sedated and paralysed

  • Written inform consent obtained from patient’s legal surrogate

Criteria for persistent respiratory acidosis and hyperinflation were the combination of: pH < 7.30, PaCO2 > 55 mm Hg and intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi) (end-expiratory occlusion) > 5 cmH2O, while on assist-controlled volume ventilation with the following settings: VT: 8 mL/kg of predicted body weight (PBW), RR: 12/min., applied PEEP: 0 cmH2O, I/E ratio: 1/3. Non-inclusion criteria were as follows: Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2, PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mm Hg, history of haemorrhagic stroke, history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and any current severe bleeding. The protocol of the study was explained to the legal representatives and informed consent was obtained from patients legal representatives. When possible, the same explanations were further provided to the patient himself after full recovery, for obtaining a definitive post hoc written consent.

Medical devices

The Hemolung® ECCO2R system (Alung Technologies, Pittsburgh, PA) was used. It consists of an exchange cartridge (membrane surface 0.59 m2) which, in connection with a controller and tubing, ensures ECCO2R of about 80 mL/min. at extracorporeal blood flow rates comprised between 350 and 550 mL/min. The vascular access is achieved by means of a double lumen 15.5 F central venous catheter. The maximum duration of use of the circuit, as specified by the manufacturer, is 7 days. Anticoagulation was achieved by the mean of continuous unfractionated heparin infusion aiming to obtain daily therapeutic antiXa activities between 0.3 and 0.6 UI/mL. No systematic daily measurement of plasma free hemoglobin was performed during the study.

The CareScape R860 ventilator (General Electric Healthcare) was used allowing continuous measurement of the native lung's VCO2 and serial measurements of the functional residual capacity (FRC) (applied PEEP set at zero) or end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) (any positive applied PEEP) using the nitrogen washout/washin technique [16, 17]. A Nutrivent catheter (Sidam, Mirandola, Italy) was inserted for esophageal pressure measurements, allowing the calculation of inspiratory work of breathing (WOB) during the weaning process as previously described [14].

Protocol of the study

Figure 1 illustrates the flowchart of the study.

Fig. 1
figure1

Flowchart of the study. PaCO2target: PaCO2 corresponding to a pH value of 7.40, based on the Henderson-Hasselbach equation, governing the relationship between the PaCO2, pH and bicarbonates plasma values. In cases of mixed respiratory and metabolic acidosis, a PaCO2target value of 40 mmHg was retained. RR: respiratory rate

After inclusion in the study, we first calculate the target PaCO2 (PaCO2target) corresponding to a pH value of 7.40, based on the Henderson-Hasselbach equation governing the relationship between PaCO2, pH and bicarbonates plasma values. In cases of mixed respiratory and metabolic acidosis, any PaCO2target below the normal PaCO2 value was replaced by the 40 mmHg value.

The second step of the study was to measure the physiological dead space (VD) using the Bohr-Enghoff equation: VD/VT = (PaCO2 – PECO2)/PaCO2.

The third step of the study was to start ECCO2R. After cannulation and initiation of the treatment, an increase in the sweep gas flow (using pure O2) generally up to 10 L/min. induced a decrease in native lung's VCO2. We checked for stabilization of the latter, with a delay of 1 h.

The fourth part of the study was then to adjust RR for reaching PaCO2target. For that purpose, we used the proportionality equation between alveolar ventilation, native lung's VCO2 and PaCO2: (VTVD) × RR = (K × VCO2)/PaCO2;

expressed as:

$$ {\text{RR }} = \, \left( {K \, \times {\text{ VCO}}_{{2}} } \right) \, /[{\text{PaCO}}_{{{\text{2target}}}} \times \, \left( {V_{{\text{T}}} {-} \, V_{{\text{D}}} } \right)] $$

assuming that VD was unchanged during the study.

The fifth part of the study was to perform final measurements after waiting again for stability of the native lung's VCO2, with a further delay of 1 h. If required, we adjusted the extracorporeal blood flow and/or sweep gas flow with the aim to keep unchanged the native lung's VCO2 after the initial decrease.

Study endpoints

The primary outcome measure was PEEPi, measured during a prolonged expiratory pause at inclusion in the study and after initiation of ECCO2R combined with RR adjustment. We choose PEEPi as the primary outcome measure because we assumed that improvement in arterial pH and PaCO2 would be obvious and that the medical device would be powerful enough for achieving both improvements in respiratory acidosis and in dynamic hyperinflation. Secondary end-points measured within the same time frame were: plateau pressure, peak pressure (Ppeak), FRC, PaCO2, PaO2, arterial pH, hemoglobin saturation (SatHbO2), extracorporeal VCO2, standard hemodynamic parameters. We also calculated VT/TE as a major determinant of dynamic hyperinflation.

Based on recorded files, WOB at the end of the weaning process was measured just before extubation with and without ECCO2R under low Pressure Support Ventilation as previously described [14]. As a supplemental analysis, we also pooled the WOB results of the present study with previously published results of 2 pilot patients obtained using the same experimental design [14]. ECCO2R-related adverse events were recorded during the whole ICU-stay. This included severe hemolysis defined as a serum free hemoglobin level higher than 500 mg/L and/or association to jaundice, hemoglobinuria or impaired renal function. Time on ECCO2R, time on IMV, length of stay in ICU and in hospital and mortality at 28 days were recorded.

Sample size calculation and statistical analysis

Considering results obtained in preliminary pilot patients, we hypothesized a mean value of PEEPi at inclusion of 9 cmH2O along with an average reduction of 2 cmH2O of PEEPi after initiation of ECCO2R combined with RR adjustment (SD pooled = 1.9- slightly below the average reduction). Based on these assumptions, with 12 evaluable patients, a paired t-test would reach a statistical power of 90% to conclude to the statistical significance of the difference before/after ECCO2R at the (two-sided) alpha level = 0.05 (nQuery MOT1 module).

Demographics and clinical characteristics of included patients at inclusion were described as follows: quantitative and qualitative variables were tabulated with medians, interquartile range (IQR) and range (min; max), and counts and proportions, respectively. We secondly described primary and secondary endpoints, at each time point, with the same statistical indicators. Results are expressed in the results sections as median (IQR). Due to study size, a non-parametric approach was adopted. For principal analysis on primary endpoint, we implemented Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare PEEPi at inclusion and PEEPi after initiation of ECCO2R combined with RR adjustment. Regarding secondary endpoints, we performed the same test as for primary endpoint. For endpoints assessed several times, graphs representing variable distributions at each timepoint helped interpreting statistical parameters and tests. In this exploratory trial, statistical significance for p-values was fixed to 0.05 for all statistical tests. We summarized SAEs by number (frequency) of patients to whom SAE occurred. The software used for analyses of data was SAS (r) Proprietary Software 9.4. (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

Results

Twelve patients were recruited during an 18-month period in 2 centers. Table 1 shows characteristics at inclusion. Causes of AE were viral pulmonary infections in 5 patients, bacterial pulmonary infection in 4 patients, pneumothoraxes in 2 patients (all with successful pleural drainage at the time of measurement), and exacerbation in a post-surgical context for the last patient.

Table 1 Characteristics of the 12 patients at inclusion

After initiation of ECCO2R, the RR adjustment algorithm (aiming to improve arterial pH value) resulted in RR decrease in 5 patients, in RR increase in 5 patients, while RR was maintained unchanged in the remaining 2 patients (Fig. 2). As a consequence, median minute ventilation was not modified, from 6300 (5112; 6900) to 6300 (4800; 6725) mL/min., p = 0.8457. PEEPi after initiation of ECCO2R and RR adjustment was not significatively different from basal values: 8.5 (7.0; 10.0) to 8.0 (5.5; 9.5) cmH2O, p = 0.1191. Other respiratory parameters (mechanical ventilator settings, other parameters of hyperinflation, ABG values and native lungs VCO2 values) before ECCO2R initiation and after ECCO2R initiation combined with RR adjustment are mentioned in Table 2, in Additional file 1: Fig. S1 (gas exchanges parameters) and Additional file 1: Fig. S2 (ventilatory parameters). In the 7 patients with pure respiratory acidosis before ECCO2R initiation, we found that the RR adjustment in addition to ECCO2R led to increase in arterial pH from 7.27 (7.25; 7.30) to 7.40 (7.35; 7.43). Median extracorporeal blood flow was 460 (430; 505) mL/min., with a median sweep gas flow of 10 (10; 10) L/min. Median extracorporeal VCO2 was 85 (80–89) mL/min. No variations in hemodynamic parameters were observed without or with ECCO2R.

Fig. 2
figure2

Respiratory rate before ECCO2R initiation and after ECCO2R initiation and adjustment aiming to improve arterial pH value. D0: first day with ECCO2R, after adjustment of respiratory rate aiming to improve arterial pH value

Table 2 Respiratory parameters before ECCO2R and after ECCO2R initiation combined with RR adjustment

Median ECCO2R duration was 5.55 (3.10; 7.25) days. Median sweep gas flow was 10 L/min. from day 1 to day 6. Additional file 1: Fig. S3 illustrates the course of total PEEP and EELV under ECCO2R until day 4. Of note, an external positive PEEP (generally between 5 and 8 cmH2O) was set after stopping deep sedation beyond the first days of IMV, to favor the synchronization between the patient and the mechanical ventilator and to counteract flow limitation. Additional file 1: Fig. S4 illustrates the course of ABG parameters and Additional file 1: Fig. S5 illustrates the course of hematological parameters under ECCO2R until day 7. Mainly, a mild thrombocytopenia was observed in the whole group.

Inspiratory WOB measurements with and without ECCO2R were possible in only 5 patients during the weaning process, due to premature cessation of ECCO2R before readiness of patients to perform a low Pressure Support Ventilation trial in 6 patients (mainly in relation with hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications) and due to accidental removal of the Nutrivent probe in one patient. WOB measurements were performed in conscious patients while breathing at a low pressure support level with ECCO2R and after switching the sweep gas flow from current value to 0 L/min. for a 1 h period. Results are indicated in Table 3. Results adding the previously published results of 2 pilot patients using a similar design are presented as Additional file 1: Table S1.

Table 3 Work of breathing (WOB) measurements in 5 patients with and without ECCO2R

Three patients died in-ICU and 9 were successfully discharged from ICU and hospital. The causes of death were one hemorrhagic stroke during ECCO2R therapy and 2 septic shocks in relation with ventilator-associated pneumonia. The median IMV total duration was 8 (6; 18) days. The median IMV duration after ECCO2R initiation was 6 (4; 16.5) days. The median ICU-stay duration was of 14.5 (8–22.5) days. The median hospital length of stay was 39 (18.5; 73) days. A ventilator-associated pneumonia was diagnosed in 4 patients. Three hemorrhagic complications were observed during ECCO2R therapy, including one fatal hemorrhagic stroke (in the absence of any unfractionated heparin overdosing or thrombocytopenia). Three thrombotic complications were observed (2 ECCO2R catheter thrombosis, one ECCO2R circuit thrombosis). No patient suffered from severe clinical hemolysis. We didn't observe air bubble in the circuit in any patient.

Discussion

We report a physiological and clinical evaluation of a low-to-middle extracorporeal blood flow veno-venous ECCO2R system in 12 very severe AE-COPD patients studied shortly after intubation. Severity of the patients was assessed by the combination of respiratory acidosis and elevated intrinsic PEEP under pre-specified respiratory settings aimed to avoid excessive dynamic hyperinflation in deeply sedated IMV patients. Moreover, all patients were intubated after NIV failure. Dynamic hyperinflation was also assessed by FRC and EELV measurements using the nitrogen washin-washout method, providing original results in this specific COPD population. Indeed, such patients were not included or were excluded from previous studies [18]. As expected, we observed very high baseline FRC values as compared to published reference values measured in the supine position [19].

Initiation of ECCO2R was associated with a median extracorporeal CO2 removal amount of 85 mL/min., corresponding to 42% of the pre-ECCO2R whole body CO2 production. Accordingly, there was a decrease in native lungs' CO2 elimination, which, in conjunction with RR adjustment, permitted to improve arterial pH and to obtain a median absolute decrease in PaCO2 of 19 mmHg. This could be beneficial at the early stage of IMV in AE COPD patients, mainly by minimizing the deleterious effects of acute hypercapnia on ventilator demands, therefore, allowing to shorten deep sedation periods and to rapidly initiate the IMV weaning process. We didn't observe any ECCO2R-induced deleterious effect on oxygenation, as sometimes mentioned in COPD patients [9, 10, 20]. However, severely hypoxemic patients were excluded from our study. Moreover, we used a low-to-middle blood flow ECCO2R device, therefore, minimizing the ECCO2R-induced imbalance between native lung's VO2 and VCO2 [20]. We also found a higher SatHbO2 under ECCO2R, which could at least in part be explained by a left shift of the O2 dissociation curve due to a decrease in arterial PaCO2 and to a parallel increase in arterial pH. Although probably too complex for a general clinical use, the algorithm for RR adjustment performed well for arterial pH improvement. Such a result was favored by the hemodynamic stability of the patients during ECCO2R initiation associated with stability in whole body CO2 production. By choice, we didn't retain an algorithm based on VT reduction. This was based on the fact that the absolute value of physiological dead space for CO2 depends of the absolute value of VT, therefore, allowing easier calculations when keeping a fixed absolute VT value [21].

However, despite the use of quasi-maximal extracorporeal blood and sweep gas flows, the algorithm led to a decrease in RR in only 5 patients. This explains that no improvement in PEEPi, as the primary outcome measure, was observed in the whole group. The clinical correlate is that the ECCO2R system was not able in our group of very severe IMV COPD patients to both improve respiratory acidosis and improve dynamic hyperinflation. However, it’s obvious that alternative adjustments algorithms would have been associated with different results. As an example, it could have been possible to first reduce RR and VT after ECCO2R initiation while keeping PaCO2 at the same level. Such a strategy very probably would have been associated with a significant decrease in PEEPi. Moreover, in the clinical setting, clinicians will have the possibility to tailor personalized strategies: by simply choosing different PaCO2 target and by calculating individual RR adjustment, clinicians have the possibility to arbitrate between respiratory acidosis and dynamic hyperinflation respective improvements. It's also likely that ECCO2R systems allowing higher extracorporeal CO2 removal amounts could have been associated with higher improvements in hyperinflation parameters and in respiratory acidosis. Altogether, this illustrates the need for clinicians to develop clinical strategies of ECCO2R initiation in deeply sedated IMV COPD patients. Such strategies should be based on the severity of patients, mainly assessed by parameters of dynamic hyperinflation and respiratory acidosis. Based on animal and clinical studies, clinicians should also take into account the performances of the different ECCO2R devices and their effects on native lungs respiratory CO2 elimination [22, 23]. Providing such strategies could have important implications for the care of patients and for the design of future RCTs aiming to prove important clinical benefits of ECCO2R in very severe AE-COPD patients. In addition, we have to mention that our algorithm is not per se suitable for awake patients. This point is important, since ECCO2R can be proposed in AE-COPD patients at high risk of NIV failure, or in cases of difficult IMV weaning. Finally, such low-to-intermediate extracorporeal blood flow devices could be viewed as more suitable for paralyzed moderate ARDS patients with minimal CO2 production rather than for very severe AE-COPD patients.

In line with PEEPi results, FRC and VT/TE were not significantly improved in the whole group. One could question the validity of FRC measurements in patients treated by ECCO2R, since ECCO2R can modify the native lung’s respiratory quotient [20]. However, the nitrogen fraction calculation is based on direct measurements of both O2 and CO2 fractions when FiO2 is lower than 65%, as indicated by the manufacturer [16]. Since our study included only non-severely hypoxemic patients, with FiO2 < 65%, we are confident in the validity of our results. Also, the course of FRC results was coherent with PEEPi results.

We previously reported an ECCO2R-induced benefit in terms of breathing pattern and of work of breathing in 2 IMV AE-COPD at the end of the weaning process [14]. Using the same design, we observed similar trends in 5 patients. Considering a possible lack of statistical power due to the number of patients, we pooled the results of the 2 studies and observed significantly less WOB (expressed either in Joules per min, per liter of ventilation or per breath) under ECCO2R. However, since we cannot exclude selection bias, these results are presented with great caution and should not be extrapolated to clinical practice. Such results obtained in non-sedated patients only suggest that ECCO2R could favor a more rapid liberation of IMV, as compared to standard care of IMV AE-COPD patients [5, 6, 15]. Moreover, the fact that efficiency of ECCO2R was observed several days after initiation, could open the way for further studies of different clinical strategies for ECCO2R weaning.

The median duration of ECCO2R was near to the maximal duration of the circuit as indicated by the manufacturer. Such result is important to consider for the choice of ECCO2R devices and circuits in COPD patients. We observed one fatal intracerebral bleeding. Such fatality, along with other hemorrhagic complications and thrombosis, illustrate the need to improve the knowledge of the interaction between ECCO2R circuits, anticoagulation regimen and coagulation system of the patients. Indeed, hemorrhagic complications can be favored by an usual mild thrombocytopenia as observed in our study and by other factors such as the occurrence of an acquired Willebrand disease, as previously preliminary reported with the Hemolung system [24] and such as a severe endothelial dysfunction, as recently reported by our group [25]. Moreover, fewer side effects could also be expected with higher extracorporeal blood flow devices, as recently shown in ARDS patients [26]. Nevertheless, the in-hospital mortality rate was found to be lower than the mortality rate observed in IMV AE-COPD patients by Burki et al. with the same device, which could suggest a benefit to initiate ECCO2R early in the course of IMV in COPD patients [11].

One of the main limitations of the study was a too optimistic hypothesis at the time of conception of the study, leading to an overestimation of the ability of Hemolung device for CO2 removal in such severe AE-COPD patient [11, 14]. Another limitation was the choice to use standardized mechanical ventilator settings, as part of our usual respiratory bundle in such severe AE-COPD patients. It is, therefore, conceivable that more personalized settings could have been more appropriate for certain patients. One other limitation was the assumption of an unchanged VD/VT during all points of the study. Indeed, there was a possibility of individual decrease (or increase) in VD/VT in patients with decrease (or increase) in RR. Such variations in VD/VT after limited modifications in ventilatory settings have been reported previously in AE-COPD patients [27]. However, there were no differences in the whole group between PEEPi, plateau pressure, Ppeak and EELV values at baseline and after initiation of ECCO2R combined with RR adjustments. The lack of standard of care control group was also a limit of the study for evaluating dynamic hyperinflation independently of ventilation on a more prolonged time. Accordingly, the different initial time points were separated by a delay of 1 h. Therefore, we cannot exclude that a more delayed ECCO2R-induced improvement in regional ventilation could have occurred and allowed decreasing RR, I/E ratio or VT, all important determinants of dynamic hyperinflation. We didn't observed severe hemolysis in contrast to other reports [26, 28]. However, the observation is limited by the lack of systematic daily plasma free hemoglobin measurement, which is now a standard practice in our centers. The low inclusion rate of the study and the fact that WOB measurements were not possible for the majority of included patients are also clear limitations.

Conclusions

Using a formalized protocol of RR adjustment, ECCO2R permitted to effectively improve pH and diminish PaCO2 at the early phase of IMV in 12 AE-COPD patients, but not to diminish dynamic hyperinflation in the whole group. Such results could support the clinical implementation of fine-tuned algorithms derived from our protocol taken into account the 2 main goals of ECCO2R at the early phase of IMV, i.e., controlling both hyperinflation and respiratory acidosis.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Decramer M, Janssens W, Miravitlles M. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet. 2012;379:1341–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kramer N, Meyer TJ, Meharg J, Cece RD, Hill NS. Randomized, prospective trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151:1799–806.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Brochard L, Mancebo J, Wysocki M, Lofaso F, Conti G, Rauss A, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:817–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chandra D, Stamm JA, Taylor B, Ramos RM, Satterwhite L, Krishnan JA, et al. Outcomes of noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the United States, 1998–2008. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:152–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Boyle AJ, Sklar MC, McNamee JJ, Brodie D, Slutsky AS, Brochard L, et al. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for lowering the risk of mechanical ventilation: research questions and clinical potential for the future. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6:874–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Morales-Quinteros L, Del Sorbo L, Artigas A. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9:79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sklar MC, Beloncle F, Katsios CM, Brochard L, Friedrich JO. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:1752–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Del Sorbo L, Pisani L, Filippini C, Fanelli V, Fasano L, Terragni P, et al. Extracorporeal CO2 removal in hypercapnic patients at risk of noninvasive ventilation failure: a matched cohort study with historical control. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:120–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Braune S, Sieweke A, Brettner F, Staudinger T, Joannidis M, Verbrugge S, et al. The feasibility and safety of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to avoid intubation in patients with COPD unresponsive to noninvasive ventilation for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (ECLAIR study): multicentre case-control study. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1437–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Karagiannidis C, Strassmann S, Schwarz S, Merten M, Fan E, Beck J, et al. Control of respiratory drive by extracorporeal CO2 removal in acute exacerbation of COPD breathing on non-invasive NAVA. Crit Care. 2019;23:135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Burki NK, Mani RK, Herth FJF, Schmidt W, Teschler H, Bonin F, et al. A novel extracorporeal CO2 removal system: results of a pilot study of hypercapnic respiratory failure in patients with COPD. Chest. 2013;143:678–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Abrams DC, Brenner K, Burkart KM, Agerstrand CL, Thomashow BM, Bacchetta M, et al. Pilot study of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to facilitate extubation and ambulation in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013;10:307–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Roncon-Albuquerque R, Carona G, Neves A, Miranda F, Castelo-Branco S, Oliveira T, et al. Venovenous extracorporeal CO2 removal for early extubation in COPD exacerbations requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1969–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Diehl J-L, Piquilloud L, Richard J-CM, Mancebo J, Mercat A. Effects of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal on work of breathing in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:951–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Pisani L, Fasano L, Corcione N, Comellini V, Guerrieri A, Ranieri MV, et al. Effects of extracorporeal CO2 removal on inspiratory effort and respiratory pattern in patients who fail weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192:1392–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Olegård C, Söndergaard S, Houltz E, Lundin S, Stenqvist O. Estimation of functional residual capacity at the bedside using standard monitoring equipment: a modified nitrogen washout/washin technique requiring a small change of the inspired oxygen fraction. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:206–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dellamonica J, Lerolle N, Sargentini C, Beduneau G, Di Marco F, Mercat A, et al. PEEP-induced changes in lung volume in acute respiratory distress syndrome Two methods to estimate alveolar recruitment. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:1595–604.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Blankman P, Hasan D, Bikker IG, Gommers D. Lung stress and strain calculations in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016;60:69–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ibañez J, Raurich JM. Normal values of functional residual capacity in the sitting and supine positions. Intensive Care Med. 1982;8:173–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Diehl J-L, Mercat A, Pesenti A. Understanding hypoxemia on ECCO2R: back to the alveolar gas equation. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:255–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kiiski R, Takala J, Kari A, Milic-Emili J. Effect of tidal volume on gas exchange and oxygen transport in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146:1131–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Karagiannidis C, Kampe K, Sipmann F, Larsson A, Hedenstierna G, Windisch W, et al. Veno-venous extracorporeal CO2 removal for the treatment of severe respiratory acidosis: pathophysiological and technical considerations. Crit Care. 2014;18:R124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    d’Andrea A, Banfi C, Bendjelid K, Giraud R. Utilisation de l’épuration extra-corporelle de dioxyde de carbone dans l’exacerbation de la maladie pulmonaire obstructive chronique: une revue narrative. Can J Anesth. 2020;67:462–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kalbhenn J, Neuffer N, Zieger B, Schmutz A. Is extracorporeal CO2 removal really “safe” and “less” invasive? Observation of blood injury and coagulation impairment during ECCO2R. ASAIO J. 1992;2017(63):666–71.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Diehl JL, Augy JL, Rivet N, Guerin C, Chocron R, Smadja DM. Severity of endothelial dysfunction is associated with the occurrence of hemorrhagic complications in COPD patients treated by extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R). Intensive Care Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06138-8).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Combes A, Tonetti T, Fanelli V, Pham T, Pesenti A, Mancebo J, et al. Efficacy and safety of lower versus higher CO 2 extraction devices to allow ultraprotective ventilation: secondary analysis of the SUPERNOVA study. Thorax. 2019;74:1179–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yang SC, Yang SP. Effects of inspiratory flow waveforms on lung mechanics, gas exchange, and respiratory metabolism in COPD patients during mechanical ventilation. Chest. 2002;122:2096–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Augy JL, Aissaoui N, Richard C, Maury E, Fartoukh M, Mekontso-Dessap A, et al. A 2-year multicenter, observational, prospective, cohort study on extracorporeal CO2 removal in a large metropolis area. J Intensive Care. 2019;7:45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The sponsor "Direction de la Recherche Clinique, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris" was in charge of the general organization of the research. The study was founded by Alung (Pittsburgh, USA). Alung (Pittsburgh, USA) and General Electric Healthcare also provided (non-financial) technical support for the study, mainly by providing ECCO2R and mechanical ventilator devices and consumables.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study design: JLD, DH, CR, JM, AM. Data collection: JLD, DV, NA, EG, JLA, MP. Data analysis: JLD, DH, AA. Data interpretation: JLD, LP, DV, NA, EG, JLA, AA, CR, JM, AM. Preparing the report: JLD, NA, JLA, JM, AM. Approbation of the report: all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.-L. Diehl.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

An institutional ethic board (Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile-de-France VI, Paris, France) approved the protocol (protocole EPHEBE P141 203-ID CRB: 2015-A100446-43). Informed consent was obtained from patients' legal representatives.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Dr. Diehl reports grants and non-financial support from Alung, non-financial support from General Electric Healthcare, during the conduct of the study; personal fees and non-financial support from Xenios Novalung (Fresenius Medical Care) outside the submitted work.

Dr. Aissaoui reports non-financial support from ASTRAZENECA, non-financial support from MEDTRONIC, non-financial support from ABIOMED, outside the submitted work.

Dr. Mercat reports personal fees from Faron Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Air Liquide Medical Systems, grants and personal fees from Fisher and Paykel, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Drager, non-financial support from General Electric, outside the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Work of breathing (WOB) measurements in 7 patients with and without ECCO2R. Figure S1. Gas exchanges parameters before ECCO2R initiation and after ECCO2R initiation and adjustment aiming to improve arterial pH value. Figure S2. Ventilatory parameters before ECCO2R initiation and after ECCO2R initiation and adjustment aiming to improve arterial pH value. Figure S3. Daily course of total PEEP and EELV under ECCO2R until day 4. Figure S4. Daily course of ABG parameters under ECCO2R until day 7. Figure S5. Course of hematological parameters under ECCO2R until day 7.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diehl, J., Piquilloud, L., Vimpere, D. et al. Physiological effects of adding ECCO2R to invasive mechanical ventilation for COPD exacerbations. Ann. Intensive Care 10, 126 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00743-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal
  • Invasive mechanical ventilation
  • COPD acute exacerbation
  • Alveolar ventilation
  • Work of breathing