Systematic overdosing of oxa- and cloxacillin in severe infections treated in ICU: risk factors and side effects

Beta-lactams are first-choice antibiotics for most infections in intensive care units [1]. Oxacillin and cloxacillin are the most frequently used penicillins for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections. Since this bacterium is responsible for more than one quarter of all endocarditis, in both a nosocomial and community context [2–4], these antibiotics stand at the forefront of the latest European Society of Cardiology guidelines [5]. Given such criteria as safety of use and low level of toxicity, as opposed to the well-known effect of aminoglycosides or vancomycin [6], the therapeutic drug monitoring of these molecules has never been widespread.

As all penicillins, oxacillin and cloxacillin are time-dependent antibiotics. For severe infections, the target is to obtain 100% of time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), or even 4× MIC to avoid emergence of resistances [7]. To reach this concentration, high doses and prolonged infusion are recommended in ICU patients with an increased distribution volume [8, 9] and glomerular hyperfiltration [10]. The dosage of 12 g/day (200 mg/kg/day as specified only for children) is recommended by consensus conferences to treat severe infections, without mentioning any specific attention in case of renal failure [5, 11]. Recently, the French Health Authority (Haute Autorité de Santé or HAS) has suggested to reduce the dose by 50% when creatinine clearance falls below 30 mL/min [12], leading to subsequent modifications of the medication approval.

There is also a lack of data in the literature concerning a possible accumulation in the event of prolonged use, particularly in case of endocarditis or endovascular infections. Thus, ICU patients are potentially exposed to severe complications, essentially neurological [13, 14], hepatic [15, 16], and renal [17–19].

The aim of our study was to analyze oxacillin and cloxacillin plasma concentrations in critical care patients in order to identify risk factors for overdosing, its frequency, and the observed adverse effects.

Sixty-two patients were included in this study, representing 94 drug monitorings. For patients included prospectively after 2012, a flowchart is available in Additional file 1: Figure S1. Cloxacillin was the most frequently used molecule in our work, as it was administered to 56 patients (90.3%), whereas oxacillin was given to the six others (9.7%).

We defined three different categories of infections: endocarditis (n = 33, 53.2%), other endovascular infections (15 patients, 24.2%), and a third group including all the extravascular infections—particularly pneumonia and mediastinitis, representing the remaining 14 patients (22.6%). Bacteremia occurred in fifty-six patients (90.3%). Only two patients underwent extracorporeal life support.

Fifty-two patients (83.9%) included in this study had a high plasma concentration in oxacillin or cloxacillin (Fig. 1). Only ten of them reached the trough plasma concentration target of 20 to 50 mg/L. Using a percentage of 10% to estimate the unbound fraction of oxa- or cloxacillin, all patients would have had a trough unbound fraction concentration superior or equal to the maximum MIC for oxa- or cloxacillin sensitivity, i.e. 2 mg/L. As the median ratio albumin/total serum protein level was 33% for the patients with available data, we used the measured or estimated albumin level in our population to estimate the median unbound fraction of oxa- or cloxacillin, which was 18 mg/L.

Twenty-nine patients had at least another antibiotic administered in the last 24 h before dosage: rifampicin (n = 14), ofloxacin (n = 5), vancomycin (n = 4), piperacillin/tazobactam (n = 3), clindamycin (n = 2), spiramycin (n = 1), cefotaxime (n = 1), erythromycin (n = 1), imipenem (n = 1), levofloxacin (n = 1), daptomycin (n = 1), ciprofloxacin (n = 1), and cotrimoxazole (n = 1).

We identified an median time lag of 6 days [4; 11] between the starting date of the treatment and plasma concentration measure. The analysis of trough concentration level on the basis of this time lag did not highlight any variation (Fig. 2). The total dosing of oxa- or cloxacillin was 12 g for 23 patients (37.1%), 8–10 g for 17 patients (27.5%), 6 g or less for 21 patients (33.9%). Only one patient received a dose superior to 12 g, i.e. 16 g. The dose reduction in case of renal failure was statistically significant (Table 2).

	Creatinine clearance (mL/min)
	<10	10–30	>30	p*
	n = 37	n = 7	n = 18
Dosing per 24 h, g, median [IQR]	8 [6–10]	6 [6–12]	12 [10–12]	0.002
Dosing per kg per day, median [IQR]	87.0 [75.0–120.5]	100.0 [52.6–155.8]	131.7 [108.1–160.0]	0.033

* This analysis has been performed with a Mann Whitney test

Fourteen patients (22.6%) experienced side effects attributed to an overdosing in oxa- or cloxacillin, as measured by the microbiological method (i.e. representing the total antimicrobial activity in plasma). Eleven (17.7%) presented with neurological symptoms, i.e. persistent coma for three patients and delirium for eight patients (12.9%). The median trough concentration of the antibiotic for those patients was 165 mg/L, with a minimum at 97 mg/L, and a maximum at 302 mg/L. Head CT scans showed no abnormalities in four patients, and formerly known strokes for 5. An electroencephalogram (EEG) was performed for six of the 11 patients and showed the presence of reactivity but a slow background activity. Taking into account the other medications administered to patients (i.e. sedatives and other antibiotics), the Naranjo score for the six patients with an EEG was 6, and 5 for the five other ones, which classified the observed neurological events as ‘probably’ due to oxacillin overdosing. Comparing the patients with and without neurological side effects, we found no statistically significant differences in terms of age, weight, renal function, length of stay (respectively, 64 vs 42 days, p = 0.14), or mortality at day 90 (41.7 vs 52%, p = 0.52), but the median duration of treatment was longer (32.5 vs 14 days, p = 0.03). Neurological evolution was favorable after reduction in treatment dose in all patients.

Our study is the first one to thoroughly evaluate oxacillin dosage in the context of extremely severe infections. We found a plasma trough concentration of oxa- or cloxacillin above the target level for a large proportion of patients and a quarter of them experienced side effects that were attributed to the high antibiotic concentration. The latest international recommendations for the treatment of endocarditis provide for a cloxacillin or oxacillin dose of 12 g/j for an adult, without reference to weight or renal function [5]. It is interesting to note that these recommendations have been slightly modified in the past 40 years, although the relevant patients population has changed; the average age of patients, in particular, has tremendously increased and concomitantly the proportion of patients with impaired renal function [26]. In the literature, the data related to a modification of the dosing of these antibiotics in case of impaired renal function are weak and contradictory. In the book ‘The use of antibiotics’ by Kucer, it is mentioned that the dose should normally be reduced in case of impaired renal function, and especially if very high intravenous doses are used [27]. Other recommendations point in the same direction, notably from the HAS in 2012, whereby a reduction in the doses by half is proposed in case of renal impairment and creatinine clearance below 30 mL/min [12]. However, none of these recommendations rely on pharmokinetics data published in the literature. There are very few differences between oxa- and cloxacillin PK/PD parameters [27]. As said before, both are highly bound to albumin, i.e. more than 90%, and distribution of the two drugs in the body after parenteral administration is similar. After IV administration, 70–80% of the injected dose of cloxacillin is eliminated by urinary route in 6 h, in an active form, and the rest by the biliary tract, also in active form; the biliary elimination is more marked for oxacillin. No data are available in the literature regarding potential differences between their metabolites’ toxicity. A first pharmacological study published by Nauta et al. [28] assessed pharmacokinetics of orally administered cloxacillin in 11 healthy subjects and 11 patients on chronic intermittent hemodialysis. They found a cloxacillin half-life (T _1/2) 3 times higher in hemodialysis patients than in healthy ones, but a lower absorption. Thus, they recommended using the same dosing in anuric patients, but this did not concern intravenous administration. Thijssen and Wolters [29] observed a prolonged half-life of antibacterial activity in plasma of patients treated with flucloxacillin and presenting with renal failure, mainly because of the accumulation of an active metabolite, hydroxyflucloxacillin. This metabolite has a longer half-life than flucloxacillin, and a lower plasma clearance by a non-renal route. Although some accumulation of the hydroxyflucloxacillin metabolite was observed, they recommended no adjustment of the flucloxacillin dose in severe renal impairment, because of a low metabolite toxicity.

All of these data did not concern ICU patients. PK/PD of beta-lactams in an intensive care context is very complex and often unpredictable [8]. Although an increase in cardiac output, glomerular filtration, and distribution volume would make the case for a higher dosing, the emergence of an acute renal failure exposes the patient to the risk of an overdosing [30]. Moreover, the target to reach a 100% T > MIC often leads to increase treatment doses.

Verdier et al. [31] analyzed plasma concentrations of oxacillin in 57 patients, half of them being treated for endocarditis. Twenty-nine patients had an altered creatinine clearance below 60 mL/min, as estimated with the Cockcroft and Gault formula, but very few of them had a clearance of less than 10 mL/min; furthermore, no renal replacement therapy was mentioned. However, they showed that plasma concentrations were higher in case of altered renal function and highlighted the interindividual variability of concentrations after administration of high doses of cloxacillin. Visser et al. [32] suggested the existence of variations of a saturable mechanism of tubular excretion, explaining the accumulation of antibiotics during treatments with continuous infusions even in patients with normal renal function. In this latter study, the authors tried to predict plasma concentration of cloxacillin administered in continuous infusions with an equation including creatinine clearance and weight; patients with a creatinine clearance inferior to 10 mL/min had to be excluded of the study, because the prediction remained unreliable.

Several studies reported neurological side effects of these molecules [33, 34]. Malone et al. [13] reported convulsions with a concentration of 270 mg/L. Delirium increases the duration of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation and is associated with a poor outcome, including subsequent cognitive decline and mortality [35, 36]. We found in our study 17.7% of patients suffering from neurological adverse effects that were attributed by the clinician in charge to an overdosing in oxa- or cloxacillin. Patients were receiving several medications, including sedatives, at the same time, and retrospective design makes it difficult to establish the responsibility of the overdosing. Nevertheless, other frequent causes of delirium as pain, new cerebral lesions or sepsis were ruled out, and neurological recovery was observed after stopping or adapting treatment dose. The Naranjo scores classified those adverse events as ‘probably’ due to the antibiotic.

Considering the high proportion of patients with renal replacement therapy included in our study, it appears that this population is particularly at risk of overdosing and must be accurately monitored.

Our study had several limitations. Data were collected retrospectively for 25 patients (40.3%) before 2012, but there was no difference in the dosage of administered antibiotics between the two study periods. Moreover, the day retained for collecting the blood samples was not the same for all patients; even if the dosing was made prospectively after 2012, blood samples could only be collected and analyzed in the laboratory on week days. Nonetheless, statistical analysis did not reveal any difference in the median trough concentration based upon the day of the measure. Finally, before 2012, the reason for assessing oxa- or cloxacillin concentration was not mentioned; we could suppose clinicians suspected an overdosing because of observed side effects. However, among those 25 patients, only three were reported to have experienced adverse effects due to overdosing.

It has also to be noted that the oxa- and cloxacillin assay used in our study represents a total antibiotic activity of oxa- and cloxacillin, thus including all active metabolites, but does not evaluate its unbound fraction. This method is the same as the one used by Nauta and Mattie [37] and Bulger et al. [38] in former studies. Verdier et al. [31] used high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to measure antibiotic concentrations that could explain their lower proportion of overdosing in normo-renal patients. Whether we should take into account the presence of the active metabolites or not to determine the optimal trough concentration target to reach is not known. Indeed, it is interesting to notice that the MIC of oxacillin or cloxacillin metabolites for Staphylococcus aureus is equivalent to that of the parent compounds, i.e. 0.5–1.2 mg/L, in the study by Thijssen and Mattie [39]. In the same study, they observed that the amount of active metabolites represented 40–50% of the plasmatic penicillin activity in patients on chronic intermittent hemodialysis. Thus, it appears that the microbiological method may more accurately estimate the total antimicrobial activity in the plasma. Whether or not the metabolites are as effective as the parent compound to treat infections in vivo is not known, since their distribution may be different. However, in the case of endocarditis or endovascular infections, this might not influence the outcome of therapy.

As compared to microbiological method, HPLC dosing method has also the advantage to give clinicians a result more rapidly. However, in our center, we were able to obtain a trough concentration of oxa- or cloxacillin in 48 h, which was considered to be a reasonable delay to adapt treatment dosing.

Due to the retrospective design of our study, we were not able to measure the unbound fraction of oxa- or cloxacillin in our patients’ plasma. Ulldemolins et al. [25] showed that the unbound fraction of flucloxacillin was more important in case of hypoalbuminemia, leading to an increased volume of distribution of the molecule and to a risk of underdosing. As most of our patients had a low serum protein level and consequently a low albumin concentration, we estimated that the unbound fraction of oxa- or cloxacillin was also increased, compared to healthy patients in which it represents 10% of the total antibiotic concentration. If we extrapolate the unbound fraction increase in the same proportion of the decrease in albumin concentration, none of our patients would have had an unbound oxa- or cloxacillin trough level inferior to 2 mg/L. Considering the very high concentrations obtained in our population with an important proportion of patients with impaired renal function, the role of albumin in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of highly protein-bound antibiotics, like oxacillin, might be of less relevance. As suggested by Benet and Hoener [40], changes in plasma protein binding will usually not influence the clinical exposure of a patient to a drug, except for some specific cases of a drug with a high extraction ratio and narrow therapeutic index that is intravenously administered. Moreover, the study by Ulldemolins et al. did not consider the plasma concentration of non-protein-bound fraction of hydroxyflucloxacillin, which may play a part in antimicrobial efficacy, and which is estimated to be twice as large as that of its parent compound in previous studies [29].

We therefore deem it essential to monitor and adapt dosing of frequently used molecules in intensive care, including antibiotics. In order to avoid antibiotic accumulation in our ICU patients, a systematic plasma concentration measure of oxacillin has been set in our unit. The efficiency of this provision has to be determined.

Through this study, we could identify the need for renal replacement therapy as a major risk factor for overdosing. In spite of a reduction in dosage in case of renal failure, it did not allow us to avoid overdosing in our intensive care population. Even if the severity of our patients’ condition may be an additional risk factor for overdosing in an ICU context, the proposed reduction by half of the dosage when the creatinine clearance is less than 30 mL/min is far from satisfactory. Further pharmacokinetic study is needed to clarify the mechanisms of this overdosing and to provide guidelines for dosage when facing renal function impairment.

We therefore propose to develop a systematic therapeutic drug monitoring for oxa- and cloxacillin in ICU, as could be done for aminoglycosides or vancomycin, in order to optimize the managing and monitoring of patients. Faster techniques such as HPLC have largely developed these last few years, allowing for a reliable plasma concentration measure of numerous molecules [41].

Nevertheless, the question concerning the efficiency of this dosing method to evaluate the accumulation of active metabolites and their potential toxicity remains unanswered.

With the proposed reduction by half of the dosage of oxa- and cloxacillin when the creatinine clearance is less than 30 mL/min, a large proportion of patients remain overdosed. In multivariate analysis, identified risk factors for overdosing were the dose-to-weight ratio and an impaired renal function. Considering the severity of the observed side effects, especially coma and delirium, ICU patients with renal failure must be accurately monitored.