Skip to main content
Annals of Intensive Care
Download PDF

Neurologic outcome of VZV encephalitis one year after ICU admission: a multicenter cohort study

Annals of Intensive Care volume 12, Article number: 32 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) is one of the main viruses responsible of acute encephalitis. However, data on the prognosis and neurologic outcome of critically ill patients with VZV encephalitis are limited. We aimed to describe the clinical features of VZV encephalitis in the ICU and to identify factors associated with a favorable neurologic outcome. We performed a multicenter cohort study of patients with VZV encephalitis admitted in 18 ICUs in France between 2000 and 2017. Factors associated with a favorable neurologic outcome, defined by a modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 0–2 1 year after ICU admission, were identified by multivariable regression analysis.

Results

Fifty-five patients (29 (53%) men, median age 53 (interquartile range 36–66)) were included, of whom 43 (78%) were immunocompromised. ICU admission occurred 1 (0–3) day after the onset of neurological symptoms. Median Glasgow Coma Score at ICU admission was 12 (7–14). Cerebrospinal fluid examination displayed a median leukocyte count of 68 (13–129)/mm3, and a median protein level of 1.37 (0.77–3.67) g/L. CT scan and MRI revealed brain lesions in 30% and 66% of the cases, respectively. Invasive mechanical ventilation was implemented in 46 (84%) patients for a median duration of 13 (3–30) days. Fourteen (25%) patients died in the ICU. One year after ICU admission, 20 (36%) patients had a favorable neurologic outcome (mRS 0–2), 12 (22%) had significant disability (mRS 3–5), and 18 (33%) were deceased (lost to follow-up n = 5, 9%). On multivariable analysis, age (OR 0.92 per year, (0.88–0.97), p = 0.01), and invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 0.09 CI 95% (0.01–0.84), p = 0.03) reduced the likelihood of favorable neurologic outcome.

Conclusion

One in every three critically ill patients with VZV encephalitis had a favorable neurologic outcome 1 year after ICU admission. Older age and invasive mechanical ventilation were associated with a higher risk of disability and death.

Background

Acute encephalitis is a neurologic syndrome characterized by the inflammation of the brain parenchyma from a wide range of infectious and autoimmune causes. This severe condition is associated with mortality rates up to 15%, but also with significant morbidity among survivors with a high rate of disability and neuropsychiatric sequelae [1]. The widespread of conjugate vaccines has led to a reduction in the incidence of bacterial meningitis with viruses now being the most common cause of central nervous system (CNS) infections [2]. Moreover, the routine use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays has greatly increased our ability to identify in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) many neurotropic viruses known to cause infectious encephalitis [3]. About 40% of patients with encephalitis require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and one-fourth invasive mechanical ventilation, for close monitoring or management of coma, seizures or other complications (aspiration pneumonia, autonomic instability or cardiac arrhythmia) [4]. The outcome of acute viral encephalitis in the ICU is estimated to be poor, although data are limited to specific etiologies (herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 or -2) or small single-center experiences [5,6,7,8].

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) is one of the eight herpes viruses known to cause human infections and is the second cause of acute encephalitis in France after herpes simplex virus (HSV) 1 and 2 [2, 3, 9]. Its incidence has grown over the last decade [10]. The most common neurologic symptoms of VZV infection are meningoencephalitis, cerebellitis, stroke, myelopathy and retinitis.

Therefore, we conducted a large multicenter cohort study to report the clinical features, ICU management, and outcome of VZV encephalitis in ICU patients. We aimed to investigate the association between the use of invasive mechanical ventilation and the neurologic outcome 1 year after ICU discharge. We hypothesized that the use of invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with VZV encephalitis would negatively impact neurologic outcome.

Methods

This study was approved by the French Intensive Care Society Ethics Committee (#15-12) on March the 16th 2015, and received an authorization to use patients’ data from the French Data Protection Agency (no. 1868870). According to French law, a waiver of informed consent was obtained.

Study design, setting, and population

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study in 18 French ICUs (see Additional file 1: Table S1). We identified all adults (≥ 18 years of age) admitted to the participating ICUs between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2017, and registered in the electronic hospital databases with any of the codes for VZV encephalitis by using the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) coding system (B01.1, B01.0, B02.0, B02.1). All patients’ medical records were reviewed by 2 investigators (AM and EC) to confirm the diagnosis of VZV encephalitis. The diagnosis of encephalitis was confirmed if patients had an acute change in mental status or behavior ≥ 24 h mentioned in their medical charts, with at least 2 of the following manifestations: fever within 72 h before or after presentation, generalized or partial seizures, new onset of focal neurological findings, lumbar puncture with CSF white blood cell count ≥ 5/mm3, neuroimaging or electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities suggestive of encephalitis [11]. A positive PCR for VZV DNA in a CSF sample was mandatory for the diagnosis of VZV encephalitis.

Data collection

For each patient, data were extracted manually from the medical chart. We obtained data for baseline patient characteristics, including demographics, comorbidities, chronic medications, and past medical history. Clinical and laboratory data, neuroimaging, and EEG were extracted from the medical charts. Immunosuppression was defined as chronic use of steroids (> 3 months) or other immunosuppressive drugs, solid organ transplantation, HIV infection, hematologic malignancy or solid tumor treated by chemotherapy during the past 5 years. Neurologic symptoms were classified as confusion, coma, seizures, status epilepticus, motor or sensitive impairment, cerebellar syndrome, and cranial nerves disorders. Mental status at baseline was graded using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Coma was defined as a GCS < 8. Other VZV-related manifestations were extracted from the medical chart, including chicken pox skin rash, hepatitis, pneumonia, and digestive symptoms. Disease severity was assessed using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) at day 1 after ICU admission [12]. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria [13]. High-dose steroids were defined as more than 30 mg/day of equivalent prednisone.

Outcome

Two physicians (AM, EC) assessed neurologic outcomes by reviewing the medical charts and or by contacting the general practitioner in charge of the patient and or the patient. The outcome was assessed at ICU discharge, 6 months, and 1 year after ICU discharge using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability and score 6 indicating death) [14]. For this study, a favorable neurologic outcome was defined as an mRS score of 0 (no symptoms at all), 1 (no significant disability) or 2 (slight disability).

Objectives

The primary objective of the study was to identify factors associated with a favorable neurologic outcome 1 year after ICU discharge. The secondary objectives were to describe the clinical features, treatments, and outcomes of critically ill patients with VZV encephalitis.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are described as median and interquartile range (IQR) and compared using Wilcoxon’s test; categorical variables are shown as counts (percent) and compared using exact Fisher test. We did not use any technique to replace missing data; missing data are reported. The occurrence of favorable 1-year neurologic outcome (versus unfavorable 1-year neurologic outcome) was analyzed as a binary variable. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify variables which were associated with the occurrence of favorable 1-year neurologic outcome, with estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The multivariable model selected to identify factors independently associated with favorable 1-year neurologic outcome was also a logistic regression model. For the multivariable model, we preselected candidate variables which plausibly fit with complicated hospital stay based on knowledge from the literature and our assumptions (age, invasive mechanical ventilation and underlying immunosuppression). We carefully checked to avoid collinearity between variables and we applied the rule of selecting approximately 1 variable per 7 events. For the number of events of the smallest group (n = 20), a maximum of 3 variables were included. All tests were two-sided, and p-values lower than 5% were considered to indicate significant associations. Statistical tests were conducted using the R statistics software, version 3.5.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; www.R-project.org/).

Results

Study population

During the study period, 55 critically ill patients were coded as having VZV encephalitis. A detailed analysis of the medical files confirmed the diagnosis for the 55 patients. Table 1 reports their main features. Median age was 53 (36–66) years and 29 (53%) were men. Forty-three (78%) patients were immunocompromised with chronic use of steroids, malignancy and solid organ transplantation being the most common causes of immunosuppression. Patients were admitted in the ICU 1 (0–3) day after the onset of neurologic symptoms. The main reasons for ICU referral were coma (n = 22, 40%) and confusion (n = 20, 36%). At ICU admission, the median GCS was 12 (7–14) and a body temperature higher or equal to 38.3 °C was noted in 34 (62%) patients. Two-thirds of the patients had a typical chickenpox skin rash associated with the neurologic symptoms. All patients had abnormal CSF examination with a median leukocyte count of 68 (13–129)/mm3 with predominance of lymphocytes (70% [61%–82%]), and a median protein level of 1.37 (0.77–3.67) g/L. A brain imaging was performed in 42 (76%) patients, including 33 (66%) computed-tomography (CT) scan and 30 (55%) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), abnormal in 10 (30%) and 21 (70%) cases, respectively. Twelve (22%) patients had a normal CT-scan followed by an abnormal brain MRI. Brain MRI analysis displayed brain parenchyma hyperintensities consistent with encephalitis in 10 (33%) patients, cerebral vasculitis in 8 (27%) patients (ischemic lesions in 5 patients, microbleeds in 2 patients and cerebral hemorrhage in one patient), and brain edema in 3 (10%) patients (Fig. 1). Brain MRI lesions involved frontal lobes in 6 (20%) patients, temporal lobes in 4 (13%) patients, parietal lobes in 4 (13%) patients, occipital lobes in 3 (10%) patients, basal ganglia in 3 (10%) patients, brainstem in 3 (10%) patients, and cerebellum in 3 (10%) patients. EEG abnormalities were noted in 18/24 (75%) patients. Main abnormalities included seizures or post-ictal changes (n = 5, 21%), and non-specific encephalopathy (n = 13, 54%).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the 55 study participants
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Imaging characteristics of VZV encephalitis and vasculitis from brain MRI. A 18-year-old man was admitted to the ICU for fever, headaches and altered consciousness. He underwent a second kidney transplantation 2 years ago. The onset of neurologic symptoms started 2 days before ICU admission and invasive mechanical ventilation was implemented at day 2 for coma. The lumbar puncture revealed acute lymphocytic meningitis and the PCR for VZV was positive. Brain MRI showed multiple recent ischemic lesions of the brain parenchyma (A: white arrows) and vasculitis with multiple stenosis of the circle of Willis arteries (B: red arrows). He was treated with intravenous acyclovir 10 mg/kg/8 h and steroids (methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg). He recovered gradually and was extubated after 4 days of invasive mechanical ventilation. The patient was ultimately discharged alive 8 days after ICU admission

Full size image

ICU management and outcomes

Table 2 provides details about the treatments used in the ICU. Two-thirds of the patients were treated with 10 mg/kg/8 h of intravenous acyclovir and one-third with 15 mg/kg/8 h for a median duration of 14 (9–19) days. Eight (15%) patients received an additional antiviral drug (foscavir, n = 6, ganciclovir, n = 2) and 3 (5%) were treated with intravenous immunoglobulins. High-dose steroid pulses were administered to 4 (7%) patients for the treatment of VZV-related brain vasculitis (Fig. 1). During the ICU stay, 18 (33%) patients had seizures and 12 (22%) developed status epilepticus. Mechanical ventilation was implemented in 46 (84%) patients for a median duration of 13 (3–30) days. Intubation occurred on day 1 after ICU admission in 43 (78%) patients. AKI was diagnosed in 28 (51%) patients and 15 (27%) required renal replacement therapy.

Table 2 ICU management and outcome
Full size table

ICU and hospital length of stay were 15 (6–38) days and 35 (17–55) days, respectively. Fourteen (25%) patients died during the ICU stay. Main causes of death were multi-organ failure in 4 (29%) patients (all of them had bacterial superinfection), treatment limitations because of an expected poor neurologic outcome in 4 (29) patients, brain death in 3 (21%) patients, and VZV-related fulminant hepatitis in 2 (14%) patients. Among the 41 (75%) ICU survivors, 4 (7%) with poor neurologic outcome ultimately died from sepsis during the first year after ICU discharge (lost to follow-up n = 5, 9%). Six months and 1 year after ICU discharge, 18 (33%) and 20 (36%) patients had a favorable neurologic outcome (mRS 0–2), while 14 (26%) and 12 (22%) had moderate-to-severe disability (mRS 3–5), respectively (Fig. 2, Additional file 1: Table S2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Neurologic outcome assessed with the modified Rankin Scale 6 months and 1 year after ICU discharge. Missing data: 5 (9%) patients at 6 months and 5 (9%) patients at 1 year. ICU: intensive care unit; VZV: varicella-zoster virus

Full size image

Factors associated with favorable one-year neurologic outcome

By univariate analysis, older age, underlying immunosuppression, and invasive mechanical ventilation were associated with an increased risk of disability or death 1 year after ICU discharge. By multivariable analysis, older age and invasive mechanical ventilation were independently associated with a lower probability of favorable neurologic outcome (mRS 0–2) (Table 3).

Table 3 Logistic regression analyses for factors associated with modified Rankin Scale scores of 0–2 at year-1 after ICU discharge
Full size table

Discussion

Key findings

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we used the ICD-10 coding system and a manual review of the medical charts to identify ICU patients with VZV encephalitis. We sought to describe their clinical features, management, and identify predictors of neurologic outcome 1 year after ICU discharge. We found that almost 80% of patients with VZV encephalitis had underlying immunosuppression. Moreover, we found that two-thirds of patients who underwent brain MRI had abnormal findings of whom 8 (15%) had signs of cerebral vasculitis. Finally, ICU mortality reached 25%, and a favorable neurologic outcome 1 year after ICU discharge was reported in 36% of the patients. Age and invasive mechanical ventilation were associated with an increased risk of disability or death.

Relationship to previous studies

Acute viral encephalitis often requires ICU admission for monitoring and treatment [15]. Most of the current knowledge on VZV encephalitis relies on laboratory data with limited clinical information, studies conducted outside the ICU, or small case series [6,7,8, 16]. Thus, we report the largest cohort study on the clinical features and outcomes of patients admitted to the ICU for the management VZV encephalitis.

A recent study conducted in France on HSV encephalitis in the ICU setting found that patients had a median age of 64 years and 19% were immunocompromised [5]. In contrast, patients with VZV encephalitis in our study were younger (median age 53 years), and almost 80% were immunocompromised. Our results are in line with a recent nationwide Danish study where almost 40% of patients with VZV encephalitis had underlying immunosuppression [16]. VZV encephalitis results from reactivation of the virus located in neurons of dorsal root, autonomic and cranial ganglia, or less frequently from a primary infection [17]. Around 50% of herpes zoster cases occur in subjects with reduced cell-mediated immunity [18, 19]. Our results suggest that immunocompromised patients have an increased risk of developing more severe forms of VZV encephalitis [20]. Moreover, the high proportion of immunocompromised patients in our study could explain that most of them developed a disseminated form of the disease with typical chickenpox skin rash. Moreover, a recent study identified TLR3 mutations in patients with VZV and HSV encephalitis, suggesting a potential host factor for these diseases [21]. We cannot exclude that non-immunocompromised patients in our cohort had such risk factors for VZV encephalitis.

Neuroimaging is a key component to investigate acute encephalitis. In this setting, MRI is the best modality over CT to analyze the brainstem, deep brain structures, cerebellum, and document signs of vasculitis [7, 22,23,24]. In HSV encephalitis, brain MRI changes have been associated with 90 days poor prognosis [25]. In our study, 70% of the patients who underwent brain MRI had abnormal findings, of whom 50% had a normal CT. Moreover, we found that 8 (15%) had signs of cerebral vasculitis. Cerebral vasculitis is a well-known complication of VZV encephalitis with stenoses of the brain arteries often associated with ischemic lesions of the grey–white matter interface [22, 23]. A recent study found that 16% of the patients with VZV encephalitis had signs of vasculitis, and that vasculitis was independently associated with a higher risk of unfavorable outcome after discharge [16]. We did not find such association in our study. However, almost half of the patients included in our study did not have MRI investigations and thus, the true incidence of vasculitis in our cohort might be underestimated. We did not find any association between time from the onset of neurological symptoms to acyclovir treatment and neurological outcomes. However, most of the patients were treated within 72 h from the onset of symptoms. Moreover, we hypothesized that some symptoms were related to ischemic or inflammatory brain lesions, for which acyclovir treatment had no impact. These findings are in line with those reported in HSV encephalitis in the ICU setting [5].

The use of adjunctive treatment with steroids for VZV vasculitis remains a matter of debate. Although recommended by some authors [26,27,28], there are conflicting results and limited evidence to support the use of steroids in patients with herpes viruses encephalitis [29,30,31]. We did not find any association between the use of steroids and the neurologic outcome one year after discharge, yet the risk of unidentified confounders and selection bias precludes any conclusion. An ongoing randomized controlled trial testing dexamethasone compared with no intervention in patients with HSV encephalitis will provide further information on the impact of steroids on the neurologic outcome of patients with acute viral encephalitis (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03084783).

Previous studies reported mortality rates ranging between 4 and 20% in patients with VZV encephalitis [16, 19, 20, 32]. In our study, we found a higher mortality rate of 25%. This figure might be explained by the fact that our study is the only one conducted in the ICU setting. Therefore, we may have selected a specific population with more severe forms of the disease. Jaquet et al. reported a mortality of 14% in ICU patients with HSV encephalitis [5]. Whether the higher rate of ICU mortality in our study is explained by specific characteristics of the VZV or by the clinical frailty associated with the immunocompromised status of most patients needs further investigation. Another important finding of our study is that only one-third of the patient had a favorable neurologic outcome 1 year after discharge. Furthermore, our longitudinal approach showed only a mild improvement of the neurologic outcome between 6 months and 1 year after ICU discharge (percentage of mRS 0–2 patients increased from 33 to 36%). This high rate of disability and death associated with VZV encephalitis is similar to the 71% of poor functional outcome reported by Jaquet et al. in ICU patients with HSV encephalitis. Herlin et al. reported that half of the 92 patients hospitalized for VZV encephalitis in Denmark had unfavorable outcome 3 months after discharge [16]. However, only 14% of these patients were admitted to the ICU, and outcome was categorized according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale, which makes comparisons difficult. We found age and invasive mechanical ventilation to be associated with poor neurologic outcome, which is in agreement with previous studies on acute viral encephalitis [4, 5, 16].

Study implications

The findings of our study imply that VZV encephalitis in the ICU setting is predominantly diagnosed in immunocompromised patients who ultimately require invasive mechanical ventilation, and is associated with a high rate of disability and death. Moreover, they imply that brain MRI is a mandatory neuroimaging investigation for a thorough examination of the parenchyma and cerebral arteries because CT lacks sensitivity and accuracy to detect brain parenchyma inflammation, early signs of vasculitis, and cerebellum or brainstem lesions. Furthermore, our study implies that the diagnosis of cerebral vasculitis should be investigated systematically to discuss adjunctive immunomodulatory agents. Finally, the identification of age and invasive mechanical ventilation as predictors of functional outcomes may help physicians in their communication with patients and families about the likelihood of functional recovery.

Strengths and limitations

Our study has several strengths. First, to our knowledge, we have conducted the largest study so far on the epidemiology and outcome of patients with VZV encephalitis admitted to the ICU. Thus, this study may help intensivists by providing new data relevant for their daily practice. Second, neurologic outcome was assessed twice, 6 months and 1 year after ICU discharge. Therefore, such longitudinal follow-up enabled us to detect patients who experienced late improvement. Third, we have a limited number of missing data for the assessment of neurologic outcome 1 year after ICU discharge (n = 5 patients). Fourth, we used a validated tool for the assessment of functional outcome, namely the modified Rankin Scale, which has demonstrated low inter- and intra-operator variability [33]. Finally, we identified predictors of neurologic outcome 1 year after ICU discharge which could help intensivists in their communication with patients and families about the prognosis of VZV encephalitis in the ICU setting.

This study also carries some limitations. First, the retrospective design implies information bias with a possibility of missing data. Second, brain MRI was performed in 55% of the patients. Thus, we may have underestimated the true incidence of some specific complications, such as VZV vasculitis. Third, we used the modified Rankin Scale to assess the neurologic outcome, which has limited sensitivity to identify mild-to-moderate cognitive sequelae. Therefore, we may have overestimated the percentage of patients who recovered without neurologic impairment. Fourth, we did not find any association between clinical parameters, laboratory data, EEG findings, treatments, and neurologic outcome. However, this lack of association might be related to the limited sample size of the study. Finally, we used a positive PCR for VZV in the CSF as inclusion criteria. Therefore, we might have missed some patients who could have been diagnosed with serologic testing of CSF.

Conclusion

In conclusion, VZV encephalitis in ICU patients chiefly occurs in immunocompromised patients and is associated with a high rate of mortality and disability. Radiologic abnormalities of the brain parenchyma and vasculitis are common and should be investigated with MRI. One year after ICU discharge, 36% of the patients have a favorable neurologic outcome. Older age and invasive mechanical ventilation are associated with a higher risk of unfavorable neurologic outcome. Further research is needed targeting new therapeutic strategies to inhibit viral replication and reduce neuroinflammation, which hopefully could translate into better patients’ outcomes.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

CNS:

Central nervous system

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

CT:

Computed-tomography

EEG:

Electroencephalogram

GCS:

Glasgow Coma Scale

HSV:

Herpes simplex virus

ICD-10:

International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision

ICU:

Intensive care unit

IQR:

Interquartile range

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

mRS:

Modified Rankin Scale

OR:

Odds ratios

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

SOFA:

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

VZV:

Varicella-zoster virus

References

  1. McGill F, Griffiths MJ, Bonnett LJ, Geretti AM, Michael BD, Beeching NJ, et al. Incidence, aetiology, and sequelae of viral meningitis in UK adults: a multicentre prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:992–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin NG, Iro MA, Sadarangani M, Goldacre R, Pollard AJ, Goldacre MJ. Hospital admissions for viral meningitis in children in England over five decades: a population-based observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:1279–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Whitley RJ, Gnann JW. Viral encephalitis: familiar infections and emerging pathogens. Lancet. 2002;359:507–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh TD, Fugate JE, Rabinstein AA. The spectrum of acute encephalitis: causes, management, and predictors of outcome. Neurology. 2015;84:359–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaquet P, de Montmollin E, Dupuis C, Sazio C, Conrad M, Susset V, et al. Functional outcomes in adult patients with herpes simplex encephalitis admitted to the ICU: a multicenter cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:1103–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Becerra JCL, Sieber R, Martinetti G, Costa ST, Meylan P, Bernasconi E. Infection of the central nervous system caused by varicella zoster virus reactivation: a retrospective case series study. Int J Infect Dis. 2013;17:e529-534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Broucker T, Mailles A, Chabrier S, Morand P, Stahl J-P, steering committee and investigators group. Acute varicella zoster encephalitis without evidence of primary vasculopathy in a case-series of 20 patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:808–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hong H-L, Lee EM, Sung H, Kang JK, Lee S-A, Choi S-H. Clinical features, outcomes, and cerebrospinal fluid findings in adult patients with central nervous system (CNS) infections caused by varicella-zoster virus: comparison with enterovirus CNS infections. J Med Virol. 2014;86:2049–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Le Maréchal M, Mailles A, Seigneurin A, Tattevin P, Stahl J-P, Épaulard O, et al. A prospective cohort study to identify clinical, biological, and imaging features that predict the etiology of acute encephalitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73:264–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mailles A, Argemi X, Biron C, Fillatre P, De Broucker T, Buzelé R, et al. Changing profile of encephalitis: results of a 4-year study in France. Infect Dis Now. 2021;S2666–9919(21):00545–55.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Venkatesan A, Tunkel AR, Bloch KC, Lauring AS, Sejvar J, Bitnun A, et al. Case definitions, diagnostic algorithms, and priorities in encephalitis: consensus statement of the international encephalitis consortium. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:1114–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707–10.

  13. Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)—KDIGO (cited 2017 Sep 4). http://kdigo.org/guidelines/acute-kidney-injury/

  14. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tyler KL. Acute viral encephalitis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:557–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Herlin LK, Hansen KS, Bodilsen J, Larsen L, Brandt C, Andersen CØ, et al. Varicella zoster virus encephalitis in Denmark from 2015 to 2019-A nationwide prospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72:1192–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grahn A, Studahl M. Varicella-zoster virus infections of the central nervous system—prognosis, diagnostics and treatment. J Infect. 2015;71:281–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Arvin AM, Moffat JF, Redman R. Varicella-zoster virus: aspects of pathogenesis and host response to natural infection and varicella vaccine. Adv Virus Res. 1996;46:263–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Persson A, Bergström T, Lindh M, Namvar L, Studahl M. Varicella-zoster virus CNS disease—viral load, clinical manifestations and sequels. J Clin Virol. 2009;46:249–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Granerod J, Ambrose HE, Davies NW, Clewley JP, Walsh AL, Morgan D, et al. Causes of encephalitis and differences in their clinical presentations in England: a multicentre, population-based prospective study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10:835–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sironi M, Peri AM, Cagliani R, Forni D, Riva S, Biasin M, et al. TLR3 mutations in adult patients with herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus encephalitis. J Infect Dis. 2017;215:1430–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gilden DH, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, LaGuardia JJ, Mahalingam R, Cohrs RJ. Neurologic complications of the reactivation of varicella-zoster virus. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:635–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Venkatesan A, Michael BD, Probasco JC, Geocadin RG, Solomon T. Acute encephalitis in immunocompetent adults. Lancet. 2019;393:702–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Britton PN, Eastwood K, Paterson B, Durrheim DN, Dale RC, Cheng AC, et al. Consensus guidelines for the investigation and management of encephalitis in adults and children in Australia and New Zealand. Intern Med J. 2015;45:563–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarton B, Jaquet P, Belkacemi D, de Montmollin E, Bonneville F, Sazio C, et al. Assessment of magnetic resonance imaging changes and functional outcomes among adults with severe herpes simplex encephalitis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2114328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gilden D, Cohrs RJ, Mahalingam R, Nagel MA. Varicella zoster virus vasculopathies: diverse clinical manifestations, laboratory features, pathogenesis, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:731–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Solomon T, Michael BD, Smith PE, Sanderson F, Davies NWS, Hart IJ, et al. Management of suspected viral encephalitis in adults–Association of British Neurologists and British Infection Association National Guidelines. J Infect. 2012;64:347–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stahl JP, Azouvi P, Bruneel F, De Broucker T, Duval X, Fantin B, et al. Guidelines on the management of infectious encephalitis in adults. Med Mal Infect. 2017;47:179–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Maraş Genç H, Uyur Yalçın E, Sayan M, Bayhan A, Öncel S, Arısoy ES, et al. Clinical outcomes in children with herpes simplex encephalitis receiving steroid therapy. J Clin Virol. 2016;80:87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramos-Estebanez C, Lizarraga KJ, Merenda A. A systematic review on the role of adjunctive corticosteroids in herpes simplex virus encephalitis: is timing critical for safety and efficacy? Antivir Ther. 2014;19:133–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tunkel AR, Glaser CA, Bloch KC, Sejvar JJ, Marra CM, Roos KL, et al. The management of encephalitis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:303–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mailles A, Stahl J-P, Steering Committee and Investigators Group. Infectious encephalitis in France in 2007: a national prospective study. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;2009(49):1838–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38:1091–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France

    Adrien Mirouse & Elie Azoulay

  2. Université de Paris, Paris, France

    Adrien Mirouse, Romain Sonneville & Elie Azoulay

  3. Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, Hôpital Bichat, APHP, Paris, France

    Romain Sonneville

  4. Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France

    Keyvan Razazi

  5. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Hôpital André Mignot, Le Chesnay, France

    Sybille Merceron

  6. Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, Hôpital E. Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

    Laurent Argaud

  7. Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, APHP, Paris, France

    Naïke Bigé

  8. Département de Néphrologie et Transplantation d’organes – Unité de Réanimation, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France

    Stanislas Faguer

  9. Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Brabois, Nancy, France

    Pierre Perez

  10. Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, Hôpital Cochin, APHP, Paris, France

    Guillaume Géri

  11. Service de médecine intensive et réanimation, Groupement Hospitalier Nord, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, INSERM 955, Créteil, France

    Claude Guérin

  12. Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation Groupement Hospitalier Centre, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France

    Claude Guérin

  13. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CHRU de Lille - Hôpital Roger Salengro, Lille, France

    Anne-Sophie Moreau

  14. Service de Réanimation des Détresses Respiratoires et Infections Sévères, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, France

    Laurent Papazian

  15. Service de Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France

    René Robert

  16. Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital la Source, Orléans, France

    François Barbier

  17. Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital E. Muller, Mulhouse, France

    Frédérique Ganster

  18. Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France

    Julien Mayaux

  19. Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France

    Emmanuel Canet

  20. Département de Médecine Interne et Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, 83 boulevard de l’hôpital, 75013, Paris, France

    Adrien Mirouse

Authors
  1. Adrien Mirouse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Romain Sonneville
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Keyvan Razazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sybille Merceron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Laurent Argaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Naïke Bigé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stanislas Faguer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Pierre Perez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Guillaume Géri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Claude Guérin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Anne-Sophie Moreau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Laurent Papazian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. René Robert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. François Barbier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Frédérique Ganster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Julien Mayaux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Elie Azoulay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Emmanuel Canet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AM and EC made substantial contributions to the conception, design of the work, the acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data, have drafted the work or substantively revised it. RS, KR, SM, LA, NB, SF, PP, GG, CG, ASM, LP, RR, FB, FG, JM, EA made substantial contributions to the acquisition of data, have substantively revised the work. All authors have approved the submitted version and have agreed both to be personally accountable for the author's own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrien Mirouse.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the French Intensive Care Society Ethics Committee (#15-12) on March the 16th 2015, and received an authorization to use patients’ data from the French Data Protection Agency (no 1868870). According to French law, a waiver of informed consent was obtained.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

EC received fees for lectures and conference talks and had travel and accommodation expenses to attend scientific meetings covered by Gilead, Baxter, and Sanofi-Genzyme. SF received fees for lectures and conference talks and had travel and accommodation expenses to attend scientific meetings covered by Vifor Pharma, Sanofi-Genzyme and Asahi, and received consulting fees from Abionyx Pharma.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Participating intensive care units. Table S2. Neurological outcome according to the treatment received.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirouse, A., Sonneville, R., Razazi, K. et al. Neurologic outcome of VZV encephalitis one year after ICU admission: a multicenter cohort study. Ann. Intensive Care 12, 32 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01002-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01002-y

Keywords