Skip to main content

Pulmonary infections prime the development of subsequent ICU-acquired pneumonia in septic shock



To investigate the determinants and the prognosis of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired pneumonia in patients with septic shock.


This single-center retrospective study was conducted in a medical ICU in a tertiary care center from January 2008 to December 2016. All consecutive patients diagnosed for septic shock within the first 48 h of ICU admission were included. Patients were classified in three groups: no ICU-acquired infections (no ICU-AI), ICU-acquired pneumonia and non-pulmonary ICU-AI. The determinants of ICU-acquired pneumonia and death were investigated by multivariate competitive risk analysis.


A total of 1021 patients were admitted for septic shock, and 797 patients were alive in the ICU after 48 h of management. The incidence of a first episode of ICU-AI was 31%, distributed into pulmonary (17%) and non-pulmonary ICU-AI (14%). Patients with septic shock caused by pneumonia were at increased risk of further pulmonary ICU-AI with a cumulated incidence of 34.4%. A pulmonary source of the initial septic shock was an independent risk factor for subsequent ICU-acquired pneumonia (cause-specific hazard 2.33, 95% confidence interval [1.55–3.52], p < 0.001). ICU-AI were not associated with a higher risk of ICU mortality after adjustment in a multivariate-adjusted cause-specific proportional hazard model.


Septic shock of pulmonary origin may represent a risk factor for subsequent ICU-acquired pneumonia without affecting mortality.


Sepsis is an infection-related life-threatening condition characterized by an initial overwhelming pro-inflammatory response followed by a complex immunosuppressive response [1]. Septic shock, its most severe presentation, remains associated with a crude 40% mortality rate, as well as with numerous short-term and long-term complications. Thanks to early recognition of the disorder as well as prompt institution of antimicrobial treatment and advanced life support, most septic shock patients nowadays survive the early phase of resuscitation but then become highly susceptible to intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections (ICU-AI) which account for a major cause of death in this setting [2, 3]. Prevention and management of complications in patients recovering from the primary insult now appear as cornerstone therapeutic challenges to improve the overall prognosis of septic shock.

ICU-acquired pneumonia accounts for the majority of ICU-AI in critically ill patients and is associated with increased mortality and other relevant poor outcomes such as prolonged ventilation and prolonged length of stay in the ICU and in the hospital. Classical risk factors for ICU-acquired pneumonia rely on patients’ characteristics including underlying immune and non-immune comorbid conditions, clinical severity and requirements for invasive ventilatory support [4]. Hence, endotracheal intubation and duration of mechanical ventilation are major determinants of so-called ventilator-associated pneumonia. Furthermore, a new paradigm of post-aggressive immunosuppression has emerged in critically ill patients [5]. Accordingly, sepsis-induced immune dysfunctions of most circulating immune cells have been associated with increased susceptibility to secondary infections in previously immunocompetent patients. Such explorations have been conducted in circulating blood cells for obvious accessibility reasons. The impact of multiple sequential insults within target organs on the subsequent risk of infectious complications remains unclear.

We hypothesize that a primary pulmonary infection may contribute to alterations in lung defense and thereby may favor the development of ICU-acquired pneumonia. The aim of this study is to investigate the determinants and the prognosis of ICU-acquired pneumonia in patients with septic shock, with a particular emphasis on linking primary and secondary infectious insults.

Patients and methods

Patients and setting

We performed a retrospective single-center study in a 24-bed medical ICU. All patients aged ≥ 18 years old diagnosed with septic shock within the first 48 h of ICU admission were included. Septic shock was defined as a microbiologically proven or clinically suspected infection, associated with acute circulatory failure requiring vasopressors despite adequate fluid filling. Patients who remained in the ICU after 48 h, and therefore at risk of ICU-acquired infections, formed the core of this study. Patients were classified in three groups: no ICU-acquired infections (no ICU-AI), ICU-acquired pneumonia and non-pulmonary ICU-AI. The ethics committee of the French Intensive Care Society approved the study and waived the need for patients’ consents due to its retrospective observational design (ref. CE SRLF, #16–30).

Intended management

Patients were treated in accordance with the guidelines of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign [6]. Patients were administered intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics, depending on the presumed site of infection, previous antibiotic treatment and known colonization with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Antimicrobial treatment was deescalated to narrower spectrum after identification of the responsible pathogen. Source control measures, such as surgery or removal of infected devices, were applied when necessary. They were subjected to a strict sedation protocol based on the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale assessment every 3 h and daily stop of sedatives whenever possible, as well as assessment of weaning criteria twice a day in order to reduce the length under mechanical ventilation. End-of-life decisions to withhold or withdraw life support were taken on collectively when maintenance or increase in life-sustaining therapies was considered as futile by all participants and that death would irremediably occur in a short-term manner. Palliative care was then appropriately delivered in the ICU.


Severity at admission was assessed by the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores [7, 8]. Patients were considered immunocompromised if one or more of the following conditions were observed: patients with solid tumors with chemotherapy in the last 3 months or a progressive metastatic disease, hematologic malignancies, solid organ transplantation, HIV infection with or without AIDS, treatment with corticosteroids (> 3 months at any dosage or ≥ 1 mg/kg prednisone equivalent per day for > 7 day), or treatment with other immunosuppressive drugs.

The characteristics of both primary and secondary infections included the source and the causative microorganism if microbiologically documented. ICU-acquired infections were defined as any new onset of probable or definite infection that developed after 48 h from ICU admission [2]. Only the first episode of ICU-acquired infection was considered. ICU-acquired pneumonia was diagnosed according to the American Thoracic Society criteria [9]. Briefly, the diagnosis of pneumonia was based on a Clinical Pulmonary Infectious Score > 6. Patients with clinically suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia were usually subjected to a tracheobronchial aspirate with semiquantitative cultures. The diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia and the decision to initiate or not antimicrobial treatment were discussed on daily rounds. A definite diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection required the growth of the same pathogen from both peripheral blood and catheter tip cultures, or from blood cultures sampled from the catheter and from venous puncture with a differential time to positivity > 120 min. The diagnosis of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus bloodstream infections required at least two positive blood cultures with the same pathogen. Urinary tract infections, mostly catheter related, were diagnosed upon the association of systemic manifestations of infection and positive urine bacterial culture at ≥ 105 CFU/mL. Invasive fungal infections were diagnosed according to the current guidelines [10]. The diagnostic work-up for ICU-AI did not change during the study period.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as median (interquartile range) and categorical variables as numbers (percentages) and were compared by the Kruskal–Wallis’ test, the Pearson’s Chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. ICU mortality was analyzed through a competitive risk framework, with discharge alive as a competing event. The independent predictors of ICU death were investigated in a multivariate Cox cause-specific model, by performing a stepwise backward and forward variable selections based on Akaike information criteria. The model included variables that were significant at p value of less than 0.20 in univariate analysis. Proportional hazard assumption was graphically checked, and potential interactions were tested in the final model. Because ICU-AI is a time-dependent covariate, we performed a Cox cause-specific survival analysis, with ICU-AI and the source of infection as predictors, at each landmark time. Landmarking is a common method recommended for the analysis of time-dependent covariates in time-to-event data. We chose each day from day 3 to day 30 for landmark times. Because multiple statistical tests increase the risk of type I error, we applied the Bonferroni correction to adjust p values (p value threshold = 0.003).

Determinants of ICU-acquired infections were also analyzed through a competing risk framework, with discharge alive and death in ICU as competing events. Since ICU-acquired infections are defined by the occurrence after 48 h, a landmark analysis was performed on the subset of patients still alive in ICU at day 3. Independent determinants of ICU-acquired infections were investigated in a multivariate analysis using a Cox cause-specific proportional hazard model with time-dependent covariates. All analyses were carried out using R 3.1.1 (R foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria) with the packages “survival,” “cmprsk,” “survival,” “rms” and “stepwise.”



From January 2008 to December 2016, 1021 patients were admitted for septic shock in our ICU. Among them, 147 (14.4%) died early within 48 h and 77 (7.5%) rapidly improved to be promptly discharged from the ICU, leaving 797 patients alive in the ICU after 48 h of management (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Among them, 337 (42%) patients presented with community-acquired infections and 460 (58%) patients had hospital-acquired infections, with a previous in-hospital length of stay of 5 (1–17) days. Most 48-h survivors had underlying comorbid conditions, including 276 (35%) with prior immunosuppression (Table 1). The lung was the most common source of the primary infection in 50% of patients. Adequacy of initial antimicrobial treatment in microbiologically documented infections was 91%. A large majority of patients were mechanically ventilated (n = 691, 87%) with a median length of ventilation of 6 (3–12) days; 213 of the 797 48-h survivors (26.7%) died in the ICU. The independent determinants of ICU mortality are displayed in Table 2 and include demographics (age and gender), underlying comorbid conditions (immunosuppression and cirrhosis) and the extent of organ failures (invasive mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy).

Table 1 Characteristics of patients
Table 2 Determinants associated with ICU mortality using multivariate Cox cause-specific model

Characteristics and outcome of ICU-acquired infections

Among 48-h survivors, the incidence of a first episode of ICU-AI was 31% (n = 249), distributed into pulmonary (n = 139, 17%) and non-pulmonary ICU-AI (n = 110, 14%). Characteristics of ICU-AI are displayed in Table 3. Microbiological documentations of primary and ICU-acquired pneumonia were all different in terms of strains and/or antibiotic susceptibility. Non-pulmonary ICU-AI episodes were mainly related to catheter-related infections (43%) and abdominal infections (31%). Time from admission to ICU-AI diagnosis was similar for both pulmonary and non-pulmonary ICU-AI, 7 (5–11) days and 8 (5–12) days, respectively. Patients with ICU-AI exhibited higher SAPS2 severity score at ICU admission resulting in higher requirements for stress-dose steroids, invasive mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy (Table 1). Of note, the underlying immune status did not impact on the susceptibility to ICU-AI. The occurrence of ICU-AI was associated with protracted invasive mechanical ventilation, especially if pulmonary ICU-AI, and a marked increase in ICU mortality (46% vs. 18% in patients without ICU-AI, p < 0.001). However, neither pulmonary nor non-pulmonary ICU-AI remained significantly associated with a higher risk of ICU mortality in a multivariate-adjusted cause-specific proportional hazard model (Fig. 1).

Table 3 Characteristics of ICU-acquired infections
Fig. 1
figure 1

Effects of pulmonary (a) and non-pulmonary (b) ICU-acquired infections on ICU mortality. The figure displays the risk of death (cause-specific hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval) associated with ICU-acquired infections in patients still at risk (alive in the ICU) at each time points (landmarks)

Determinants of pulmonary ICU-AI

Most importantly, we observed a link between sources of primary and secondary infections. Thus, patients with septic shock caused by pneumonia carried a particular susceptibility to further pulmonary ICU-AI with a cumulated incidence of 34.4% (Fig. 2a). In contrast, a primary pneumonia did not favor the occurrence of non-pulmonary ICU-AI (Fig. 2b). Differences between patients with ICU-acquired pneumonia and other patients without ICU-AI or with non-pulmonary ICU-AI are displayed in Table 1.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cumulative incidence of pulmonary (a) and non-pulmonary (b) ICU-acquired infections depending on the source of primary infection

Using a cause-specific Cox regression multivariate model, we plotted the pulmonary source of the primary infection against other relevant determinants of ICU-acquired pneumonia including prior invasive mechanical ventilation treated as a time-dependent covariate (Table 4). A primary pulmonary infection was an independent risk factor for subsequent ICU-acquired pneumonia (pulmonary vs. non-pulmonary primary infections: CSH 2.33, 95% confidence interval [1.55–3.52], p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in a sensitivity analysis performed in the 691 patients who had required invasive mechanical ventilation (pulmonary vs. non-pulmonary primary infections: CSH 2.03, 95% confidence interval [1.35–3.05], p < 0.001).

Table 4 Determinants associated with ICU-acquired pneumonia


We herein reported that ICU-acquired pneumonia account for the majority of secondary infections in patients who survived the early days of septic shock. After adjustment with potential confounders, including the exposition to invasive mechanical ventilation, a primary pulmonary infection was independently associated with the development of further ICU-acquired pneumonia. This suggests that a primary pulmonary insult may impair lung defense mechanisms toward secondary infections.

Recent cohorts of sepsis and septic shock patients have reported that ICU-acquired infections remain frequent and dreaded complications, with incidence ranging from 13.5 to 23% [2, 11]. Incidence of nosocomial infections is higher in critical care setting than in general hospital wards given the complex interactions between underlying diseases, the severity of acute illness and the multiplicity and the maintenance of invasive devices [12, 13]. We reported here a slightly higher incidence ICU-AI of 31%, with a majority of nosocomial pneumonia, probably linked to the underlying characteristics of our cohort. Although ICU-AI are clearly associated with a higher risk of death in critically ill patients, whether they directly contribute to mortality or only account for a surrogate marker of frailty remains questionable. Moreover, the burden of antimicrobial resistance is increasing, due to extensive antimicrobial use and protracted hospital length of stay, and raises new therapeutic challenges. Hence, early identification of ICU-AI and infection control measures are of major concern in preventing ICU-AI and decreasing the spread of antimicrobial resistance.

Although the development of ICU-AI is commonly associated with an increased risk of death, multiple additional factors are likely to contribute to mortality in critically ill patients including underlying comorbid conditions, accumulation of organ failures, infectious and non-infectious complications. This may frequently result in therapeutic limitations that may prevent appropriate diagnostic work-up and treatment. Sophisticated statistical models taking into account such confounders allow addressing the specific attributable mortality of nosocomial infections, defined as the percentage of death that would not have occurred without infection. Thus, recent studies retrieved little impact of ICU-acquired infections, and more specifically of ventilator-associated pneumonia, on ICU mortality [2, 14, 15]. Using a multivariate cause-specific hazard model, we observed that both pulmonary ICU-AI and non-pulmonary ICU-AI were not significantly associated with a higher risk of ICU mortality.

The major result of this study lies in the link between primary and secondary sources of infection. Specifically, we found that the pulmonary source of the primary infection was a risk factor for further ICU-acquired pneumonia, independent from prior requirement and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation. This result suggests regional disparities induced by different sources of infection that rely on the compartmentalization of immune responses. Primary pulmonary or non-pulmonary insults may differentially impact on lung defense and modulate the further susceptibility to superimposed infectious insults. The regimen and duration of prior antibiotics may also impact on the type of pathogens involved in ventilator-associated pneumonia and their eventual susceptibility to antimicrobials [16]. We also found that male patients had an increased risk of developing pulmonary ICU-AI. We could hardly find a definite explanation, but it is likely that sexual hormones play a role in the regulation of the immune system and may therefore impact on the eventual susceptibility to and outcome of sepsis [17].

It is now well documented that both pulmonary and non-pulmonary sepsis may induce various quantitative and functional changes in most immune cells [18], which have been associated with an increased susceptibility to secondary infections [19,20,21,22]. Furthermore, experimental studies have highlighted that different body compartments may not behave similarly following an infectious insult. For instance, alveolar macrophages do not produce interferon-β after LPS stimulation when compared to peritoneal macrophages [23]. Therefore, assuming a regional compartmentalization of immune response, several mechanisms could participate to explain the susceptibility of the lung to a second infectious hit after septic shock of pulmonary origin. A recent study reported acquired tolerogenic properties of pulmonary dendritic cells, an important subset of antigen-presenting cells, following severe primary pulmonary infection with an increased susceptibility to secondary infections [24]. Besides sepsis-induced immunosuppression, various ICU interventions such as mechanical ventilation or systemic therapeutics such as antimicrobials, corticosteroids and transfusions may contribute to alter lung susceptibility to secondary infections. Since mechanical ventilation is a well-known risk factor for ventilator-associated pneumonia [9], pulmonary alterations due to mechanical ventilation may participate to lung susceptibility to secondary infections. In experimental models, ventilated injured lungs develop direct damage in both epithelial and endothelial cells [25]. Another interesting line of approach is the relation between microbiota and antimicrobial treatment. A recent experimental study provides data suggesting that both intestinal and upper airway microbiota promote the innate response to pulmonary infections by enhancing pathogens clearance [26]. One could hypothesize that a previous episode of pneumonia could modify the bacterial composition of respiratory microbiota and therefore promote susceptibility to secondary infections.

As already reported in a previous study involving part of the present cohort, we observed that the underlying immune status did not confer a higher susceptibility toward ICU-acquired infections [27]. Although this observation may contradict a common belief, several explanations can be proposed. All septic shock patients were exposed to invasive procedures and breakthrough of natural barriers to infections. Most non-immunocompromised patients exhibited non-immune comorbidities also likely to impair local and/or systemic anti-infectious defense mechanisms. Finally, sepsis-induced dysfunctions can promote profound immunosuppression smoothing away the immune capacities between immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised patients.

This study has several limitations. First, this was a retrospective study, performed in a single center with a particular case mix of patients and a high prevalence of immune comorbidities. Such a study can only identify association but not causality links between variables. Second, we were able to collect only ICU-acquired infections, but we did not address the incidence of further hospital-acquired infections following ICU discharge. Third, the study did not include a control group of patients with primary pneumonia but no septic shock, which may allow understanding the respective roles of pulmonary insults and shock on the further susceptibility to pulmonary ICU-AI. In addition, some potential confounders such as prior pulmonary lesions and prior antimicrobial exposure may also impact on the risk of pulmonary ICU-AI. Fourth, we focused on the first episode of ICU-acquired infection, whereas one third of those patients exhibited additional infection episodes throughout the ICU stay.


A prior episode of pulmonary infection in patients with septic shock may represent a major risk factor for secondary ICU-acquired pneumonia. A better understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms of post-septic alterations in lung defense could contribute to better stratify the risk of secondary pneumonia, and therefore identify patients likely to benefit from innovative preventive or therapeutic approaches.



herpes virus entry mediator


ICU-acquired infections




Sequential Organ Failure Assessment


  1. Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Immunosuppression in sepsis: a novel understanding of the disorder and a new therapeutic approach. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:260–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. van Vught LA, Klouwenberg PMCK, Spitoni C, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and attributable mortality of secondary infections in the intensive care unit after admission for sepsis. JAMA. 2016;315:1469–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daviaud F, Grimaldi D, Dechartres A, et al. Timing and causes of death in septic shock. Ann Intensive Care. 2015;5:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rello J, Ollendorf DA, Oster G, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a large US database. Chest. 2002;122:2115–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Venet F, Monneret G. Advances in the understanding and treatment of sepsis-induced immunosuppression. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14:121–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:486–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vincent JL, de Mendonça A, Cantraine F, et al. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on “sepsis-related problems” of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:1793–800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993;270:2957–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas M, et al. Executive summary: management of adults with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:575–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1813–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Landelle C, Lepape A, Français A, et al. Nosocomial infection after septic shock among intensive care unit patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:1054–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Suetens C, Latour K, Kärki T, et al. Prevalence of healthcare-associated infections, estimated incidence and composite antimicrobial resistance index in acute care hospitals and long-term care facilities: results from two European point prevalence surveys, 2016 to 2017. Euro Surveill. 2018;23:1800516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Healthcare-associated infections acquired in intensive care units. In: ECDC. Annual epidemiological report for 2016. Stockholm: ECDC; 2018.

  14. Melsen WG, Rovers MM, Groenwold RHH, et al. Attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised prevention studies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:665–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bekaert M, Timsit J-F, Vansteelandt S, et al. Attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a reappraisal using causal analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:1133–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Llitjos J-F, Amara M, Benzarti A, et al. Prior antimicrobial therapy duration influences causative pathogens identification in ventilator-associated pneumonia. J Crit Care. 2018;43:375–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Klein SL, Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16:626–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:862–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grimaldi D, Louis S, Pène F, et al. Profound and persistent decrease of circulating dendritic cells is associated with ICU-acquired infection in patients with septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:1438–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Landelle C, Lepape A, Voirin N, et al. Low monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR is independently associated with nosocomial infections after septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:1859–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Grimaldi D, Le Bourhis L, Sauneuf B, et al. Specific MAIT cell behaviour among innate-like T lymphocytes in critically ill patients with severe infections. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:192–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Drewry AM, Samra N, Skrupky LP, et al. Persistent lymphopenia after diagnosis of sepsis predicts mortality. Shock (Augusta, Ga). 2014;42:383–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cavaillon J-M, Annane D. Compartmentalization of the inflammatory response in sepsis and SIRS. J Endotoxin Res. 2006;12:151–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roquilly A, McWilliam HEG, Jacqueline C, et al. Local modulation of antigen-presenting cell development after resolution of pneumonia induces long-term susceptibility to secondary infections. Immunity. 2017;47:135–147.e5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Suki B, Hubmayr R. Epithelial and endothelial damage induced by mechanical ventilation modes. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20:17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brown RL, Sequeira RP, Clarke TB. The microbiota protects against respiratory infection via GM-CSF signaling. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jamme M, Daviaud F, Charpentier J, et al. Time course of septic shock in immunocompromised and nonimmunocompromised patients. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:2031–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

JFL and AG collected and analyzed data. JL, MJ and JFL performed data analysis and statistical analysis. JC, CR, AC and JPM analyzed data. JFL and FP analyzed data and wrote manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.



Presented at the congress “Réanimation 2018”, 24–26 January 2018, Paris, France.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethics committee of the French Intensive Care Society approved the study and waived the need for patients’ consents due to its retrospective observational design (ref. CE SRLF, #16–30).



Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédéric Pène.

Additional file

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Flowchart of the study. ICU: intensive care unit.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Llitjos, JF., Gassama, A., Charpentier, J. et al. Pulmonary infections prime the development of subsequent ICU-acquired pneumonia in septic shock. Ann. Intensive Care 9, 39 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: