Skip to main content

Long-term outcomes in patients who received veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and renal replacement therapy: a retrospective cohort study



Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in patients with severe respiratory failure receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, little is known of long-term kidney function in ECMO survivors. We aimed to assess the long-term mortality and kidney outcomes in adult patients treated with veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO).


This was a single-centre retrospective study of adult patients (≥ 18 years old) who were treated with VV-ECMO at a commissioned ECMO centre in the UK between 1st September 2010, and 30th November 2016. AKI was defined and staged using the serum creatinine and urine output criteria of the Kidney Diseases: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classification. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. Secondary outcomes were long-term mortality (up to March 2020), 1-year incidence of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) among AKI patients who received renal replacement therapy (AKI-RRT), AKI patients who did not receive RRT (AKI-no RRT) and patients without AKI (non-AKI).


A total of 300 patients [57% male; median age 44.5; interquartile range (IQR) 34–54] were included in the final analysis. Past medical histories included diabetes (12%), hypertension (17%), and CKD (2.3%). The main cause of severe respiratory failure was pulmonary infection (72%). AKI occurred in 230 patients (76.7%) and 59.3% received renal replacement therapy (RRT). One-year mortality was 32% in AKI-RRT patients vs. 21.4% in non-AKI patients (p = 0.014). The median follow-up time was 4.35 years. Patients who received RRT had a higher risk of 1-year mortality than those who did not receive RRT (adjusted HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.06, 3.06; p = 0.029). ESKD occurred in 3 patients, all of whom were in the AKI-RRT group. At 1-year, 41.2% of survivors had serum creatinine results available. Among these, CKD was prevalent in 33.3% of AKI-RRT patients vs. 4.3% in non-AKI patients (p = 0.004).


VV-EMCO patients with AKI-RRT had high long-term mortality. Monitoring of kidney function after hospital discharge was poor. In patients with follow-up creatinine results available, the CKD prevalence was high at 1 year, especially in AKI-RRT patients. More awareness about this serious long-term complication and appropriate follow-up interventions are required.


Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a rescue therapy in patients with severe respiratory failure, refractory cardiogenic shock, or combined cardiorespiratory failure. Two landmark randomised controlled trials and a subsequent individual-patient meta-analysis have suggested survival benefits and less organ failure in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated with veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) compared to conventional management [1,2,3]. The use of ECMO in adult patients with refractory respiratory failure has risen significantly in the past decade, including during the coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic [4,5,6].

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in patients receiving ECMO [7]. The reported AKI incidence ranges from 26 to 85%. Overall, 40–60% of ECMO patients receive renal replacement therapy (RRT), but clinical practice varies [7, 8]. The pathophysiology of AKI is multifactorial and includes patient-related factors (e.g. pre-existing comorbidities, haemodynamics, exposure to nephrotoxic agents, severe hypoxemia, hypercapnia, systemic inflammation, neurohormonal dysregulation), the impact of mechanical ventilation on kidney function and ECMO-related factors (e.g. ischaemia–reperfusion injury, continuous flow during veno-arterial (VA-) ECMO, haemolysis, bioincompatibility and hypercoagulability) [9].

Short-term outcomes are worse in patients who develop AKI during ECMO compared to patients without AKI, including higher risk of in-hospital mortality, sepsis, fluid overload, bleeding, and failure to wean from ECMO [10, 11]. However, little is known about the long-term kidney outcomes in ECMO survivors. This question is particularly important since research in non-ECMO patients has highlighted the high risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in AKI survivors and the negative impact of lack of follow-up [12, 13].

The aim of this study was to determine the short and long-term patient and kidney outcomes of patients who received VV-ECMO. In addition, we aimed to explore the correlation between serum creatinine results at hospital discharge, 6 months, and 1 year.

Material and methods


Guy’s & St Thomas’ Hospital is one of 6 commissioned ECMO centres in the UK National Health Service (NHS). The ECMO service was set up in 2010 and serves a sixth of the country with a catchment area of around 17 million people [14].

Study design and participants

We retrospectively identified all patients who received VV-ECMO at our centre between September 1, 2010, and November 30, 2016. VV-ECMO was initiated in patients with severe acute respiratory failure refractory to conventional management as specified in the ECMO commissioning criteria, with the ultimate decision at the discretion of the clinical team [15] (Additional file 2). Exclusion criteria were: (1) age younger than 18 years; (2) receipt of VA-ECMO or extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R); (3) death within 48 h of ECMO initiation; (4) pre-existing ESKD, and (5) history of kidney transplantation.

Data collection

Data were extracted from electronic health records by trained researchers. The following variables on admission were collected: demographic data, comorbidities, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, laboratory parameters, details about ECMO (indications, timing, initial settings, duration), urine output, and fluid balance. AKI was defined and staged according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classification using both serum creatinine (SCr) and urine output criteria [16]. Baseline kidney function was defined as the most recent outpatient non-emergency SCr concentration between 7 and 365 days before admission. In patients with missing baseline SCr results, we followed the KDIGO guideline and used the first SCr on day of hospital admission or performed back calculation of SCr based on an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 75 mL/min/1.73 m2 using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula [16]. The following details for AKI were collected: criteria, onset, duration and RRT requirement including onset relative to ICU admission and ECMO initiation.

We also collected data related to in-hospital complications, e.g. sepsis, bleeding, thrombosis, stroke, and units of blood product transfusion. For in-hospital outcomes, we recorded the duration of ICU and hospital stay and duration of mechanical ventilation, RRT, and ECMO support. In hospital survivors, we obtained survival data through NHS records and the incidence of new-onset ESKD from the United Kingdom Renal Registry (UKRR), a mandatory ESKD registry in the UK. SCr values after discharge at 6 months and 12 months (or the closest values within 3 months) were acquired from local health records or by contacting general practitioners (GPs) via phone calls or emails. CKD was defined as persistent GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for > 3 months and staged according to the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation [17].


The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. We differentiated between patients with AKI who received RRT (AKI-RRT), patients with AKI not treated with RRT (AKI-no RRT) and patients without AKI (non-AKI). Secondary outcomes were: (1) long-term mortality (up to March 2020); (2) the incidence of CKD and ESKD at 1 year among AKI-RRT, AKI-no RRT, and non-AKI patients; (3) SCr results at 6 months and 1 year and (4) changes and correlation of SCr results at hospital discharge, 6 months, and at 12 months. The last follow-up date for survival status was 4th March 2020, the date of the last available data from the NHS records at the time of the study end.

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics were summarised by AKI diagnosis and RRT status. Continuous variables were reported as median (interquartile range, IQR) and categorical variables as number (percentage). Hospital and 1-year outcomes were tabulated by AKI and RRT status. We analysed long-term mortality from the date of ECMO initiation according to AKI and RRT status using Kaplan–Meier curves, and by fitting a Cox proportional hazards model with AKI and RRT status as a time-updated covariate. To identify and adjust for relevant confounders associated with mortality, we used Cox proportional hazards modelling with a forward stepwise selection algorithm. We used a p-value threshold of 0.05 for inclusion and forced age at admission into the model as a covariate that was a priori likely to be associated with mortality. Since a proportion of patients did not have SCr results available at 1 year, we compared characteristics of one-year survivors with and without follow-up SCr measurements. We examined Spearman’s correlations between creatinine measurements at discharge and at 6 and 12 months following discharge. Analyses were conducted with R version 3.6.1.


Baseline characteristics

Between 1st September 2010 and 30th November 2016, 346 patients were treated with ECMO at Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust. Following exclusion of 46 patients, 300 were included in the final analysis (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Their median age was 44.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 34–54)], 57% were male, and the median body mass index (BMI) was 27.3 (IQR 24.1–33.4) kg/m2. Past medical histories included diabetes (12%), hypertension (17%), and pre-existing CKD (2.3%). The median SOFA score on admission to ICU was 9 (IQR 6–12). The main indication for VV-ECMO was respiratory failure due to infection (72%) (Table 1). The total number of patients who received ECMO by year is shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. The majority of the patients were initiated on ECMO on the same day or within 1 day of ICU admission (Additional file 1: Table S2). The median duration of ECMO treatment was 9 days (IQR 6–16 days) and median length of hospital stay was 26 days (IQR 17–45 days).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients by AKI and RRT status

AKI diagnosis and RRT

True baseline SCr values were available in 33 (11%). AKI was diagnosed in 230 patients (76.7%) of whom 178 (59.3% of all patients) received RRT. The AKI diagnosis was based on SCr results in 129 (56.1%), urine output in 53 (23.0%), and both criteria in 48 (20.9%) of all AKI patients. AKI was diagnosed before ECMO initiation in 25.6% and on the same day or after ECMO start date in 74.4%, respectively. RRT was started before ECMO initiation in 17.4% and on the same day or after ECMO cannulation in 82.6% (Additional file 1: Tables S3, S4). Patients in the AKI-RRT group were older, had higher BMI and baseline SCr values, had more hypertension and higher SOFA score on admission, and were more likely to be exposed to nephrotoxic drugs than those in the non-AKI and AKI-no RRT groups (Table 1). The main indications for RRT initiation were volume control/fluid overload, followed by oliguria, uraemia then acidosis (Additional file 1: Table S5).

In-hospital outcomes

The in-hospital mortality was 27.0% in AKI-RRT patients compared with 11.5% in the AKI-no RRT and 15.7% in non-AKI cohorts. Patients with AKI-RRT had a longer ICU stay and needed mechanical ventilation and ECMO for longer durations. They were also more likely to have complications, including sepsis, bleeding, stroke or thrombosis, received more blood products, and were less likely to be liberated from ECMO (Table 2). In AKI-RRT patients, the median RRT duration was 14 days (IQR 9–24) while the median ECMO duration was 10 days (IQR 7–16). At ICU discharge, 45 of 235 ICU survivors (19.1%) were still RRT-dependent. At hospital discharge, 7 of 212 hospital survivors (3.3%) were RRT-dependent.

Table 2 In-hospital outcomes by acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy status

One-year and long-term mortality

The overall 1-year mortality was 32.0% in AKI-RRT patients compared with 13.5% in the AKI-no RRT and 21.4% in non-AKI cohorts (p = 0.014 for AKI-RRT vs. no-AKI; unadjusted HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.15–3.51 and p = 0.241 for AKI-no RRT vs. no-AKI; unadjusted HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.22–1.46) (Table 3). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that AKI-RRT, age, chronic liver disease, malignancy, low baseline serum albumin, and SOFA score on admission were associated with 1-year mortality. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients who received RRT had a 1.80-fold (95% CI 1.06–3.06, p = 0.029) higher hazard of 1-year mortality than those who did not receive RRT (Table 4).

Table 3 Primary and secondary outcomes at 1 year by acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy status
Table 4 Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios of the association between clinical characteristics and 1-year mortality

The median follow-up time was 4.35 years. Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall mortality according to AKI and RRT status are shown in Fig. 1. Patients who received RRT had higher risk of overall mortality than those who did not receive RRT (unadjusted HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.13, 2.55; p = 0.011). The higher mortality among AKI-RRT patients was mainly driven by a high mortality rate early in follow-up (Fig. 1). Among RRT patients, 1-year mortality rate was higher in those in whom RRT was initiated on the same day or after ECMO cannulation (35.2% and 32.2%) than in patients in whom RRT was started before ECMO (22.6%) (Additional file 1: Table S6) However, the adjusted HR by RRT initiation relative to ECMO start date did not show an association with overall mortality (Additional file 1: Table S7).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Kaplan–Meier estimates of long-term mortality according to acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal replacement therapy (RRT) status

One-year kidney outcomes

At 6 months, 5 of 227 6-month survivors (2.2%) were RRT-dependent. Three of 221 hospital survivors (1.4%) developed new ESKD by 1 year; all 3 patients had received RRT for AKI during admission. Among survivors, 91 (41.2%) patients had follow-up SCr measurements within 1 year after hospital discharge; 26 (11.8%) had only one result available at 6 months, 14 (6.3%) had only one result available at 12 months, and 51 (23.1%) had results available at both time points. Patients with SCr values available at 1 year were similar to patients without SCr results at 1 year in terms of baseline characteristics, SCr results at hospital admission and discharge, and receipt of RRT during hospitalisation (Additional file 1: Table S8).

Among 91 survivors with SCr results available at 6 or 12 months after discharge, SCr concentrations were highest in the AKI-RRT group (98.4 ± 64 µmol/L), followed by AKI-no RRT (85.3 ± 18.5 µmol/L) and no-AKI (71.8 ± 16.6 µmol/L) groups, respectively (p = 0.026 for AKI-RRT vs. no-AKI; p = 0.033 for AKI-no RRT vs. no-AKI) (Table 3).

Nineteen (20.9%) patients had prevalent CKD at 1 year; 33.9% in the AKI-RRT group compared with 4.3% in the non-AKI group (p = 0.004) (Table 3). The severity of CKD in the non-ESKD patients was CKD stage 3, 4, and 5 in 17, 1, and 1 patient, respectively. Patients in the AKI-RRT group who were still RRT-dependent at hospital discharge had a prevalence of CKD of 40.9% (9 of 22 patients with SCr available) at 1 year compared to 29.4% (10 of 34 patients with SCr available) in those who were liberated from RRT before discharge (p = 0.40).

Correlation of SCr at discharge, 6 months, and 12 months

In all patients with SCr results available at hospital discharge, 6 and 12 months (n = 51), the comparison of median SCr (IQR) is shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S2. SCr significantly increased from 70.0 (46.5, 169.0) µmol/L at discharge to 78.0 (61.0, 103.0) µmol/L at 6 months (p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between the values at 6 and 12 months (p = 0.146). There was a modest correlation between SCr values at discharge and 6 months (r = 0.514, p < 0.001) and between SCr at discharge and 12 months (r = 0.652, p < 0.001). The relationship between SCr results at 6 and 12 months was stronger (r = 0.878, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Scatter plots and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients comparing creatinine at hospital discharge and at 6 months (n = 77) (A) and 12 months (n = 65) (B) following hospital discharge and between creatinine at 6 and 12 months (n = 51) (C), in patients who survived until 1 year with available creatinine measurements

Subgroup analysis

AKI incidence was underestimated when using first hospital admission SCr values while overestimated when using back-calculated SCr values. However, in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were not different when comparing the 3 methods of determining baseline SCr values. A subgroup analysis of patients with true baseline SCr confirmed similar outcomes in the AKI-RRT group than the others (Additional file 1: Tables S9, S10).


This is the largest study exploring both short- and longer-term kidney outcomes in VV-ECMO patients. The key findings were: (i) AKI requiring RRT is common (59.3%); (ii) 19% were dialysis dependent at discharge; (iii) long-term mortality was highest in the AKI-RRT group; (iv) only 42% of survivors had follow-up SCr results available within 12 months after hospital discharge; (v) among patients with SCr results available, one-third of the AKI-RRT group had CKD compared with 4% in the non-AKI group, and (vi) SCr at discharge had a modest correlation with SCr at 6 or 12 months.

Despite a high ICU survival rate that correlates well with NHS England data [15], the incidence of AKI is high in patients receiving VV-ECMO. Current literature reports mortality rates of 55% in patients with severe AKI on VV-ECMO [18] which is much higher than in our patient cohort. This may be accounted for by various factors such as young age, high BMI, and the centre volume–outcome relationship [19, 20]. As in other studies in the literature, the outcomes of AKI-RRT patients were worse, including prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation and ECMO, longer length of ICU stay, higher incidence of sepsis, thrombosis, bleeding and stroke, need for more units of blood products, and increased mortality [10, 21, 22]. These findings might reflect a higher severity of illness. Other potential explanations are the negative impact of AKI on other organs, and the potential interactions between RRT and ECMO technologies [9]. However, the exact cause-and-effect relationship between in-hospital outcomes and AKI and RRT status was not established.

Long-term functional and psychological well-being of VV-ECMO survivors has been well described [23,24,25], but little data exist about their long-term kidney outcomes. Furthermore, in several previous studies, VA and VV ECMO patients were analysed together despite the fact that there are important differences in patient comorbidities as well as ECMO characteristics. In children receiving concomitant ECMO and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), dialysis independence rates of 93% at discharge and 95% at 1 year have been reported [26, 27]. Two large cohort studies from the Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database including VV- and VA-ECMO patients revealed increased risks of CKD, ESKD, and all-cause mortality in AKI-RRT patients (mean follow-up 2.4 ± 2.5 years per patient) [10, 28]. A study in VA-ECMO patients demonstrated 11% dialysis dependence (median follow-up 64 months in non-ESKD patients) and 51% prevalence of CKD at 1 year [29]. Another recent study of predominantly VA-ECMO survivors (80%) reported major adverse kidney events (median follow-up time 3.4 years) which include AKI, partial/no recovery at discharge, and RRT on the same date or after ECMO initiation [30]. In two studies of exclusively VV-ECMO patients, no and 6.8% patients were dialysis dependent at hospital discharge, but longer-term renal function was not reported [11, 31]. Our study includes only patients who received VV-ECMO for severe acute respiratory failure and focusses on long-term survival and kidney outcomes after discharge. Similar to previous literature, long-term mortality is highest in patients who received RRT [10, 28].

Although only 3 patients developed ESKD, it should be noted that they were young and had few comorbidities prior to the acute illness requiring ECMO. It is surprising and very concerning that less than 50% of patients had SCr results available within the first 12 months after discharge from hospital despite the fact that 60% of them had received RRT whilst on ECMO. One-third of the AKI-RRT group had CKD at 1 year. Although the CKD status could only be determined in patients with SCr results available, their baseline characteristics, RRT status during hospitalisation, and SCr values at discharge were comparable to those without follow-up SCr results. This leads us to speculate that CKD prevalence of the total cohort at 1 year may have indeed been in the range of 30%.

Identifying patients who are at high risk of long-term CKD after AKI is important. However, as in previous studies, we demonstrated that SCr at discharge was not predictive of subsequent SCr values [32, 33]. This may be the consequence of prolonged hospitalisation and the impact of muscle wasting, inflammation, sepsis, and malnutrition on creatinine generation [34]. Notably, previous studies reported sarcopenia in around 1 in 4 of patients who received ECMO on admission [35]. Consequently, GFR at hospital discharge can easily be overestimated leading to suboptimal follow-up and under-recognition of GFR decline. Over time, SCr returned to the steady state [32], hence the observed increase in SCr from discharge to 6 months and the improved correlation between SCr results at 6 and 12 months.

With increasing use of ECMO in acute respiratory failure and the associated high survival [15], attendance at ICU recovery clinics and general practice is expected to increase. Our study highlights the high incidence of CKD in ECMO survivors and the worrying lack of kidney function monitoring in this high-risk group. There is an urgent need for greater awareness and formal guidance to ensure appropriate and timely follow-up post-ECMO, in particular of patients who received RRT. As proposed for critically ill patients in general, AKI aftercare for ECMO patients requires a collaborative multidisciplinary effort by all teams involved, including intensivists, nephrologists, internists, GPs and pharmacists [36]. To facilitate this, comprehensive discharge documentation and information transfer are essential [37]. The hospital discharge summary should not only contain primary events such as AKI cause, staging and RRT receipt, but also recommendations for future management such as nephrotoxin avoidance, weight and blood pressure monitoring, cardiovascular medication management, and sick day rules. If possible, cardioprotective medications should be restarted before discharge [36]. During follow-up, SCr and urine protein should be determined and monitored in all AKI survivors at 1–12 weeks post-discharge depending on risk factors and degree of kidney recovery [38]. Finally, nephrology referral should be considered in patients with persistent poor kidney recovery and/or GFR ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 [39].

This is one of the first studies highlighting the high risk of CKD in VV-ECMO survivors. However, we acknowledge some limitations of our study. Firstly, this was a single-centre study and might not be representative of other ECMO centres. Patient-level criteria for ECMO initiation and ventilation settings before ECMO initiation are not available. However, ECMO was offered and delivered according to clear guidance from the NHS commissioning document, and the mortality rates are in keeping with the UK data [15] and remained similar over time (Additional file 1: Table S1). Second, we acknowledge that few patients had true baseline SCr values. We made every possible attempt to retrieve results from local care records or general practitioners and assume that the remaining patients had not had their kidney function checked in the 12 months prior to falling ill. This is supported by the fact that they were younger than average patients in the ICU and had only few comorbidities. It is likely that this group also had a low prevalence of CKD. Comparison of patient-centred outcomes including in-hospital and 1-year mortality also showed similar outcomes between using 3 baseline SCr methods. In addition, a subgroup analysis of patients with true baseline SCr values also corroborated with the results of the whole cohort. Less than half of the patients had SCr results available within 1 year of hospital discharge and thus the incidence of CKD may have been overestimated. We acknowledge that a proportion of these patients may have had SCr measurements which we were unable to retrieve. We also compared the characteristics of patients with and without available SCr results and found no significant difference. Third, the ESKD data were available from the UKRR until December 2017. It is possible that the risk of ESKD increased beyond 1 year. Fourth, the initiation of RRT was at clinicians’ discretion and could have impacted the different trajectories of kidney function. However, RRT was delivered by a team of highly skilled critical care nurses according to the departmental protocol. Fifth, although the study included all eligible patients in our centre over 6 years, the total number of patients eligible for analysis was 300 and some analyses were not possible such as the difference in outcomes between recovery and non-recovery AKI. Finally, we were unable to determine the exact causes of death. Nevertheless, this is the largest study which focuses on solely VV-ECMO adult patients and explored longer-term outcomes beyond hospital discharge. Also, we used both SCr and urine output criteria to diagnose AKI. In non-ECMO patients, it has been shown that patients meeting both urine output and SCr criteria are at increased risk of worse short-term and long-term outcomes compared with patients who meet the SCr criteria alone [40]. In our cohort, 23% of patients had AKI based on urine output criteria alone and would have been missed if we had only used SCr criteria. Whilst these findings should be validated externally with longer follow-up duration for kidney outcomes, our analysis highlights a significant gap in aftercare. Apart from a structured individualised follow-up care plan, there is a need for more research and intervention studies in post-AKI care. In particular, the role of biomarkers to predict patients at high-risk of developing worse kidney outcomes, the role of protective drugs like renin–angiotensin aldosterone inhibitors or statins in prevention of CKD after AKI, and the effectiveness of post-AKI clinic should be explored [41,42,43].


Patients who received VV-ECMO in combination with RRT for AKI were at high risk of long-term mortality and CKD. Monitoring of kidney function was infrequent in routine clinical care post-hospitalisation. SCr results at discharge showed modest correlation with follow-up values, supporting the current recommendation to monitor kidney function after discharge. Clinicians and patients should be made aware of long-term kidney complications in this high-risk group. There is a need for appropriate follow-up and prevention strategies.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Acute kidney injury


Acute respiratory distress syndrome


Confidence interval


Chronic kidney disease


Chronic kidney disease-epidemiology collaboration


Coronavirus disease-19


Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal


Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation


End-stage kidney disease


Glomerular filtration rate


General practitioner


Hazard ratio


Intensive care unit


Interquartile range


Kidney Diseases: Improving Global Outcomes


Modification of diet in renal disease


National Health Service


Renal replacement therapy


Serum creatinine


Sequential Organ Failure Assessment


United Kingdom


United Kingdom Renal Registry


Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation


Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation


  1. Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, Wilson A, Allen E, Thalanany MM, et al. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9698):1351–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, Demoule A, Lavoué S, Guervilly C, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(21):1965–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Combes A, Peek GJ, Hajage D, Hardy P, Abrams D, Schmidt M, et al. ECMO for severe ARDS: systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(11):2048–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lorusso R, Combes A, Coco VL, De Piero ME, Belohlavek J. ECMO for COVID-19 patients in Europe and Israel. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(3):344–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedrichson B, Mutlak H, Zacharowski K, Piekarski F. Insight into ECMO, mortality and ARDS: a nationwide analysis of 45,647 ECMO runs. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Whebell S, Zhang J, Lewis R, Berry M, Ledot S, Retter A, et al. Survival benefit of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe COVID-19: a multi-centre-matched cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, Lertjitbanjong P, Aeddula NR, Bathini T, Watthanasuntorn K, et al. Incidence and impact of acute kidney injury in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2019;8(7):981.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bidar F, Luyt CE, Schneider A, Ostermann M, Mauriat P, Javouhey E, et al. Renal replacement therapy in extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation patients: a survey of practices and new insights for future studies. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021;40: 100971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ostermann M, Lumlertgul N. Acute kidney injury in ECMO patients. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen SW, Lu YA, Lee CC, Chou AH, Wu VC, Chang SW, et al. Long-term outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury: a cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(3): e0212352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Delmas C, Zapetskaia T, Conil JM, Georges B, Vardon-Bounes F, Seguin T, et al. 3-month prognostic impact of severe acute renal failure under veno-venous ECMO support: importance of time of onset. J Crit Care. 2018;44:63–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Noble RA, Lucas BJ, Selby NM. Long-term outcomes in patients with acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;15(3):423–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haines RW, Powell-Tuck J, Leonard H, Crichton S, Ostermann M. Long-term kidney function of patients discharged from hospital after an intensive care admission: observational cohort study. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):9928.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eurostat population database. Accessed 2 Mar 2022.

  15. Warren A, Chiu YD, Villar SS, Fowles JA, Symes N, Barker J, et al. Outcomes of the NHS England national extracorporeal membrane oxygenation service for adults with respiratory failure: a multicentre observational cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125(3):259–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(4):c179–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Levin A, Stevens PE. Summary of KDIGO 2012 CKD guideline: behind the scenes, need for guidance, and a framework for moving forward. Kidney Int. 2014;85(1):49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mou Z, He J, Guan T, Chen L. Acute kidney injury during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: VA ECMO versus VV ECMO. J Intensive Care Med. 2021;37(6):743–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Barbaro RP, Odetola FO, Kidwell KM, Paden ML, Bartlett RH, Davis MM, et al. Association of hospital-level volume of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases and mortality. Analysis of the extracorporeal life support organization registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(8):894–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidt M, Zogheib E, Rozé H, Repesse X, Lebreton G, Luyt CE, et al. The PRESERVE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(10):1704–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Haneya A, Diez C, Philipp A, Bein T, Mueller T, Schmid C, et al. Impact of acute kidney injury on outcome in patients with severe acute respiratory failure receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(9):1898–906.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kielstein JT, Heiden AM, Beutel G, Gottlieb J, Wiesner O, Hafer C, et al. Renal function and survival in 200 patients undergoing ECMO therapy. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2013;28(1):86–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Auzinger G. Long-term outcome after VV ECMO: like the iceberg beneath the Titanic. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85(9):934–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. von Bahr V, Kalzén H, Frenckner B, Hultman J, Frisén KG, Lidegran MK, et al. Long-term pulmonary function and quality of life in adults after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure. Perfusion. 2019;34(1_suppl):49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanfilippo F, Ippolito M, Santonocito C, Martucci G, Carollo T, Bertani A, et al. Long-term functional and psychological recovery in a population of acute respiratory distress syndrome patients treated with VV-ECMO and in their caregivers. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85(9):971–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Meyer RJ, Brophy PD, Bunchman TE, Annich GM, Maxvold NJ, Mottes TA, et al. Survival and renal function in pediatric patients following extracorporeal life support with hemofiltration. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2001;2(3):238–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Paden ML, Warshaw BL, Heard ML, Fortenberry JD. Recovery of renal function and survival after continuous renal replacement therapy during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12(2):153–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuo G, Chen SW, Fan PC, Wu VC, Chou AH, Lee CC, et al. Analysis of survival after initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ayers B, Bjelic M, Kumar N, Wood K, Barrus B, Prasad S, et al. Long-term renal function after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Card Surg. 2021;36(3):815–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bobba A, Costanian C, Bahous SA, Tohme FA. Determinants of major adverse kidney events in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survivors. Crit Care Explor. 2022;4(2): e0636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Deatrick KB, Mazzeffi MA, Galvagno SMJ, Boswell K, Kaczoroswki DJ, Rabinowitz RP, et al. Breathing life back into the kidney—continuous renal replacement therapy and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J. 2021;67(2):208–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kirwan CJ, Blunden MJ, Dobbie H, James A, Nedungadi A, Prowle JR. Critically ill patients requiring acute renal replacement therapy are at an increased risk of long-term renal dysfunction, but rarely receive specialist nephrology follow-up. Nephron. 2015;129(3):164–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Prowle JR, Kolic I, Purdell-Lewis J, Taylor R, Pearse RM, Kirwan CJ. Serum creatinine changes associated with critical illness and detection of persistent renal dysfunction after AKI. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(6):1015–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ostermann M, Joannidis M. Acute kidney injury 2016: diagnosis and diagnostic workup. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bear DE, MacGowan L, Elstad M, Puthucheary Z, Connolly B, Wright R, et al. Relationship between skeletal muscle area and density and clinical outcome in adults receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(4):e350–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Koyner JL, Haines RW, Bouchard J. Individualized acute kidney injury after care. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2020;26(6):581–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Choon XY, Lumlertgul N, Cameron L, Jones A, Meyer J, Slack A, et al. Discharge documentation and follow-up of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury treated with kidney replacement therapy: a retrospective cohort study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8: 710228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Practitioners RCoG. Acute kidney injury toolkit. Accessed 16 Sept 2021.

  39. NICE. Acute kidney injury: prevention, detection and management 2019 [updated 18 December 2019]. Accessed 16 Sept 2021.

  40. Kellum JA, Sileanu FE, Murugan R, Lucko N, Shaw AD, Clermont G. Classifying AKI by urine output versus serum creatinine level. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(9):2231–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Thanapongsatorn P, Chaikomon K, Lumlertgul N, Yimsangyad K, Leewongworasingh A, Kulvichit W, et al. Comprehensive versus standard care in post-severe acute kidney injury survivors, a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chou YH, Huang TM, Pan SY, Chang CH, Lai CF, Wu VC, et al. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitor is associated with lower risk of ensuing chronic kidney disease after functional recovery from acute kidney injury. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46518.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Brar S, Ye F, James M, Hemmelgarn B, Klarenbach S, Pannu N. Statin use and survival after acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Rep. 2016;1(4):279–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank Dr. Kath Daly for providing the list of patients who received ECMO. The authors would also like to thank the clinical teams who cared for severe respiratory failure patients for the past decade.


This study received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



NL is the guarantor of the content of the manuscript, including the data and analysis. NL was responsible for study design, data collection, data analysis and data interpretation; MO was responsible for study design, study supervision, data analysis, and data interpretation; LP and JG were responsible for data analysis and data interpretation; RW, GH, JK, GV, and KL were responsible for data collection; BS was responsible for data extraction; and RL, LC and NAB were responsible for data interpretation and significant input during the manuscript revision. All authors contributed to writing and revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marlies Ostermann.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by The GSTT Trust Quality Improvement and Clinical Audit Committee (approval number GSTT 6790). The need for informed consent was waived as this was a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively for routine clinical care, and there was no breach of privacy or anonymity (UK National Research Ethics Service).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All other authors declare no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Figure S1. Study flowchart. Figure S2: Median (interquartile range) of serum creatinine values at discharge and at 6 and 12 months following discharge, in patients with all three measurements available (n = 51); p < 0.001, p = 0.104 and p = 0.146 for comparisons of creatinine at discharge vs. 6 months, discharge vs. 12 months and 6 months vs. 12 months, respectively. Table S1. Prevalence and outcomes of patients in the AKI-RRT, AKI-No RRT, and non-AKI groups, stratified by ECMO start year. Table S2. Relationship between ECMO start date and date of ICU admission. Table S3. Onset of AKI (n = 230) relative to ECMO start date. Table S4. Timing of RRT initiation relative to ECMO start date (n = 178). Table S5. Indications for RRT initiation by year of ECMO initiation. Table S6. 1-year mortality stratified by RRT status and date of RRT initiation relative to ECMO start date. Table S7. Adjusted hazard ratios of the association between RRT status relative to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation start date and overall mortality. Table S8. Characteristics of patients who survived to 1-year with and without SCr measurements available at 1-year. Table S9. AKI and RRT incidence, in-hospital mortality and 1-year mortality compared between using different baseline SCr methods. Table S10. Outcomes of cohort with true SCr results available.

Additional file 2.

NHS ECMO referral criteria.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lumlertgul, N., Wright, R., Hutson, G. et al. Long-term outcomes in patients who received veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and renal replacement therapy: a retrospective cohort study. Ann. Intensive Care 12, 70 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: